Categories: AstronomyPhysics

Don’t Be Surprised if EmDrive Experiments Never Work

Every few years the “EmDrive”, a proposed method of generating rocket thrust without any exhaust, hits the news. Each time, everyone asks: could this be it? Could this be the technological leap to revolutionize spaceflight?

Don’t hold your breath.

Here’s the basic idea behind the EmDrive. You take a chamber with a funky shape (usually narrower on one end than the other). You let a bunch of microwave radiation bounce around inside it. Accordingly to some – ahemcontroversial experiments, the device begins to move, with no emission from the drive at all. This runs counter to the usual rocket setup, which requires the expulsion of a propellent to push a spacecraft around.

Proponents of the EmDrive claim that it represents a revolution in physics and technology, a great leap for mankind that frees us from the shackles of…well, needing a propellent. Sure, the claimed thrust is incredibly tiny – not even enough to push a piece of paper – but anything other than 0 would be a big deal.

Big deal indeed. Assuming that the EmDrive works as advertised, it completely violates known physics. And not just in a small way – it breaks one of the most important, fundamental, cornerstone aspects of physics: conservation of momentum.

Things can’t just start moving on their own. According to literally everything we know about physics, the EmDrive can’t just go all by itself. It has to push something out in the opposite direction, or react to something else, in order to generate thrust.

Momentum conservation isn’t just a cool idea. It underscores almost the entirety of modern physics. Everything from quantum field theory to general relativity are really just expressions of conservation of momentum in specialized contexts. Conservation of momentum has been experimentally confirmed countless times in everything from high-energy particle colliders to the expansion of the universe itself.

Yeah, sure, momentum conservation could be broken in a new, exotic case that we haven’t encountered before. But it’s unlikely to show up as a tiny thrust in an EmDrive, where the observed thrust is so small that there many other, more plausible, explanations: microwave leakage, reactions with the Earth’s magnetic field, miscalibration, etc.

We may someday find that we need to update our understanding of momentum conservation. But not today.

Paul M. Sutter

Astrophysicist, Author, Host | pmsutter.com

Recent Posts

New Study Addresses how Lunar Missions will Kick up Moondust.

Before the end of this decade, NASA plans to return astronauts to the Moon for…

1 day ago

How Warm Are the Oceans on the Icy Moons? The Ice Thickness Provides a Clue.

Scientists are discovering that more and more Solar System objects have warm oceans under icy…

1 day ago

NASA Tests the New Starship Docking System

The Apollo Program delivered 12 American astronauts to the surface of the Moon. But that…

2 days ago

China Has Built a Huge Space Simulation Chamber

Well it certainly caught my attention when I saw the headlines  “China’s first Space Environment…

2 days ago

The International Space Station’s Air Leaks are Increasing. No Danger to the Crew

Only the other week I had to fix my leaky tap. That was a nightmare. …

2 days ago

Planetary Atmospheres: Why study them? What can they teach us about finding life beyond Earth?

Universe Today has surveyed the importance of studying impact craters, planetary surfaces, exoplanets, astrobiology, solar…

2 days ago