8 Ridiculous Things Bigger Than NASA’s Budget

by Nancy Atkinson on May 27, 2009

Astronaut John Grusnfeld on the recent Hubble servicing mission. Credit: NASA

Astronaut John Grusnfeld on the recent Hubble servicing mission. Credit: NASA


Why do we explore? In the days of Magellan, Columbus and da Gama, undoubtedly the average person thought it was foolish to risk lives and spend large amounts of money to find out what was beyond the horizon. Those explorers didn’t find what they expected, but their explorations changed the world. What drives us to explore and discover is what we don’t know, and the spirit of exploration inspires us to create and invent so that we can go explore and possibly change the world. We don’t know yet exactly what we’ll find if humans ever go to Mars, Europa or beyond, but if we stay in our caves we’ll never find out. Similarly, space probes and telescopes like Hubble, as well as ground-based telescopes have helped us explore remotely and have facilitated the discovery of so many things we didn’t know — and didn’t expect — about our universe.

However, exploration takes money.

The most often-used argument against space exploration is that we should use that money to alleviate problems here on Earth. But that argument fails to realize that NASA doesn’t just pack millions of dollar bills into a rocket and blast them into space. The money NASA uses creates jobs, providing an opportunity for some of the world’s brightest minds to use their talents to, yes, actually benefit humanity. NASA’s exploration spurs inventions that we use everyday, many which save lives and improve the quality of life. Plus, we’re expanding our horizons and feeding our curiosity, while learning so, so much and attempting to answer really big questions about ourselves and the cosmos.

NASA’s annual budget for fiscal year 2009 is $17.2 billion. The proposed budget for FY 2010 would raise it to about $18.7 billion. That sounds like a lot of money, and it is, but let’s put it in perspective. The US annual budget is almost $3 trillion and NASA’s cut of the US budget is less than 1%, which isn’t big enough to create even a single line on this pie chart.
US Federal Spending.  Credit: Wikipedia
A few other things to put NASA’s budget in perspective:

Former NASA administrator Mike Griffin mentioned recently that US consumers spend more on pizza ($27 billion) than NASA’s budget. (Head nod to Ian O’Neill)

Miles O’Brien recently brought it to our attention that the amount of money Bernie Maddof scammed with his Ponzi scheme ($50 billion) is way bigger than NASA’s budget.

Americans spend a lot of money on some pretty ridiculous things. Returning to that oft-used phrase about spending the money used in space to solve the problems on Earth, consider this: *

Annually, Americans spend about $88.8 billion on tobacco products and another $97 billion on alcohol. $313 billion is spent each year in America for treatment of tobacco and alcohol related medical problems.

Likewise, people in the US spend about $64 billion on illegal drugs, and $114.2 billion for health-related care of drug use.

Americans also spend $586.5 billion a year on gambling.

It’s possible we could give up some other things to help alleviate the problems in our country without having to give up the spirit of exploration.

*the numbers used here are from various years, depending on what was readily available, but range from the years 2000 and 2008.

  • Maxwell

    I believe the author is trying to point out that we’ve become gunshy on space programs, and that it has little to do with the cost. The recession is just a political exceuse for politicians to kill competing agendas.

    The problem with Apollo was most people thought “Gee wiz, thats EXPENSIVE!” when, in fact, it was not. Vaun Brauns proposals were fairly affordable when put in perspective. It also had a bigger payout than the military and social programs which we sink our cash into.

    To think if we had followed down his path we would have several hundred people living on the moon and a few dozen on mars by now… How the hell would a communist nation argue against that?
    Why would a corporation want to do business with anyone but the US?

    Today GM is about to walk away with over three times what NASA gets for spaceflight. The return on this investment will be more cars, just like every other nations cars.

    I don’t think anyone is willing to give up smoking or drinking for the space program. But it does put the cost into perspective.
    We can afford to develop space for a pittance compared to what we spend doing frivilous things.

    Its a matter of keeping space in perspective.

  • http://www.singaporephotography.com singapore photography photographers

    Cool! The intangible benefits of space exploration is there.

Previous post:

Next post: