All the water on Earth would fit into a sphere 860 miles (1,385 km) wide. (Jack Cook/WHOI/USGS)

Earth Has Less Water Than You Think

Article Updated: 23 Dec , 2015

by

[/caption]

If you were to take all of the water on Earth — all of the fresh water, sea water, ground water, water vapor and water inside our bodies — take all of it and somehow collect it into a single, giant sphere of liquid, how big do you think it would be?

According to the U. S. Geological Survey, it would make a ball 860 miles (1,385 km) in diameter, about as wide edge-to-edge as the distance between Salt Lake City to Topeka, Kansas. That’s it. Take all the water on Earth and you’d have a blue sphere less than a third the size of the Moon.

Feeling a little thirsty?

And this takes into consideration all the Earth’s water… even the stuff humans can’t drink or directly access, like salt water, water vapor in the atmosphere and the water locked up in the ice caps. In fact, if you were to take into consideration only the fresh water on Earth (which is 2.5% of the total) you’d get a much smaller sphere… less than 100 miles (160 km) across.

Even though we think of reservoirs, lakes and rivers when we picture Earth’s fresh water supply, in reality most of it is beneath the surface — up to 2 million cubic miles (8.4 million cubic km) of Earth’s available fresh water is underground. But the vast majority of it — over 7 million cubic miles (29.2 cubic km) is in the ice sheets that cover Antarctica and Greenland.

Of course, the illustration above (made by Jack Cook at the Woods Hole Oceanographic Institution) belies the real size and mass of such a sphere of pure liquid water. The total amount of water contained within would still be quite impressive — over 332.5 million cubic miles (1,386 cubic km)! (A single cubic mile of water equals 1.1 trillion gallons.) Still, people tend to be surprised at the size of such a hypothetical sphere compared with our planet as a whole, especially when they’ve become used to the description of Earth as a “watery world”.

Makes one a little less apt to take it for granted.

Read more on the USGS site here, and check out some facts on reducing your water usage here.

Water, water, every where,
And all the boards did shrink;
Water, water, every where,
Nor any drop to drink.
– from The Rime of the Ancient Mariner, Samuel Taylor Coleridge

, , , ,



Sort by:   newest | oldest | most voted
Le_REAL_MACK
Guest
Le_REAL_MACK
May 8, 2012 3:00 AM

That is still a f^ckton of water any way you cut it. Imagine standing in Topeka and looking up from the ground at that thing.

Kawarthajon
Member
Kawarthajon
May 8, 2012 3:08 AM

That’s a pretty tall ball of water – much taller than Hubble orbits and about 1/10 the diameter of the earth. Also consider that the Eart’h’s crust, where most of the water lives, is very thin, no more than 70km deep.

Nephish777
Member
Nephish777
May 8, 2012 3:17 AM

What about water in magma and lava?

Jason Major
Guest
May 8, 2012 3:48 AM

All the water.

Checkers Crossfox
Guest
Checkers Crossfox
May 8, 2012 5:04 AM

Actually, it appears this only takes into account water in-and-above the crust; water present in the mantle wasn’t accounted for (and I’m not sure we even have a reliable estimate of the water content of the mantle).

Corrie Engelbrecht
Guest
May 8, 2012 10:22 PM

Considering that the Earth’s mantle consists of liquid magma and pressurised solid rock, I think we can conclude that this estimate includes all the water.

Adrian Morgan
Guest
May 8, 2012 4:11 AM

For non-Americans, here are some more analogies to show how far 1,385 km is (the diameter of the ball). For Australians: Distance from Melbourne to Brisbane. For Europeans: Distance from Paris to Warsaw. For astronomers: The size of Sedna.

SilvaDesiree
Guest
SilvaDesiree
May 8, 2012 6:23 PM

Lot of peoples are attracted towards making money online. If you do this in a proper way, the online work can bring you extra income. Recently I got a webpage, where you can kick a good start 300$ in a day or even more depends up to your skills and working hours, Look this for further details. ??http://startbytoday.blogspot.com

Gadi Eidelheit
Guest
Gadi Eidelheit
May 8, 2012 6:35 AM

Wow! this is on I am going to translate…. Very interesting

JM
Guest
JM
May 8, 2012 7:15 AM

Nothing like a reality check.

Wonder how large a sphere needs to be to hold the denser part of the atmosphere…say up to 10,000 feet?

Albion Bowers
Guest
Albion Bowers
May 9, 2012 2:13 PM

JM,
I thought almost the exact same question this morning. So computing the size of a ball of atmosphere (all of it, at sea level pressure and density) comes out to 2087.86 km diam (1296.56 mi). That’s only nominally larger than the size of the ball of water…
Al

Brian Sheen
Member
Brian Sheen
May 8, 2012 7:55 AM

In one way it is not surprising, water only covers 2/3rds of the Earth’s surface to a fairly shallow depth. (when compared to the diameter of our planet. ) It is a great reality check though.
Roseland Observatory. UK.

