Even Early Galaxies Had Supermassive Black Holes

by Nancy Atkinson on October 16, 2008

Artist’s conception of the 4C60.07 system of colliding galaxies. Credit: David A. Hardy/UK ATC

Artist’s conception of the 4C60.07 system of colliding galaxies. Credit: David A. Hardy/UK ATC


We’re learning more about black holes and the early universe all the time, with the help of all the amazing ground-based telescopes astronomers now have at their disposal. Astronomers think that many – perhaps all – galaxies in the universe contain massive black holes at their centers. New observations with the Submillimeter Array now suggest that such colossal black holes were common even 12 billion years ago, when the universe was only 1.7 billion years old and galaxies were just beginning to form. The new conclusion comes from the discovery of two distant galaxies, both with black holes at their centers, which are involved in a spectacular collision.

4C60.07, the first of the galaxies to be discovered, came to astronomers’ attention because of its bright radio emission. This radio signal is one telltale sign of a quasar – a rapidly spinning black hole that is feeding on its home galaxy.

When 4C60.07 was first studied, astronomers thought that hydrogen gas surrounding the black hole was undergoing a burst of star formation, forming stars at a remarkable rate – the equivalent of 5,000 suns every year. This vigorous activity was revealed by the infrared glow from smoky debris left over when the largest stars rapidly died.

The latest research, using the keen vision of the Submillimeter Array of eight radio antennas located in Hawaii, revealed a surprise. 4C60.07 is not forming stars after all. Indeed, its stars appear to be relatively old and quiescent. Instead, prodigious star formation is taking place in a previously unseen companion galaxy, rich in gas and deeply enshrouded in dust, which also has a colossal black hole at its center.

“This new image reveals two galaxies where we only expected to find one,” said Rob Ivison (UK Astronomy Technology Centre), lead author of the study that will be published in the Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society. “Remarkably, both galaxies contain supermassive black holes at their centers, each capable of powering a billion, billion, billion light bulbs. The implications are wide-reaching: you can’t help wondering how many other colossal black holes may be lurking unseen in the distant universe.”

Due to the finite speed of light, we see the two galaxies as they existed in the distant past, less than 2 billion years after the Big Bang. The new image from the Submillimeter Array captures the moment when 4C60.07 ripped a stream of material from its neighboring galaxy, as shown in the accompanying artist’s conception. By now the galaxies have merged to create a football-shaped elliptical galaxy. Their black holes are likely to have merged and formed a single, more massive black hole.

The galaxies themselves show surprising differences. One is a dead system that has formed all of its stars already and used up its gaseous fuel. The second galaxy is still alive and well, holding plenty of dust and gas that can form new stars.

“These two galaxies are fraternal twins. Both are about the size of the Milky Way, but each one is unique,” said Steve Willner of the Harvard-Smithsonian Center for Astrophysics, a co-author of the paper.

“The superb resolution of the Submillimeter Array was key to our discovery,” he added.

Source: Smithsonian CfA


  • Eddie Maalouf

    I’m a bit confused. The article says that there is evidence that “colossal” Black holes existed as early as 1.7 Billion years after the Big Bang. Since Black holes are burned up stars that implode internally, and since “colossal” Black holes will require “colossal” stars that are large enough to form “colossal” Black holes when they die. Logic dictates that these “colossal” stars will burn longer than 1.7 Billion years before forming “colossal” Black holes?

    If the star that formed these early time Black holes were not “colossal” when they burned up and formed Black holes, then the Black holes that formed will be too small and will take them longer than 1.7 Billion years to suck enough enough matter to become “colossal”? Either way, that’s earlier (encompasses) than the time the Big Bang took place?

    Question: Is it possible that Black holes were in existence prior to and at the time of the Big Bang? Can the Big Bang be actually a “singular” super massive, colossal Black hole that swallowed an immense amount of gasses and mass then collapsed upon itself to the point of generating the Big Bang?

    Searching for theories and answers…
    emaalouf@starstream.net

  • Stephen Michael Orazi

    How do you know that we are not inside a black hole?

    Are they not simply a critical mass of energy that has broken down the inter-atomic forces that hold atomic structures in form?
    That hold the very atom itself in volume…
    That holds the electrons apart from the protons, and that holds true the electron existence as one would describe it in magnetic theory…
    Basically crunching mass to the point where it approaches a finite volume. Well, as far close to finite as we can observe. Perhaps even forming time itself.

    You may be focusing on the appearances that black holes have mass – yet we are only viewing the extent to which light is drawn closely enough to be accelerated by force.

    I think that answers would be attained faster if we were to calculate the rate of change (from earth point of reference) that the universe volume is accelerating at. At least to what we can surmise. Obviously if light is actually a constant then the volume would be accelerating due to a vector radius changing the size of the sphere. But is that rate of change constant? Or is the formula actually observed to be integration and/or a derivative? If you can accurately theories this for me, then I may be able to adorn you some answers. I think that the question in of itself may beg of the answer. If you can devise the formula to the rate of change, then I can tell you the critical mass that results in a black holes formation.

    So much mass held together with so much more force that the universe (light) can not hold it apart within the relative argument of existence and functioning laws of our universe…

    I gave Hawkins his paradox years ago… the dude knows one – I still have seven more…. <|;-)

    Keep up the good work guys, let me know the extents…. You have to see out to see in.

    Cheers,

    Peace

Previous post:

Next post: