Phoenix: Mars Soil Can Support Life

by Ian O'Neill on June 26, 2008

Phoenix delivers regolith to the wet lab (NASA/UA)
Another groundbreaking discovery from Mars: Phoenix has analysed martian regolith containing minerals more commonly found in soil here on Earth, and the acidity is not a hindrance for life to thrive. These new and very exciting results come after preliminary analyses of a scoop of regolith by the landers “wet lab” known as the Microscopy, Electrochemistry and Conductivity Analyzer (MECA) instrument. Although more data collecting needs to be done, trace levels of nutrients have already been detected. This, with the recent discovery of water ice, has amazed mission scientists, likening these new results to “winning the lottery.”

The MECA instrument is carrying out the first ever wet-chemical analysis on a planet other than Earth, and these first results are tantalisingly close to providing answers for the question: “Can Mars support life?” Taken from a scoop of top-soil, the robotic digger managed to excavate a 2 cm deep ditch, delivering the sample to the MECA where analysis could be carried out. The first results from the two-day wet-lab experiment are flooding in and mission scientists are excited by the results. “We are awash in chemistry data,” said Michael Hecht of NASA’s Jet Propulsion Laboratory and lead scientist for the MECA.

The salts discovered contain magnesium, sodium, potassium and chlorine, indicating these minerals had once been dissolved in water. The knowledge that these elements exist in martian regolith is nothing new, but the fact that they would be soluble in water means they would have been available for life to form. In fact, there are some strong similarities between the mineral content and pH level of the martian surface and soils more commonly found here on Earth.

This soil appears to be a close analog to surface soils found in the upper dry valleys in Antarctica. The alkalinity of the soil at this location is definitely striking. At this specific location, one-inch into the surface layer, the soil is very basic, with a pH of between eight and nine. We also found a variety of components of salts that we haven’t had time to analyze and identify yet, but that include magnesium, sodium, potassium and chloride.” – Sam Kounaves, Phoenix co-investigator, Tufts University.

From the question “Has Mars supported life?” to “Can Mars support life?” – The answer seems to be an overwhelming “Yes.” Although nitrates have yet to be detected, the Mars soil appears to have an alkalinity commonly found in terrestrial soils. At a pH of eight or nine, a zoo of bacteria and plants can live comfortably. Vegetables such as asparagus and turnips are farmed in soils to this degree of alkalinity. Besides, extreme forms of bacteria have been discovered in environments that resemble the alkalinity of bleach, exceeding a pH of 12. The martian surface has suddenly become a little more hospitable for life to thrive.

Over time, I’ve come to the conclusion that the amazing thing about Mars is not that it’s an alien world, but that in many aspects, like mineralogy, it’s very much like Earth.” – Kounaves.

Although these first results are very exciting, mission scientists are staying realistic. This is only one of several tests, plus it is a sample from a single location. As the digger only scooped a sample 2 cm deep, scientists are keen to see if the regolith deeper down has similar chemistry, so the intention is to dig deeper into the same location, possibly including ice.

Aside: The term “Mars soil”, up to this point, hasn’t been technically accurate. If we look at the definition of “soil” we get:

The material on the surface of the ground in which plants grow; earth
- Cambridge Dictionaries.
The top layer of the earth’s surface, consisting of rock and mineral particles mixed with organic matter.
- Answers.com

The stuff with a red hue on Mars is actually regolith, pulverized grains of rock from hundreds of millions of years of meteorite impacts, geological activity and weathering. Until Phoenix produced these new findings, the most accurate way to describe Mars “soil” was to call it regolith. But now, it seems, Mars regolith fulfils most of the characteristics of being a soil. It contains rock, it contains minerals and it appears to have a pH capable of sustaining plant growth. But does it already contain organic matter? Whether it contains anything “organic” now is open to debate, but it might do in the future…

Sources: Phoenix (UA), New Scientist

  • James

    Certain Earthly life could be as deadly to certain certain Martian life as Martian life could be to it.