Prism2Spectrum
Guest
Prism2Spectrum
May 8, 2012 9:37 AM
And all that life-sustaining water is said to have been naturally out-gassed, and/or deposited by hail-storm of cometary impacts. However old the Earth actually is, that amazing aquamarine sphere has apparently been preserved through all Earth’s living history, in the finest balance with the vast continental landmasses, and through all erosive processes and material transfers of time, from lands to seas, in dynamic change of ages. Though ocean levels have apparently been raised and lowered (or continental shelf regions themselves), from warm/cold climatic episodes (Ice Sheets/melt-offs), the breaking waves of endless shores, define the edges of its bulk to narrow tidal zones, ebbing and flowing only so far. Little changed over a span of life. In scales of… Read more »
maurizio52
Guest
maurizio52
May 8, 2012 9:37 AM

What a huge amount of water!
Only freshwater is about 300giga litre procapite considering 7 billions people living on the earth.
Each human being could swim in a giant freshwater’s droplet 80m in diam. (260 feet) , can you imagine it?
Considering all of the water, the droplet’s diameter should rise to about 270m (900 feet).
It is enough freshwater to fill a personal square swimming pool 100m wide (330feet) and 30m (100 feet) deep.
I feel… wet, not thirsty at all… wink

rama
Guest
rama
May 9, 2012 8:48 AM

Whether we feel thirsty or wet, better to conserve our water resources NOW!!

Olaf
Member
Olaf
May 9, 2012 4:44 PM

Water resources are going no where, all you need to do it is purify it again.

Fons Jena
Guest
May 8, 2012 10:57 AM

And that amount is becoming smaller and smaller isn’t it? Rockets using liquid oxygen and hydrogen dump tons of water into space or does the exhaust fall back to earth? Correct me if I’m wrong.

When I think about the fact that we are launching one rocket after the other the only thing I can think about is that we are discarding tons of precious metals and liquids/gases that we will never be able to recycle. It hurts.

Murray Bell
Guest
Murray Bell
May 8, 2012 12:13 PM

Dude, stop being such a pansy! You’re at the extreme end of the greeny spectrum, take a look outside every now and then it’s not all doom and gloom. In the grand scheme of things, what’s some fuel and metal in the name of science when you consider all the asteroids / meteoroids that come through the atmosphere everyday?! Seriously, it’s depressing that you’re so concerned about this.

squidgeny
Member
squidgeny
May 8, 2012 6:10 PM

If it helps, consider all the rockets to be an investment in future space-mining. There’s water on the moon dontcha know!

Daddy Bud
Guest
Daddy Bud
May 9, 2012 1:24 AM

they are developing a machine satalite that will go up and bring down obsolete sats from orbit..a space Junk vaccuum if you will…spend a drop get a drop back…sort of an endless cycle.

Alanator
Member
Alanator
May 9, 2012 10:27 PM

Who`s to say we won`t get hit by an asteroid next week, which replenishes all the water, but you can`t enjoy it for another 50 million years! (:

Joe Cazana
Guest
May 8, 2012 11:12 AM

It is that big a volume only because water does not compress. Imagine all of earth’s atmosphere…stuff all of it into a large tank

tareece
Member
tareece
May 8, 2012 1:21 PM

Space Balls much?

Daddy Bud
Guest
Daddy Bud
May 9, 2012 1:20 AM

Atmosphere is very thin and is included in this measurement…as is ice and all other forms of water…its foolish to worry as its going to be the one thing that will limt the humans on this rock…after we kill off the other animals for their water

Julian Maytum
Guest
May 8, 2012 12:07 PM

“Makes one a little less apt to take it for granted.” – We’re talking humans here right? One of the reasons I want space exploration and colonization to go full speed ahead is *because* of my fellow humans. Very interesting article though smile

Joseph Shuster Sr
Guest
May 8, 2012 12:33 PM

I wonder if that incorporates atmospheric water, soil water, ice, and moisture in rock. It would be cool to see a pie chart of salt, fresh, and the others.

tareece
Member
tareece
May 8, 2012 1:41 PM
Ok I’m going to be a bit snarky here. Soooo I guess the answer is to flush twice with the low flush toilets… Perhaps the better answer is to harvest glaciers and icebergs. This really comes down to population control doesn’t it? So… we then gotta figure out who gets the short stick… because I reckon the Libs won’t just volunteer to self-sacrifice… I mean just look at the big AGW champions… Those ‘conservatives’ of the Earth. Water is precious. I conserve what I can and have actively tried to use greywater on plants… But I’m a realist also. The 3rd world is not going to limit their promise at development and better lives just because we say… Read more »
Adrianmc5
Guest
Adrianmc5
May 8, 2012 2:17 PM

Than “you” think?…I knew this. I ain’t stupid!

Lawrence B. Crowell
Member
Lawrence B. Crowell
May 8, 2012 4:01 PM

The Earth has a modest amount of water. A few of these extra-solar planets that have been found have water up to hundreds of kilometers in depth.

LC

Daddy Bud
Guest
Daddy Bud
May 9, 2012 1:16 AM

Water or Liquid….there is a significant difference

hdutton
Member
hdutton
May 8, 2012 4:27 PM

What’s with the fresh water “100 miles across”? Seems like 50 miles radius would be 50^3 * 4/3 * Pi = about 1/2 million cubic miles… article then goes on to to say it’s 9+ million cubic miles. Perhaps it’s 200 miles across?

Trippy
Member
Trippy
May 8, 2012 7:19 PM

Hey Jason, I think you’re missing a few zeroes in a couple of places.

Paragraph 5:
“But the vast majority of it — over 7 million cubic miles (29.2 cubic km) is in the ice sheets that cover Antarctica and Greenland.”

And paragraph 6, sentence 2:
“The total amount of water contained within would still be quite impressive — over 332.5 million cubic miles (1,386 cubic km)! (A single cubic mile of water equals 1.1 trillion gallons.) ”

Shouldn’t they be 29.2 million and 1,386 million respectively?

James Jestes
Guest
May 8, 2012 7:27 PM

I never would have guessed it to be that thin. Water on this planet is much scarcer then we were led to believe as kids

ITSRUF
Guest
ITSRUF
May 8, 2012 7:51 PM

All the water on Earth could fit on the head of a pin if it was in a black hole.

wpDiscuz