Book Review: Martian Summer

Article written: 18 Nov , 2011
Updated: 24 Dec , 2015
by

[/caption]
The Mars Phoenix Lander has long since gone quiet on the frigid, dusty plains of Mars. Its legacy however remains. It will go down as the first mission to land in the Martian Polar Regions, the first to be led primarily by a University.

The University of Arizona took the lead on the mission with Peter Smith being the Mars Phoenix lander’s Principle Investigator or “PI.” Andrew Kessler was brought onto the Phoenix team to help promote Phoenix to the public. It was a controversial decision.

The media, by-and-large tends to focus on accidents, explosions or other failures. Given that Phoenix accomplished its objectives with nary a wrinkle – it is not hard to understand why the media paid it little attention. One need only look at the lander’s cousin, the Mars Exploration Rover Opportunity – who has been largely forgotten by the press – despite the fact that it has been working on the red planet for the past seven years (even though it was only slated to last 90 days).

The Mars Phoenix Lander thundered off of Cape Canaveral Air Force Station's Space Launch Complex 17 in the summer of 2007. About nine months later - it landed on the surface of Mars. Image Credit: NASA/JPL

One of the things that no media outlet wants to see is one of their employees repeatedly make what are known as “fact errors.” These can be as large as gross misrepresentations, or in this case, as small as not knowing the correcting spelling or pronunciation of an individual’s name. In this case, it was someone well-known in “space” circles, Keith Cowing — not “Cowling” as the author repeatedly states – even in the book’s index. Kessler could have easily verified the correct spelling by going to NASAWatch.com or by picking up a copy of New Moon Rising. Apparently he did neither.

The importance of this is simple. If he got something this simple wrong, what about the larger topics the book discusses? The author was sure to mention that his work has appeared on The Discovery Channel and The New York Times. One would think such respectable media outlets would ensure journalists made sure their work was free of fact-errors, especially since a portion of the book is spent assailing the work of other journalists.

Phoenix became the first spacecraft to be imaged in the process of landing on another world. This picture clearly captures the lander, still in its aeroshell, under parachute and on its way to the ground. This picture was taken by the Mars Reconnaissance Orbiter's HiRISE camera. Photo Credit: NASA/JPL/University of Arizona

One might ask, “Why so harsh?” Simply put, Kessler has massive potential. His writing style is easy to read and is perfectly suited for the general public. Kessler is a great writer and makes a complex subject accessible to all. He also makes it interesting, adding personal reflections and witticisms that other authors don’t. But glaring errors has the reader wondering about the author’s veracity.

But in Martian Summer, Kessler does provide a behind-the-scenes glimpse of what was going on during his time with the Mars Phoenix Lander project. It highlights the difficulties involved with mastering numerous skills required to reach another world. More importantly, it opens the door to the sheer wonder of it all.

Mars Phoenix Lander's landing site at the Martian North Pole. The inset image was taken by MRO some time after the lander fell silent. Image Credit: NASA/JPL/University of Arizona

Martian Summer is published by Pegasus Books and it weighs in at 352 pages (with 16 of them filled with color images). It details how Phoenix rose up out of the ashes that was the Mars Polar Lander and would go on to discover what may be an ocean of ice under the Martian North Pole. Phoenix was the first spacecraft to be imaged as it landed on the surface of another world. In all, it was an amazing mission that was supposed to last for 90 Martian “sols” – but went on to work for 155 sols.

Kessler works to remind us of the magic of spaceflight and exploration in a manner we can all understand. If you want an accurate scientific description – you won’t find it here (Kessler says so himself in the Author’s Note). What you will find is a peek behind the curtain at what makes a mission to Mars work – in all of its quirky glory.

NASA is currently planning to launch the next mission to Mars, the Mars Science Laboratory or MSL, next week on Nov. 25 at 10:21 a.m. EDT. Image Credit: NASA/JPL


9 Responses

  1. Polly Jenkins says

    That will be very cool . Hopefully with new color video.

  2. Anonymous says

    We’re definitely heading in the right direction, one day…off-world and toward a much better (and larger) way of life…despite the many shock/entertainment-driven media rags that can’t see beyond the next bit-story. I’ll enjoy reading this book.

  3. Kev Girard says

    Speaking of spelling, i’ve seen mis-spelling in articles on Universe Today more than a dozen times. Focus on Space stuff please 🙂

  4. Ray Fowler says

    The thing about fact-checking is that you have to prioritize which facts to check. A misspelled name is far less egregious than, say, reporting thruster data in pound-seconds instead of Newton-seconds.

    Unless you are writing a biography, the spelling of someone’s name is tangential to the subject matter of the material, and therefore way down on the list of things to fact-check before the editing deadline. As such, I’m not sure it’s fair to extrapolate that error to broader conclusions about the overall accuracy of the book.

  5. HeadAroundU says

    Keith Cowing, Ivanman’s real name. 😀

  6. I’ve read the book, and the misspelling was the only error I noticed. Other than that, it was a wonderful depiction of what working on a NASA program is really like, from the frustration of ITAR regulations to why you have to be very careful about using the word “safe”.

  7. Kvisoft says

    If there be live creature in the Mars, they must take the aircrafts as UFO.

  8. Dear Jason,

    The funding is drying up. The kids don’t really care about science. Nobody pays attention to missions. And your main criticism of Martian Summer is that I got Keith Cowing’s name wrong? Seriously?! I know it’s annoying. Believe me, I have shuddering spasms of regret over that and other (inevitable) typos that ended up in the book. Not the least because I can’t even send the guy a copy, in spite of how much pleasure I took from his interactions with the mission. For what it’s worth, I’m a regular reader of NASAWATCH.com. But that’s how it goes in the editing an re-editing process. Heck, even your review had a couple typos when you first put it up. But it seems to me, and yes, I’m biased, that there are better points of attack to criticize this book.

    I do appreciate the praise – I can live with crap fact checker, “great writer” – but I really think your readers would benefit from a lively discussion of whether a casual/humorous approach does anything to attract more fans to the space program, or what new ideas can be brought to publicizing missions. These seem far more meaningful. Of course, I’m just a casual observer trying to bring my naive outsider’s perspective to your insular world.

    While I humbly submit that the fact checking and typo procedure for books is flawed, I hope you can find a way to forgive and dig into the important stuff. I’ll make sure to send you a review copy of the paperback, where I promise Cowing’s good name shall be resorted and all the other cowlardly typos will be fixed.  Hopefully then we can find something a bit more worthwhile to mix it up over. 

    Sincerely,

    Andrew Kessler
    Author Martian Summer

  9. The pictures make this book really worth buying!

    Screen recorder http://freescreenrecorder.net/

Leave a Reply