  • Nexus

    When we start terraforming Mars (and I say “when” not “if” because I regard it as a near certainty) things will rapidly become very unpleasant for any native life.

  • bill

    hd Says:
    June 27th, 2008 at 9:42 am

    Yeah, right. Let’s nuke Mars, just in case…

    Its the only way to be sure….

  • http://www.chriscoles.com Chris Coles

    I agree with Nexus, Mars is downwind from the Earth and in all probability, has the same microbes as earth based upon the same evolutionary road map, but instead based upon the difference in local environments. Take the difference between Australian and North American species here and you will see what I mean. There is a permanent atmospheric connection between all the planets and always there is sufficient atmosphere at the surface of any object in space to be certain that life can exist in many places where conventional thinking says is impossible.

    Nexus, I believe the surface marking on Europa is caused by lichen. We will both be glued to our TV’s when a mission arrives at that frozen surface.

  • dollhopf

    Some microbes from our world could have survived inside of the “Phoenix “. They would be protected from the rough radiation which bombards the surface outside. When Martian winter comes and packs the whole vehicle in ice its structure could be damaged or broken up and life from earth could start with its Martian branch on the tree of evolution.

  • Maxwell

    Its difficult to know if life exists on mars without going there and spending many years shoveling through dirt to find it. The mission to send humans and their equipment will certainly contaminate mars with earth style life forms.

    Unfortunately for the mars purists, the survival of our species and creatures from this planet will eventually take priority over anything growing on mars.
    The preservation of a mossy rock will be of little consolation if we lose the best chance at saving our own species.

  • T.A. Radiant

    Go Phoenix, go! Fantastic discoveries and great job so far. I’m sure the lander and the spectacular NASA team will have more great finds from this neck of the Mars ‘woods’ before the winter freeze.

    Cheers.

  • James

    William Millard, you don’t need to force your vocabulary. You sound just a tad pretentious. Let’s try to keep this a little, hm, colloquial.
    I felt like I was reading Charles Dickens.

    As far as these people who are saying “Oh man, that mossy rock has no idea what we’ve got in store for it!” Chill, guys. I remember reading that Phoenix was isolated in its development and storage and should contain nothing biological on it. And sure, human contact with mars will contaminate the planet, but you guys are acting like you know the exact chain of events.
    We might never inhabit the entire planet of mars. Current ideas involve taking up an area smaller than a car (aside from explorations). We might have a negative impact on life in the close vicinity, but for us to wipe out the entire planet’s life? Not very likely? At least not in our early explorations (which will be the greater portion of the next hundred years or more). And, in worst case scenario, we would most definitely create a reservation or keep a living sample of any endangered life. While our species can be destructive in our curiosity, we’ve become concerned with not annihilating entire species.

  • John Umana

    Don’t break out the champagne just yet. The Phoenix Lander last week conducted its first wet chemical analysis through its Microscopy, Electrochemistry and Conductivity Analyzer (MECA), which mixes the soil sample with water and bakes the mud to 1,832 degrees Fahrenheit to test for chemical composition. The results show the martian soil had a pH between 8 and 9, meaning it is alkaline — the kind of soil you could grow vegetables in if you brought it back to Earth, tossed in some cow manure, and watered regularly. MECA detected the presence of magnesium, sodium, potassium and chloride but no organic carbon, the crucial ingredient necessary for life on Earth (alright, maybe silicon might also work). Interestingly, JPL tells us that the mineral content of the soil is not much different from the upper dry valleys in Antarctica. What Phoenix’ wet chemical analysis (still ongoing) shows is that there is no life in the soil sample tested by MECA. They’re going to dig down further in the next few days. The Phoenix Lander’s follow-the-water strategy for searching for organic compounds is, however, exactly the right strategy for NASA or other space agencies to pursue. Here’s a hint — if tomorrow we could land the Phoenix Lander or Mars Science Laboratory on Enceladus or Titan or any other body in this sun system, the test results would show that there is no life in this sun system other than on Earth. It takes more than liquid water for life to emerge. But the Milky Way galaxy is teeming with life and with intelligent life. As Mulder used to say, “the truth is out there.”

  • Eric Near Buffalo

    ~hd Says:
    June 27th, 2008 at 4:59 pm
    You have a point there.

    There’s some research going on right now on Earth btw to try and find “alien” life forms that use different chemistries than our “normal” life. ~

    Good because I have always thought that our searches for life were a close-minded search for carbon based life forms. I’m glad we’re searching for possible life with different chemical make-ups.

  • Andy

    I don’t believe life exists on Mars. Look at the Earth. Over the eons, life on this planet has evolved and adapted to every conceivable ecological niche. And you’re trying to tell me that, in the same amount of time, no Martian life has evolved to live on the surface? I don’t buy it.

  • James

    You make a really good point, Andy, but maybe the Earth was simply more suitable for all these ‘larger’ forms of life like mammals and plants.
    Maybe Mars could and can only support teeny microbes. If the Earth lacked our big oceans, would life as we know it exist? It may have stayed in the microscopic form.
    And, they say water once covered Mars, so maybe there was other life, but at one point it became unable to survive the environment.

    I think there are far too many possibilities to make any definite conclusions. I completely understand your logic, but I’m going to keep an open mind on the situation.

    Oh, and as another theory, who knows how the first clump of inanimate matter became animate and was life. The process could have happened recently on Mars, leaving no time for evolution.
    And on that note, that question has always annoyed me. How does a bunch of junk just…become alive?! I’m not turning to religion for the answer, either. I think science will answer it…one day.

  • http://www.gomarsgo.com TD

    Why do people get hung up over whether life evolved on Mars? When scientists look at an island, do they ask if life evolved there? no – they know life is there because physics moved it there – ovcean currents, wind currents, whatever. Space is no different…but the physics may get more complicated. Life can be moved by solar radiation (Arrhenius, 1908), magnetospheric plasmoids (Dehel, 2006), or meteor impact ejecta (unknown). Of course, life did originate somewhere….but that potentially took billions of years – not enough time for it to have evolved from rock on Earth before the first ancient signs of life appear. So does Mars have life? Of course.

  • RUF

    “Mars belongs to the Martians — even if they are only microbes.” — Carl Sagan

  • nemo

    Andy,
    Why would you or anybody think that life could never have existed on Mars? Our solar system is around 4.x billion years old. Some say that life started on earth around 3.x billion years ago. Life could have very well been on Mars then also. When the volcanism stoped life could have (probably) stopped as well. If it topped on Earth, life would most likely halt as well.

    You have to remember that to the best of our knowledge, the materials that made life possible here on Earth came from comets and such. Keeping this in mind means that it is very likely that life could also exist else where in the Universe. And more than likely would be eerily similar to life here, whether it’s micro organisms or sentient life.

    There are over 100 billion stars (suns) in our galaxy, and there is over 100 billion galaxies. The odds say life is out there, so why not Mars as well? I don’t ask if, I ask when?

  • R.L.BROWN

    In all probability life will be discovered on mars. The Pope has addressed his church on the subject, maybe he knows about some early findings? In any case it seems to be a mathematical impossibility for life not to exist elsewhere in the galaxy~universe. Even the growing number of UFO sightings leans toward this. A race of beings 1,000s to 1,000,000s of years ahead of our technology could easily close the distance from their world to ours. I personally think we are in a universe that is teaming with life in all stages of evolutionary advancement. Then what is life, some ask. Well since partical matter is just a stationary measurement of electromagnetic radiation that comprises all of existance, then life must be the universe looking back upon itself, through a telescope, a microscope or a miror.

  • Bill

    Seriously…. what better expiriment could we conduct on Mars than detonating 10 of our most powerful nuclear warheads on the planet? It would make for a fun light show, would give us a lot of information on what happens during multiple ground blast nuclear detonations and would kick up very large quantities of water ice which would sublimate into water vapor and allow us to see whether water vapor induced global warming is possible there. Beside that… it would be FUN!!!

Previous post:

Next post: