New Technique Could Find Another “Pale Blue Dot”


By looking back at Earth from alien’s point of view, scientists have developed a new technique to look for other worlds that might harbor oceans, and therefore life. Using the old Deep Impact spacecraft, which is now being used for the EPOXI mission, scientists are able to look at the spectrum of an extrasolar planet’s light which would reveal the presence of water. “We used the High Resolution Imager telescope on Deep Impact to look at Earth from tens of millions of miles away,” said Nicolas B. Cowan, of the University of Washington, ” and developed a method to indicate the presence of oceans by analyzing how Earth’s light changes as the planet rotates. This method can be used to identify extrasolar ocean-bearing Earths.”

Last year, the EPOXI science team was able to take videos of the Moon transiting Earth, (see our article from July 2008). The team has now practiced the technique by looking back at Earth, and have determined that they should be able to detect oceans on other worlds by looking at the changing spectrum of light the planet gives off as it rotates.

Cowan is lead author of a paper on this research appearing in the August 2009 issue of the Astrophysical Journal. Our planet looks blue all the time because of Rayleigh scattering of sunlight by the atmosphere, the same reason that the sky appears blue to us down on the surface, points out Cowan. “What we studied in this paper was how that blue color changes in time: oceans are bluer than continents, which appear red or orange because land is most reflective at red and near-infrared wavelengths of light. Oceans only reflect much at blue (short) wavelengths,” said Cowan.

“A ‘pale blue dot‘ is the best picture we will get of an Earth-like extrasolar world using even the most advanced telescopes planned for the next couple decades,” Cowan continued. “So how do we find out if it is capable of supporting life? If we can determine that the planet has oceans of liquid water, it greatly increases the likelihood that it supports life.”

palebluedot_jpg This narrow-angle color image of the Earth, dubbed ‘Pale Blue Dot‘, is a part of the first ever ‘portrait’ of the solar system taken by Voyager 1, and made famous by astronomer Carl Sagan. The spacecraft acquired a total of 60 frames for a mosaic of the solar system from a distance of more than 4 billion miles from Earth and about 32 degrees above the ecliptic. From Voyager’s great distance Earth is a mere point of light, less than the size of a picture element even in the narrow-angle camera. Earth was a crescent only 0.12 pixel in size. Coincidentally, Earth lies right in the center of one of the scattered light rays resulting from taking the image so close to the sun. This blown-up image of the Earth was taken through three color filters — violet, blue and green — and recombined to produce the color image. The background features in the image are artifacts resulting from the magnification. Credit: NASA JPL

The maps that the team created are only sensitive to the longitudinal (East – West) positions of oceans and continents. Furthermore, the observations only pick out what is going on near the equator of Earth: the equator gets more sunlight than higher latitudes, and the EPOXI spacecraft was above the equator when the observations were taken. These limitations of viewing geometry could plague observations of extrasolar planets as well: “We could erroneously see the planet as a desert world if it had a nearly solid band of continents around its equator and oceans at its poles,” said Cowan.

Other things besides water can make a planet appear blue; for example, in our solar system the planet Neptune is blue due in part to the presence of methane in its upper atmosphere. “However, a Neptune-like world would appear as an unchanging blue using this technique, and again it’s the changes in the blue color that reveal oceans to us,” said Cowan. “There are some weird scenarios you can dream up that don’t involve oceans but would lead to varying patches of blue on a planet, but these are not very plausible.”

“A spectrum of the planet’s light that reveals the presence of water is necessary to confirm the existence of oceans,” said Drake Deming, a co-author of the paper at NASA’s Goddard Space Flight Center in Greenbelt, Md. Instruments that produce a spectrum are attached to telescopes and spread out light into its component colors, like a prism separates white light into a rainbow. Every element and molecule emits and absorbs light at specific colors. These colors can be used like a fingerprint to identify them.

“Finding the water molecule in the spectrum of an extrasolar planet would indicate that there is water vapor in its atmosphere, making it likely that the blue patches we were seeing as it rotates were indeed oceans of liquid water. However, it will take future large space telescopes to get a precise spectrum of such distant planets, while our technique can be used now as an indication that they could have oceans,” said Deming. The technique only requires relatively crude spectra to get the intensity of light over broad color ranges, according to the team.

EPOXI is a combination of the names for the two extended mission components: a search for extrasolar planets during the cruise to Hartley 2, called Extrasolar Planet Observations and Characterization (EPOCh), and the flyby of comet Hartley 2, called the Deep Impact eXtended Investigation (DIXI).

Source: NASA

4 Replies to “New Technique Could Find Another “Pale Blue Dot””

  1. Interested readers may want to check out the paper by Cowan et. al. with the intriguing title ‘Alien Maps of an Ocean-Bearing World’ here: . While only 11 pages in length, many illustrations are provided along with descriptions of their technique. Many thanks to Nancy for highlighting this fascinating research.

  2. Add ocean maps to (outer atmosphere) thermal maps of other worlds. I can hardly wait for the first test on an actual exoplanet.

    This combined with detecting gases and traces of (alien) photosynthesis, who would have expected that much observability of exoplanets a few years back?

    I wish someone in the know could survey the range of these techniques though. How many stars can we survey, how large a sample will we ever get with these methods? Will we have a fair chance of picking up useful distributions of habitable and inhabited planets (say, for characterizing biosphere likelihood and age distribution), or at least a few confirmations that they exist? Qs are many, As are few.

  3. Joe, thanks for the link.

    They seem to entertain the notion that they can also map average cloud coverage and variability (and compensate for some of it). More climate data!

Comments are closed.