≡ Menu

White House Petition: Could we Build the Starship Enterprise?

Could we build a version of the Starship Enterprise over the next 20 years? Credit: BuildTheEnterprise.org

Earlier this year, an engineer who goes by the name of BTE Dan proposed building a full-sized, ion-powered version of a Constitution-Class Enterprise – from the original Star Trek – saying it could be built with current technology and could be completed within 20 years. Now, BTE Dan has started a White House petition — not to build the Enterprise but to just do a feasibility study and conceptual design of the USS Enterprise interplanetary spaceship. As of this writing, the petition has 1,414 signatures of the 25,000 needed by January 21, 2013 to be considered by the Obama administration.

The petition reads:

We have within our technological reach the ability to build the 1st generation of the USS Enterprise. It ends up that this ship’s inspiring form is quite functional. This will be Earth’s first gigawatt-class interplanetary spaceship with artificial gravity. The ship can serve as a spaceship, space station, and space port all in one. In total, one thousand crew members & visitors can be on board at once. Few things could collectively inspire people on Earth more than seeing the Enterprise being built in space. And the ship could go on amazing missions, like taking the first humans to Mars while taking along a large load of base-building equipment for constructing the first permanent base there.

See the petition and sign it here.

BTE Dan told Universe Today earlier this year that what he really is hoping for is to find a segment of scientists and engineers in the space industry to take an active interest and contribute to the ideas on his website, BuildTheEnterprise.org to help move the concept forward.

“I have been getting many offers of help from engineers outside the space industry, and that’s great,” he said via email. “But also what is needed are some experienced space engineers who adopt a can-do attitude about the concept of the Gen1 Enterprise.”

BTE Dan prefers to remain anonymous at this point, and his biggest concern has been that the scientists and engineers at NASA and their space contractors were going to be hostile about the idea, as his first brush with them did not go well.

Diagram of a proposed current generation of a Starship Enterprise. Credit: BuildTheEnterprise.org

“I am an outsider poking around in their sandbox, and human nature is that people don’t like that,” he said, noting that he knows his design may have fatal flaws, but that is why he is looking for assistance.

“There is a lot of waste heat to get rid of, today’s ion propulsions engines need major advances, and perhaps stability problems will be found with the gravity wheel,” he said.

When Universe Today broke the story of the BuildTheEnterprise concept in May of this year, it went viral and BTE Dan’s website crashed under the traffic.

“I really did not expect this at all,” he said at the time. “I did not plan for this level of web traffic!” He has since made upgrades to handle more traffic.

His website is complete with conceptual designs, ship specs, a funding schedule, and almost every other imaginable detail of how the Enterprise could be built. It would be built entirely in space, have a rotating gravity section inside of the saucer, and be similar in size with the same look as the USS Enterprise that we know from Star Trek.

The White House takes petitions on many topics at the “We the People” website and will consider them if they receive 25,000 signatures. Earlier this year, a petition to build a Death Star space station by 2016 received over 32,000 signatures, but so far there has not been an official response about it from the White House.


Nancy Atkinson is currently Universe Today's Contributing Editor. Previously she served as UT's Senior Editor and lead writer, and has worked with Astronomy Cast and 365 Days of Astronomy. Nancy is also a NASA/JPL Solar System Ambassador.

Comments on this entry are closed.

  • Avery Davis January 1, 2013, 8:58 PM

    Marc Millis shows the way to developing the propulsion technology we need to open up the Solar System to exploration and settlement, and eventually go to the stars, in his book Frontiers of Propulsion Science: https://www.aiaa.org/PubDetail.aspx?id=4002

  • Lawrence Jasper January 6, 2013, 11:07 AM

    The unbelievers who think we can’t build the ship are the same people who said we can’t go to the moon “its a fairy tale”. However, today unlike any period in history we have wireless communicators, internet, R & D of nano technologies (like nano fiber perfications systems in the Astronauts suits) scanners of the human body, computers that can run at speeds of 3.4 terra bites rather than 56k when we went to the moon. It is not only possible its realistic, since today we reap the benifits of going to the moon with items inspired by research done by NASA of the last 30 years. This includes the personal computer as the intergrated circuit was created by research and experiments put on by NASA. Over 8,000 products we use everyday in our lives today came from the space program, so why should we not do it again like we did in the 60’s and create jobs for those unemployed, and create a true vision for the future, rather than war and a one world government.

  • jonsebox28 January 6, 2013, 10:19 PM

    This is laughable.

    However, I strongly suspect this idea is not completely groundless. It probably has some meat to it, but not enough for it to ever fly. You know?

    The thing that’s good about this is that it’s better than a lot of things we do. We spend billions of dollars every year on fruitless pursuits like movies, sex, drugs and sport. People waste ungodly numbers of hours playing games which offer no benefit to them or anybody else. And yet here we have a concept that while unfeasible still pushes people to learn science in order to either debunk the idea or to support it.