Rogue Black Holes May Wander the Galaxy

by Nancy Atkinson on April 29, 2009

Want to stay on top of all the space news? Follow @universetoday on Twitter

Artists concept of a rogue black hole floating near a globular cluster star near the outskirts of the Milky Way. Credit: David A. Aguilar, CfA

Artists concept of a rogue black hole floating near a globular cluster star near the outskirts of the Milky Way. Credit: David A. Aguilar, CfA


Here’s another “rogue black hole” theory, which hopefully doesn’t set the doomsday crowd off on a new tangent. But new research suggests that hundreds of massive black holes, left over from the early galaxy-building days of the Universe, may wander the Milky Way. Astrophysicists Ryan O’Leary and Avi Loeb say that rogue black holes originally lurked at the centers of tiny, low-mass galaxies. Over billions of years, those dwarf galaxies smashed together to form full-sized galaxies like the Milky Way. But they also predict that Earth should be safe, as the closest rogue black hole should reside thousands of light-years away.

“These black holes are relics of the Milky Way’s past,” said Loeb, from the Harvard Smithsonian Center for Astrophysics. “You could say that we are archaeologists studying those relics to learn about our galaxy’s history and the formation history of black holes in the early universe.”

Astronomers say if these wandering black holes could be located, they could provides clues to the formation of the Milky Way.

The theory predicts that each time two proto-galaxies with central black holes collided, their black holes merged to form a single, “relic” black hole. During the merger, directional emission of gravitational radiation would cause the black hole to recoil. A typical kick would send the black hole speeding outward fast enough to escape its host dwarf galaxy, but not fast enough to leave the galactic neighborhood completely. As a result, such black holes would still be around today in the outer reaches of the Milky Way halo.

This sounds similar to another “rogue black hole” theory released in 2008 from Vanderbilt University, where a supercomputer simulation predicted colliding black holes created in globular clusters would be kicked out of their home and left to wander the galaxy. Astronomers have been looking for them for years, and even after all that searching, they’ve only come up with a couple of tentative candidates.
But Loeb and O’Leary say hundreds of rogue black holes should be traveling the Milky Way’s outskirts, each containing the mass of 1,000 to 100,000 suns. They would be difficult to spot on their own because a black hole is visible only when it is swallowing, or accreting, matter.

There could be on telltale sign, however. A surrounding cluster of stars could be yanked from the dwarf galaxy when the black hole escaped. Only the stars closest to the black hole would be tugged along, so the cluster would be very compact.

But still it would be hard to determine. Due to the cluster’s small size on the sky, appearing to be a single star, astronomers would have to look for more subtle clues to its existence and origin. For example, its spectrum would show that multiple stars were present, together producing broad spectral lines. The stars in the cluster would be moving rapidly, their paths influenced by the gravity of the black hole.
O’Leary and Loeb say now that they know what to look for, astronomers should begin scanning the skies for a population of highly compact star clusters in the Milky Way’s halo.

The number of rogue black holes in our galaxy will depend on how many of the proto-galactic building blocks contained black holes at their cores, and how those proto-galaxies merged to form the Milky Way. Finding and studying them will provide new clues about the history of our galaxy.

Loeb and O’Leary’s journal paper will be published in the Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society and is available online at arXiv.

About

Nancy Atkinson is Universe Today's Senior Editor. She also is the host of the NASA Lunar Science Institute podcast and works with the Astronomy Cast and 365 Days of Astronomy podcasts. Nancy is also a NASA/JPL Solar System Ambassador.

  • Nereid

    Exoplanets (extra-solar planets); the Tutorials page of exoplanet.eu (not all the links are useful, but in English the ASU and Scholarpedia: Microlensing exoplanets ones between them cover the three methods I refer to):
    http://exoplanet.eu/overview.html

  • Nereid

    H.E.S.S. (High Energy Stereoscopic System, a system of Imaging Atmospheric Cherenkov Telescopes) page on detection of ~100 GeV -10 TeV+ gammas from the Crab:
    http://www.mpi-hd.mpg.de/hfm/HESS/pages/home/som/2004/10/

  • Nereid

    Auger Observatory, established with an objective to study UHECRs (ultra-high energy cosmic rays):
    http://www.auger.org/observatory/

    If you click on News, and then the top story (“Highest-Energy Cosmic Rays Linked With Violent Black Holes”) you’ll find an article, aimed at the general reader, on the source directions of UHECRs.

  • Nereid

    The Hipparcos Space Astrometry Mission:
    http://www.rssd.esa.int/index.php?project=HIPPARCOS

    Click on High Proper Motion Stars, under Educational Resources, for a few words about Barnard’s star.

  • Nereid

    WMAP (Wilkinson Microwave Anisotropy Probe) Five Year Data Scientific Papers page:
    http://lambda.gsfc.nasa.gov/product/map/dr3/map_bibliography.cfm

    Click on the Nolta et al. one (“Five-Year Wilkinson Microwave Anisotropy Probe (WMAP) Observations: Angular Power Spectra”) for details of the angular power spectrum.

  • Nereid

    APOD (Astronomy Picture of the Day), 5 February 2005 is a visualisation of the 408 MHz radio sky, based on data compiled by Haslam et al.
    http://antwrp.gsfc.nasa.gov/apod/ap050205.html

    None of the links in this APOD seem to take you to the source, a 1992 Astronomy and Astrophysics Supplement Series paper (“A 408 MHz all-sky continuum survey. II – The atlas of contour maps”) by Haslam et al.; if anyone’s interested, ask and I’ll provide a link to that too.

  • Nivag

    One thing not mentioned about black holes, is the affect of time dilation.

    Essentially,, the gravitational field is so intense, that time starts to flow more slowly as you approach the event horizon from outside, and continues to slow down inside..

    From what I understand, the time taken for matter to reach the point at the centre, increases asymptotically the closer it gets to the centre.- according to General Relativity.

    Hence, no infinity is created within a finite time interval.

    Since we can only observe things outside the event horizon, we cannot see what is happening inside. But that does not stop us from proposing theories about what is happening inside the event horizon – we can evaluate the theories based on how well the explain what we observe outside the event horizon.

    In the centre of our galaxy, we observe stars orbiting at very high speeds. This means we can calculate the amount of mass around which they are orbiting. Other observations can give us an upper estimate as to the diameter of the central object. From that and other observations, we deduce that an object matching that predicted by black hole theories exists.

    One of the key things to remember, is that mathematics helps us model the universe and produce theories. However, mathematics itself, is not reality. though immensely useful.

    I hope this helps.

    I have been interested in black holes for over 40 years.

  • Nivag

    Note that General Relativistic time dilation has to be allowed for in order for GPS systems to be sufficiently accurate.

  • Lawrence B. Crowell

    The relativistic time dilation for a black hole is,

    s = (1 – 2GM/c^2r)t.

    Time intervals you observe on a clock approaching the horizon, here the standard time t, and where s is the propertme of the clock becomes huge for any interval s on the clock’s frame. Things which approach a black hole will then slow down and never reach the horizon.

    There are also interesting spatial contractions. The apparent length of a body along the radius of the black hole will contract as well by (1 – 2GM/c^2r). However, since time is slowing down the size of oscialltors (say atoms or strings) must also appear to increase. So a superstring will appear to spread across the horizon! As the string approaches the horizon it will begin to densely cover the horizon, and all the high frequency ‘folds” or bends in the string are smeared around. This is the essense of Lenny Susskind’s “stretched horizon.” This then leads to the holographic principle and lots of theoretical fun with duality principles between conformal fields and cosmological spacetimes.

    Lawrence B. Crowell

  • Lawrence B. Crowell

    As for Nereid’s question about my remark on “these guys,” I don’t know their particular ideas by their moniker here. There is one plasma universe wag with the name “OilsMastery,” who is really out there. He insists there is no such thing as gravity.

    One thing they have in common is that they talk a lot about plasma physics, but they make few references to actual magnetohydrodynamics MHD. PU is more of a scientism-ideology than anything else.

    Plasma physics or MHD is a very difficult area of physics, for the dynamical equations have no known system of solutions in closed form. In fact the basic hydrodynamic equation, the Navier-Stokes equation, is not well understood. Clay-Math has a $million prize open for a mathematical understanding of its solution set.. MHD involves coupling this with the Maxwell equations which makes things very tough.

    Lawrence B. Crowell

  • Nivag

    Lawrence B. Crowell, what do you think of this:

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gravitational_time_dilation

  • Lawrence B. Crowell

    Crap! I forgot the square roots on what I wrote! Yes, this is basically the physics of gravity and time. You might think of gravity as a slowing of time in the presence of a source or spacetime configuration. Fermat derived something called the “principle of least time” for optics. So the slowing down of time is similar to an index of refraction of a lens. Here the index is determined directly by the time dilation, as just as with a lens it bends the paths of particles and light.

    Lawrence B. Crowell

Previous post:

Next post: