Cosmology

A New Way to Measure the Expansion Rate of the Universe: Redshift Drift

In 1929 Edwin Hubble published the first solid evidence that the universe is expanding. Drawing upon data from Vesto Slipher and Henrietta Leavitt, Hubble demonstrated a correlation between galactic distance and redshift. The more distant a galaxy was, the more its light appeared shifted to the red end of the spectrum. We now know this is due to cosmic expansion. Space itself is expanding, which makes distant galaxies appear to recede away from us. The rate of this expansion is known as the Hubble parameter, and while we have a good idea of its value, there is still a bit of tension between different results.

One of the difficulties in resolving this tension is that thus far we can only measure cosmic expansion as it appears right now. This also means we can’t determine whether cosmic expansion is due to general relativity or a more subtle extension of Einstein’s model. But as powerful new telescopes are built, we might be able to observe the evolution of cosmic expansion thanks to what is known as the redshift drift effect.

The Hubble parameter has a value of about 70 km/s per Megaparsec. This means if a galaxy is about 1 Megaparsec away (about 3 million light-years), then the galaxy appears to be moving away from us at about 70 km/s. If a galaxy is 2 Megaparsecs away, it will appear to recede at about 140 km/s. The greater a galaxy’s distance, the greater its apparent speed. Since the Universe is still expanding, with each passing year a galaxy is a bit more distant, and that means its redshift should become slightly larger. In other words, cosmic expansion means that the redshifts of galaxies should drift more to the red over time.

Theoretical redshift drift based on the standard model. Credit: ESO / ELT Science Case

This drift is extremely small. For a galaxy 12 Billion light-years away, its apparent speed would be about 95% of the speed of light, while its drift would be just 15 cm/s each year. That’s much too small for current telescopes to observe. But when the Extremely Large Telescope (ELT) starts gathering data in 2027, it should be able to observe this drift in time. Estimates are that after 5 – 10 years of precise observations, ELT should be able to see redshift drifts on the order of 5 cm/s. While this will become a powerful tool in our understanding of the universe, it will take a lot of data and a lot of time. So a new paper proposes a different method using gravitational lensing.

The authors call this effect redshift difference. Rather than observing the redshift of a galaxy over decades, the team proposes looking for distant galaxies that are gravitationally lensed by a closer galaxy. Lots of distant galaxies are lensed by a closer galaxy between us and the distant one, but most lensed galaxies appear as a single distorted arc to the side of the foreground galaxy.

How gravitational lensing can create multiple galaxy images. Credit: NASA/CXC/M.Weiss

But sometimes gravitational lensing can create multiple images of a distant galaxy. Since each image of the distant galaxy takes a slightly different path to reach us, the distance of each path is also slightly different. So instead of waiting decades for a galaxy to move farther away from us, we can get snapshots of the galaxy separated by years or decades. Each image would have a slightly different redshift, and by comparing these we could measure the redshift drift.

This is still beyond our current ability to detect. But while we are waiting for telescopes such as the ELT to come online, we can search for distant lensed galaxies with multiple images. That way when we do have the ability to detect redshift drift, we won’t have to wait decades for the result.

Reference: Melia, Fulvio. “Definitive test of the R h = ct universe using redshift drift.” Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society: Letters 463.1 (2016): L61-L63.

Reference: Wang, Chengyi, Krzysztof Bolejko, and Geraint F. Lewis. “The Redshift Difference in Gravitational Lensed Systems: A Novel Probe of Cosmology.arXiv preprint arXiv:2308.07529 (2023).

Brian Koberlein

Brian Koberlein is an astrophysicist and science writer with the National Radio Astronomy Observatory. He writes about astronomy and astrophysics on his blog. You can follow him on YouTube, and on Twitter @BrianKoberlein.

Recent Posts

Could Planets Orbiting Two Stars Have Moons?

Exomoons are a hot topic in the science community, as none have been confirmed with…

2 hours ago

Webb Weighs an Early Twin of the Milky Way

Astronomers have used JWST to weigh a galaxy in the early Universe, finding that it…

12 hours ago

Do the Fastest Spinning Pulsars Contain Quark Matter?

When a massive star dies as a supernova, it can leave behind a pulsar, a…

14 hours ago

Another Clue About the Ultra-High Energy Cosmic Rays: Magnetic Turbulence

Space largely seems quite empty! Yet even in the dark voids of the cosmos, ultra-high-energy…

1 day ago

NASA Thinks it Knows Why Ingenuity Crashed on Mars

NASA’s Ingenuity helicopter sent its final signals to Earth in the earlier part of the…

1 day ago

New Research may Explain how Supermassive Black Holes in the Early Universe Grew so Fast

Not long ago, the James Webb Space Telescope (JWST) peered into Cosmic Dawn, the cosmological…

1 day ago