Looking For a Free Ride To Venus?

The folks over at Ars Technica report that the Japanese Space Agency, JAXA, announced they are now accepting proposals for a microprobe that can hitch a ride with the Venus Climate Orbiter, Japan’s upcoming robotic mission to Venus. They will provide a free ride to either a low-Earth orbit or on a trajectory toward Venus. There are just a few requirements that JAXA has specified:

The launch booster for the Venus Climate Orbiter has room for one piggyback probe that can weigh up to 40 kilograms. It must fit into a 50x50x50 centimeter cube. After the microprobe is released, it will be on its own. JAXA will not assist with further correcting its trajectory or inserting it into an orbit around Venus.

The proposal must be submitted by a researcher based at a Japanese institution, and the mission will have to be managed in Japan. However, this does not preclude a Japanese team from collaborating with foreign researchers on a proposal. Also, all the documents for information and proposals are written in Japanese.

But if you’re in the market for a ride to Venus, the deadline for submitting your proposal is May 23, 2008. The announcement of JAXA’s micro-satellite program is posted here, and the specific announcement for piggybacking on Venus Climate Orbiter is here. The requirements for the micro-satellite and the application forms are found here.

Piggybacked micro-mission to a planet has been done before: NASA’s failed Mars Polar Lander mission had two accompanying microprobes, each weighing only 2.4 kilograms, that would have penetrated the Martian soil to take measurements if the mission had gone better. Mars Polar Lander and the two penetrator probes—named Deep Space 2—all failed independently of one another.

Original News Source: Ars Technica

10 Satellites Launched in Record Setting Mission for India (Video)

India’s space agency sent a record 10 satellites into Earth orbit with a single launch early Monday. The Polar Satellite Launch Vehicle (PSLV) rocket ejected all the satellites within minutes of each other after liftoff from the Sriharikota space station in southern India. Initial signals indicated all the satellites were working normally. India is seeking to compete with other space-faring nations for commercial launch services, and this mission’s success demonstrates India’s ability to launch multiple payloads into precise orbit. The flight breaks the previous record of eight satellites launched at once by a Russian rocket, according to Indian news reports.


It was the 13th flight of the Polar Satellite Launch Vehicle, which has “repeatedly proved itself as a reliable and versatile workhorse launch vehicle,” said Indian Space Research Organization (ISRO.) Later this year India will launch its own a lunar mission, Chandrayaan which will orbit the moon to create chemical and topographical maps.

The satellites included a 690-kilogram (1,518-pound) remote-sensing satellite, Cartosat-2A, an 83-kilogram mini-satellite and a cluster of eight so-called nano-satellites, each weighing between three kilograms and 16 kilograms. The two larger satellites were built by the ISRO, but the nano-satellites were built by research institutions from Europe, Canada and Japan.

“[India] wants to market its launch systems and also its capability in earth imagery,” said Ajay Lele, a space expert at the Institute of Defence Studies and Analyses in New Delhi. “The mission is very significant from a commercial point of view.”

“The mission was perfect,” said ISRO chairman G. Madhavan after the launch was telecast live.

“It is a historic moment for us because it is the first time that we have launched 10 satellites in a single mission,” he added.

Cartosat-2A, the main satellite launched Monday to an altitude of 630 kilometres (391 miles) above earth, also has a domestic economic dimension and can be used for intelligence gathering as well, officials say.

Here’s a YouTube Video from an Indian television station (in English) with more information about the launch.

Last year, India launched an Italian spacecraft into orbit, and in January 2008, it launched an Israeli spy satellite.

For more information about India’s space agency: ISRO.

Original News Source: AFP

Globular Clusters Are Less Evolved than Astronomers Thought

Some of the oldest structures in the Milky Way are the globular clusters. Ancient collections of millions of stars, that have held together by mutual gravity over billions of years. But new data collected by NASA’s Chandra X-Ray Observatory casts doubt on their “ancient nature”. They might be surprisingly less mature than astronomers previously believed.

According to conventional wisdom, globular clusters pass through three phases of evolution in the development of their structure: adolescence, middle age, and old age. Keep in mind, we’re talking about the age of the cluster here, not the age of the individual stars in the cluster.

One way to calculate the age of a cluster is to look for the presence of binary X-ray sources. These happen when two stars get so close to one another that they begin to transfer mass. The transfered material piles up into an accretion disk around one star, which can blaze brightly in the X-ray spectrum. Globular clusters should form these X-ray binaries in their middle age, and then lose them again as they reach old age.

Recent images from NASA’s Chandra X-Ray Observatory revealed the number of bright X-ray sources in two globular clusters: NGC 6397 and NGC 6121. While they were expecting to see less double stars in NGC 6397, it was just the opposite.

Instead of most globular clusters being in their middle ages, astronomers are starting to think that many are in an adolescent stage of evolution. When astronomers surveyed 13 globular clusters, 10 were in adolescence and only 3 were middle aged.

With so many clusters in the earlier stags of their evolution, the later stages must take much longer to reach than astronomers previously believed. Even though the clusters are already billions of years old, they’ve barely reached their prime.

Original Source: Chandra News Release

Book Review: The Mystery of the Missing Antimatter

Good mystery novels keep you in suspense to the very end. Luckily, our universe does the same to us. While we learn more, we learn that we have so much more to go. Helen Quinn and Yossi Nir in their book The Mystery of the Missing Antimatter look at one outstanding puzzle of particle physics. Suspense may lack somewhat but there’s no doubting that some high powered intellects are exercising lots of gray matter.

So, why would anyone think that antimatter is missing. Well, most people wouldn’t even acknowledge the existence of antimatter. Nevertheless through a simple process of deductive reasoning, principally via the rules of symmetry, Quinn and Nir let the reader know that matter needs antimatter. We do see lots of matter in our universe whether planets, stars or galaxies. Yet, there are no apparent globs of antimatter. So, either they lie hidden or they must have disappeared. This is the mystery that Quinn and Nir tackle.

With the theme of a murder mystery installed in the reader by a silhouette on the cover, this book takes the reader on a tour de force of the case at hand. That is, since about the last hundred years, we read of researchers who’ve developed models and experiments that have dived ever deeper into what is matter. Atoms gave way to protons, neutrons and electrons. These gave way to mesons, fermions, bosons, hadrons and leptons. Finally we read of the latest on the scene; the neutrinos with mass. How do these relate to matter? Well, via symmetry. That is, whatever we begin with, we will end with. This is the supposition that’s carried throughout the book. So, when small particles in accelerators crash together, the remnants must, in sum, equal the beginning, accounting for charge, mass and spin. This, the reader learns, is the simple basis for advancements in particle physics and its perception of the tiniest of the tiny. And this basis explains why antimatter must be accounted for somewhere or somehow.

Now this book is in a series entitled Science Essentials. Its objective is to convey to the reader, in clear prose, the fundamental knowledge underlying a rapidly evolving field. The book meets this need as it proudly trumpets the lack of any equations or math. Yet, it also lacks charts and explanatory figures. In particular, there’s a lack of an easy reference that links all the particles and variables together. For instance, reading of “each charged lepton converting to a single type of neutrino when it emits or absorbs a W-boson” can quickly lose a reader who is not familiar with particles, charms and colours as they relate to particle physics. Sure, the authors take the reader by the hand for introductions to each, but there’s a lot of which to keep track as one proceeds to “neutral particles of definite mass [that] are admixtures of two states of different strangeness”. Yes, this verbiage is essential and does build on itself. But, unless already indoctrinated, the reader will quickly feel overwhelmed. Essentially, all the words are familiar but they’re used in a very different way than as normally spoken on the street. Reading this book will help the average reader in understanding the relevant press clippings. It certainly won’t dish out all the tricks of the particle physicist

Yet, this lack of affinity is perhaps the failing of the average reader rather than the writer. This book takes the reader on a breathtaking foray into the depths of the particles that make-up our body and our worlds. A flavourful timeline at the end of the book shows just how quickly our knowledge is transporting us into an existence of knowing. As the authors note, our understanding increases but we still don’t know why antimatter is missing. But we know it exists and we’re not giving up the search. It is good to be more aware of our existence and this book does provide the necessary background even though the reader may need to re-read or passage or two.

Assuming the universe came from nothing, then the sum of its parts must still be nothing. Hence matter that we readily see must have an equivalent antimatter. But where? Helen Quinn and Yossi Nir consider this in their book The Mystery of the Missing Antimatter. And, like an affable Dr. Watson, the reader can journey with them as they explore this still unsolved case.

Read more reviews or purchase a copy online from Amazon.com

Podcast: The End of the Universe Part 1: The End of the Solar System

planetary nebula
Planetary nebula. The future for our Sun. Image credit: Hubble

This is a show we wanted to do since we started Astronomy Cast but we always thought it was too early. We wanted you to know that we’re positive, happy people with enthusiasm for astronomy and the future. It’s time for some sadness. It’s time for a grim look to see what the future holds for the Universe. This week we stay close to home and consider the end of humanity, the Earth, the Sun, and the entire Solar System. Next week we’ll extend out to the very end of the Universe.

Click here to download the episode

The End of the Universe Part 1: The End of the Solar System – Show notes and transcript

Or subscribe to: astronomycast.com/podcast.xml with your podcatching software.

The Earth’s Cities at Night

You only have to walk outside at night, look up and not see the Milky Way to know that light pollution is a problem. And seen from space at night, the Earth’s surface glows with the light of millions of homes, buildings, cars and streetlights. Seen at night, our impact on the Earth is immediate and obvious.

A few years ago, NASA and NOAA compiled a complete world map of the nighttime Earth, using 9 months of data collected by satellites. This “Night Lights” image is pretty famous, and widely circulated around the Internet.

There’s a great article at NASA’s Earth Observatory that describes how they capture these night images of the Earth’s surface. You can also see many of the best images taken so far.

Click here to read the article.

Discovery of Pluto

Once the planet Uranus was discovered, astronomers have suspected that there are probably more planets in the Solar System. Astronomers used Newtonian mechanics to predict Neptune from its perturbations of Uranus’ orbit. German astronomer Gottfried Galle found Neptune exactly where calculations predicted it should be.

Now that they knew the method worked, astronomers set about finding other planets beyond Neptune. In the late 19th century, astronomers were starting to suspect that another body was pulling on both Uranus and Neptune, and so they tried to calculate its position, and then go look for it.

Percival Lowell, a wealthy Bostonian who founded the Lowell observatory in Flagstaff, Arizona, took up that search. He searched from 1905 all the way up to his death in 1915, and he never found it.

The job then turned to a young astronomer named Clyde W. Tombaugh – a 22-year old Kansas farm boy. Tombaugh spent the better part of a year staring at two photographic plates capturing the same region of sky at two different points in time.

Using a tool called a blink comparator, Tombaugh finally turned up images of Pluto moving in 1930. It turns out there had been evidence of Pluto in earlier photographs, but nobody had noticed it yet.

As the discoverers, Tombaught and his team were given the honor of naming Pluto. In the end, they settled on the name Pluto, suggested by a British school girl.

Self-Healing Computers for Damaged Spaceships

View of the Westar 6 satellite while Dale Gardner retrieves it during STS-51-A in 1984 (NASA)

What happens when a robotic space probe breaks down millions of miles away from the nearest spacecraft engineer? If there is a software bug, engineers can sometimes correct the problem by uploading new commands, but what if the computer hardware fails? If the hardware is controlling something critical like the thrusters or communications system, there isn’t a lot mission control can do; the mission may be lost. Sometimes failed satellites can be recovered from orbit, but as there’s no interplanetary towing service for missions to Mars. Can anything be done for damaged computer systems far from home? The answer might lie in a project called “Scalable Self-Configurable Architecture for Reusable Space Systems”. But don’t worry, machines aren’t becoming self-aware, they’re just learning how to fix themselves…

When spacecraft malfunction on the way to their destinations, often there’s not a lot mission controllers can do. Of course, if they are within our reach (i.e. satellites in Earth orbit), there’s the possibility that they can be picked up by Space Shuttle crews or fixed in orbit. In 1984 for example, two malfunctioning satellites were picked up by Discovery on the STS-51A mission (pictured above). Both communications satellites had malfunctioning motors and couldn’t maintain their orbits. In 1993 Space Shuttle Endeavour (STS-61) carried out an orbital mirror-change on the Hubble Space Telescope. (Of course, there’s always the option that top secret dead spy satellites can be shot down too.)

Although both of the retrieve/repair mission examples above most likely involved mechanical failure, the same could have been done if their onboard computer systems failed (if it was worth the cost of an expensive manned repair mission). But what if one of the robotic missions beyond Earth orbit suffered a frustrating hardware malfunction? It needn’t be a huge error either (if it happened on Earth, the problem could probably be fixed quickly), but in space with no engineer present, this small error could spell doom for the mission.

So what’s the answer? Build a computer that can fix itself. It might sound like the Terminator 2 storyline, but researchers at the University of Arizona are investigating this possibility. NASA is funding the work and the Jet Propulsion Laboratory is taking them seriously.

Ali Akoglu (assistant professor in computer engineering) and his team are developing a hybrid hardware/software system that may be used by computers to heal themselves. The researchers are using Field Programmable Gate Arrays (FPGAs) to create self-healing processes at the chip-level.

FPGAs use a combination of hardware and software. Because some hardware functions are carried out at chip-level, the software acts as FPGA “firmware”. Firmware is a common computer term where specific software commands are embedded in a hardware device. Although the microprocessor processes firmware as it would any normal piece of software, this particular command is specific to that processor. In this respect, firmware mimics hardware processes. This is where Akoglu’s research comes in.

The researchers are in the second phase of the project called Scalable Self-Configurable Architecture for Reusable Space Systems (SCARS) and have set up five wireless networked units that could easily represent five cooperating rovers on Mars. When a hardware malfunction occurs, the networked “buddies” deal with the problem on two levels. First, the troubled unit attempts to repair the glitch at node level. By reconfiguring the firmware, the unit is effectively reconfiguring the circuit, bypassing the error. If it is unsuccessful, the unit’s buddies perform a back-up operation, reprogramming themselves to carry out the broken unit operations as well as their own. Unit-level intelligence is used in the first case, but should this fail, network-level intelligence is used. All the operations are performed automatically, there is no human intervention

This is some captivating research with far-reaching benefits. If computers could heal themselves at long-distance, millions of dollars would be saved. Also, the longevity of space missions may be extended. This research would also be valuable to future manned missions. Although the majority of computer issues can be fixed by astronauts, critical systems failures will occur; using a system such as SCARS could perform life-saving back up whilst the source of the problem is being found.

Source: UA News

Pluto, Planet X

In the beginning of the 20th century, astronomers studied the orbit of Neptune and calculated that there must be another planet in the outer reaches of the Solar System that was pulling at the planet with its gravity. Percival Lowell, who was made famous by his “discovery” of canals on Mars, coined the term for this theoretical object: Planet X.

Lowell performed two searches for Planet X, but failed to turn up the object. He revised his predictions for the location of Planet X twice, and failed to find it. Ironically, two faint images had been recorded on photograph plates at the Lowell observatory, but Lowell didn’t recognize them.

Lowell’s observatory continued to search for Planet X up until his death in 1916. So the task fell to Clyde Tombaugh. Tombaugh’s job was to systematically observe pairs of photographs taken of the night sky. He used a machine called a blink comparator, which flashed two images of the same region of the sky. Any moving objects, like asteroids or undiscovered planets, would appear to change in position from one image to the next.

On February 18, 1930, Tombaugh finally turned up the object he was looking for, and announced that he had discovered Planet X, later renamed to Pluto.

Astronomers have been searching for additional planets beyond Pluto ever since, hoping to find the elusive Planet X. Japanese astronomers have predicted that an object between the size of Mars and Earth could be out at the end of the Kuiper Belt – a region known as the Kuiper Cliff, at 55 astronomical units from the Sun.

Surface of Pluto

When you imagine cold, icy Pluto, orbiting in the distant regions of the Solar System, you imagine snowy white ball.

You can also look through these books from Amazon.com if you want more information about Pluto.

But images of Pluto, captured by the Hubble Space Telescope have shown that Pluto’s surface isn’t just pure ice. Instead, it has a dirty yellow color, with darker and brighter regions across its surface. Hubble studied the entire surface of Pluto as it rotated through a 6.4 day period.

The images revealed almost a dozen distinctive features never before seen by astronomers. This included a “ragged” northern polar cap cut in half by a dark strip, a bright spot seen to rotate around the dwarf planet, and a cluster of dark spots. The images also confirmed the presence of icy-bright polar cap features.

Some of the variations seen on Pluto’s surface could be topographic features, like basins and fresh impact craters. But most of them are probably caused by the complex distribution of frosts that move across Pluto’s surface during its orbital and seasonal cycles.

The surface area of Pluto is 1.795 x 107 square kilometers; about 0.033% the surface area of Earth.

When Pluto is furthest away from the Sun, gases like nitrogen, carbon monoxide and methane partially freeze onto its surface.

All will be revealed when NASA’s New Horizons spacecraft finally arrives at Pluto in 2015, finally capturing close-up pictures of Pluto and its moon Charon.