What is the Drake Equation?

Article Updated: 13 Jun , 2017
by

Is there life out there in the Universe? That is a question that has plagued humanity long before we knew just how vast the Universe was – i.e. before the advent of modern astronomy. Within the 20th century – thanks to the development of modern telescopes, radio astronomy, and space observatories – multiple efforts have been made in the hopes of finding extra-terrestrial intelligence (ETI).

And yet, humanity is still only aware of one intelligent civilization in the Universe – our own. And until we actually discover an alien civilization, the best we can do is conjecture about the likelihood of their existence. That’s where the famous Drake Equation – named after astronomer Dr. Frank Drake – comes into play. Developed in the 1960s, this equation estimates the number of possible civilizations out there based on a number of factors.

Background:

During the 1950s, the concept of using radio astronomy to search for signals that were extra-terrestrial in origin was becoming widely-accepted within the scientific community. The idea of listening for extra-terrestrial radio communications had been suggested as far back as the late 19th century (by Nikolai Tesla), but these efforts were concerned with looking for signs of life on Mars.

Frank Drake standing before his famous equation on a white board. Credit: SETI.org

Then, in September of 1959, Giuseppe Cocconi and Philip Morrison (who were both physics professors at Cornell University at the time) published an article in the journal Nature with the title “Searching for Interstellar Communications.” In it, they argued that radio telescopes had become sensitive enough that they could pick up transmissions being broadcast from other star systems.

Specifically, they argued that these messages might be transmitted at a wavelength of 21 cm (1420.4 MHz), the same wavelength of radio emissions by neutral hydrogen. As the most common element in the universe, they argued that extra-terrestrial civilizations would see this as a logical frequency at which to make radio broadcasts that could be picked up by other civilizations.

Seven months later, Frank Drake made the first systematic SETI survey at the National Radio Astronomy Observatory in Green Bank, West Virginia. Known as Project Ozma, this survey relied on the observatory’s 25-meter dish to monitor Epsilon Eridani and Tau Ceti – two nearby Sun-like stars – at frequencies close to 21 cm for six hours a day, between April and July of 1960.

Though unsuccessful, the survey piqued the interest of the scientific and SETI communities. It was followed shortly thereafter by a meeting at the Green Bank facility in 1961, where the subjects of SETI and searching for radio signals of extra-terrestrial origin were discussed. In preparation for this meeting, Drake prepared the equation that would come to bear his name. As he said of the equation’s creation:

“As I planned the meeting, I realized a few day[s] ahead of time we needed an agenda. And so I wrote down all the things you needed to know to predict how hard it’s going to be to detect extraterrestrial life. And looking at them it became pretty evident that if you multiplied all these together, you got a number, N, which is the number of detectable civilizations in our galaxy. This was aimed at the radio search, and not to search for primordial or primitive life forms.”

The meeting, which included such luminaries as Carl Sagan, was commemorated with a commemorative plaque that is still in the hall of the Green Bank Observatory today.

The 85-foot (26 m) Howard E. Tatel Radio Telescope at NRAO used in Project Ozma. Credit: Z22/WIkipedia Commons

The Formula:

The formula for the Drake Equation is as follows:

N = R* x fp x ne x fl x fi x fc x L

Whereas N is the number of civilizations in our galaxy that we might able to communicate with, R* is the average rate of star formation in our galaxy, fp is the fraction of those stars which have planets, ne is the number of planets that can actually support life, fl is the number of planets that will develop life, fi is the number of planets that develop intelligent life, fc is the number civilizations that would develop transmission technologies, and L is the length of time that these civilizations would have to transmit their signals into space.

Limits and Criticism:

Naturally, the Drake Equation has been subject to some criticism over the years, largely because a lot of the values it contains are assumed. Granted, some of the values it takes into account are easy enough to calculate, like the rate of star formation in the Milky Way. There are an estimated 200 – 400 billion stars within our Milky Way, and modern estimates say that there between 1.65 ± 0.19 and 3 new star form every year.

Assuming that our galaxy represents the average, and given that that there are as many as 2 trillion galaxies in the observable Universe (current estimates based on Hubble data), that means that there are as many as 1.5 to 6 trillion new stars being added to the Universe with every passing year! However, some of the other values are subject to a great deal of guess work.

For example, estimates on how many stars will have a system of planets has changed over time. Currently, it is estimated that the Milky Way contains 100 billion planets, which works out to about 50% of its stars having a planet of their own. Furthermore, those stars that have multiple planets will likely have one or two that lies within their habitable zone (aka. “Goldilocks Zone”) – where liquid water can exist on their surfaces.

Now let’s assume that 100% of planets located within a habitable zone will be able develop life in some form, that at least 1% of those life-supporting planets will be able to give rise to intelligent species, that 1% of these will be able to communicate, and that they will able to do so for a period of about 10,000 years. If we run those numbers through the Drake Equation, we end up with a value of 10.

In other words, there are possibly 10 civilizations in the Milky Way at any time capable of sending out signals that we could detect. But of course, the values used for four parameters there – fl, fi, fc and L – were entirely assumed. Without any real data to go by, there’s no real way to know how many alien civilizations could really be out there. There could just be 1 in the entire Universe (us), or millions in every galaxy!

The Fermi Paradox:

Beyond the issue of assumed values, the most pointed criticism of the Drake Equation tend to emphasize the argument put forth by physicist Enrico Fermi, known as the Fermi Paradox. This argument arose in 1950 as a result of conversation between Fermi and some colleagues while he was working at the Los Alamos National Laboratory. When the subject of UFOs and ETI came up, Fermi famously asked, “Where is everybody?”

This simple question summarized the conflict that existed between arguments that emphasized scale and the high probability of life emerging in the Universe with the complete lack of evidence that any such life exists. While Fermi was not the first scientists to ask the question, his name came to be associated with it due to his many writings on the subject.

In short, the Fermi Paradox states that, given the sheer number of stars in the Universe (many of which are billions of years older than our own), the high-probability that even a small fraction would have planets capable of giving rise to intelligent species, the likelihood that some of them would develop interstellar travel, and the time it would take to travel from one side of our galaxy to other (even allowing for sub-luminous speeds), humanity should have found some evidence of intelligent civilizations by now.

Naturally, this has given rise to many hypotheses as to how advanced civilizations could exist within our Universe but remain undetected. They include the possibility that intelligent life is extremely rare, that humanity is an early arrival to the Universe, that they do not exist (aka. the Hart-Tipler Conjecture), that they are in a state of slumber, or that we are simply looking in the wrong places.

The “Great Filter” Hypothesis:

But perhaps the best known explanation for why no signs of intelligence life have been found yet is the “Great Filter” hypothesis. This states that since that no extraterrestrial civilizations have been so far, despite the vast number of stars, then some step in the process – between life emerging and becomes technologically advanced – must be acting as a filter to reduce the final value.

According to this view, either it is very hard for intelligent life to arise, the lifetime of such civilizations is short, or the time they have to reveal their existence is short. Here too, various explanations have been offered to explain what the form the filter could take, which include Extinction Level Events (ELEs), the inability of life to create a stable environment in time, environmental destruction. and/or technology running amok (some of which we fear might happen to us!)

Alas, the Drake Equation has endured for decades for the very same reason that if often comes under fire. Until such time that humanity can find evidence of intelligent life in the Universe, or has ruled out the possibility based on countless surveys that actually inspect other star systems up close, we won’t be able to answer the question, “Where is everybody?”

As with many other cosmological mysteries, we’ll be forced to guess about what we don’t know based on what we do (or think we do). As astronomers study stars and planets with newer instruments, they might eventually be able to work out just how accurate the Drake Equation really is. And if our recent cosmological and exoplanet-hunting efforts have shown us anything, it is that we are just beginning to scratch the surface of the Universe at large!

In the coming years and decades, our efforts to learn more about extra-solar planets will expand to include research of their atmospheres – which will rely on next-generation instruments like the James Webb Space Telescope and the European Extremely-Large Telescope array. These will go a long way towards refining our estimates on how common potentially habitable worlds are.

