A New Look at Apollo Samples Supports Ancient Impact Theory


New investigations of lunar samples collected during the Apollo missions have revealed origins from beyond the Earth-Moon system, supporting a hypothesis of ancient cataclysmic bombardment for both worlds.

Samples of Apollo 16 breccia that contain chondritic material (JSC)

Using scanning electron microscopes, researchers at the Lunar-Planetary Institute and Johnson Space Center have re-examined breccia regolith samples returned from the Moon, chemically mapping the lunar rocks to discern more compositional detail than ever before.

What they discovered was that many of the rocks contain bits of material that is chondritic in origin — that is, it came from asteroids, and not from elsewhere on the Moon or Earth.

Chondrites are meteorites that originate from the oldest asteroids, formed during the development of the Solar System. They are composed of the initial material that made up the stellar disk, compressed into spherical chondrules. Chondrites are some of the rarest types of meteorites found on Earth today but it’s thought that at one time they rained down onto our planet… as well as our moon.

The Lunar Cataclysm Hypothesis suggests that there was a period of extremely active bombardment of the Moon’s surface by meteorite impacts around 3.9 billion years ago. Because very few large impact events — based on melt rock samples — seem to have taken place more than 3.85 billion years ago, scientists suspect such an event heated the Moon’s surface enough prior to that period to eradicate any older impact features — a literal resurfacing of the young Moon.

There’s also evidence that there was a common source for the impactors, based on composition of the chondrites. What event took place in the Solar System that sent so much material hurtling our way? Was there a massive collision between asteroids? Did a slew of comets come streaking into the inner solar system? Were we paid a brief, gravitationally-disruptive visit by some other rogue interstellar object? Whatever it was that occurred, it changed the face of our Moon forever.

Curiously enough, it was at just about that time that we find the first fossil evidence of life on Earth. If there’s indeed a correlation, then whatever happened to wipe out the Moon’s oldest craters may also have cleared the slate for life here — either by removing any initial biological development that may have occurred or by delivering organic materials necessary for life in large amounts… or perhaps a combination of both.

Timeline for the Lunar Cataclysm Hypothesis (LPI)

The new findings from the Apollo samples provide unambiguous evidence that a large-scale impact event was taking place during this period  on the Moon — and most likely on Earth too. Since the Moon lacks atmospheric weathering or water erosion processes it serves as a sort of “time capsule”, recording the evidence of cosmic events that take place around the Earth-Moon neighborhood. While evidence for any such impacts would have long been erased from Earth’s surface, on the Moon it’s just a matter of locating it.

In fact, due to the difference in surface area, Earth may have received up to ten times more impacts than the Moon during such a cosmic cataclysm. With over 1,700 craters over 20 km identified on the Moon dating to a period around 3.9 billion years ago, Earth should have  17,000 craters over 20 km… with some ranging over 1,000 km! Of course, that’s if the craters could had survived 3.9 billion years of erosion and tectonic activity, which they didn’t. Still, it would have been a major event for our planet and anything that may have managed to start eking out an existence on it. We might never know if life had gained a foothold on Earth prior to such a cataclysmic bombardment, but thanks to the Moon (and the Apollo missions!) we do have some evidence of the events that took place.

Sample of lunar impact melt breccia, showing exterior and chondrule-filled interior. (Click for sample report.) Source: JSC

The LPI-JSC team’s paper was submitted to the journal Science and accepted for publication on May 2. See the abstract here, and read more on the Lunar Science Institute’s website here.

And if you want to browse through the Apollo lunar samples you can do so in depth on the JSC Lunar Sample Compendum site.

11 Replies to “A New Look at Apollo Samples Supports Ancient Impact Theory”

  1. How is this Lunar Cataclysm Hypothesis any different from the Nice model/ late heavy bombardment? Or does it fit in and refine?

    Any indications about what part of the Asteroid belt where the impactors originated? Perhaps the destabilized E belt?

  2. The “Lunar-Planetary Institute at Johnson Space Center” is not at JSC. It is nearby but a seperate institution.

  3. Possibly if the martian meteorites can be found on Earth, then a lot of rocks blasted off the Earth during Late Heavy Bombardment could be found on the Moon in well-preserved state…

  4. Recent evidence of interstellar planetary interlopers comes to mind… Should a ‘rogue’ planet enter an otherwise stable planetary system the ensuing gravitational disruption might wreck havoc on an otherwise stable planetary system? A ‘captured’ interloper might be gravitationally flung inwards and with subsequent close encounters with Saturn and/or Jupiter effect the orbitals of the inner planets? Hard to retro-guess wot mite happen(ed).. Hmm…

  5. Chondrites are some of the rarest types of meteorites found on Earth today

    Actually, they’re the commonest.

  6. Does this correlate in time to when the large gas giants planets began to migrate to their present locations — further out in the Solar System? It is my understanding that this is when this Late Heavy Bombardment took place (– and what caused it to occur.)

  7. It is good that they have found unambigious chondrites, which is another test for the Nice theory that would be most likely responsible for the impactors. But the dating problems of Moon impactors remains, and the presence of a Late Heavy Bombardment spike remains ambiguous.

    The LHB says little about earliest life, since very few rocks survives from > 3.4 Ga bp due to plate tectonics.

    Note that the earliest accepted evidence for life is ~ 3.5 Ga bp. The isotopic evidence from ~ 3.8 Ga bp is accepted by few early life researchers nowadays, and is no better or worse than similar evidence of a large supply of light carbon from ~ 4.1 Ga bp in diamond inclusions of Hadean zircons. The light carbon, otherwise a biological signature, can arise from hydrothermal Fischer-Tropsch reactions of carbon monoxide out of mineralogically catalyzed carbon dioxide.

Comments are closed.