Internet Search Yields No Evidence of Time Travelers

Article written: 6 Jan , 2014
Updated: 23 Dec , 2015

You can find anything on the internet, right? A new study reveals, however, that you can’t find evidence of time travelers on the internet. Credible time travelers, that is.

The study was conducted by astrophysicist Robert Nemiroff who is part of the Astronomy Picture of the Day (APOD) team, along with some of his students from Michigan Technological University.

They did three separate types of searches, and developed a search strategy based on what they call “prescient knowledge.” They looked for discussions on social media and various websites where there might be evidence of a mention of something or someone before people should have known about it. If they were able to find evidence of that, it could indicate that whoever wrote it had traveled from the future.

They selected search terms relating to two recent phenomena, Pope Francis and Comet ISON, and began looking for references to them before they were known to exist.

First, they looked for specific terms on Twitter, then secondly looked for “prescient” inquiries submitted to a search engine, and the third search involved a request for a direct Internet communication, either by email or tweet, pre-dating to the time of the inquiry.

The team used a variety of search engines, such as Google and Bing, and combed through Facebook and Twitter.

Their results? “No time travelers were discovered,” says the abstract of their paper.

“In our limited search we turned up nothing,” Nemiroff said in a press release. “I didn’t really think we would. But I’m still not aware of anyone undertaking a search like this. The Internet is essentially a vast database, and I thought that if time travelers were here, their existence would have already come out in some other way, maybe by posting winning lottery numbers before they were selected.”

So far, no lottery winners have confessed to using time travel to make their winnings.

In the case of Comet ISON, there were no mentions before it was discovered in September 2012. They discovered only one blog post referencing a Pope Francis before Jorge Mario Bergoglio was elected head of the Catholic Church on March 16, but it seemed more accidental than prescient.

In the third part of their search, the researchers created a post in September 2013 asking readers to email or tweet one of two messages on or before August 2013: “#ICanChangeThePast2” or “#ICannotChangeThePast2.”

No replies have been given … yet.

And just in case you’re wondering credible time travelers do not include the two “chrononauts” who said they time traveled with a young Barack Obama.

Nemiroff and physics graduate student Teresa Wilson will present their findings today, Monday, Jan. 6, at the American Astronomical Society meeting in Washington, DC.


8 Responses

  1. novenator says

    This is some great popular science. By the way, didn’t Stephen Hawking do an experiment like this previously where he sent out invitations to a party AFTER it happened?

  2. Joe_de_Loe says

    So, if they had found evidence of time travel, there would have been a furor in the media. The time travellers would have seen that and then they’d know to nix any internet chatter about the Pope and the comet. Which means that the study would turn out with a negative result. So there was no media furor. Knowing this, the time travellers could then safely talk about the Pope and the comet.
    I sure hope my tax money didn’t go to this study.

  3. Martin says

    I get emails from the future every so often, but silly me, I thought it meant that somebody’s clock was wrong.

  4. Member
    Gerald McKeegan says

    Please tell me no government money was used to finance this foolishness.

    • Grimbold says

      It seems frivolous, but there is a place in science for explicitly verifying what we’re already confident of. It guards against nasty surprises later.

      • Jason blodgett says

        teaching michigan tech students how to conduct a research project doesnt seem so foolish. Also, get off my lawn!

  5. Ivan B says

    Would this study also be good for debunking ‘psychics’? I think so

  6. Member
    Aqua4U says

    On a whim I go into the ‘Psychic-deli’ and my order is waiting for me by the cash register…. hot and toasty and just like I like it!

Comments are closed.