Neutron Star Suffers a “Glitch”, Gives Astronomers a Glimpse Into How They Work

What, exactly, is the inside of a neutron star like?

A neutron star is what remains after a massive star goes supernova. It’s a tightly-packed, ultra-dense body made of—you guessed it—neutrons. Actually, that’s not absolutely true.

Mathematical models show that neutron stars are made up of layers, and in those layers there are things other than just neutrons. But as you look deeper into a neutron star, you see more and more tightly-packed neutrons, and less of anything else. Once you get to the core, it’s mostly neutrons.

We’re not certain, exactly, what the interior of a neutron star looks like, but mathematical models suggest they’re like this. Image Credit: By Robert Schulze – Own work, CC BY-SA 3.0,

But it’s the ‘looking deeper into a neutron star’ that’s the problematic part. Nobody’s ever seen the inside of one.

Astronomers are stuck observing the exterior of neutron stars from a distance to try to understand them. Physics and mathematical models help, but there’s no substitute for actual observation. Luckily, sometimes neutron stars suffer “glitches,” and those glitches are an opportunity to learn something about these ultra-dense bodies.

Neutron stars rotate. They can also emit electromagnetic radiation from their poles, and when that radiation is pointed at Earth intermittently during the star’s rotation, we can see the beams. These neutron stars are called pulsars.

In this animation of a neutron pulsar, the pink is gamma radiation. The green are the narrow beams of radio waves that can only be detected when they’re pointed at Earth. Video: NASA

For the most part that rotation is very regular, and very rapid. But sometimes they rotate faster, and that happens when portions of the interior of the star move towards the exterior. For a brief astronomical moment, this glitch can let astronomers gain some insight into these perplexing objects.

In 2016, astronomers using the Mt. Pleasant telescope observed the Vela Pulsar glitching. The Vela Pulsar is about 1000 light years away, in the constellation Vela. It’s the brightest pulsar in the sky in radio frequencies, and it’s also the most well-known of all the glitching pulsars. Only about 5% of pulsars glitch, and Vela glitches about every three years.

This Chandra image shows the Vela Pulsar as a bright white spot in the middle of the picture, surrounded by hot gas shown in yellow and orange. A jet of material is wiggling from the hot gas in the upper right. Image Credit: By NASA/CXC/PSU/G.Pavlov et al. –, Public Domain,

This neutron star, which like all neutron stars is only several kilometers in diameter, normally rotates at about 11 times per second. But during the 2016 glitch, the star’s rotation sped up. This was the first time that it was observed glitching live.

In a paper published in the journal Nature Astronomy, a team of scientists re-analyzed the data from the 2016 glitch. The paper is called “Rotational evolution of the Vela pulsar during the 2016 glitch.” The first author is Dr. Greg Ashton of the Monash School of Physics and Astronomy.

The main finding of their re-analysis is that the glitch is more than just a simple increase of rotational velocity. The star rapidly spun up, before relaxing to glitch speed. According to the authors, the behavior of Vela during the glitch gave them a glimpse into the make-up of the interior of the neutron star.

They say that neutron stars have three distinct layers. In a press release, co-author Paul Lasky, also from the Monash School of Physics and Astronomy, said, “One of these components, a soup of super-fluid neutrons in the inner layer of the crust, moves outwards first and hits the rigid outer crust of the star causing it to spin up. But then, a second soup of super-fluid that moves in the core catches up to the first, causing the spin of the star to slow back down.”

They call this phenomenon an overshoot. According to the authors, other scientists have predicted this in studies, but it hasn’t been observed.

“This overshoot has been predicted a couple of times in the literature, but this is the first real time it’s been identified in observations,” Lasky said.

Study co-author Dr Vanessa Graber from McGill University was one of the scientists to predict this overshoot, and she talked about it in her 2018 paper “Rapid crust coupling and glitch rises in superfluid neutron stars.”

But during the live observation of Vela in 2016, the rotating neutron star displayed some other odd behavior: prior to the glitch it actually slowed down. This is something that’s never been observed before.

“Immediately before the glitch, we noticed that the star seems to slow down its rotation rate before spinning back up,” Dr Ashton said. “We actually have no idea why this is, and it’s the first time it’s ever been seen.”

Artist’s illustration of a rotating neutron star, the remnants of a super nova explosion. Credit: NASA, Caltech-JPL

“It could be related to the cause of the glitch, but we’re honestly not sure,” Ashton said.

This study is a new piece of the puzzle when it comes to neutron stars. They’re calling the slow down that precedes the spin-up an “anti-glitch.” The anti-glitch is followed by the “overshoot” which was predicted by co-author Graber and others. Then, there’s the relaxation down to the actual glitch speed. This three-step sequence hasn’t been observed in its entirety before. The authors think that this three-step model for glitches is an important discovery.

In the conclusion of their paper they say, “During the 2016 glitch, the Vela pulsar first spun down. A few seconds later it rapidly spun up, before finally spinning down with an exponential relaxation time of ? 60 s. This model is substantially favoured over a simple step glitch, or one with only a single spin-up event.”

It’s the observation of the anti-glitch that’s key. If astronomers are able to observe other pulsars behaving like this, then they can test predictions against them.

Artist’s illustration of a neutron star, a tiny remnant that remains after its predecessor star explodes. Here, the 12-mile (20-kilometer) sphere is compared with the size of Hannover, Germany. Credit: NASA’s Goddard Space Flight Center

But for now, there’s only one observed instance of the anti-glitch. Without more observation evidence, scientists are limited to models. As the authors say in the conclusion of their paper, “Analyses like that presented herein only assess the relative evidence of models.” Also, “Even the best fitting models tested here do not explain all the features in the data.”

The authors suspect that their analysis will re-ignite more observation and study of neutron stars and their glitches, and to inspire some new theories.


Evan Gough

Recent Posts

China and Russia Announce their Future Plans for the Moon, Including a Human Base

China and Russia have released a Guide that details their plans for a lunar base…

17 hours ago

Astrobiologists Detect a Signature of Life Remotely. Don’t get too Excited, Though, it was With a Helicopter Here on Earth

Chirality is a word normally found in biological textbooks that will occasionally pop up in…

18 hours ago

Teeny Tiny Space Telescope has Taken Thousands of Pictures of Both Earth and Space

A new nanosat has been quietly snapping over 4500 pictures of the Earth and the…

21 hours ago

Space Telescopes Could Provide Next-Level Images of Black Hole Event Horizons

Back in 2019, the world was treated to the first ever image of a black…

21 hours ago

Supermassive Black Hole Winds Were Already Blowing Less Than a Billion Years After the Big Bang

New evidence shows that black holes and galaxies have a significant effect on each other…

2 days ago

Juno Captured This Image of Earth on its Way Out to Jupiter Back in 2013

Since the Juno spacecraft has been in orbit around Jupiter for nearly five years --…

2 days ago