Maybe the Aliens Aren’t Hiding, they’re Sleeping, Waiting for the Universe to Get Better

When you consider that age of the Universe – 13.8 billion years by our most recent counts –  and that which is “observable” to us measures about 93 billion light-years in diameter, you begin to wonder why we haven’t found signs of extra-terrestrial intelligence (ETI) beyond our Solar System. To paraphrase Enrico Fermi, the 20th-century physicists who advanced the famous Fermi Paradox – “where the heck are all the aliens?”

Naturally, Fermi’s Paradox has attracted a lot of theoretical explanations over the years – which include ETI being very rare, humanity being early to the Universe, and the aliens being extinct! But a new study by a team of scientists from the Future of Humanity Institute (FHI) offers a different take on this age-old paradox. According to their study, the key to answering this question is to consider the possibility that the aliens are engaged in “aestivation”.

Essentially, aestivation is a prolonged state of torpor that organisms enter into during a particularly hot or dry period. Similar to what hibernating animals do during the winter, this state is designed to keep creatures alive until more favorable conditions emerge. And when applied to the cosmos, this concept could explain why one of the key things astronomers have been looking for – i.e. activity – has been lacking.

The study was led by Anders Sandberg, a research associate to the Oxford Uehiro Center for Practical Ethics, the Oxford Center for Neuroethics, and the James Martin Research Fellow at FHI. Cryptically titled, “That is Not Dead Which Can Eternal Lie: the Aestivation Hypothesis for Resolving Fermi‚Äôs Paradox“, their study considers the possibility that advanced alien civilizations might be difficult to find because they are sleeping right now.

This is not the first time Sandberg has addressed questions arising out of the Fermi Paradox. In a previous study, he and Stuart Armstrong (also a research associate with the FHI and one of the co-authors on this study) extended the Fermi Paradox to look beyond our own galaxy, addressing how more advanced civilizations would feasibly be able to launch colonization projects with relative ease (and even travel between galaxies without difficulty).

In the end, they concluded that civilizations from millions of galaxies should have been able to reach us by now, which only serves to bring the Fermi Paradox into greater focus. If these early civilizations are around, why are they not visible to us? The reason for this, they claim in this new study, has to do with the thermodynamics of computation.

According to this basic rule, the cost of a certain amount of computation is proportional to the temperature it generates. For some time, astronomers and cosmologists have been aware that the Universe is steadily cooling down over the time. Not only is star formation in galaxies slowly dying out over the course of billions of years, but even the cosmic background radiation is becoming colder.

Artist’s conception of city lights on an alien planet. Credit: David A. Aguilar (CfA)

As such, it makes sense that ancient and advanced civilizations would want to wait for cooler conditions to prevail. Sandberg explained to Universe Today via email:

“The core idea is that if advanced civilizations mainly or solely care about computation, then it is rational for them to wait until the Universe is much older than now. The reason is that the energy cost (which will eventually limit how much computation you can do) is proportional to temperature, and this means that the far future is vastly more hospitable than the hot present. If this were true, we have a nice explanation for the apparent absence of big old civilizations. It would also lead to observable consequences: a reduction in processes that waste resources they would want in the late eras.”

Timing is a key feature to this hypothesis. Much like the theory that humanity may have arrived early to the Universe, this theory states that the lack of detection has to do with species being in different places in their biological/technological evolution. In this case, the aestivation period of early civilizations has coincided with the subsequent rise of humanity as an space-faring and technologically-adept species.

Herein lies another reason why ancient civilizations might want to take a cosmic nap. Given how long life needs in order to emerge – humanity took roughly 4.5 billion years to get to where it is today – then it stands to reason that ancient civilizations might want to skip ahead a few eons in order to let new races emerge.

Ever since it was first announced in 2015, there has been speculation as to what could account for the dimming of KIC 8462852. Credit:

“There is an entropy cost to irreversible logical operations, including error correction,” said Sanders. “So unless there is some magical energy source or entropy sink, if you want to do as much computation as possible you should wait until the cosmic background radiation levels off. In addition, civilizations may want to go to the future if they want to meet other, independently evolved civilizations. If intelligence is rare in time and space but aestivates to the far future, then it will meet there.”

Of course, the aestivation hypothesis (much like the Drake Equation and the Fermi Paradox) is based on a few assumptions about what ETI would be capable of. These include:

  1. There are civilizations that mature much earlier than humanity.
  2. These civilizations can expand over sizeable volumes, gaining power over their contents.
  3. These civilizations have solved their coordination problems.
  4. A civilization can retain control over its volume against other civilizations.
  5. The fraction of mature civilizations that aestivate is non-zero
  6. Aestivation is largely invisible.

In other words, the hypothesis assumes the existence of civilizations that are more advanced than humanity which is based on the notion that they have had billions of years to develop elsewhere in the Universe. These civilizations would be higher on the Kardashev Scale (between Level II and III) by now, meaning that they had evolved to the point where they could harness the energy of entire star systems and perhaps even galaxies.

Also, it assumes that these civilizations would have become space-faring races that had expanded to occupy parts of the cosmos that lie well beyond their own star systems. Ultimately, those civilizations that have chosen to become dormant would therefore be invisible to us since they are not currently traveling between stars and galaxies, smashing up planets to create megastructures, or consuming entire stars for fuel.

You know, the kind of stuff we think mega-civilizations would do. Which naturally raises the question, how might we be able to detect such civilizations at rest? To this, Sandberg has a few possible suggestions, ones which ETI-hunters may want to heed:

“Look for galaxies that either move out of the way of galaxy collisions or towards big clusters by ejecting mass or energy in one direction, or have an unusually low number of heavy blue-white stars, or otherwise avoid losing gas to interstellar space. Or, try launching a self-replicating space probe to pave the universe and see if somebody stops you.”

As with all things having to do with aliens and ETI, a measure of guess-work is required here. And some would naturally argue that it is also possible that advanced civilizations are not subject to the same limitations we humans are, which would limit our ability to speculate here. In the end, we humans are required to theorize about what we don’t know based on what we do – aka. the “low-hanging fruit” approach.

The findings reported in the study were also the subject of a talk that took place at the second annual meeting of the UK SETI Research Network (UKSRN), which took place on September 11th and 12th, 2014, at Birkbeck College in London.

Further Reading: arXiv

13 Replies to “Maybe the Aliens Aren’t Hiding, they’re Sleeping, Waiting for the Universe to Get Better”

  1. I would be incredibly surprised if were to see travelers from other planets. It would mean that they are tremendously more technologically advanced than we are. It is fun to contemplate such encounters but take our civilization for example. We have only recently had one of our primitive probes leave the confines of our small solar system, not to mention travel interstellar distances. At the very least I believe it will be several hundred years at a minimum until we have a maned mission that would leave our system.
    Why would we think other civilizations developed to that technological level much quicker than us. Hopefully we find through research that Einstein was wrong and there is a way to travel faster than the speed of light and that we can find a way to harness such power, although I doubt that our Government would fund NASA to the level needed to do so.

    1. That’s not what is being argued here. The argument isn’t that other life forms evolved faster than we did, but that advanced species have likely been evolving long before we showed up. Our Solar System has only existed for about 4.5 billion years. Meanwhile, the oldest galaxy in the Universe discovered to date is 13.2 billion years old.

      From this, many astronomers and SETI researchers tend to think that humanity is a more recent addition to the cosmos, and that there are surely species that have existed for far longer out there.

      Also, Einstein was NOT wrong. The speed of light is inviolable (as far as we know) and all attempts at experimentation thus far have only yielded possible ways to get around it, not break it.

  2. This is the dumbest theory ever devised, the aliens are hibernating? They’re gonna wait billions of years for the universe to cool down? They couldn’t invent air conditioning?

  3. The real debate arising out of the Fermi Paradox is:
    Is the planet earth under quarantine as a primitive planet after the Extra Terrestrials viewed the news clips of Stalin, Hitler, Mao Zedong, and other dictators, or does earth fall under the category of a primitive planet, and is thus subject to the Prime Directive, because “Action at a distance” communication has not been invented yet on Earth? (Some variation of Quantum Entanglement)
    Everything else is just a giant ego trip by earthlings.

    Note: The Drake Equation gives a different result when updated to include the effects of Gamma Ray Bursts, etc.

  4. Reminds me of the Hitchhiker’s Guide To The Galaxy when our heroes land on Magrathea and wake up Slartibartfast who along with the other Magratheans has gone into hibernation until the rest of the galaxy can afford their planetary designs. Just as funny.

  5. A dumb theory … it assumes that every advanced ETI goes down this path without exception, and that it occurs before a stage in their technology where they might make their presence known intentionally or unintentionally.

  6. Here’s an alternative … an ETI only slightly more advanced than ours should be able to computationally model the probable outcomes of making their presence known. And perhaps their simulations show that it eventually and inevitably results in their subjugation or extinction.

  7. In the future we should have the computer power to run simulations for the creation and evolution of life. Perhaps we may discover that there is a vast diversity in consciousness and sentience that doesn’t necessarily share human-type values and motivations. It may not be extraterrestrial intelligence that is rare but rather our curiosity and desire to explore, understand nature and science, and create and use technology.

  8. the way I see it, we’re looking for civilizations similar to our own. with the recent proof of a fifth dimension (see gravitational waves) more advanced civilizations would interact outside the branes. or within the branes but undetectable. we still have a long way to go beyond flesh.

Comments are closed.