Discovered in 1964 during a rocket flight, Cygnus X-1 holds the record for being the strongest X-ray source seen from Earth. The blue supergiant star designated as HDE 226868 is just part of this high-mass X-ray binary system… the other is a black hole.
“We present a detailed study of the X-ray dust scattering halo of the black hole candidate based on two Chandra HETGS observations. Using 18 different dust models, including one modified by us (dubbed XLNW), we probe the interstellar medium between us and this source.” says Jingen Xiang, et al. “A consistent description of the cloud properties along the line of sight that describes at the same time the halo radial profile, the halo lightcurves, and the column density from source spectroscopy is best achieved with a small subset of these models… The remainder of the dust along the line of sight is close to the black hole binary.”
Remove All Ads on Universe Today
Join our Patreon for as little as $3!
Get the ad-free experience for life
Located about 6,000 light years from Earth as measured by the Hipparcos satellite (but this value has a relatively high degree of uncertainty), Cygnus X-1 has been the topic for a huge amount of astronomical studies for nearly 50 years. We’re aware the blue supergiant variable star orbits its unseen companion at roughly 1/5 the distance of the Sun to the Earth (0.2 AU), and we surmised that stellar wind accounted for the accretion disk around the X-ray source. We are also aware of a pair of jets spewing material into interstellar space. Deep inside, superheated materials are sending out copious amounts of X-rays, but what else lay beyond? Can we separate star from event horizon with accuracy?
“We report a direct and accurate measurement of the distance to the X-ray binary Cygnus X-1, which contains the first black hole to be discovered. The distance of 1.86(-0.11,+0.12) kpc was obtained from a trigonometric parallax measurement using the Very Long Baseline Array. The position measurements are also sensitive to the 5.6 d binary orbit and we determine the orbit to be clockwise on the sky.” says Mark J. Reid, et al. “We also measured the proper motion of Cygnus X-1 which, when coupled to the distance and Doppler shift, gives the three-dimensional space motion of the system. When corrected for differential Galactic rotation, the non-circular (peculiar) motion of the binary is only about 21 km/s, indicating that the binary did not experience a large “kick” at formation.”
If you don’t think this is exciting news, then think again. “The compact primary in the X-ray binary Cygnus X-1 was the first black hole to be established via dynamical observations.” says Lijun Gou. “We have recently determined accurate values for its mass and distance, and for the orbital inclination angle of the binary. Building on these results, which are based on our favored (asynchronous) dynamical model, we have measured the radius of the inner edge of the black hole’s accretion disk by fitting its thermal continuum spectrum to a fully relativistic model of a thin accretion disk.”
Determining the spin rate has been high on the list of observations – and difficult because it changed states periodically. Only when it is in a soft spectral state can accurate measurements be taken. Oddly enough, for all the countless observations taken of Cygnus X-1 over the years, it has never been caught in a thermally dominant state. To that end, the black hole spin is measured by estimating the inner radius of the accretion disk.
“Our results take into account all significant sources of observational and model-parameter uncertainties, which are dominated by the uncertainties in black hole mass, orbital inclination angle and distance.” says the team. “The uncertainties introduced by the thin-disk model we employ are particularly small in this case, given the disk’s low luminosity.”
Heisenberg would be so proud….
Original Story Souce: Cornell University Library with facts from Wikipedia.
6 Replies to “Cygnus X-1: Blue Supergiant Pairs With Black Hole”
At the third paragraph, first line:
Since the clause within the parentheses is (I presume) referring to stated distance, the comma should come after the closing parenthesis and not before the opening one.
Somewhat more significant might be “caught in a thermal dominant state.” Assuming the “soft spectral state” refers to soft X-rays produced at low temperature, should that read “caught in a thermally dormant state.”?
Yeah, you’re right about that; I missed it for some reason — see the time stamp (GMT) on my comment!
i re-read the paper. it’s thermally dominant.
Cygnus X-1 was very interesting when first discovered. It is fun to see specifics about its mass and configuration, and to see what we can see, learn, and know about stellar mass black holes.
“Throughout this paper, we have used M = 14.8 ± 1.0 M? and i = 27.1 ± 0.8 deg for Model D, an asynchronous model with a rotational frequency for the O-star that is 40% greater than the orbital frequency. As an alternative to Model D, we now consider Model C, which assumes synchronous rotation. Model C gives a poorer fit”
Oh, locked vs unlocked rotation.
Btw, as I ripped through the paper [the latest of the arxiv listed] to find that, I stumbled on the observation that the spin measurements are arguable
“While it is not possible for us to account in detail for the gross difference between the near-zero spin reported by Miller et al. (2009) and our near-extreme value, we note the following:”
“The extreme spin we find for this black hole is based on an analysis of three broadband spectra that are each capable of constraining the soft thermal component, the hard Compton component, and the reflected component. The extreme spin we find is insensitive to the details of our analysis, as we have shown by employing a progression of five relativistic models and a wide array of model components.”
Comments are closed.