Ice on the Moon? Debate Resumes

The yellow dots represent simple craters containing permanent shadow. Credit: Lunar and Planetary Institute

[/caption]
Ice on the moon or no ice? That is the question. It’s long been thought that water ice could be hiding in deep, dark craters near the Moon’s poles. However in October, 2008 Japan’s Kaguya spacecraft took the best look yet inside the Shackelton Crater at the lunar south pole and didn’t see anything resembling ice, dashing hopes for an abundant water source for future colonists on the moon. But now a team of researchers have re-analyzed data from NASA’s 1998 Lunar Prospector mission – the spacecraft that deliberately took a kamikaze nose-dive into the moon hoping to create a visible ice plume, which it didn’t. But researchers from Glasgow and Durham Universities in the UK say that a new look at old data shows polar craters that are shaded from the sun could have ice in concentrations of up to 10 grams for each kilogram of rock.

The Lunar Prospector’s Neutron Spectrometer (NS) instrument had detected large quantities of hydrogen around the Moon’s north and south pole, but the spacecraft’s crash into the surface didn’t create the plume of ice that scientists had hoped for to prove that ice was actually present.

The latest research of the Lunar Prospector probe’s data is being used to pinpoint likely locations of water ice.

A map showing the north and south polar regions of the moon. The dark blue shaded areas represent the highest concentrations of hydrogen. Credit: Dr Vincent Eke, Durham University/NASA
A map showing the north and south polar regions of the moon. The dark blue shaded areas represent the highest concentrations of hydrogen. Credit: Dr Vincent Eke, Durham University/NASA

“We used a newly developed technique to show that the hydrogen on the moon is concentrated into permanently shaded craters near to the lunar poles,” said Dr. Luis Teodoro, of Glasgow University’s physics and astronomy department. “Hydrogen, together with the oxygen that is abundant within moon rock, is a key element in making water.”

If water ice is actually there, it should be stable for billions of years on the moon provided that it receives no sunlight.

“If the hydrogen is present as water ice then our results imply that the top meter of the moon holds about 200 billion litres of water,” Teodoro added.

However the researchers also say that instead of being water ice, hydrogen may be present in the form of protons fired from the sun into the dusty lunar surface.

The research is of interest for NASA’s upcoming LCROSS (Lunar Crater Observation and Sensing Satellite), part of the Lunar Reconnaissance Orbiter to be launched in 2009, and another impactor mission. Dr. Richard Elphic, in the Planetary Systems Branch, NASA Ames Research Center, said “LCROSS aims to liberate water by impacting into permanently shadowed polar terrain where ice may exist, and our improved maps of hydrogen abundance can help LCROSS select a promising impact site.

“These maps will also help focus LRO’s search for possible polar ice by identifying hydrogen-rich locales.”

If the LCROSS mission doesn’t definitively answer the ice question, it’s very likely we won’t know if water ice is on the moon until we go there ourselves and dig.

The findings from the UK team are published in the scientific journal Icarus.

Source: BBC, Science Daily

The Milky Way and Andromeda

Andromeda Galaxy. Image Credit: NASA

[/caption]

The Andromeda galaxy is the closest spiral galaxy to the Milky Way (though it’s not the closest galaxy). It’s the most distant object you can easily see with the naked eye (under good observing conditions). Andromeda is 220,000 light years in diameter, and is one of the 35 objects that make up what is called the Local Group. Andromeda lies, of course, in Andromeda constellation.

The Andromeda galaxy (also known as  Messier 31, M31, or NGC 224) could be considered the big brother of the Milky Way, as it contains over a trillion stars (compared to our 200-400 billion), and is approximately 220,000 light years across to our 100,000. Andromeda and the Milky Way formed at roughly the same time – 13.5 billion years ago – near the beginning of the Universe. Our galaxy is thought to look much like Andromeda. Both Andromeda and the Milky Way got to their current size by eating up other galaxies they collide with. The expansion of the Universe causes most galaxies to move away from us, but Andromeda and the Milky Way are actually headed towards each other.

