Famous Earthquakes

Earthquakes are among the most devastating forces of nature. What we have are seven of the world’s most famous earthquakes, chronologically listed below. Not all included here are necessarily the strongest (in terms of magnitude) but they made the headlines when they hit. Here they are:

Shaanxi Earthquake of 1556

– This was the deadliest quake ever recorded. It claimed the lives of about 830,000 people. At that time, most inhabitants in the affected areas were living in Yaodongs or artificial caves. They were buried alive when the huge tremors caused the cliffs in which these caves were located in, to collapse.

San Francisco Earthquake of 1906

– Although its tremors were also felt in Southern Oregon, it is the resulting fire in San Francisco that had a more devastating impact on the economy. Is has been often compared recently to Hurricane Katrina because of its similar economic bearing.

The Great Chilean Earthquake of 1960

– Like the one that hit Asia in 2004, this 9.5-rated quake resulted in a massive tsunami reaching up to as high as 10.7 meters. This magnitude is the highest recorded ever. Although the tsunami originated in Cañete, Chile, the waves raced north-westward to Japan and the Philippines, wreaking havoc there.

Great Alaska Earthquake of 1964

– With a magnitude of 9.2, it is the second strongest earthquake to be ever recorded. It caused tsunamis, landslides, and resulted in major landscape changes. Some places near Kodiak is said to have been raised 9.1 meters high, while those near Portage were dropped by 2.4 meters. Here are more articles about Alaska earthquakes.

Great Tangshan Earthquake of 1976

– This is the deadliest quake of the 20th Century, with the number of deaths hitting somewhere near 250,000. Weak building structures and the time this disaster struck (4 am) contributed a lot to that sickening number.

Bam Earthquake of 2003

– The death toll in this tremor reached over 26,000. Like the one in Tangshan, the use of poor construction materials was one of the leading culprits for the deaths. Most of the affected buildings were made of mud bricks.

Indian Ocean Earthquake of 2004

– The resulting tsunami that killed 230,000 people was caused by a subduction between the India and Burma plate. Its 30 m-high waves destroyed virtually everything in its path, making this quake not only one of the most famous earthquakes but also one of the famous natural disasters in history.

Excluding poor building infrastructure, we can see that high death tolls in these famous earthquakes result when the tremors are accompanied by tsunamis. This happens when the quake’s epicenter is found at the bottom of the ocean.

You can read more about famous earthqueakes here in Universe Today. Here are the links:

There’s more about it at USGS. Here are a couple of sources there:

Here are two episodes at Astronomy Cast that you might want to check out as well:

Sources:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/1906_San_Francisco_earthquake
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2006_Hawaii_earthquake
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/1556_Shaanxi_earthquake
http://earthquake.usgs.gov/earthquakes/world/events/1960_05_22.php
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/1964_Alaska_earthquake
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/1976_Tangshan_earthquake
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2003_Bam_earthquake
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2004_Indian_Ocean_earthquake_and_tsunami

Milankovitch Cycle

Graphic showing how changes in the Earth's eccentricity and tilt can lead to massive changes in maximum sunlight it receives, and therefore its climate.

Milankovitch cycles. Source: UCAR

A Milankovitch cycle is a cyclical movement related to the Earth’s orbit around the Sun. There are three of them: eccentricity, axial tilt, and precession. According to the Milankovitch Theory, these three cycles combine to affect the amount of solar heat that’s incident on the Earth’s surface and subsequently influence climatic patterns.

Eccentricity

The path of the Earth’s orbit around the sun is not a perfect circle, but an ellipse. This elliptical shape changes from less elliptical (nearly a perfect circle) to more elliptical and back, and is due to the gravitational fields of neighboring planets (particularly the large ones – Jupiter and Saturn). The measure of the shape’s deviation from being a circle is called its eccentricity.

That is, the larger the eccentricity, the greater is its deviation from a circle. Thus, in terms of eccentricity, the Earth’s orbit undergoes a cyclical change from less eccentric to more eccentric and back. One complete cycle for this kind of variation lasts for about 100,000 years.

Axial Tilt

We know the earth is spinning around its own axis, which is the reason why we have night and day. However, this axis is not upright. Rather, it tilts at angles between 22.1-degrees and 24.5 degrees and back. These angles are measured between the angle of the axis to an imaginary line normal (perpendicular) to the Earth’s plane of orbit. A complete cycle for the axial tilt lasts for about 41,000 years.

Greater tilts mean that the hemispheres closer to the Sun, i.e., during summer, will experience a larger amount of heat than when the tilt is less. In other words, regions in the extreme upper and lower hemispheres will experience the hottest summers and the coldest winters during a maximum tilt.

Precession

Aside from the tilt, the axis also wobbles like a top. A complete wobble cycle is more or less 26,000 years. This motion is caused by tidal forces from the Sun and Moon.

Precession as well as tilting are the reasons why regions near and at the poles experience very long nights and very long days at certain times of the year. For example, in Norway, the Sun never completely descends beneath the horizon between late May to late July.

The Milankovitch Cycles are among the arguments fielded by detractors of the Global Warming concept. According to them, the Earth’s current warming is just a part of a series of cyclical events that take thousands of years to complete, and hence cannot be prevented.

You can read more about milankovitch cycle here in Universe Today. Here are the links:

There’s more about it at USGS and NASA. Here are a couple of sources there:

Here are two episodes at Astronomy Cast that you might want to check out as well:

References:
NASA Earth Observatory
NOAA Website

News Story on Neil Armstrong Slips on an Onion

Neil Armstrong on the moon. Credit: NASA

 

Two newspapers in Bangladesh have issued a retraction after publishing an article taken from the popular but satirical website “The Onion” which claimed Neil Armstrong had been convinced by conspiracy theorists that the Moon landings were faked. The Daily Manab Zamin said Armstrong had shocked a news conference by saying he now knew it had been an “elaborate hoax.” The New Nation then picked up the story, and only later did they realize the Onion was not a genuine news site.

Both have now apologized to their readers for not checking the story. “We thought it was true so we printed it without checking,” associate editor Hasanuzzuman Khan told the AFP news agency.

“We didn’t know the Onion was not a real news site.”

The article said Armstrong had told a news conference he had been “forced to reconsider every single detail of the monumental journey after watching a few persuasive YouTube videos and reading several blog posts” by a conspiracy theorist.

Of course, like everything else on The Onion, the story was completely made up.

The two newspaper articles drew a lot of attention in Bangladesh, and was one of the top articles getting hits on the papers’ websites.

Here’s the Onion’s article.

Future Friday: Orbital Megastructures

Artists concept of a pair of O'Neill cylinders. Credit: NASA.

[/caption]
The International Space Station is big. About the size of American football field, it has an acre of solar panels, includes 358 cubic meters (12,626 cubic ft) of habitable volume, and there is enough reflective outer surface that in the right conditions, it can be seen from Earth during the day. But with the ISS, we’re just getting warmed up with building structures in space. There are some ideas out there for even larger structures — so called megastructures in space. Here are a few proposals for future space stations and structures that one day could be built in Earth orbit.

The top image is called an O’Neill cylinder, and is a space habitat proposed by physicist Gerard K. O’Neill. What started out as a design challenge for his students became structures O’Neill used in his book that promoted the idea of humans living in space, The High Frontier: Human Colonies in Space. An O’Neill cylinder consists of two very large, counter-rotating cylinders, each 5 miles (8 km) in diameter and 20 miles (32 km) long, that are connected at each end by a rod via a bearing system. The rotation provides artificial gravity on the inner surfaces while the central axis of the habitat would be a zero gravity region, where recreational facilities could be located.

To save the huge cost of rocketing the materials from Earth, this habitat could be built with materials launched from the moon with a mass driver.

Exterior view of a Stanford torus. Bottom center is the non-rotating primary solar mirror, which reflects sunlight onto the angled ring of secondary mirrors around the hub. Painting by Donald E. Davis
Exterior view of a Stanford torus. Bottom center is the non-rotating primary solar mirror, which reflects sunlight onto the angled ring of secondary mirrors around the hub. Painting by Donald E. Davis

After O’Neill proposed his structure, a later NASA/Ames study at Stanford University developed an alternate version, the Stanford torus. This is torus, or donut-shaped ring, 1.8 km in diameter. This structure would be capable of housing 10,000 to 140,000 permanent residents, similar to a suburb here on Earth.

The structure would rotate once per minute to provide between 0.9g and 1.0g of artificial gravity on the inside of the outer ring from centripetal acceleration. The interior of the torus would be used as living space, and is large enough that a “natural” environment can be simulated, including trees and other plants. Sunlight would be provided inside the structure with a system of mirrors.

Outside view of a Bernal Sphere.
Outside view of a Bernal Sphere.

A Bernal sphere is a another type of orbital space habitat intended as a long-term home for permanent residents. It was first proposed in 1929 by John Desmond Bernal, and is said to be one of the inspirations for Gerard O’Neill and his students. Bernal’s original proposal included a hollow spherical shell 1.6 km (1 mile) in diameter, filled with air for a target population of 20,000 to 30,000 people.
The inside of the Bernal sphere.
The inside of the Bernal sphere.

Bernal predicted that as the human race grew, their material and energy needs would outpace what planet Earth could provide. Orbiting colonies could harness the Sun’s energy and provide extra living space for a burgeoning population.

Rotating the sphere twice a minute would generate an artificial gravity aproximate to Earth’s. An advantage of the sphere is that it has the smallest surface area for a given internal volume, so minimizing the amount of radiation shielding required.

Our next Future Friday will take a look at megastructures at the planetary scale.

Source: Wiki

White Dwarf “Close” to Exploding as Supernova

ESA’s XMM-Newton orbiting X-ray telescope has uncovered the first close-up of a white dwarf star that could explode into a type Ia supernova within a few million years. That’s relatively soon in cosmic time frames, and although this white dwarf that is orbiting its companion star HD 49798, is far enough away to pose no danger to Earth, it is close enough to become an extraordinarily spectacular celestial sight. Calculations suggest that it will blaze initially with the intensity of the full Moon and be so bright that it will be seen in the daytime sky with the naked eye. But don’t worry, it will be awhile!

Astronomers have been on the trail of this mysterious object since 1997, when they discovered that something was giving off X-rays near the bright star HD 49798. Now, thanks to XMM-Newton’s superior sensitivity, the mysterious object has been tracked along its orbit. The observation has shown it to be a white dwarf, the dead heart of a star, shining X-rays into space.

Sandro Mereghetti, INAF–IASF Milano, Italy, and collaborators also discovered that this is no ordinary white dwarf. They measured its mass and found it to be more than twice what they were expecting. Most white dwarfs pack 0.6 solar masses into an object the size of Earth.

This particular white dwarf contains at least double that mass but has a diameter just half that of Earth. It also rotates once every 13 seconds, the fastest of any known white dwarf.

The mass determination is reliable because the XMM-Newton tracking data allowed the astronomers to use the most robust method for ‘weighing’ a star, one that uses the gravitational physics devised by Isaac Newton in the 17th century. Most likely, the white dwarf has grown to its unusual mass by stealing gas from its companion star, a process known as accretion. At 1.3 solar masses, the white dwarf is now close to a dangerous limit.

When it grows larger than 1.4 solar masses, a white dwarf is thought either to explode or collapse to form an even more compact object called a neutron star. The explosion of a white dwarf is the leading explanation for ‘type Ia supernovae’, bright events that are used as standard beacons by astronomers to measure the expansion of the Universe. Until now, astronomers have not been able to find an accreting white dwarf in a binary system where the mass could be determined so accurately.

“This is the Rosetta stone of white dwarfs in binary systems. Our precise determination of the masses of the two stars is crucial. We can now study it further and try to reconstruct its past, so that we can calculate its future,” says Mereghetti.

So start telling your descendants to watch out for the spectacular show! (And hopefully no new hoax emails will be spawned about a supernova coming soon that will look as big as the full Moon to the naked eye a la the “Mars as big as the full Moon” hoax!)

Lead image caption: Illustration of the white dwarf and its companion HD49798. If it was possible to look at the system up-close, it would look something like this. Credits: Francesco Mereghetti, background image: NASA, ESA and T.M. Brown (STScI)

Source: ESA

Andromeda Galaxy Eating the Neighborhood

An artist's rendering shows the spiral galaxy of Andromeda, center right, over a period of about three billion years as repeated, but modified views of the dwarf galaxy Triangulum, move away from it, clockwise towards Earth, then back towards it, where Triangulum will be ultimately devoured by the Andromeda galaxy says astronomer John Dubinski. (AP Photo/Illustration by John Dubinski and Larry Widrow)

[/caption]

From Earth, the Andromeda Galaxy looks like a calm, bright galaxy, and is visible with the naked eye in our night sky. But astronomers have discovered things aren’t as tranquil as it seems over at M31. Andromeda is eating the neighbors.

The Andromeda Galaxy contains a trillion stars and lies only about 2.5 million light-years away, so it is a great object to observe and study. But recently astronomers observed wispy streams of stars on the outer fringes of Andromeda, and realized they were leftovers from a cannibalistic feeding frenzy of smaller galaxies it has absorbed.

“This is a startling visual demonstration of the truly vast scale of galaxies,” said Dr. Mike Irwin from the University of Cambridge. “The survey has produced an unrivalled panorama of galaxy structure which reveals that galaxies are the result of an ongoing process of accretion and interaction with their neighbours.”

The cannibalism continues and another victim lies in wait: M33 in the constellation of Triangulum, is destined for a future meal.

“Ultimately, these two galaxies may end up merging completely,” Dr. Scott also from the University of Cambridge. “Ironically, galaxy formation and galaxy destruction seem to go hand in hand.”

Astronomers from Cambridge were part of an international team that made a million light-year-wide survey of the Andromeda Galaxy and its surroundings using a powerful digital camera on the giant Canada-France-Hawaii telescope on Mauna Kea, Hawaii.

They discovered that many of these stars could not have formed within Andromeda itself because the density of gas so far from the galaxy’s core would have been too low to allow formation to take place. Therefore, the team reason that they are almost certainly the remnants of other, smaller galaxies which have been absorbed by Andromeda – and that Andromeda itself is still in a state of expansion.

The team’s paper argues that the larger-scale substructures identified on the galaxy’s fringes are probably the “undigested” remains of previously accreted dwarf galaxies. In all likelihood, they originally belonged to dwarf galaxies or other, proto-galactic fragments.

Article in Nature.

Source: PhysOrg

What Planets Are Visible Tonight?


Are you interested in knowing what planets are visible tonight? Almost every night of the year, some planet in our solar system can be spotted using either just your eyes, a pair of binoculars or a small telescope. Finding the planets is easy – but you just have to know how! Here’s a few simple lessons and some great links to helping you locate what planets you can see from your location on any given night…

Finding The Ecliptic Plane

eclipticJust as the Earth orbits the Sun, our Moon orbits the Earth in a clockwork fashion, along an imaginary path called the ecliptic plane. Why is knowing the sky position of the Moon and Sun important? Because the planets also orbit the Sun like clockwork on the same path – the ecliptic plane. Picture our solar system from above. In the center is our Sun and around it the planets move along their own race tracks. The planets close to the Sun orbit faster and their track is smaller, while outer planets move slower and their track is longer – this is Kepler’s law in action!

orreryVenus and Mercury speed past Earth’s position several times a year, passing in front of or behind the Sun. Earth is running with them, but on a longer track. On the outside tracks are Mars, the asteroid belt, Jupiter, Saturn, Uranus, Neptune and planetoid Pluto – all on the same flat plane. There are times when the Sun is positioned between Earth and the outer planets. They are still holding their position on their tracks, but we simply cannot see them. When the inner planets pass the Earth, or the Earth passes the outer planets, something very extraordinary happens – retrograde motion. How does it work? Picture yourself in a moving car coming up on another vehicle. As you approach, the other car seems to slow down, stand still and then move backwards. It’s a rather simple explanation, but it’s how retrograde motion works!

Observing the Planets

mercury_and_venusThe two inner planets – Mercury and Venus – are closer to the Sun than Earth. This means we will always see them just before the Sun rises, or just after the Sun sets. The ring of the inner planet’s orbit is much smaller than Earth’s, and they will only appear a short distance above the horizon. At times, when Mercury reaches its greatest elongation, it is bright enough to be seen easily with just your eyes, but it helps to use binoculars. And we all know that Venus outshines every star in the sky! Mercury apparitions usually happen in the evening sky three times a year and three times in the morning. Usually, the best time to see Mercury is just after sunset near the vernal equinox. Since it orbits the Sun in just 88 days, it moves fast, so don’t delay your observations! If you observe Mercury through a telescope, you’ll see it enter a slim crescent phase as it passes between us and the Sun – just like our Moon! Another planet that goes through phases is inner Venus. Orbiting the Sun more slowly along its longer track every 244 days, we see Venus for months at a time instead of just days. It will appear in the evening for about six weeks as it comes out from behind the Sun, growing higher and brighter each night until it reaches a point between the Earth and Sun. This is when you’ll see a crescent phase in the telescope! Venus will then disappear and a week or two later it will return just before the Sun rises. It will stay in the morning sky for about 9 months until it once again switches its course back to the evening.

MarsViewing_Dec11-12As we move outward along the ecliptic plane, we pass Earth and move on to Mars. Since its orbital track around the Sun is slightly longer than ours, there will be extended periods of time when Mars is visible. Do you remember retrograde motion? When the Earth catches up with Mars it will appear to slow down on its path across the sky as we approach it, stand still as we come alongside, and move the other way as we pass it. A Mars’ viewing year will begin when it first makes its appearance in the morning on the opposite side of our solar system. There it will stay until Earth’s orbit begins to catch up with it and it rises 6 minutes earlier each day. As the cycle continues, it won’t be long until Mars reaches opposition, meaning it (or any outer planet) rises precisely the same time as the Sun sets. As we pass, it becomes brighter and larger – but never the same size as our Moon.

Jupiter_Saturn_dennismammana2Next up is Jupiter – orbiting the Sun once every twelve years. Jupiter is visible most of the year, beginning in the morning until sidereal time carries it to the early evening hours. With a much slower orbit of 30 years, graceful old Saturn will be viewable much of the year as well – waltzing slowly along the ecliptic plane. Far away Uranus and Neptune and planetoid Pluto can viewed whenever their respective constellations are visible. Retrograde motion also happens with the outer planets, but the process is much slower. Just remember… the planets all follow the same rule – the ecliptic plane. Do you remember what else also follows that same rule? That’s right… the constellations of the zodiac. You will always see the planets in relationship with those twelve constellations!

What Planets Are Visible Tonight?

724We can observe the planets with our eyes, binoculars, or a telescope and many planets are viewable during many different times of the year. There are many on-line resources that can tell you when and where they will appear, as well as many periodicals which chart the planets’ paths. Would you like some resources to help you along your planetary discovery path? Then here are a few of my favorites:

See The Planets Tonight!

free_2776077It is very easy, even from light polluted areas, to follow Mercury, Venus, Mars, Jupiter and Saturn with just your eyes alone. When they are visible, they shine brightly enough to follow their movements without any special equipment. The outer planets are naturally dimmer because they are much further away. With a pair of binoculars as an aid, it’s also easy to see Uranus and Neptune, but they aren’t very big or very bright. Planetoid Pluto is so incredibly small and distant that it takes at least a medium-sized telescope and careful work over many nights with a star chart to identify properly. Now… Get out there and get started! Once you have gained confidence in the position of the ecliptic, it won’t be difficult to watch the action of the planets from night to night. They are easy to recognize and it won’t be long before you’ll be identifying them – not by luck – but as an amateur astronomer!

“Planetary Line-Up” photo courtesy of Dennis Mammana (APOD).

LRO Sees Bouncing, Rolling Boulders on the Moon

Closeup of LROC image showing boulders that have rolled down the slope of Tsiolkovskiy Crater. Credit: NASA

[/caption]
Think nothing ever happens on the Moon? New images from the Lunar Reconnaissance Orbiter Camera shows spectacular views of the famous Tsiolkovskiy Crater, and a close-up look reveals boulders that have rolled down the slopes of the crater. In the larger image, below, it is easy to see where the boulders came from by following their rolling, bouncing tracks. These are not small rocks by any means: the largest boulder in this image is about 40 meters wide – half as big as a soccer field! Seeing where the boulders originated from is a great clue to geologists reconstructing the local geology. What do they see here?

Tsiolkvoskiy Crater is 185 km in diameter, and is a great example of complex impact crater. It has a terraced rim, a central peak, and a floor flooded with mare basalts. Impact events release tremendous amounts of energy and result in very dynamic changes in the local landscape. Just after the initial impact, the central peak was uplifted from lower crustal rock, forming a giant mountain in the middle of the crater. That’s where the boulders rolled down the slopes, as pieces of the uplifted rock rolled down and accumulated at the base of the slope.

This is an easy way for explorers to find samples of the central peaks without having to climb the top. The Apollo 17 astronauts used this strategy as an easy way to sample nearby mountain tops without having to don any climbing gear!
Tsiolkovskiy Crater from LROC. Click for larger "Zoomifiable" version. Credit: NASA/GSFC/Arizona State University

Click the image for a larger “Zoomifiable” version.

The dark area in the lower right is the tip of enormous shadow cast by the central peak. Scroll north in the full image, and you will find the contact where the later-formed lavas pooled at the base of the peak. Even though the central peak formed before the mare, it has fewer craters due to its steep slope which tends to slump and slide erasing small craters. In this case, that’s an apparent violation of the rule that older surfaces have more craters!

Click here to see a zoomable look at Tsiolkovskiy Crater taken by the Apollo missions.

Source: LROC Journal

Watch Saturn’s Rings Disappear (Video)

Composite image of Saturn over 6 years. Credit: Alan Friedman

On September 4, 2009, Earth’s orbital motion will carry it through the same plane as Saturn’s rings. From our vantage point, the rings will disappear. Usually these ring plane crossings — which only happen about every 15 years — are great opportunities to observe Saturn’s moons. But this year’s ring plane crossing will be practically impossible to see, as Saturn will be very close to the sun, only 11 degrees away. So, disappointingly, we won’t see much. However, amateur astronomer Alan Friedman has given us a glimpse of what this event will look like, without the glare from the sun. Friedman has put together an animation of how the angle of Saturn’s rings have changed over the past six years. See the animation below. “It shows the changing plane of the ring system as viewed from my Buffalo backyard from 2004 to 2009,” said Friedman. “The final frame has been assembled from earlier 2009 observations to display how the planet will appear with its rings edge on.” Gorgeous!

6 years of Saturn observations were combined to create this animation showing the changing plane of the ring system as viewed from earth. Credit: Alan Friedman
6 years of Saturn observations were combined to create this animation showing the changing plane of the ring system as viewed from earth. Credit: Alan Friedman

But, Friedman says, our real view of Saturn should get much better and provide a real treat this autumn. “In the fall of 2009, Saturn will emerge from the glare of the sun in the early morning sky and provide Earth-bound astronomers with our first glimpse of its blue north pole in 14 years,” he said.

Enjoy perusing Friedman’s impressive gallery on his website.

And thanks, Alan, for sharing your six-year endeavor with Universe Today!

Is The Milky Way Doomed By Galactic Bombardment?

This image from a supercomputer simulation shows the density of dark matter in our Milky Way galaxy which is known to contain an ancient thin disk of stars. Brightness (blue-to-violet-to-red-to-yellow) corresponds to increasing concentration of dark matter.

[/caption]

As scientists attempt to learn more about how galaxies evolve, an open question has been whether collisions with our dwarf galactic neighbors will one day tear apart the disk of the Milky Way.

That grisly fate is unlikely, a new study now suggests.

While astronomers know that such collisions have probably occurred in the past, the new computer simulations show that instead of destroying a galaxy, these collisions “puff up” a galactic disk, particularly around the edges, and produce structures called stellar rings.

The finding solves two mysteries: the likely fate of the Milky Way at the hands of its satellite galaxies — the most massive of which are the Large and Small Magellanic Clouds — and the origin of its puffy edges, which astronomers have seen elsewhere in the universe and dubbed “flares.”

The mysterious dark matter that makes up most of the universe plays a role, the study found.

Astronomers believe that all galaxies are embedded within massive and extended halos of dark matter, and that most large galaxies lie at the intersections of filaments of dark matter, which form a kind of gigantic web in our universe. Smaller satellite galaxies flow along strands of the web, and get pulled into orbit around large galaxies such as our Milky Way.

Ohio State University astronomer Stelios Kazantzidis and his colleagues performed detailed computer simulations of galaxy formation to determine what would happen if a satellite galaxy — such as the Large Magellanic Cloud and its associated dark matter — collided with a spiral galaxy such as our own.

The researchers considered the impacts of many different smaller galaxies onto a larger, primary disk galaxy. They calculated the likely number of satellites and the orbital paths of those satellites, and then simulated what would happen during collision, including when the dark matter interacted gravitationally with the disk of the spiral galaxy.

The conclusion?  None of the disk galaxies were torn apart.  To the contrary, the primary galaxies gradually disintegrated the in-falling satellites, whose material ultimately became part of the larger galaxy.  The satellites passed through the galactic disk over and over, and on each pass, they would lose some of their mass, a process that would eventually destroy them completely.

Though the primary galaxy survived, it did form flared edges which closely resembled our galaxy’s flared appearance today.

Does that settle the question of the fate of the Milky Way?

Kazantzidis couldn’t offer a 100-percent guarantee.

“We can’t know for sure what’s going to happen to the Milky Way, but we can say that our findings apply to a broad class of galaxies similar to our own,” Kazantzidis said. “Our simulations showed that the satellite galaxy impacts don’t destroy spiral galaxies — they actually drive their evolution, by producing this flared shape and creating stellar rings — spectacular rings of stars that we’ve seen in many spiral galaxies in the universe.”

Source: Ohio State University