Universe Today
[/caption]
The announcement yesterday of the discovery of the closest Earth-sized planet found so far that also exists in the habitable zone around its star is certainly exciting (
read our previous article for all the details
). Gliese 581g is surely a
potentia
l habitable planet where liquid water
could
exist on the planet's surface, and many are touting the old adage of where there's water, there's life. However, some quotes from one of the scientists involved in the discovery might be feeding some wild speculation about the potential for life on this extrasolar planet and elsewhere. "Personally, given the ubiquity and propensity of life to flourish wherever it can, I would say, my own personal feeling is that the chances of life on this planet are 100 percent," said discoverer and astronomer Steven Vogt during a press briefing yesterday. "I have almost no doubt about it."
Yes, that is an exact quote. He really used those words. He also said that it would be pretty hard to imagine that water wouldn't exist on the planet, given the ubiquity of water in our solar system and beyond, and the habitable region in which this planet orbits.
Also participating in the briefing was Paul Butler of the Carnegie Institution of Washington, which provided funds for the observations at the Keck I telescope, and his comments were more tempered.
"Any discussion of life on at this point is purely speculative," Butler said. "What we know is that this planet exists at the right distance for liquid water it has the right amount of mass to hold on to its atmosphere and any liquid water on the surface. So any subsequent discussion of life there is purely speculative. That being said, on the Earth anywhere you find liquid water you find life in overwhelming abundance. The question should be, if this planet has liquid water, how can you rule out life doesn't exist? It is pretty probable that anywhere you find liquid water pooling, that you would find life existing."
Are Vogt's claims too extreme, or were they made in exhilaration during an exciting announcement? This has been a topic of debate on Twitter this morning. Some wondered if Vogt had been misquoted, and many expressed that Vogt's words may fuel off-the-deep-end speculation about the certainty of life on another world.
"Until we know more about this planet and the origin of life itself, any claim of certain habitation is idiotic and does not serve science," said
Dr. Stuart Clark
(
@DrStuClark
), author and astronomy journalist. To clarify, he wanted others to know that he thinks just the claim is idiotic, not the discovery or the people involved.
"As cool as it is, please realize that right now
all
we really know about it is its orbit and estimated mass. That's it." said Lee Billings (@leebillings), editor at Seed Magazine. "In other words, barring observational evidence that may still be a generation away, Gliese 581g is 'Earth-like' only in terms of mass/orbit."
From our pal
Phil Plait
, the Bad Astronomer (@badastronomer): "I understand what he meant - he thinks it
could
have life - but it was phrased unfortunately, and the media have jumped on it, of course."
From David Masten (@dmasten), CEO of the commercial space company
- Masten Space Systems
-
"I have an opinion or 3 about life on anything in Gliese 581! And I'd dare say much closer to zero chance. But I'm not an astrobiologist."
"Claiming a 100% chance of life on Gliese 581g is definitely an overreach," said astrophysicist
Juan Cabanela
(@Juan_Kinda_Guy) at Minnesota State University Moorhead, "given we currently have a sample of 1 planet with life."
"Vogt's extrapolation was certainly quite a leap. On the other hand, the media might finally get it that some scientists really do think life everywhere is possible - but not bug-eyed aliens" said Robert Cumming, (@maltesk), journalist at the Swedish magazine "
Populär Astronomi.
". "Then we can also discuss why there might not be life everywhere after all."
Mark Thompson
(
@PeoplesAstro
), Astronomy presenter on BBC's the One Show said the Vogt's quote was "absolutely and totally inappropriate. We can't even be 100% sure it's made of rock!!!"
From astronomer, educator and journalist
Nicole Gugliucci
(@noisyastronomer): "The public seems to have enough trouble trusting science these days without scientists making bold statements like that."
"100% is ridiculous," Tweeted frequent image contributor to Universe Today,
Stu Atkinson
(@mars_stu). "No
possible
way anyone could know that, surely?"
Many expressed excitement over the discovery, and Stu articulated perhaps the most colorful, which was re-tweeted several times yesterday: "Ah, a PROPER planet!" Not a great fat bloated sweaty "Who ate all the pies" 'hot Jupiter' tearing insanely around its star."
What are your views?
*all Tweets used by permission.
Here's an article about
abiogenesis
, theories about how life got started here on Earth.
