Universe Today

Nothing in my jewelry box compares to the Kappa Crucis Cluster, also known as NGC 4755 or simply the “Jewel Box.” This object is just bright enough to be seen with the unaided eye, but a combination of images taken by three exceptional telescopes, the Very Large Telescope, the 2.2-meter telescope at the La Silla observatory and the Hubble Space Telescope, has allowed the stunning Jewel Box star cluster to be seen in a whole new light. Above is the image from ESO' Very Large Telescope, which zooms in for a close look at the cluster itself. This new image is one of the best ever taken of this cluster from the ground, taken with an exposure time of just 5 seconds.
Read more…

Filed under: Astronomy, Hubble | 6 Comments »

Object Name: Messier 26
Alternative Designations: M26, NGC 6694
Object Type: Open Galactic Star Cluster
Constellation: Scutum
Right Ascension: 18 : 45.2 (h:m)
Declination: -09 : 24 (deg:m)
Distance: 5.0 (kly)
Visual Brightness: 8.0 (mag)
Apparent Dimension: 15.0 (arc min)

Locating Messier 26: Finding Messier 26 in binoculars is easy as far as location goes – but not so easy distinguishing it from the starfield. Begin with the constellation of Aquila and its brightest star – Alpha. As you move southwest, count the stars down the Eagle's back… When you reach three you are at the boundary of the constellation of Scutum. While maps make Scutum's stars appear easy to find, they really aren't. The next most easily distinguished star in the line in Alpha Scutii. Aim your binoculars or finderscope there and you'll see northern Epsilon and southern Delta to the east. Messier 26 is slightly southeast of Delta and will show as a slight compression in the starfield to small binoculars and resolve a few individual stars to larger ones. In a finderscope, it will be a very vague brightening – perhaps not seen at all depending on your finder's aperture. In even a small telescope, however, you'll be pleased with what you see! Medium magnification will light up this 8th magnitude galactic star cluster and mid-sized instruments will fully resolve it.

What You Are Looking At: When this cloud of stars formed some 89 million years ago, it was probably far more compact than today's size of a 22 light year span. At a happy distance of about 5,000 light years from our solar system, we can't quite see into the nucleus to determine just how dense it may actually be because of an obscuring cloud of interstellar matter. However, we do know a little bit about the stars contained within it. "The relations between color and apparent magnitude show that NGC 6694 contains a well-defined main sequence and a slight indication of a giant branch." says James Cuffey, "A zone of low star density 3' from the center of NGC 6694 is noted. The ratio between general and selective absorption is estimated from the available data on red color indices in obscured clusters. Although uncertain in many cases, the results tend to confirm the ratio predicted by the law of scattering."

However boring a field of stars may look upon first encounter, studies are important to our understanding how our galaxy evolved and the timeline incurred. "Star Clusters are unique because all of the stars in the cluster essentially have the same age and are roughly the same distance from Earth." says Kayla Young of the Manhasset Science Research team, "Therefore, the purpose was to determine if a correlation exists between mean absolute magnitude and age of a star cluster. The absolute magnitude for star cluster NGC 6694 was calculated to be about 1.34 + .9. Using the B-V (Photometric Analysis) data ages were also calculated. After a scatter plot was created, the line of best fit demonstrated an exponential relation between the age and absolute magnitude."

History: While Messier Object 26 won't be impressive in binoculars – remember that it's much the same view that Charles himself got when he discovered it on the night of June 20, 1764: "I discovered another cluster of stars near Eta and Omicron in Antinous [now Alpha and Delta Scuti] among which there is one which is brighter than the others: with a refractor of three feet, it is not possible to distinguish them, it requires to employ a strong instrument: I saw them very well with a Gregorian telescope which magnified 104 times: among them one doesn't see any nebulosity, but with a refractor of 3 feet and a half, these stars don't appear individually, but in the form of a nebula; the diameter of that cluster may be 2 minutes of arc. I have determined its position with regard to the star o of Antinous, its right ascension is 278d 5' 25", and its declination 9d 38' 14" south."

Later, Bode would report a few stars with nebulosity – a field that simply wouldn't resolve to his telescope. William Herschel would spare it but only a brief glance, saying: "A cluster of scattered stars, not rich." While John Herschel would later go on to class it with its NGC designation, it was Admiral Smyth who would most aptly describe M26 for the true galactic cluster we know it to be…

"A small and coarse, but bright, cluster of stars, preceding the left foot of Antinous, in a fine condensed part of the Milky Way; and it follows 2 Aquilae by only a half degree. The principle members of this group lie nearly in a vertical position with the equatorial line, and the place is that of a small pair in the south, or upper portion of the field [in telescope]. This neat double star is of the 9th and 10th magnitudes, with an angle [PA] = 48 deg, and is followed by an 8th [mag star], the largest [brightest] in the assemblage, by 4s. Altogether the object is pretty, and must, from all analogy, possess affinity among its various components; but the collocation and adjustment of these wondrous firmamental clusters, and their probable distances, almost stun our present faculties. There are many astral splashes in this crowded district of the Galaxy, among which fine specimens of what may be termed luminiferous ether, are met with."

Power up! See how many stars you can – and can't – resolve in this dusty, curtained, distant beauty!

Top image thanks to Palomar Observatory, courtesy of Caltech and color image thanks to Hillary Mathis, Vanessa Harvey, REU program/NOAO/AURA/NSF.

Filed under: Astronomy | Comments Off

Object Name: Messier 25
Alternative Designations: M25, IC 4725
Object Type: Open Galactic Star Cluster
Constellation: Sagittarius
Right Ascension: 18 : 31.6 (h:m)
Declination: -19 : 15 (deg:m)
Distance: 2.0 (kly)
Visual Brightness: 4.6 (mag)
Apparent Dimension: 32.0 (arc min)

Locating Messier 25: Finding Messier 25 in binoculars is quite easy. Simply start at the teapot "lid" star, Lambda, and aim about a fist width almost due north. Here you will encounter a a Cepheid variable – U Sagittarii. This one is a quick change artist, going from magnitude 6.3 to 7.1 in less than seven days, so although it is a cluster member, it may fade on you from time to time as a marker star! M25 will appear a a loose, but bright association of stars in binoculars and as a faint hazy spot in binoculars – but behold incredible resolution in a telescope. You'll love the different magnitudes, so stick to around low to medium magnifications to enjoy it most.

What You Are Looking At: This galactic star cluster was originally discovered by Philippe Loys de Cheseaux in 1745 and included in Charles Messier's catalog in 1764. Oddly enough, it was one of those curious objects that didn't get cataloged by Sir John Herschel – therefore it never received a New General Catalog (NGC) number. Strange considering it was part of the 1777 catalog of Johann Elert Bode, observed by William Herschel in 1783, written about by Admiral Smyth in 1836 and even commented on by the Reverend Thomas William Webb in 1859! It was until J.L.E. Dreyer in 1908 that poor little M25 ended up getting added to the second Index Catalog.

Cruising along peacefully about 2,000 light-years away from Earth, this little group of stars spans across about 19 light years of space. Caught inside of its influence are four giant stars – two of spectral type M and two of type G. As we know, it contains the variable star U Sagittarii, a Delta Cephei-type, which lets us know this group of 86 or so stars may have began life together as long ago as 90 million years.

But how many stars are really in there? If you're using a large aperture telescope, you're probably detecting the signature of several just beyond the threshold limits… And so has more recent scientific studies. "The young open star cluster M25 (IC 4725) is located in the direction of the galactic center in a crowded region, near much irregular absorption features on Sagittarius arm. This cluster has some difficult observing problems due to its southern location. The mass data available in the literature have been gathered to re investigate this cluster using most photometric tools to determine its main photometric parameters." says A.L. Tadross (et al) of the National Research Institute of Astronomy and Geophysics, "More than 220 stars with mean reddening of 0.50 mag and absorption of 1.62 mag are found within the cluster."

And how many of those stars are surprises? Let's try a few blue straggler stars… "Combination of high-precision photometry and spectroscopy allows the detailed study of the upper main sequence in open clusters. We are carrying out a comprehensive study of a number of clusters containing Be stars in order to evaluate the likelihood that a significant number of Be stars form through mass exchange in a binary. Our first results show that most young open clusters contain blue stragglers. In spite of the small number of clusters so far analyzed, some trends are beginning to emerge." says A. Marco (et al), "In younger open clusters, such as NGC 869 and NGC 663, there are many blue stragglers, most of which are not Be stars. In older clusters, such as IC 4725, the fraction of Be stars among blue stragglers is very high. Two Be blue stragglers are moderately strong X-ray sources, one of them being a confirmed X-ray binaries. Such objects must have formed through binary evolution. We discuss the contribution of mass transfer in a close binary to the formation of both blue stragglers and Be stars."

History: Perhaps we know more about it today than our historic astronomers, but we owe it to folks like Charles Messier who took the time to catalog it. Let's take a look at his notes: "In the same night, June 20 to 21, 1764, I have determined the position of another star cluster in the vicinity of the two preceding, between the head and the extremity of the bow of Sagittarius, and almost on the same parallel as the two others: the closest known star is that of the sixth magnitude, the twenty-first of Sagittarius, in the catalog of Flamsteed: this cluster is composed of small stars which one sees with difficulty with an ordinary refractor of 3 feet: it doesn't contain any nebulosity, and its extension may be 10 minutes of arc. I have determined its position by comparing with the star Mu Sagittarii; its right ascension has been found at 274d 25', and its declination at 19d 5' south."

Perhaps William Herschel understood there was more there to be seen, for he commented in his unpublished notes; "Very large, bright, stars and some small, faint ones; I counted 70, and there are many more within no considerable extent."

Yet, it was Admiral Smyth who really understood what lay beyond. From his observations he writes: "A loose cluster of large and small stars in the Galaxy, between the Archer's head and Sobieski's shield; of which a pair og 8th magnitudes, the principle of a set something in the form of a jew's harp, are above registered. The gathering portion of the group assumes an arched form, and is thickly strewn in the south, on the upper part, where a pretty knot of minute glimmers occupies the center, with much star-dust around. It was discovered in 1764 by Messier, and estimated by him at 10' in extent: it is 5 deg to the north-east of Mu Sagittarii, and nearly on the parallel of Beta Scorpii, which glimmers far away in the west."

May the star dust be yours to enjoy as well!

Top image thanks to Palomar Observatory, courtesy of Caltech and color image thanks to Hillary Mathis, Vanessa Harvey, REU program/NOAO/AURA/NSF.

Filed under: Astronomy | Comments Off