Andromeda and the Milky Way are good neighbors, but eventually our neighbor is going to move in with us – the Milky Way and Andromeda are approaching each other at 200 kilometers per second, and will eventually collide. There’s no need to panic, though, as Andromeda is over 2 million light years away, and the collision won’t happen for another 2 or 3 billion years. Astronomer John Dubinski of the University of Toronto has an excellent animated simulation from multiple perspectives of what this galactic dance could look like.

The collision between Andromeda and the Milky Way won’t be catastrophic, and after about 5 billion years from now the resulting galaxy will have settled down into an elliptical galaxy. There is a small chance, though, that the Sun won’t be part of this new “Milkomeda” galaxy.

Fraser and Pamela discuss how the collision between the Milky Way and Andromeda will look from Earth in the September 28th, 2008 episode of Astronomy Cast, and the Milky Way in Episode 99.

Pictor

Pictor

[/caption]

The small constellation of Pictor resides just south of the ecliptic plane and was created by Nicolas Louis de Lacaille. It was adopted by the International Astronomical Union and accepted as one of the permanent 88 modern constellations. Pictor covers approximately 247 square degrees of sky and ranks 59th in size. It has 3 main stars in its asterism and contains 15 Bayer Flamsteed designated stars within its confines. Pictor is bordered by the constellations of Caelum, Carina, Columba, Dorado, Puppis and Volans. It is visible to all observers located at latitudes between +26° and ?90° and is best seen at culmination during the month of January.

Because Pictor is considered a “new” constellation, it has no mythology associated with it – but Nicolas Louis de Lacaille was a man of science and arts. The constellation names he chose to add to his southern star catalog – Coelum Australe Stelliferum – favored this love of technological advances and all things in the field, therefore Pictor was once added as “Equuleus Pictoris”, the “artist’s easel”, but was later shortened to just Pictor when added permanently to the modern constellation charts.

Let’s begin our tour of Pictor with binoculars and its brightest star – Alpha Pictoris – the “a” symbol on our map. It is a class A subgiant star which resides almost 100 light years away from Earth. At close to a billion years old, it is around 3 times larger than our own Sun, yet it rotates over 100 times faster. Alpha is a star that shouldn’t produce X-rays – but does. What’s going on? Perhaps it has a small companion star that’s waiting to be discovered!

Keep your binoculars in hand and hop to Beta Pictoris – the “B” symbol. Located about 64 light years from our solar system, Beta is the key player in a moving star group. This is a stellar association of young stars which share the same motion through space and have the same age. But that’s not all that Beta has going for it. The Beta Pictoris system is very young – only 8-20 million years old – and already in the main sequence stage of stellar evolution. While that in itself isn’t peculiar, what’s curious is an excess of infrared emission compared to normal stars of its type. It would appear that Beta has large quantities of dust! According to detailed studies, a large disk of dust and gas has been found orbiting Beta and was the first to ever be imaged. Inside they found the presence of several planetesimal belts and cometary activity… and there are indications that planets may have formed within this disk and that the processes of planet formation may still be occurring! In November 2008, the European Southern Observatory (ESO) published a press release announcing that a planet matching previous predictions may have been imaged in orbit around Beta Pictoris in the plane of the debris disk. If the physical association of the detected object with Beta Pictoris is confirmed, it would be the closest planet to its star ever photographed. How far apart you ask? Tthe observed separation between the parent star and the planet is roughly the same as the distance between Saturn and the Sun. Too cool….

Now, take out your telescope and have a look at Theta Pictoris – the figure “8” symbol. That’s right… We’ve got a multiple star system here! Theta Pictoris is a three part system, with each of the components all around 7th magnitude and well spaced enough to be easy for optics!

For a nice optical double star in binoculars, have a look at Eta Pictoris – the “n” symbol on our map. Although not gravitationally bound, it’s still a pretty pair!

While there is almost no deep sky to be observed in Pictor, you can still scope out Kapteyn’s Star. It is a class M0 subdwarf star which was discovered by Jacobus Kapteyn in 1897. Located just about 13 light years from Earth, this one has a high radial velocity, orbits the Milky Way in retrograde, and is the nearest halo star to the Sun! When Kapetyn first discovered it, it had the highest proper motion of any star known, later bowing to the discovery of Barnard’s star..

Don’t forget to have a look at variable star, R Pictoris, too!

Sources:
Chandra Observatory
Wikipedia
Chart provided by Your Sky.

Mass of the Milky Way

The Milky Way and its dark matter halo. Image credit: Sloan Digital Sky Survey

[/caption]

The mass of the Milky Way depends on what you consider this question to mean. If you are only talking about the visible part of the Milky Way – all the stars, gas and dust that make up the disk – then the Milky Way’s mass is between 200-600 billion times that of the Sun. We can’t just put the Milky way on a bathroom scale to get this number, however. This number is reached by counting the number of stars in the galaxy and assuming their mass is roughly that of the Sun. The mass varies depending on where one defines the edge of the Milky Way to be.

But there is another way to check the heft of the Milky Way – by measuring how fast stars are rotating around the disk, the mass of the disk itself can be determined. In other words, the heavier the Milky Way is, the more of an effect gravity will have on the rotation, and the faster the stars will move through the disk. This number comes up to be a whopping 1-2 trillion times the mass of the Sun!  The most recent estimate from a study using information from the Sloan Digital Sky Survey measuring the velocity of over 2,4oo stars put the mass of the Milky Way and its halo at 1 trillion solar masses. Though astronomers don’t use kilograms when measuring such large objects as the Sun or galaxies, the Milky Way and its halo would be about 6 x 10^42 kilograms.

Where is all of this matter, if not in the stars? As with many contemporary mysteries in astronomy, the answer is dark matter. The Milky Way is thought to be home to a halo of dark matter – matter that cannot be detected except through its gravitational influence – which makes up approximately 80-90% of its mass. That’s right, the mass of the Milky Way that can be seen (through visible, X-ray, infrared, etc.) makes up only about 10-20% of its mass. This halo may extend out to as far as 300,000 light years from the galactic center.

For more information about the Milky Way, you can refer to Episode 99 of Astronomy Cast, visit the rest of our section here in the Guide to Space, or Swinburne Astronomy Online.

Source:
Sloan Digital Sky Survey

Studying Black Holes Using a PlayStation 3

Binary waves from black holes. Image Credit: K. Thorne (Caltech) , T. Carnahan (NASA GSFC)

[/caption]
If you’re a PlayStation 3 fan, or if you just received one as a holiday gift, you may be able to do more with the system than just gaming. A group of gravity researchers have configured 16 PlayStation 3’s together to create a type of supercomputer that is helping them estimate properties of the gravitational waves produced by the merger of two black holes. The research team from the University of Alabama in Huntsville and the University of Massachusetts, Dartmouth, calls their configuration the Gravity Grid, and they say the Sony PlayStation 3 has a number of unique features that make it particularly suited for scientific computation. Equally important, the raw computing power per dollar provided by the PS3 is significantly higher than anything else on the market today.

PlayStation 3s have also been used by the Folding@Home project, to harness the PS3’s technology to help study how proteins are formed in the human body and how they sometimes form incorrectly. This helps in research in several diseases such as Parkinson’s, Alzheimer’s, cystic fibrosis, and even Mad-Cow disease.

Front view of the cluster of PS3's. Credit:  GravityGrid
Front view of the cluster of PS3's. Credit: GravityGrid

The PS3 uses a powerful new processor called the Cell Broadband Engine to run its highly realistic games, and can connect to the Internet so gamers can download new programs and take each other on.

The PlayStation 3 cluster used by the gravity research team can solve some astrophysical problems, such as ones involving many calculations but low memory usage, equaling the speed of a rented super-computer.
“If we had rented computing time from a supercomputer center it would have cost us about $5,000 to run our [black hole] simulation one time. For this project we ran our simulation several dozens of times to test different parameters and circumstances,” study author Lior Burko told Inside Science News Service.

One of the unique features of the PS3 is that it is an open platform, where different system software can be run on it. It’s special processor has a main CPU (called the PPU) and six special compute engines (called SPUs) available for raw computation. Moreover, each SPU performs vector operations, which implies that they can compute on multiple data, in a single step.

But the low cost is especially attractive to university researchers. The Gravity Grid team received a partial donation from Sony, and are using “stock” PS3s for the cluster, with no hardware modifications and are networked together using inexpensive equipment.

Gravitational waves are “ripples” in space-time that travel at the speed of light. These were theoretically predicted by Einstein’s general relativity, but have never been directly observed. Other research is being done in this area by the newly constructed NSF LIGO laboratory and various other such observatories in Europe and Asia. The ESA and NASA also have a mission planned in the near future – the LISA mission – that will also be attempting to detect these waves. To learn more about these waves and the recent attempts to observe them, please visit the LISA mission website.

More information on the PS3 Gravity Grid.

Sources: USA Today, Gravity Grid

Weekend SkyWatcher’s Forecast – December 26-28, 2008

Greetings, fellow SkyWatchers! I trust everyone had a pleasant holiday? If you received new binoculars, a telescope or an eyepiece as a present – then why don’t we put them to a workout with some great new targets to have a look at? Why stop at just one galactic star cluster when you can catch three-in-one! It’s a great time for the galaxy hunt, too… So let’s step out in the dark together, cuz’ here’s what’s up!

Friday, December 26, 2008 – Sir William Herschel stop exploring because of the holidays? Never! I’m even beginning to believe the master also never had a Moon or a cloudy night. So what was he into on this night in 1785? Let’s find out… Beginning with binoculars a little less than a fist width northeast of Aldebaran for a triple treat: two clusters within a cluster. Their designations are NGC 1746, 1758, and 1750.

ngc1746

Located near the galactic anti-center in the direction of the Taurus dark clouds (RA 05 03 48 Dec +23 46 00), Dreyer was the first besides Herschel to believe this trio were physically overlapping star clusters. Studied photometrically, the neighboring Pleiades and Hyades clearly show as foreground objects while our “questionable clusters” appear reddened to different degrees. Of course, like many disputed regions, the larger, sparser, NGC 1746 may not be considered a cluster by some books – even though the two interior collections of stars show marked distance differences.

No matter how you view it, enjoy this large collection for yourself. NGC 1746 shows as a widely scattered field with two areas of compression to binoculars, while even a small telescope will resolve southern NGC 1750 (a Herschel “400” object) with its prominent double star. The smaller collection – NGC 1758 – will be just to its northeast. Until the proper motion of this trio is properly studied by proper equipment, you can still consider it another good call on Herschel’s part, and a real triple treat!

kepler-j50-browseSaturday, December 27, 2008 – Born today in 1571 was Johannes Kepler – a Danish astronomer and assistant to Tycho Brahe. Kepler used Brahe’s copious notes of Mars’ positions to help formulate his three laws of planetary motion. These laws are still applicable today. If you’re up before dawn this morning, you can see them in action as Mars has returned low on the eastern horizon!

Tonight is New Moon and there is a vast array of things we could choose to look at. I am a galaxy hunter at heart, and nothing makes it beat just a little bit quicker than an edge-on. Tonight let’s walk into the lair of the Dragon as we seek out the incredible NGC 5907.

ngc5907Located just a few degrees south of Iota Draconis (RA 15 15 53 Dec +56 19 43), this particular galaxy is worth staying up just a bit late to catch. Located about 40 million light-years away, 10th magnitude NGC 5907 contains far more than meets the casual eye. It’s warped. Long believed to have been the prototype for non-interacting galaxies, things changed drastically when two companion dwarf galaxies were discovered. A faint, photographic ring structure revealed itself, exposing tidal disruption – the ellipsoid involving the nuclear region of the primary galaxy pulling apart the small spheroid. Also part of the picture is PGC 54419, another dwarf so close to the warp as to almost belong to NGC 5907 itself!

In smaller scopes, prepare yourself to see nothing more than an averted vision scratch of light. The larger the aperture, the more there is revealed, as 5907 gains a bright and prominent nucleus. Although it doesn’t look like the grand spiral we envision our own Milky Way to be, we are looking at it from a different angle. In this respect, it behaves much like our own microcosm – a living, interacting, member of a larger group, and of a much, much larger Universe.

eddingtonSunday, December 28, 2008 – Today we celebrate the birth of Arthur S. Eddington. Born in 1882, Eddington was a British theoretical astrophysicist whose work was fundamental to interpreting and explaining stellar nature. He also coined the phrase “expanding universe” to refer to the mutual recession of the galaxies. This idea would eventually become known as “Hubble’s Law,” as the massive 200″ telescope at Palomar Observatory played another important role when Eddington’s work in this field was continued by Edwin Hubble. Tonight let us honor both great minds as we take a look at a galaxy which is indeed receding from us – NGC 1300.