In the meantime, all we can do is look, listen, wait and see…

We have written many articles about the Drake Equation for Universe Today. Here’s Inside the Drake Equation: A Chat with Frank Drake, The Odds of Intelligent Life in the Universe, A New Drake Equation? Other Life Not Likely to be Intelligent, A New Drake Equation for Potential of Life, Bayesian Analysis Rains on Exoplanet Life Parade, and Where are all the Aliens? The Fermi Paradox?

There are some great resources out there on the Internet. Check out this Drake Equation calculator.

We have recorded an entire episode of Astronomy Cast about the Drake Equation. Check it out here, Episode 23 – Counting Aliens with the Drake Equation.

Sources:

, , , , , ,



8 Responses

  1. Dan says:

    Maybe you can do an article/episode about the Rare Earth Hypothesis. How it stacks up against the Drake Equation, and why astronomers are generally pro-ETI while biologists are generally skeptical of ETI.

    • jjb54 says:

      This is a very good point.

      I recently read a good read about the ” Goldilocks Zone ” for Stars to have ” Earth Type Planets ” in their given Galaxy Location.

      It really made for a good read and well explained. That just like an Earth type planet has to be in JUST THE RIGHT PLACE …. and our Star also had to be in JUST THE RIGHT PLACE ….

      The Star’s location is just as important as the planet.

  2. rhgedaly says:

    The Drake Equation was specific to communications with ETI. If we instead are just interested in the number of detectable ETIs, then we can generalize parameter Fc to detectable technology (instead of transmission technology) and relax parameter L to be much longer than the lifetime of the civilization.

    For instance, an advanced technology may be detectable by the existence of enormous artificial structures (e.g. Dyson Sphere), unusual or geometric pattern/positioning of astronomical objects (stars, black holes ), the signature/pattern of energy generation or consumption (e.g. gamma rays with an energy frequency corresponding to matter/antimatter annihilation), the signature of certain compounds in planetary atmospheres, etc., some of which should still be detectable long after the civilization itself has disappeared.

  3. chfosmith says:

    The problem and hidden error in all of these discussions and questions is that “Earth has an advanced civilization.”

    In my opinion, any civilization that has not managed to develop “action at a distance” communication methods rather than relying on electromagnetic waves is primitive.
    In other words, if their technology is limited by the speed of light, they are not advanced.
    This advance will not occur soon. It was about 200 years between Sir Isaac Newton and Albert Einstein.
    I look forward to continuing this discussion in 2227 AD. (Joke)

  4. dougdwyer says:

    Fast Radio Bursts are narrow spectrum 1.4Ghz signals identical to that would be created by an entity but are probably of “natural” origin ,suprisingly similar to mobile phone preamble synch. Could be useful as an interstellar passive radar chirp source.
    The source possibly a resonant plasma sphere surrounding an old supernova creating a cosmic scale Maser oscillator.

  5. ProfMOZ says:

    IMHO Earth is unique, in fact so unique, that it is unlikely to discover, or being discovered, by an advanced civilization, simply because it my well NOT exist in our Milky Way ;-).
    Whatever the Drake equation stipulates is all conjecture, not more and not less.
    Asimov (who was also a scientist, apart from an SF writer) has probably been closer to the truth than anyone else in his Robot and Foundation series… In 20 years we will have independent machines, which are in many ways better than we will ever be. :D!
    One more thing: Since I can remember (more than 65 years) our Milky way has been described as 100 – 400 Billion stars by different scientists… when will we get close to the truth?

  6. Jim Krug says:

    Matt,

    Your articles have been awesome lately, and I don’t know how you have the time to write them all!

    I have seen many slightly different versions of the Drake Equation, in which the variables are listed slightly differently.

    However, what I would REALLY like to see today is for someone to re-calculate the Drake Equation. Frank Drake gave his ballpark estimations for these values decades before the first extrasolar planet was ever found. I believe his estimates on planet formation, etc were actually quite low in hindsight, and I would love to see the values re-calculated based on what we know today.

    • Why thank you, I try my best 🙂 And to be fair, the 100 billion planets estimate is pretty recent. It is true that Drake and his contemporaries were strictly guessing as to how many stars would have planets, whereas we are making slightly more educated estimates. 🙂

      Of course, the last three variables are still very much the stuff of guesswork. Until the James Webb is up and gathering data, we really won’t have any idea how statistically-likely habitable planets really are.

Leave a Reply