Of Overhead Projectors and Planetarium Foolishness

Overhead projector. Courtesy Alibaba.com

[/caption]

We don’t normally publish political articles here on Universe Today, but I’m going to make an exception here after watching last night’s presidential debate because a.) John McCain mentioned something about a planetarium, which is an area of interest for UT readers, and b.) McCain obviously had no idea what he was talking about. McCain, the Republican presidential nominee pointed out how Barack Obama, the Democratic nominee, has voted for almost a billion dollars of “pork barrel” projects (money for specific pet projects in their districts) and said, “He (Obama) voted for … $3 million for an overhead projector at a planetarium in Chicago, Illinois.”

First of all, there’s a big difference between an overhead projector and a planetarium projection system. Spacewriter’s Ramblings has a great explanation and pictorial description, if you have questions.

Second, if you want to be nitpicky, while Obama requested the funding, he never voted on it.

Obviously, McCain thinks this is a big issue, since this is at least the second time he’s mentioned Obama and planetariums. A few weeks ago he said that Obama has sought money for “planetariums and other foolishness.”

Foolishness! Over 110 million people around the world visit planetariums every year! They are important learning and teaching tools that encourage a science-literate population, and have inspired young people to become astronomers and astronauts, and aspire to many other science-related occupations as well.
Children enjoy the stars and planets at the Morehead Planetarium in Chapel Hill, North Carolina.

Davin Flateau says it much better than I can on his great post at his Perfect Silence blog.

Obama’s website has a list of his federal funding requests for Fiscal Year 2008, and clearly listed is “Adler Planetarium, to support replacement of its projector and related equipment, $3,000,000,” with a description that says the 40 year old projection equipment has begun to fail and since parts are no longer available, soon students and other museum-goers will be left “without this very valuable and exciting learning experience.” I don’t see that as “pork barrel” funding, but an attempt to maintain a long-standing (Adler opened in 1930) and important institution in his district.

And don’t get me going on Sarah Palin.

Uranus Rings

Rings of Uranus
The rings of Uranus. Credit: NASA/Hubble

We’re all familiar with the beautiful rings around Saturn. In fact, you can see them with any backyard telescope. But did you know that Uranus has rings too?

The rings of Uranus were first discovered in 1977 by the astronomical team of James L. Elliot, Edward W. Dunham, and Douglas J. Mink. When he first discovered Uranus more than 200 years ago, William Herschel also reported seeing rings, but that’s probably impossible, because the rings of Uranus are very dark and thin.

Astronomers now know that Uranus has 13 distinct rings. They start at about a distance of 38,000 km from the center of Uranus, and then extend out to about 98,000 km.

Unlike the rings of Saturn, which are very bright and composed of water ice, the rings of Uranus are relatively dark. Instead of containing dust, the rings seem to be made up of larger chunks, measuring 0.2 to 20 m across. These would really qualify as boulders, not dust. They’re also very thin. Each ring is only a few km thick.

Uranus now has a total of 10 known rings.

The rings of Uranus are thought to be very young, not more than 600 million years old. They probably came from a few shepherd moons that were shattered by Uranus’ gravity and turned into rings around the planet. The chunks collided with each other and turned into smaller and smaller particles.

We have written many stories about the rings of Uranus. Here’s one about the rings seen edge on. And here’s another about the discovery of a blue ring around Uranus.

Here’s an article that discusses the discovery of the Rings of Uranus. And here’s a fact sheet from NASA about Uranus’ rings.

We have recorded an episode of Astronomy Cast just about Uranus. You can access it here: Episode 62: Uranus.

Could There Be Life on Uranus?

Uranus Compared to Earth. Image credit: NASA

[/caption]
The more we learn about life on Earth, the more we realize that it can live in some of the most inhospitable places on the planet: encased in ice, in boiling water, and even in places with high radiation. But could life exist elsewhere in the Solar System? Could there be life on Uranus?

Maybe, but probably not.

There are a few problems. The first is the fact that Uranus has no solid surface. It’s mostly composed of ices: methane, water and ammonia. And then it’s enshrouded by an atmosphere of hydrogen and helium. The second is that Uranus is really cold. Its cloud tops measure 49 K (?224 °C), and then it gets warmer inside down to the core, which has a temperature of 5,000 K.

You could imagine some perfect place inside Uranus, where the temperature could support life. The problem is that the pressures inside Uranus are enormous at those temperatures, and would crush life. The other problem is that life on Earth requires sunlight to provide energy. There’s no process inside Uranus, like volcanism on Earth, that would give life inside the planet a form of energy.

Life on Uranus would have to be vastly different from anything we have here on Earth to be able to survive. Of course, it’ll be almost impossible to ever send a spacecraft down into the planet to look for ourselves.

We have written many articles about the search for life in the Solar System. Here’s an article about how life on Mars might have been killed off. And here’s an article about how the soil on Mars might have supported life.

Here’s a link to Hubblesite’s News Releases about Uranus, and here’s NASA’s Solar System Exploration guide.

We have recorded an episode of Astronomy Cast just about Uranus. You can access it here: Episode 62: Uranus.

Temperature of Uranus

Uranus. Image credit: Hubble

How’s the temperature on Uranus? Cold. In fact, the temperature of Uranus makes it the coldest planet in the Solar System. The average temperature of the cloud tops on Uranus is 49 K (?224 °C).

Why is Uranus so cold? The big problem is that Uranus isn’t generating any heat. The other giant planets in the Solar System actually give off more heat than they receive from the Sun. This is because they’re slowly compacting down, and this generates high temperatures inside their cores. Uranus has a core of only 5,000 K, while Jupiter’s core is 30,000 K. If you removed the Sun, Jupiter would still be visible in infrared telescopes because of this internal warmth, but Uranus would be very dark.

Astronomers aren’t sure why Uranus has such a low core temperature, but they think it has something to do with its bizarre rotation. Unlike the rest of the planets in the Solar System, Uranus is tilted right over onto its side. Scientists think that Uranus has a massive collision early on in its history, which knocked it over. This collision might have also allowed the planet to release much of its internal heat. Others believe that something about Uranus’ internal structure allows it to release this heat more easily than other planets.

We have written many articles about Uranus here on Universe Today. Here’s an article about how Uranus can actually get pretty stormy, and here’s an article about what should be found inside a gas giant.

If you’d like more info on Uranus, check out Hubblesite’s News Releases about Uranus. And here’s a link to the NASA’s Solar System Exploration Guide to Uranus.

We have recorded an episode of Astronomy Cast just about Uranus. You can access it here: Episode 62: Uranus.

Ten Interesting Facts About Uranus

Uranus as seen through the automated eyes of Voyager 2 in 1986. (Credit: NASA/JPL).

The gas (and ice) giant known as Uranus is a fascinating place. The seventh planet from out Sun, Uranus is the third-largest in terms of size, the fourth-largest in terms of mass, and one of the least dense objects in our Solar System. And interestingly enough, it is the only planet in the Solar System that takes it name from Greek (rather than Roman) mythology.

But these basic facts really only begin to scratch the surface. When you get right down to it, Uranus is chock full of interesting and surprising details – from its many moons, to its ring system, and the composition of its aqua atmosphere. Here are just ten things about this gas/ice giant, and we guarantee that at least one of them will surprise you.

Continue reading “Ten Interesting Facts About Uranus”

Dense Exoplanet Creates Classification Calamity

Jupiter and Corot-exo-3b are about the same size, but Corot-exo-3b is much, much more massive. Image Credit: ESA

[/caption]

Given all the fervor over the definition of Pluto (planet? dwarf planet? snowball?), let’s hope the debate over the discovery of a planet that lies in an equally hazy area of classification is a little calmer. The COROT satellite recently discovered an extrasolar planet named Corot-exo-3b. It’s quite a curiosity as far as exoplanets are concerned, and its characteristics – such as a density twice that of lead – may force astronomers to rethink the distinction between massive planets and low-mass brown dwarfs.

Corot-exo-3b is orbiting close to its star, and takes 4 days and 6 hours to complete one orbit. For comparison, Mercury orbits the Sun every 88 days. It’s also roughly the same size as Jupiter, but far more dense, totaling a whopping 21.6 times Jupiter’s mass. This makes classification of the object a bit tricky.

“COROT-exo-3b might turn out to be a rare object found by sheer luck. But it might just be a member of a new-found family of very massive planets that encircle stars more massive than our Sun. We’re now beginning to think that the more massive the star, the more massive the planet,” said Dr Francois Bouchy, from the Institut d’Astrophysique de Paris (IAP), a member of the team that discovered the object.

Because of its extreme density, Corot-exo-3b lies in the shady area of classification between planet and brown dwarf. Brown dwarfs are massive bodies (between about 13 and 80 times the mass of Jupiter) that don’t make the cut for fusing hydrogen in their cores – and thus don’t shine in optical wavelengths – yet are much more massive that what is normally classified as a planet. Brown dwarfs can fuse deuterium even at lower masses (above 13 Jupiter masses), and lithium in masses above 65 that of Jupiter.

Planets generally form out of a disk of dust and gas that surrounds the early star they orbit, and then are pulled in closer due to friction with the debris that lies in their orbit. The close orbit and very short orbital period of Corot-exo-3b was likely caused by this effect.

The COROT satellite initially discovered the planet by measuring the change in the brightness of the host star as the planet passes in front of it. As the planet moves in front of the star, it slightly darkens the visible light, and then the star brightens once again as the planet moves behind it. The bigger the planet, the more it will darken the light coming from the star. The pull of a planet as it moves around its star can also redshift or blueshift the light coming from the star, and this shift can give information as to the mass of the planet.

Follow-up observations of the planet were done by a collaboration of scientists from around the world, led by Dr. Magali Deleuil from the Laboratoire d’Astrophysique de Marseille (LAM). Their results will be published in the journal Astronomy and Astrophysics.

Author’s note: Due to technical errors in the original posting of this article, the original was removed from UT, but the link may still show up in your feed reader. Be assured that this corrected version is the real, much more accurate one.

Source: ESA

Core of Uranus

Uranus Compared to Earth. Image credit: NASA

[/caption]
Uranus has a mass of roughly 14.5 times that of Earth, which makes it the least massive of the giant planets. Astronomers know that it’s mostly made of various ices, like water, ammonia and methane. And they theorize that Uranus probably has a solid core.

The core of Uranus probably only accounts for 20% of the radius of Uranus, and only about 0.55 Earth masses. With gravity of all the outer mantle and atmosphere, regions in the core experience a pressure of about 8 million bars, and have a temperature of 5,000 Kelvin. That sounds hot, like as hot as the surface of the Sun, but keep in mind that the core of Jupiter is more like 24,000 K – much hotter. The core of Uranus has a density of about 9 g/cm3, which makes it about twice as dense as the average density of the Earth.

For astronomers, Uranus has an unusually low temperature; and that’s a mystery. One ideas is that the same impact that knocked Uranus off its rotational axis might have also caused it to expel much of its primordial heat. With the heat gone, Uranus was able to cool down significantly further than the other planets. Another idea is that there’s some kind of barrier in Uranus’ upper atmosphere that prevents heat from the core to reach the surface.

We have written many stories about Uranus on Universe Today. Here’s an article about a dark spot in the clouds on Uranus, and here’s an article about the composition of Uranus.

If you’d like more info on Uranus, check out Hubblesite’s News Releases about Uranus. And here’s a link to the NASA’s Solar System Exploration Guide to Uranus.

We have recorded an episode of Astronomy Cast just about Uranus. You can access it here: Episode 62: Uranus.

How To Use A Telescope

Choose Your Observing Site To Use A Telescope

One of the most important things to begin with is to carefully choose the site you will use set up and use your telescope at. While it would be tempting to take your new telescope out of the box and use it that night, it’s best to wait just a day or two! Begin the first clear night by going outside a taking a good look around. You want to choose an observing site where the view is as unobstructed and as dark as possible. While you are doing this, keep in mind that it must be comfortable to you as well. While the vista might be far improved a kilometer away – do you really want to have to take your equipment that distance each time you want to use it? Look at many different alternatives. If you live in a city, perhaps a rooftop will serve well. Urban settings often have very suitable yards that will work for most observing projects and rural settings are ideal.

Light pollution is another factor when choosing your site. Again, keep in mind that you must have a site that is accessible to enjoy. It isn’t always possible if you live in a well-lit area to take your equipment remote each time you want to use your telescope – but a sheltered area, such as in the shadow of a house, often blocks stray light well enough to enjoy using your telescope right at home. Of course, finding a dark sky site is also important, too. But not half as much as just finding a spot that you will enjoy and use.

