How do you determine the thickness of an ocean that you can’t see, let alone know how salty it is? Europa, the sixth satellite from Jupiter, is thought to have an ocean of liquid water underneath its icy surface. We know this because of its remarkably uncratered surface and the way its magnetic field reacts with that of Jupiter. New results that take into consideration Europa’s interaction with the plasma surrounding Jupiter â€“ in addition to the magnetic field â€“ give us a better picture of the ocean’s thickness and composition. This will help future robotic explorers know how deep they need to tunnel to reach the oceans underneath.
“We know from gravity measurements made by Galileo that Europa is a differentiated body. The most plausible models of Europa’s interior have an H2O-ice layer of thickness 80-170km. However, the gravity measurements tell us nothing about the state of this layer (solid or liquid),” said Dr. Nico Schilling of the Institut fÃ¼r Geophysik und Meteorologie in KÃ¶ln, Germany.
The water in Europa’s ocean â€“ just like the water in our own ocean â€“ is a good conductor of electricity. When a conductor passes through a magnetic field, electricity is produced, and this electricity has an effect on the magnetic field itself. It’s just like what happens inside an electric generator. This process is called electromagnetic induction, and the intensity of the induction gives a lot of information about the materials involved in the process.
But Europa doesn’t only interact with the magnetic field coming from Jupiter, however; it also has electromagnetic interactions with the plasma surrounding Jupiter, called the magnetospheric plasma. This same thing happens on Earth in a way that is very familiar: Earth has a magnetosphere, and when plasma coming from the Sun interacts with our magnetosphere we see the beautiful Aurora Borealis phenomenon.
Remove All Ads on Universe Today
Join our Patreon for as little as $3!
Get the ad-free experience for life
This process, happening intermittently as Europa orbits Jupiter, has an effect on the induction field of the subsurface ocean of the moon. By combining these measurements with the previous measurements of the interaction between Europa and Jupiter’s magnetic field, the researchers were able to get a better picture of just how thick and how conductive Europa’s ocean is. Their results were published in a paper titled, Time-varying interaction of Europa with the jovian magnetosphere: Constraints on the conductivity of Europa’s subsurface ocean, which appears in the August 2007 edition of the journal Icarus.
The researchers compared their models of Europa’s electromagnetic induction with the results of Galileo’s magnetic field measurements, and found that the total conductivity of the ocean was about 50,000 Siemens (a measure of electrical conductivity). This is much higher than previous results, which placed the conductivity at 15000 Siemens.
Depending on the composition of the ocean, though, the thickness could be between 25 and 100km, which is also thicker than the previously estimated lower limit of 5km. The less conductive the ocean is, the thicker it must be to account for the measured conductivity, and this depends on the quantity and type of salt found in the ocean, which still remains unknown.
Taking into account the interactions with the magnetospheric plasma are important when studying the composition of planets and moons.
Dr. Schilling said, “The plasma interaction effects the magnetic field measurements, but not e.g. the gravity measurements. So in every case in the Jupiter system, where magnetic field measurements were used to get some informations from the interiors of the moons, the plasma interaction has to be considered. An example is for instance Io, where the first flybys suggested that Io may have an internal dynamo field. It turned out that the measured magnetic field perturbation was not an internal field but was created by the plasma interaction.”
Europa and Io, though, are not the only place where magnetic fields and plasma interactions can tell us about the nature of a planet’s interior; this same method was also used to detect the geysers of Enceladus, one of Saturn’s moons.
“The first hints of an active south polar region came from the magnetic field measurements and the simulations of the plasma interaction, before Cassini actually saw the geysers,” Dr. Schilling said.
With the discovery of entire ecosystems at the bottom of oceans here on Earth – ecosystems entirely cut off from sunlight – the discovery of oceans on Europa gives scientists hope that there could be life there. And this new discovery helps researchers understand what kind of ocean they could be dealing with.
Now, we just have to tunnel down through the shell of ice and look for ourselves.
7 Replies to “Europa’s Ocean: Thick or Thin?”
Great article. I found only one small problem. I have no reference point to understand the Siemens unit of measure. It would have helped if the article had said “…50,000 Siemens, about (five times)(half) that of earth’s oceans.”
Also, I am finding keywords double-underlined and highlighted in green. When I hover my mouse pointer over one of them, I get a popup for Windows Live Search. It does this for the term, Siemens, and then offers to give me information on the Siemens corporation. Fraser, is this something you have sanctioned?
Off Topic I guess BUT….. there definitely IS a double underline under all the MSN Live search Ads… also… if they are a problem for you and you can see them coming why click on them (these are here to make money for Fraiser… not give you info)??
p.s. I hope they do some kind of science at Europa in my lifetime.. life there would mean life could be just about anywhere in the universe (which I believe anyway) very interesting!!
“Also, I am finding keywords double-underlined and highlighted in green. When I hover my mouse pointer over one of them, I get a popup for Windows Live Search. It does this for the term, Siemens, and then offers to give me information on the Siemens corporation. Fraser, is this something you have sanctioned?”
Only if you are the lucky winning 999,999 visitor to UT. I have been, every time I sign on, for three months now.
Slightly more on topic, all-ocean worlds have been an SF topic for years. To find one, and a frozen one at that, in our own solar system is wonderful.
Speaking of frozen, putting a rocket decelerated probe down on the surface of Europa might be a very wet experience.
That popup is an advertisement for MSN Live Search. So it’s sanctioned.
I don’t think that is a universal problem. I don’t see any underlined text like that.
i think that , as far as our system is concerned, europa may be the best bet. it has water, a protective “shell” to shield it from jupiter, and potential seabed energy sources thanks to interaction with jupiter.
with that said, i don’t really feel that any planets or moons in our system hold all that much promise. in europa’s case, there are other potential conductors. that ocean may turn out to be quite toxic.
hopefully i’m wrong 🙂
“in europa’s case, there are other potential conductors. that ocean may turn out to be quite toxic.”
Well that’s the fun thing about extremophile life. What’s toxic for us could be heaven for something else. We’ve already found life that thrives in extremely alkaline or acidic environments, extreme temperature conditions, and even inside the core containment walls of nuclear reactors.
Comments are closed.