A very zoomed-in image of Phaethon from NASA's STEREO spacecraft, showing a comet-like extension. Credit: Jewitt, Li, Agarwal /NASA/STEREO
A very zoomed-in image of Phaethon from NASA's STEREO spacecraft, showing a comet-like extension. Credit: Jewitt, Li, Agarwal /NASA/STEREO

Asteroids, Astronomy, Comets, NASA, sun

Asteroid Vs. Comet: What The Heck Is 3200 Phaethon?

10 Sep , 2013 by

Sometimes, putting things into categories difficult. Witness how many members of the general public are still unhappy that Pluto was reclassified as a dwarf planet, a decision made by the International Astronomical Union more than seven years ago.

And now we have 3200 Phaethon, an asteroid that is actually behaving like a comet. Scientists found dust that is streaming from this space rock as it gets close to the sun — similarly to how ices melt and form a tail as comets zoom by our closest stellar neighbor.

Phaethon’s orbit puts it in the same originating region as other asteroids (between Mars and Jupiter), but its dust stream is much closer to actions performed by a comet — an object that typically comes from an icy region way beyond Neptune. So far, therefore, the research team is calling Phaethon a “rock comet.” And after first proposing a theory a few years ago, they now have observations as to what may be going on.

Phaethon is not only an asteroid, but also a source of a prominent meteor shower called the Geminids. This shower happens every year around December when the Earth plows into the cloud of debris that Phaethon leaves in its wake. Astronomers have known about the Geminids’ source for a generation, but for decades could not catch the asteroid in the act of shedding its stuff.

That finally came with images of NASA’s twin sun-gazing Solar TErrestrial RElations Observatory (STEREO) spacecraft that were taken between 2009 and 2012. The researchers saw a “comet-like tail” extending from the 3.1-mile (five kilometer) asteroid. “The tail gives incontrovertible evidence that Phaethon ejects dust,” stated David Jewitt, an astronomer at the University of California, Los Angeles who led the research. “That still leaves the question: why?”

Time lapse-photo showing geminids over Pendleton, OR. Credit: Thomas W. Earle

Time lapse-photo showing geminids over Pendleton, OR. Credit: Thomas W. Earle

The answer lies in just how close Phaethon whizzes past the sun. At perihelion, its closest approach to the sun, it only appears eight degrees (16 solar diameters) away from the sun in Earth’s sky. This close distance makes it all but impossible to study the asteroid without special equipment, which is why STEREO came in so handy.

When Phaethon reaches its closest approach of 0.14 Earth-sun distances, surface temperatures rise above an estimated 1,300 degrees Fahrenheit (700 degrees Celsius). It’ s way too hot for ice, as what happens with a comet. In fact, it’s probably hot enough to make the rocks crack and break apart. The researchers publicly hypothesized this was happening at least as far back as 2010, but this finding provided more evidence to support that theory.

“The team believes that thermal fracture and desiccation fracture (formed like mud cracks in a dry lake bed) may be launching small dust particles that are then picked up by sunlight and pushed into the tail,” a statement from the research team read.

“While this is the first time that thermal disintegration has been found to play an important role in the solar system,” they added, “astronomers have already detected unexpected amounts of hot dust around some nearby stars that might have been similarly produced.”

The results were presented at the European Planetary Science Congress on Tuesday. By the way, STEREO also caught Mercury behaving somewhat like a comet in results released in 2010, although that find was related to the planet’s escaping sodium atmosphere.

Read more about the research in the June 26 issue of Astrophysical Letters. A preprint version is also available on Arxiv.

Source: European Planetary Science Congress


By  -      
Elizabeth Howell is the senior writer at Universe Today. She also works for Space.com, Space Exploration Network, the NASA Lunar Science Institute, NASA Astrobiology Magazine and LiveScience, among others. Career highlights include watching three shuttle launches, and going on a two-week simulated Mars expedition in rural Utah. You can follow her on Twitter @howellspace or contact her at her website.

6 Responses

  1. Gozlemci says:

    It may be designated as “cometoid”.

  2. Laurel Kornfeld says:

    It isn’t just members of the public who reject the controversial IAU “reclassification” of Pluto. Many professional and amateur astronomers continue to reject it because the IAU resolution is poorly worded and was adopted for political rather than scientific reasons. Pluto’s planet status remains as much of a debate today as it did seven years ago when only four percent of the IAU voted on the decision, most of whom are not planetary scientists, and hundreds of professional astronomers led by New Horizons Principal Investigator Dr. Alan Stern signed a formal petition rejecting it. That petition can be found here: http://www.ipetitions/com/petition/planetprotest . The four percent of the IAU who voted on this misused the term “dwarf planet,” which, ironically, was created by Stern. However, he meant it to designate a third class of planets in addition to terrestrials and jovians, not to designate a group of non-planets.

  3. IVAN3MAN_AT_LARGE says:

    You’re flogging a dead horse (or, in Pluto’s case, beating a dead dog), so give it a rest already!

    • Laurel Kornfeld says:

      No, I’m not. Planet Pluto is NOT dead; in fact, over time more and more astronomers are coming to recognize that the entire issue of planet definition needs to be revisited. Sorry, but I will never “give it a rest” until a better, more inclusive planet definition that includes dwarf planets is adopted, whether by the IAU or by another organization.

  4. David Krauss says:

    What about Charon?

    • Laurel Kornfeld says:

      Given that Pluto and Charon orbit a common barycenter between the two of them, it makes sense to consider them a binary dwarf planet system orbited by four tiny moons.

Comments are closed.