While out during the day, look for level, solid ground. No one wants to see their telescope take a tumble. While it is tempting to set up on a deck, remember that any footsteps will cause vibration in the image. Setting up on places like a blacktop driveway or concrete can also cause thermal issues, too. Avoid them when you can, but do not discard these types of sites if they are comfortable and accessible.

How To Set Up Your Telescope

While every telescope set-up is slightly different, they are all basically the same in some respects. There must be an optical tube of some type, a mount and eyepieces. Take the time to become familiar with all the components of your telescope! If you must assemble and dis-assemble your telescope each time you use it, it’s a very wise idea to practice a few times before you go out in the dark. There is simply nothing more frustrating that trying to learn to set up your equipment when you cannot see what you are doing – or to loose a small part in the dark. If it is at all possible, leave your telescope and tripod fully assembled and in a place where it is easy to set outside at a moment’s notice. You’ll find that you’ll use it far more often if it takes less work.

Your telescope’s view is also dependent on ambient temperature. If you wear eyeglasses, you understand why! If you go from a very cool environment, such as a air-conditioned house, into a humid outdoors setting, your glasses fog up, don’t they? And so will your telescope’s optics. The same is true when observing outdoors in the winter. When taking your telescope from a heated climate to a cold one, you must give the telescope time to “cool down”. Even just a few degrees can mean waiver in the image.

Align your finderscope in advance! While this sounds rather strange, another frustrating thing to do in the dark is to align a finderscope – especially on a moving target. Once you have learned to assembly your telescope, learn to align your finder. Set up your scope and aim at a distant object. Now align your finder to that object as well. This will make things much easier, later!

Once your telescope is set up, the last thing to remember is to stow your things neatly so you won’t have any problems finding them when it comes time to put things away. Dust covers and eyepieces cases are so easy to lose. Keep things neat and you won’t have any problems. Choose the eyepiece you think you will need in advance and have them in a place where you won’t need to fumble in the dark. Have your red flashlight and maps handy. These are just little things that make using your telescope much more enjoyable!

Choose Your Observing Times

Experience will become your best teacher. It won’t take long before you realize that very humid nights or exceptionally cold ones are not particularly good times to observe. Unless you plan on looking at the Moon itself, nights that are well moon-lit are also not good times to search for a faint galaxy, either. Little things, like waiting for a planet to clear the atmospheric “murk” at the lower horizon mean a much better viewing experience.

How To Use A Telescope

Now that you have your observing site, learned to set up, and established a time to practice astronomy… Let’s learn how to use your telescope!

If you have an equatorial mount, align the axis to the pole star. Altazimuth mounts do not need this step. Take off your dustcaps and stow them away. Double check to make sure your tripod legs are secure. Choose your low power eyepiece and put it in the focuser. Are you ready? Now, loosen the axis and take aim at a star using your finderscope. When the star is aligned in the center of the finder, tighten the axis and it’s time to go to the eyepiece. Gently adjust the focus in or out until you have a crisp, clean image. Now watch the star move. This direction is always west – regardless of the orientation in the eyepiece. For equatorial mounts, use your slow motion cables to learn to “track” the star. For altazimuth mounts, use the pan control or shift the tube manually (dobsonian models). Once you have learned to “follow” and object, it’s time to star hop!

Each time you go to a new object with an equatorial mount, you must unlock the axis. The same is true with some styles of altazimuth mounts. Once you have the general location in the finder, lock the axis back up and use the slow motion cable controls or panhandle control to make small moves. Using a low power eyepiece first will help you locate things much easier, and you can then switch to more magnification once the object is located.

When you are finished for the evening, make sure to replace all your dustcaps. If your optics should become dewed, don’t wipe them off. Allow them to air dry to avoid micro-scratches on delicate coatings. Always make sure to give your observing area one last check before leaving just in case you’ve forgotten something!

A Herschel Anniversary – NGC 891 by Ken Crawford

NGC891 by Ken Crawford

[/caption]

On this night – October 6 – in 1784, Sir William Herschel was busy at the eyepiece of his telescope with a new galaxy he’d just discovered. It was a beauty, too. A pencil-slim, edge-on galaxy with a dark dust lane. Herschel marked it down in his fifth catalog as discovery 19, but when he got excited talking about his sister Caroline’s discoveries, he made a mistake. Let’s learn…

Even though William Herschel later confused NGC 891 with Caroline’s independent discovery of NGC 205 (M110), you can understand how the brother/sister astronomy team could honestly make a mistake. In the words of Caroline Herschel; “I knew too little of the real heavens to be able to point out every object so as to find it again without losing too much time by consulting the Atlas. But all these troubles were removed when I knew my brother to be at no great distance making observations with his various instruments on double stars, planets, etc., and I could have his assistance immediately when I found a nebula, or cluster of stars, of which I intended to give a catalogue; but at the end of 1783 I had only marked fourteen, when my sweeping was interrupted by being employed to write down my brother’s observations with the twenty-foot.”

Oddly enough, Herschel’s mistake was perpetuated by Admiral William Henry Smyth – who when he retired from the Royal Navy spent his time in his private observatory equipped with a 6-inch refractor. There he observed a variety of deep sky objects, including double stars, clusters and nebulae, and kept careful records of his observations, publishing his work as the “Cycle of Celestial Objects” – including Herschel’s mistake. But in the end, does it really matter which Herschel discovered it? It’s what’s out there that counts…

Located some thirty million light years away in the Local Super Cluster, NGC 891 is wrapped by a cold, gaseous halo. According to Tom Oosterloo (et al); “HI observations are among the deepest ever performed on an external galaxy. They reveal a huge gaseous halo, much more extended than seen previously and containing almost 30 % of the HI. This HI halo shows structures on various scales. On one side, there is a filament extending (in projection) up to 22 kpc vertically from the disk. Small halo clouds, some with forbidden (apparently counter-rotating) velocities, are also detected. The overall kinematics of the halo gas is characterized by differential rotation lagging with respect to that of the disk. The lag, more pronounced at small radii, increases with height from the plane. There is evidence that a significant fraction of the halo is due to a galactic fountain. Accretion from intergalactic space may also play a role in building up the halo and providing low angular momentum material needed to account for the observed rotation lag. The long HI filament and the counter-rotating clouds may be direct evidence of such accretion.”

Accretion? Accretion from where? Is NGC 891 gathering material from somewhere else? Apparently so. According to work of Mapelli (et al): “It has been known for a long time that a large fraction of disc galaxies are lopsided. We simulate three different mechanisms that can induce lopsidedness: flyby interactions, gas accretion from cosmological filaments and ram pressure from the intergalactic medium. Comparing the morphologies, HI spectrum, kinematics and m = 1 Fourier components, we find that all of these mechanisms can induce lopsidedness in galaxies, although in different degrees and with observable consequences. The time-scale over which lopsidedness persists suggests that flybys can contribute to ~20 per cent of lopsided galaxies. We focus our detailed comparison on the case of NGC 891, a lopsided, edge-on galaxy with a nearby companion (UGC 1807). We find that the main properties of NGC 891 (morphology, HI spectrum, rotation curve, existence of a gaseous filament pointing towards UGC 1807) favour a flyby event for the origin of lopsidedness in this galaxy.”

Ah, ha! So, we have a nearby companion galaxy. We’ve learned recently that combining galaxies produces starburst activity and the case is true of NGC 891 as well. Studies done as recently as June 2008 indicate starbust activity based on the strength of the polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbon (PAH) features. And where are those PAHs? Why, in the halo, of course. According to the work of Rand (et al): “We present infrared spectroscopy from the Spitzer Space Telescope at one disk position and two positions at a height of 1 kpc from the disk in the edge-on spiral NGC 891, with the primary goal of studying halo ionization. Our main result is that the [Ne III]/[Ne II] ratio, which provides a measure of the hardness of the ionizing spectrum free from the major problems plaguing optical line ratios, is enhanced in the extraplanar pointings relative to the disk pointing. Using a 2D Monte Carlo-based photoionization code that accounts for the effects of radiation field hardening, we find that this trend cannot be reproduced by any plausible photoionization model and that a secondary source of ionization must therefore operate in gaseous halos. We also present the first spectroscopic detections of extraplanar PAH features in an external normal galaxy. If they are in an exponential layer, very rough emission scale heights of 330-530 pc are implied for the various features. Extinction may be non-negligible in the midplane and reduce these scale heights significantly. There is little significant variation in the relative emission from the various features between disk and extraplanar environment. Only the 17.4 ?m feature is significantly enhanced in the extraplanar gas compared to the other features, possibly indicating a preference for larger PAHs in the halo.”

So where is all this going? Current research shows a correlation between PAH abundance with galactic age. When asymptotic giant branch cough their carbon dust back into the interstellar medium at the end of their evolution, they become the primary source of PAHS and carbon dust in galaxies. As we know, a galaxy is one big recycling plant, and the ejecta is returned back to the interstellar medium after a few hundred million years along the line of main sequence evolution. But, the filamentary pattern extending away from the galactic disc of NGC 891 may very well point to stellar supernova explosions. By contrast, those, huge, massive stars that end up as Type II supernovae are the ones that blast dust and metals everywhere the moment they form.

So is this the result of old – or new – activity? According to Popescu (et al): “We describe a new tool for the analysis of the UV to the sub-millimeter (sub-mm) spectral energy distribution (SED) of spiral galaxies. We use a consistent treatment of grain heating and emission, solve the radiation transfer problem for a finite disk and bulge, and self-consistently calculate the stochastic heating of grains placed in the resulting radiation field. We use this tool to analyse the well-studied nearby edge-on spiral galaxy NGC 891. First we investigate whether the old stellar population in NGC 891, along with a reasonable assumption about the young stellar population, can account for the heating of the dust and the observed far-infrared and sub-mm emission. The dust distribution is taken from the model of Xilouris et al. (1999), who used only optical and near-infrared observations to determine it. We have found that such a simple model cannot reproduce the SED of NGC 891, especially in the sub-mm range. It underestimates by a factor of 2-4 the observed sub-mm flux. A number of possible explanations exist for the missing sub-mm flux. We investigate a few of them and demonstrate that one can reproduce the observed SED in the far-infrared and the sub-mm quite well, as well as the observed radial profile at 850 mu m. For the models calculated we give the relative proportion of the dust radiation powered by the old and young stellar populations as a function of FIR/sub-mm wavelength. In all models we find that the dust is predominantly heated by the young stellar population.”

Although it may have been busy at one time, NGC 891 is quiet now. According to Rowan Temple, “Using a sample of other local galaxies, we compare the X-ray and infrared properties of NGC 891 with those of `normal’ and starburst spiral galaxies, and conclude that NGC 891 is most likely a starburst galaxy in a quiescent state.” So take a look when you have time. This magnitude 10 beauty is located at (RA 2 : 22.6 Dec +42 : 21) at is often considered to be one of the finest deep sky objects Messier never cataloged.

No matter which Herchel discovered it.

Many thanks to AORAIA member Ken Crawford for the use of his superb image!

Surface of Uranus

True-color and false-color image of Uranus. Credit: NASA/JPL

[/caption]
Uranus is a ball of ice and gas, so you can’t really say that it has a surface. If you tried to land a spacecraft on Uranus, it would just sink down through the upper atmosphere of hydrogen and helium, and into the liquid icy center.

When we look at Uranus, we see the blue-green color that seems to come from the surface of Uranus. This color is light from the Sun reflected off Uranus’ surface. The atmosphere of Uranus contains hydrogen and helium, and most importantly, it has relatively large amounts of methane. This methane absorbs color in the red end of the spectrum of light, while photons at the blue end of the spectrum are able to reflect off the clouds and go back into space. So the full spectrum of the Sun’s light goes in, the red and orange end of the spectrum is absorbed, and the blue green end of the spectrum bounces back out. And this is why the surface of Uranus has its color.

But let’s imagine that the surface of Uranus was actually solid, and you could walk around. You might be surprised to know that you would only experience 89% the gravity that you feel back on Earth. Even though Uranus has 14.5 times more mass than Earth, it has 63 times the volume of Earth. Uranus is the second least dense planet in the Solar System, so it has a relatively weak gravity on its surface.

We have written several articles about Uranus for Universe Today. Here’s a story about what’s inside a gas giant, and here’s one about two new moons discovered for Uranus.

If you’d like more info on Uranus, check out Hubblesite’s News Releases about Uranus. And here’s a link to the NASA’s Solar System Exploration Guide to Uranus.

We have recorded an episode of Astronomy Cast just about Uranus. You can access it here: Episode 62: Uranus.