≡ Menu

The First Photo From The Moon

“That’s one small step for a man, one giant leap for mankind.” After speaking these historic words at 10:56 EDT on July 20, 1969, marking the moment that humanity first placed a foot on a world other than its own, Apollo 11 commander Neil Armstrong began his work documenting the lunar surface before him.

The image above is the first photo taken by Armstrong after exiting Eagle, the landing module — and the first photograph ever taken by a person standing on the surface of another world.

After this image, Armstrong took several more images of the surrounding landscape before fellow astronaut Edwin “Buzz” Aldrin, Jr. exited the module as well. The third man on the mission, Michael Collins, remained in lunar orbit piloting the command module Columbia.

The rest, as they say, is history.

Armstrong, as were all the Apollo mission astronauts, was trained in the use of a modified Hasselblad 500 EL camera, which took wonderfully detailed images on large-format film. Most of the photos they brought back have been high-quality scanned by Kipp Teague and are available online at the Apollo Image Gallery.

Today is the 43rd anniversary of the first lunar landing. More than just a page in the history books, it marks a shining moment for all of humanity when the combined ingenuity and courage of many, many people succeeded in the daunting task of, in President Kennedy’s words from May 25, 1961, “landing a man on the moon and returning him safely to Earth.”

Images: NASA. Scans by Kipp Teague.

About 

A graphic designer in Rhode Island, Jason writes about space exploration on his blog Lights In The Dark, Discovery News, and, of course, here on Universe Today. Ad astra!

Comments on this entry are closed.

  • kkt July 20, 2012, 4:51 PM

    Thanks for the reminder of this day.

  • DrFlimmer July 20, 2012, 4:52 PM

    That white bag there means either that aliens were there before, or that it was all made in a film studio and some stupid fellow forgot it. I leave it up to you to decide! :D

    • Jason Major July 20, 2012, 5:19 PM

      Cut!! Now who left their laundry on set?? ;)

    • Aqua4U July 21, 2012, 4:21 AM

      Well alrighty then… there’s got to be a space buff out there who actually knows what was in that bag? I thought I’d seen most or all of the images from that mission.. yet don’t recall seeing this one. I suppose there was no one around to give a ticket for littering?

  • squidgeny July 20, 2012, 5:34 PM

    Here’s the true first photo from the Moon, taken by the Soviet Luna 9 lander. Seeing that image appear on the screens must have been just as incredible back then as seeing men land there 3 years later.

    Edit: Expect SJstar to pop by any second now and accuse this article of Amerocentrism ;)

    • Jason Major July 20, 2012, 7:44 PM

      True… but that up there was the first photo taken by a guy with a camera (a nice camera, no less.) The film shots are simply stunning.

      • Wezley Jackson July 21, 2012, 11:01 AM

        Yes that shot has stunning detail.. For artistic reach nothing beats chemical emulsion with its infinite resolution (no pixels to get in the way) and the limiting factor on effective resolution being the (glass) optics. For some applications “your old stuff if better than your new stuff”… having said that nothing beats ccd for scientific applications like deep field, long exposure astrophotography and analysing light curve profiles in exoplanet huntinh..

        Wezley

        • Wezley Jackson July 21, 2012, 11:11 AM

          sorry ipad glitching.. heres the rest: …exoplanet hunting where precise measurement of photons received is necessary..

          All in all with all our problems on earth we (humans) are still an amazing race and i still am optimistic we are advancing and improving…  Americans can be proud of the enlightenment the moon landings, its space tech and internet have gifted humankind with.

          Wezley

    • SJStar July 21, 2012, 7:52 AM

      Actually, I would comment that it shows the ‘couldn’t care less’ attitude with the environment. I see it as the first picture on the moon, with the white bag, just as environmental vandalism. Stuffed our planet, now stuffing the moon. (Americans ought to go back to the Moon just to clean-up their own stinking mess!)

      Actually I’m not against Amerocentrism. You have to have pride and serve the best interests in the country where you are born — a cohesion that holds the population together.

      What I am really against is stupid narrow-minded Americans that think the rest of the world (or the universe) is second to them or that they believe they are the only people on the planet. Such people as these are not ‘Amerocentric’ they are more like feeble-minded jingoistic xenophobes.

      Really. Some 380-odd million Americans verses the rest of the 6,620-odd million that occupy the planet kinda puts it in perspective. Being just 5.7% of the world’s population clearly means a smallish minority. Champions of democracy, Ha! Well the real point is clear, if it were put to a vote, you Americans wouldn’t last ten minutes!

      (More humble than thou art, might be far more strategically wise! )

      • SJStar July 21, 2012, 7:53 AM

        ..oh it wasn’t any second, it was 14 hours. Just saying.

      • Ancient Brit July 21, 2012, 3:14 PM

        I think the more apt term is American Exceptionalism – the idea that America – and by inclusion Americans – holds a special place in the world (not necessarily a superior one). Conservatives have distorted the original interpretation to add”… and therefore should not be subject to the constraints that are placed on others”.

      • SJStar July 22, 2012, 4:02 AM

        Amused at the negative ticks here. squidgeny stated a point, and I’m just explaining myself.

  • Benjamin Lefebvre July 20, 2012, 5:36 PM

    “That’s one small step for a man, one giant leap for mankind.” Read up on your history. I can’t believe people still make that mistake. Come on.

    • Jason Major July 20, 2012, 6:32 PM

      I always debate with myself on putting the “a” in there… I know Armstrong intended it, but it didn’t come across as him saying it, and you can’t really “say” an intended word…ah heck. I’ll add it back in.

      • IVAN3MAN_AT_LARGE July 20, 2012, 6:37 PM

        Of course, if you are going to add something that was not in the original quote, you should enclose it within square brackets.

        • Jason Major July 20, 2012, 6:40 PM

          That’s why I don’t often include it. I hate square brackets.

          In this instance, I don’t think Mr. Armstrong will mind.

        • Thomas Houck July 25, 2012, 4:59 PM

          Neil Armstrong said, “That’s one small step for a mand, one giant leap for mankind'” but, due to a radio transmission hiccup we all here on Earth didn’t hear it.

    • Dampe July 21, 2012, 1:13 PM

      Pretty certain the reason it sounds like Armstrong mucks up the quote is because of his accent. He says it like “That’s one small step for’a’man, etc” Pronounces it as one single word – kind of like how British and Australians tend to mumble multiple words into single words…. if that makes sense. I doubt Armstrong was that daft to muck up an important scripted line…

    • Mean_deviatioN July 23, 2012, 5:11 AM

      Nope: absolutely no “a” in the audio.
      Despite what historians and the man himself claim was was intended, surely we are obliged to go with the original unadulterated evidence.

      Quote:
      “It is one of the most famous phrases in history – and now experts have proven that Neil Armstrong got it wrong.
      As
      he became the first man to set foot on the Moon in 1969, the astronaut
      believed he had said: ‘One small step for a man. One giant leap for
      mankind.’
      But linguistic analysis has proven that Armstrong
      dropped the ‘a’, instead uttering the immortal: ‘One small step for man.
      One giant leap for mankind.’

      On returning home after the Moon landing, Armstrong claimed he thought he had uttered the ‘a’ in the sentence.
      Researchers claimed perhaps the ‘a’ was lost in transmission, or that it simply could not be heard because of his Ohio accent.
      The long-running debate has finally been settled, however: and it has proved Armstrong wrong.

      Dr Chris Riley, author of the new Haynes book Apollo 11, An Owner’s
      Manual, and forensic linguist John Olsson concluded that Armstrong does
      pronounce his ‘a’s in a unique way – but that he definitely did not
      utter the sound during the Moon landing.

      Instead, their analysis of a voice print spectograph showed the ‘r’
      of ‘for’ and the ‘m’ of ‘man’ running together – proving, they told the
      BBC, that there was simply no room for an ‘a’.”
      Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-1190819/One-small-mistake–The-proof-Neil-Armstrong-got-famous-One-small-step-man-Moon-landing-line-WRONG.html#ixzz21Q3QXv6r

      Again: definitely no “a” between “for” and “man”.
      THAT is history, Benjamin, as it happened, not as it was intended. No mistake.

  • Olaf2 July 20, 2012, 5:44 PM

    For those interested, there are really very good resources no on Youtube about the landings. This one about the orbits: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HuA5xNfYUFo&feature=related

    And here these quaterly report series:
    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oIJ-fNSNYXY&feature=related

hide