The shape of the two-mile-tall Texas-sized ice cap at the north pole of Mars has puzzled scientists for forty years, but new results to be published in a pair of papers in the journal Nature on May 27 have put the controversy to rest.
The polar caps of Mars have been known since the first telescopic views of the planet, but early spacecraft images revealed that the north polar cap is scored by enigmatic troughs that spiral out from its center, as well as a chasm larger than the Grand Canyon. The origin of these features has been debated since they were first discovered in 1972.
Remove All Ads on Universe Today
Join our Patreon for as little as $3!
Get the ad-free experience for life
One hypothesis to explain the giant canyon, called Chasma Boreale, is that volcanic heat melted the ice and caused a catastrophic flood that formed the chasm. Other scientists have suggested that wind sweeping downhill from the top of the cap carved Chasma Boreale from the ice.
Multiple explanations have been suggested for the spiral troughs too. One explains the troughs as fractures caused by the flow of ice from the pole. Another uses a model to suggest that the troughs are the natural result of solar heating and lateral heat conduction in the ice.
The two new papers, led by Jack Holt and Isaac Smith of The University of Texas at Austin’s Institute for Geophysics, used data from the Shallow Subsurface Radar (SHARAD) on the Mars Reconnaissance Orbiter (MRO) to study the internal structure of the ice cap and discover the origin of the troughs and the chasm.
“SHARAD sends pulses of radio waves from orbit, 700 times per second,” Holt explained. “Some energy is reflected from the surface, and then from subsurface interfaces if the intervening material allows the radio waves to penetrate. Radar at this wavelength (about 20 meters) penetrates ice very well, and it has been used from airplanes on Earth to map large portions of Earth’s ice sheets.”
“By putting all of the reflections together one can make an image of what lies beneath the
surface,” Smith added.
Holt explained that the ability to map not only the surface features but also the internal structure of the ice cap “opens the door to better understand what we see on the surface by providing critical context in time.”
By mapping the three-dimensional structure of the north polar ice cap, Smith and Holt have determined that both the troughs and Chasma Boreale were formed by katabatic winds, which blow down from the top of the ice cap.
“We aren’t saying they were carved by wind, rather that wind had a strong role in their formation and evolution.” Holt said. “Chasma Boreale is an old feature that persisted because new ice did not accumulate there, likely due to persistent winds coming from the highest point on the ice cap.”
Holt also discovered evidence for another old canyon that has been completely filled in over time. “No evidence remains on the surface to indicate that it was there previously,” Holt said. “We can map it in the radar data, however.”
The spiral troughs likewise are controlled by the wind. “The radar layers we see show evidence for wind transport because they vary in thickness and elevation [across the troughs],” Smith, lead author of the trough paper, explained. “The wind moves across the trough instead of through it [and] moves ice from the upwind side (thereby thinning they layer) to the downwind side (adding more to the existing layer).”
This causes the spiral troughs to migrate upwind over time, a phenomenon first proposed by Alan Howard, a researcher at the University of Virginia, in 1982. “Many people proposed other hypotheses suggesting he was wrong,” Smith said. “But when you look at a hypothetical cross section from his paper, it looks almost exactly like what we see in the radar data. We were amazed at how accurate Alan Howard predicted what we would
The troughs are spiral shaped due to the planet’s rotation. As the katabatic winds blow from the center of the cap down to lower latitudes they are twisted by the same “coriolis force” that causes hurricanes to spiral on the Earth.
The layers that Holt and Smith mapped using radar data also suggest that ice flows are much rarer on Mars than they are on Earth. The lack of flows means that the polar ice on Mars preserves more complex layers than expected. “This complexity provides very specific constraints on the climatic processes responsible for [the layers],” Holt said. “We will eventually be able to reconstruct winds and accumulation patterns across the polar cap and through time.”
Holt plans to use the ancient polar landscapes inferred from the SHARAD data along with simulations of the martian climate to model the formation of the polar cap. “If we can recreate the major features such as Chasma Boreale [in the models], then we will have learned a great deal about climate on Mars during that period.”
Smith and Holt also plan to study the effect of Mars’ tilt on the formation of the ice cap. “Because Mars’ orbit and tilt change so much with respect to the sun, it would be nice to see how that has affected deposition of ice on the cap. This requires much more mapping, and we have already begun that process,” Smith said.
“There is still much research to do on Mars,” Smith said. “The planet has a lot of mysteries, some of which we haven’t even found yet.”
8 Replies to “Mars Polar Cap Mystery Solved”
Isaac Smith suggested that I mention that he is an active BAUT forum member. His user name is “crosscountry”.
I remember being fascinated by the first images of the spiral troughs in the northern polar ice cap taken by Mariner 9. Over the years many explanations have been put forward. After forty years, finally, closure. 🙂
BTW, Wikipedia notes that Mariner 9 is still in a stable orbit and expected to reenter the Martian atmosphere around 2022!
Another fine example of a critical thinker who reasoned through evidence instead of believing everything published.
The history of cosmology is full of individuals who critically think through problems and don’t go with the flow, are ridiculed and later proved correct.
I’ve said it many times… if all you do is believe all the pretty pictures and slides without thinking through things, you will end up cutting and pasting other individuals work; without actually learning a thing for yourself.
Research isn’t looking for things in the work others have done. Research is collecting evidence and doing work the first time.
I completely agree. This seems to be a common problem is all sciences these days, not to mention journalism or politics.
“The history of cosmology is full of individuals who critically think through problems and don’t go with the flow, are ridiculed and later proved correct.”
That does not mean that ALL ridiculed people are correct. 99.9% of then are ripe for psychiatry.
“Research isn’t looking for things in the work others have done. Research is collecting evidence and doing work the first time.:
BS, most new research is built on research from others. Not some nut in a basement that never read other science papers and invents something weird.
News papers are indeed very bad in this.
Nice to see some results publicised from an instrument aboard MRO that isn’t the HiRISE camera. HiRise is very nice, but the other instruments are muy capable too!
You wouldn’t know anything about research even if it smacked you in the head. You just hide behind this facade just cover your own ignorance. Anyone criticises you and then your just run away like the stinking coward you are.
Didn’t Newton say; “If I have seen further it is by standing on the shoulders of giants”?
Comments are closed.