Black Holes Can Get Really Big, And We Have No Idea Why

Article Updated: 23 Dec , 2015

Right now, as you read this article, it’s quite possible that the ultra-huge black hole at the center of our galaxy is feasting on asteroids or supercooked gas.

We’ve seen these supermassive black holes in other spots in the universe, too: merging together, for example. They’re huge heavyweights, typically ranging between hundreds of thousands to billions of times the mass of the Sun. But we also know, paradoxically, that mini supermassive black holes exist.

So while we’ve observed the gravitational effects of these monsters, a University of Alberta researcher today (May 30) is going to outline the big question: how the heck some of them got so massive. For now, no one knows for sure, but scientists are naturally taking a stab at trying to figure this out.

Maybe they were your ordinary stellar black holes, just three to 100 times the mass of the sun, that underwent a growth spurt. There’s a sticking point with that theory, though:  “To do this, the black holes would have to gorge excessively, at rates that require new physics,” stated the Canadian Astronomical Society.

Illustration of Cygnus X-1, another stellar-mass black hole located 6070 ly away. (NASA/CXC/M.Weiss)

Illustration of Cygnus X-1, a stellar-mass black hole located 6070 ly away. (NASA/CXC/M.Weiss)

“We might also expect to see some black holes that are intermediate in mass between stellar-mass and supermassive black holes in our nearby universe,” the society added, “like a band that is consistently releasing albums, but never making it truly big.”

Anyway, Jeanette Gladstone (a postdoctoral researcher) will make a presentation at CASCA’s annual meeting in Vancouver today outlining some ideas. Gladstone, by the way, focuses on X-rays (from black holes) in her work. Here’s what she said on her research page:

HLX-1 in the periphery of the edge-on spiral galaxy ESO 243-49. Credit: Heidi Sagerud.

HLX-1 in the periphery of the edge-on spiral galaxy ESO 243-49. Credit: Heidi Sagerud.

“I am currently trying to understand a strange group of curiously bright X-ray binaries. These ultraluminous X-ray sources emit too much X-ray radiation to be explained by standard accretion [of] only a regular stellar mass black hole,” she wrote.

“So I use various parts of the electromagnetic spectrum to try and understand what makes them appear so bright. More recently I have started looking at the very brightest of these sources, a group of objects that have recently become a class in their own right. These are the hyperluminous X-ray sources.”

For context, here’s more info on a hyperluminous X-ray source (and its black hole) in spiral galaxy ESO 234-9, as studied by the Hubble Space Telescope and the Swift X-Ray Telescope.

Astronomers were pretty excited with this 2012 work: “For the first time, we have evidence on the environment, and thus the origin, of this middle-weight black hole,” said Mathieu Servillat, a member of the Harvard-Smithsonian Center for Astrophysics research team, at the time.

Credit: CASCA

, ,

6 Responses

  1. lcrowell says:

    I have this idea, which unfortunately I have not had time to work on, that hyperstars in the early universe were a form of PopIII star which contained a black hole. Maybe something like this bloated them up quickly. This is a rather strange problem in astrophysics, a problem one would not think a first should exist.


  2. Planemo says:

    Dial 1-777-CRE-ATOR? Ask for Ezekiel, if not, Moses will put you on hold forever!

  3. Vincent says:

    Im guessing that at the Start of the Universe Suns where bigger and most likely in Binary systems, Now imagine the biggest starts but bigger, having one collapse and then eating off its Giant twin.
    Didn’t they say suns are getting smaller as material gets more spread out. As well that most systems are actually binary.

  4. Texas says:

    “have to gorge excessively, at rates that require new…”. What does that mean? Is there an upper limit to how much a BH can eat. What are the parameters? Speed of light? Amount of mass?

  5. Peristroika says:

    Yeah, this article needs some help. It barely scrapes the surface and gives almost no background info. If a black hole even ate one star a year since the beginning of the universe, it would be 13 billion solar masses. That’s a big black hole. Irregular galaxies should have a lot of stars steering towards the centre! The mystery of few medium sized BH’s is enough. Why SHOULDN”T the most gravitationally gifted objects in the universe pull in their share of the fun?

  6. M_J_Murcott says:

    The multiverse theory of space, or why we don’t need dark energy and dark matter.-

Comments are closed.