Dark Energy Survey is out. 29 Papers Covering 226 Million Galaxies Across 7 Billion Light-Years of Space

Cosmology is now stranger to large scale surveys.  The discipline prides itself on data collection, and when the data it is collecting is about galaxies that are billions of years old its easy to see why more data would be better.  Now, with a flurry of 29 new papers, the partial results from the largest cosmological survey ever – the Dark Energy Survey (DES) – have been released.  And it largely confirms what we already knew.

The DES took place over 6 years from 2013 to 2019, and looked at over 1/8th of the night sky for a total of 758 nights.  Results released on May 27th contain analysis of the data from the first half of that observational period, having already released results from the first year back in 2017.

Video describing the work by the DES.
Credit: NOIRLab YouTube Channel

Even using just half the data, the survey, which included 400 individual scientists from 25 institutions in 7 countries, observed over 226 million galaxies.  Observations were done with the Victor M Blanco telescope at Cerro Tololo Inter-American Observatory in Chile.  Measuring 4 meters in width, the Blanco telescope has a resolution of 570 megapixels – almost 50 times as much as a standard iPhone camera.

All that observational power is great to collect data, but the scientists need to know what to do with it when collected.  The goal of the survey was to “quantify the distribution of dark matter and the effect of dark energy” according to a press release by Fermilab, which built and tested the camera used in the survey.   These two poorly understood cosmic features make up 95% of all the known “stuff” in the universe.  

The Dark Energy Survey camera (DECam) at the SiDet clean room. The Dark Energy Camera was designed specifically for the Dark Energy Survey. It was funded by the Department of Energy (DOE) and was built and tested at DOE’s Fermilab.
Credit: NOIRLab

Despite their prevalence, they are very hard to detect, hence the name “dark”.  However, DES provides more insight that ever before into some characteristics  of these little understood phenomena.  In particular, two cosmological features were central to the survey’s efforts.  The first was the “cosmic web”, while the second were weak gravitational lenses.

The cosmic web is what cosmologists use to describe the structure of galaxies.  These massive clusters of gravitationally bound stars aren’t randomly distributed, as one might assume if the universe was all started from the same state.  They form a pattern, with clumps of galaxies banding together to form galaxy clusters. 

Maps of some recent work to map clustering due to dark matter.
Credit: Hong et. al., Astrophysical Journal

Cosmologists normally attribute those clumped up areas to the presence of higher densities of dark matter and, therefore, gravity.  Mapping where they occur in space provides insight into what areas of the galaxy might feature high concentrations of dark matter to study.  Results from universe growth models can then be compared to the cosmic web as a way to check their accuracy in predicting how the universe actually turned out.

Clustering isn’t the only way to detect dark matter though.  DES scientists also utilized a well-studied cosmological phenomena called gravitational lensing.  This effect happens when light is bent around areas of high gravity, which pockets of dark matter certainly are. Strong gravitational lensing, such as that around black holes, is a common enough feature of cosmology, producing features such as Einstein rings that look spectacular.

The “Molten Ring” is one of the most complete Einstein Rings ever discovered.
Credit: ESA / Hubble & NASA, S. Jha, L. Shatz

Weak gravitational lensing doesn’t have quite as much visual impact as its stronger cousin, but it does provide more insight into that important map of dark matter and dark energy.  It can also be notoriously difficult to calculate what effect the lensing has, which is where some additional analytical tools developed by the DES team come into play.

Redshifting is a feature of astronomical observations where things that are far away and getting further away appear to have the light they emit shifted to the red side of the light spectrum. It is notorious for confounding observational data of features like gravitational lensing or even of clustering itself.  

This diagram shows the difference between unshifted, redshifted and blueshifted targets.
Credit: NASA

To deal with this issue, the DES team came up with a novel calibration technique. They chose 10 different regions of the sky to perform “deep field” searches of, which allowed them to see galaxies that were even farther away than their normal observational area.  They then used the redshift values calculated in these deep fields to calibrate redshift values in the rest of the surveyed sky.

Even having removed the redshift, more data is always more useful in understanding cosmological phenomena.  The DES team also analyzed a number of other phenomena, which included baryonic acoustic oscillations, frequency measurements for massive galaxy clusters, and calculations of some of the features of Type Ia supernovae captured in the survey.

This image shows an immersive view from inside the dome of the Víctor M. Blanco 4-meter Telescope at the Cerro Tololo Inter-American Observatory (CTIO), a Program of NSF’s NOIRLab. The Dark Energy Survey photographed the night sky using the 570-megapixel Dark Energy Camera on the Blanco.
Credit: NOIRLab

The overall result of all this effort is another feather in the cap of the current model of the evolution of the universe.  Survey results from the DES fit well with the predicted model that is used to map the universe from the beginning of time.  In fact, it contradicts previous claims that there was a few percentage difference between the observed universe and the predicted one.  

But the team’s effort isn’t done yet.  They still have only analyzed half the data, so the other half is expected to add even more detail to the picture of dark energy and dark matter.  In addition, new surveys using new instruments, such as the Vera Rubin Observatory, are already planned.   There’s always more cosmological data to be collected.

Webinar discussing the DES Year 3 survey.
Credit: DES YouTube Channel

Learn More:
NOIRLab – Dark Energy Survey Releases Most Precise Look at the Universe’s Evolution
DES – DES Year 3 Cosmology Results: Papers
arXiv – Dark Energy Survey Year 3 Results: Redshift Calibration of the Weak Lensing Source Galaxies
UC – Dark Energy Survey releases most precise look yet at the universe’s evolution

Lead Image:
Deep field image of some of the 226 million galaxies the DES surveyed.
Credit: Dark Energy Survey / DOE / FNAL / DECam / CTIO / NOIRLab / NSF / AURA
Acknowledgments: T.A. Rector (University of Alaska Anchorage/NSF’s NOIRLab), M. Zamani (NSF’s NOIRLab) & D. de Martin (NSF’s NOIRLab)

One Reply to “Dark Energy Survey is out. 29 Papers Covering 226 Million Galaxies Across 7 Billion Light-Years of Space”

  1. Great article!

    The papers can be found on the DES Y3 cosmology result page.

    But the current description is “There will be 30 interconnected papers in all, with the main cosmology analysis at the bottom of the page. 26 of the 30 papers, including our main results, have now been released!” Looks like most are arxiv preprints.

    The main take home for me was that DES Y3 stays robust within the 2 sigma tension Y1 had with Planck 2018 cosmology, albeit now they have incorporated half the data from their lower quality photometric 200+ million galaxy survey. That implies that the DES data will not yield surprises, but that the higher quality Dark Energy Spectroscopic Instrument [DESI] that started last week to survey 30+ million galaxies in 5 years may be the next interesting galaxy survey.

    It is else hard to compare surveys. The recent forerunner to DESI, the eBOSS galaxy part of the 20 year spectroscopic SDSS survey, had 3 million galaxies out to the same depth as DES but managed to increase the significance of dark energy from previous 7 to now 11 sigma – dark matter lies at something like 45 sigma. I believe the article here on Universe Today hailed it as evidence for a ‘solid fact’. In any case, the easily compared parameters come out at much the same quality between eBOSS and DES respective collaboration summary papers on cosmology:

    eBOSS upper limit on the sum of neutrino masses ?m_? < 0.115 eV (95% confidence).
    DES Y3 upper limit on the sum of neutrino masses ?m_? < 0.13 eV (95% confidence).

    eBOSS equation of state in wCDM [i,e relaxing curvature constraint of flat space in LCDM, where equation of state is exactly -1] of w_p = ?1.018 ± 0.032 "at a pivot redshift z_ = 0.29 and a Dark Energy Task Force Figure of Merit of 94".

    DES Y3 equation of state in wCDM of w = ?1.031+0.030 ?0.027.

    So eBOSS manages a tighter limit on neutrino upper masses and gets closer to the LCDM equation of state at comparable uncertainty. YMMV of course, and it is a matter of taste.

Comments are closed.