Located about a finger width north of Tau 4 Eridani (RA 03 19 41 Dec 19 24 40), this is probably the most incredible barred spiral you will ever encounter. At magnitude 10, it will require at least a 4.5″ telescope in northern latitudes, but can probably be spotted with binoculars in the far south.

ngc130075 million light-years away, NGC 1300’s central bar alone is larger than the Milky Way, and this galaxy has been intensively studied because the manner of its formation was so similar to our own. Although it is so distant, it is seen face-on: allowing us to see this formation without looking through the gas and dust which block our own Galaxy’s center from view. Enjoy this one’s fantastic structure!

Until next week, remember… Dreams really do come true when you keep on reaching for the stars!

This week’s awesome photos are: 60 arc minute view centered on NGC 1746 – Credit: Palomar Observatory, courtesy of Caltech, Johannes Kepler (widely used public image), NGC 5907 – Credit: Palomar Observatory, courtesy of Caltech, Arthur Eddington – Credit: American Institute of Physics Niels Bohr Library and NGC 1300 – Credit: Palomar Observatory, courtesy of Caltech. We thank you so much!

Map of the Milky Way

The major and minor arms of the Milky Way. Image Credit: NASA/JPL-Caltech

[/caption]

The Milky Way is pretty hard to map, given that we live inside of it and have to peer through all of the dust and gas that lie inside the disk. Though we can’t get a picture of our galaxy from outside, we can create images and maps from computer modeling of the stars we see in the disk.

The Milky Way – until recently – was thought to be a barred spiral with four star-forming arms, named  Norma, Scutum-Centaurus, Sagittarius and Perseus. In June of 2008, images from NASA’s Spitzer Space Telescope revealed that the Milky Way is a barred spiral with only two major arms, demoting the Sagittarius and Norma arms to minor arms. The Sun lies in a minor arm, named the Orion Arm, or Orion Spur, sandwiched between the Sagittarius minor arm and Perseus arm.

Our galaxy is a large disk approximately 100,000 light years across. There’s a bulge in the center that is 12,000-16,000 light years thick, and is home to a black hole named Sagittarius A*. Other areas of the disk range between 2,300 and 2,600 light years in thickness.

The image above is a representation of what the Milky Way would look like from above. Of course, there are plenty of maps of the Milky Way as we see it from the Earth. Also, you can go outside on a clear night and see it splashed across the sky. Below is an image in the infrared, with the various regions marked (named because of the constellation in which they lie).

Infrared map of the Milky Way. Image Credit: NASA/JPL-Caltech
Infrared map of the Milky Way. Image Credit: NASA/JPL-Caltech

Plenty of maps are available all over the web in a variety of spectrum. Here’s a gallery of 9 images of the Milky Way in different spectra to get you started, and An Atlas of the Universe has maps of the Milky Way and Universe from different perspectives and distances. If you’re looking for interactive maps of the sky and Milky Way, Sky-Map.org, Google Sky and the downloadable Stellarium are all great resources to familiarize yourself with our Galaxy.

If you’re interested in learning more about other aspects of the Milky Way, Astronomy Cast has a whole episode devoted to it. You can also check out the rest of our resources in the Milky Way section of the Guide to Space.

Sources: NASA, Wikipedia

Podcast: The Christmas Star

Adoration of the Magi

[/caption]
With Christmas just around the corner, we thought we’d investigate a mystery that has puzzled historians for hundreds of years. In the bible, the birth of Jesus was announced by a bright star in the sky that led the three wise men to his birthplace. What are some possible astronomical objects that might look like such a bright star in the sky? And were there any unusual events that happened at that time?

Click here to download the episode.

Or subscribe to: astronomycast.com/podcast.xml with your podcatching software.

The Christmas Star – Transcript and show notes.

Where In The Universe #35

Are you ready for another Where In The Universe Challenge? Take a look and see if you can name where in the Universe this image is from. Give yourself extra points if you can name the spacecraft responsible for the image. As usual, we’ll provide the image today, but won’t reveal the answer until tomorrow. This gives you a chance to mull over the image, drink some eggnog, and provide your answer/guess in the comment section — if you dare! Check back tomorrow on this same post to see how you did. Good luck and enjoy the holidays!

UPDATE (12/25): The answer has now been posted below. If you haven’t made your guess yet, no peeking before you do!!


In this holiday edition of Where In The Universe, newborn stars, hidden behind thick dust in visible light, are revealed in infrared in this image of a part of the Christmas Tree Cluster from NASA’s Spitzer Space Telescope. Two instruments created this image, Spitzer’s Infrared Array Camera (IRAC) and Multiband Imaging Photometer (MIPS) instruments.

Astronomers nicknamed this the “Snowflake Cluster,” the stars appear to have formed in regularly spaced intervals along linear structures in a configuration that resembles the pattern of a snowflake.

More info on this image.

Best wishes for the merriest of whatever holiday you may celebrate.

SpaceX, Orbital Sciences Awarded ISS Re-supply Contract

SpaceX DragonLab™ - a free-flying, fully-recoverable, reusable spacecraft capable of hosting pressurized and unpressurized payloads. Credit: SpaceX

[/caption]
Two upstart commercial space companies have been awarded contracts by NASA for commercial cargo resupply services to the International Space Station. SpaceX, also known as Space Exploration Technologies received a contract for $1.6 billion while Orbital Sciences Corp. of Dulles, Va. has a contract valued at $1.9 billion. NASA has ordered 12 flights from SpaceX and eight from Orbital. In October, at this year’s International Symposium for Personal and Commercial Spaceflight, SpaceX Vice President of Marketing and Communications Diane Murphy said that the six- year-old company has it in their sights to be able to fly to the space station by 2009. For now, the contract is for cargo only, however SpaceX’s Dragon capsule and Falcon 9 rocket are human rated, and would be capable of delivering up to 7 crew members to the station. The Dragon could also be used as an escape vehicle. If SpaceX and Orbital can be successful in cargo re-supply, it could pave the way for a potential solution to the gap between the shuttle retirement in 2010 and when the Constellation program would be ready to fly, hopefully by 2015.

“The SpaceX team is honored to have been selected by NASA as the winner of the Cargo Resupply Services contract,” said Elon Musk, CEO and CTO, SpaceX. “This is a tremendous responsibility, given the swiftly approaching retirement of the Space Shuttle and the significant future needs of the Space Station. This also demonstrates the success of the NASA COTS program, which has opened a new era for NASA in US Commercial spaceflight.”

Orbital's Cygnus module will be used for ISS resupply.  Credit:  Orbital
Orbital's Cygnus module will be used for ISS resupply. Credit: Orbital

“We are very appreciative of the trust NASA has placed with us to provide commercial cargo transportation services to and from the International Space Station, beginning with our demonstration flight scheduled in late 2010,” said Mr. David W. Thompson, Orbital’s Chairman and Chief Executive Officer. “The CRS program will serve as a showcase for the types of commercial services U.S. space companies can offer NASA, allowing the space agency to devote a greater proportion of its resources for the challenges of human spaceflight, deep space exploration and scientific investigations of our planet and the universe in which we live.”

Orbital will use their module called Cygnus to deliver cargo, launched on their Taurus rocket.
These fixed-price indefinite delivery, indefinite quantity contracts will begin Jan. 1, 2009, and are effective through Dec. 31, 2016. The contracts each call for the delivery of a minimum of 20 metric tons of upmass cargo to the space station. The contracts also call for delivery of non-standard services in support of the cargo resupply, including analysis and special tasks as the government determines are necessary.

NASA has set production milestones and reviews on the contracts to monitor progress toward providing services. The maximum potential value of each contract is about $3.1 billion. Based on known requirements, the value of both contracts combined is projected at $3.5 billion.

These agreements do fulfill NASA’s need to for cargo delivery to the space station after the retirement of the space shuttle.

Sources: NASA, SpaceX, Orbital