Categories: Exoplanets

Ground-Based Observatories Could use Starshades to see Planets too

All hail the occulter: an orbiting starshade for ground-based telescopes.

Ground-based telescopes and orbiting observatories have revealed thousands of exoplanets orbiting other stars. And while the techniques used by those instruments have proven to be incredibly powerful in discovery, they are decidedly less capable in characterization. That’s because most exoplanet-hunting techniques rely on indirect measurements of the existence of an exoplanet – they look for dips in the brightness of a parent star or slight wobbles in its position.

Those techniques only give us extremely limited information about what those exoplanets are really like. We have to make educated guesses as to their compositions. But astronomy is just like anything else: a picture is worth a thousand words. An image of an exoplanet provides extremely rich detail that simply cannot be gained from other techniques. But to take a picture of an exoplanet you have to contend with the overwhelming brightness of its parent star.

The most common method to deal with this interference is through a coronagraph, which is a device inside a telescope that blocks out the light of the star. If the orbiting planet is big enough and bright enough (usually in the infrared due to its own heat emission), we can get a direct picture. But this method has only delivered a handful of direct images.

What would it take to image Earth-like planets around sun-like stars? That is the question pondered in a recent paper appearing on the preprint journal arXiv.

To do that, you need a truly giant telescope, much bigger than the ones we can loft into space. And to get enough contrast, you need an equally massive coronagraph. One so big that it couldn’t fit within the telescope itself. In other words, you need starshades that are aimed at the ground: an occulter.

The idea is put an occulter in orbit around the Earth. If you tune its orbit precisely, it would periodically pass over a giant observatory, like the European Extremely Large Telescope. With exactly the right alignment, the occulter would block the light of a target star, allowing the telescope to directly image any orbiting planets.

While this setup wouldn’t provide as much continuous observing time as space-based arrangements, it would leverage the massive observing power of ground-based telescopes, which just might make the tradeoff worth it.

The starshades wouldn’t need to be all that big – 80 to 100 meters across. While we don’t have anything like that in space currently, the development of lightsail technology would provide the perfect platform for deploying something like this in the near future.

Paul M. Sutter

Astrophysicist, Author, Host | pmsutter.com

Recent Posts

Could Comets have Delivered the Building Blocks of Life to “Ocean Worlds” like Europa, Enceladus, and Titan too?

Throughout Earth's history, the planet's surface has been regularly impacted by comets, meteors, and the…

6 mins ago

There’s More Water Inside Planets Than We Thought

When you walk across your lawn or down the street, you move on the surface…

1 hour ago

Why Did Copernicus Reject Geocentrism?

Popular science history paints a picture of the Greek geocentric model dominating astronomical thought beginning…

4 hours ago

China Will Launch its Mars Sample Return Mission in 2028

While NASA's Mars Sample Return mission has experienced a setback, China is still moving forward…

10 hours ago

Artemis III Landing Sites Identified Using Mapping and Algorithm Techniques

Where would be the most ideal landing site for the Artemis III crew in SpaceX’s…

18 hours ago

One Step Closer to Solving the Mystery of Mars’ Lost Water

Few scientists doubt that Mars was once warm and wet. The evidence for a warm,…

1 day ago