≡ Menu

New Evidence For Fomalhaut Planets

Fomalhaut's exoplanet (NASA, ESA, P. Kalas (UC, Berkeley))

The planetary system of the star Fomalhaut has been one of intense debate over the past few years. In 2008, it was announced that a large, Saturn mass planet shepherd a large dust ring and was spotted in visual images from Hubble. But in late 2011 infrared observations called the previous detections into question. Now joining the discussion is the recently completed Atacama Large Millimeter/sub-millimeter Array (ALMA). This radio observatory suggests that there may be more planets than previously detected.

ALMA sits in the high Atacama desert in northern Chile. This dry location is ideal for linking together the 66 radio dishes (although only 15 were used in the new observations) to give unprecedented resolution. With this new set of eyes, astronomers from the University of Florida and Bryant Space Science Center were able to study the fine details in the dust ring. These details were then compared to various models of how rings should function in different conditions.

The dust ring has several characteristics that any explanation would have to reproduce. The first was that the ring is slightly oval shaped. It must be exceptionally thin and have a sharp cutoff both on the interior and exterior edges. If the previously claimed planet, Fomalhaut b, were the only one present, it could not account for the outer edge of the disk being sharply truncated as well as the inner edge. Another possibility is that the ring is simply newly formed as the result of a collision between two planets and has not yet had time to dissipate giving it the sharp appearance. However, the authors note that planets at such a distance from the parent star shouldn’t have high enough relative velocities to crush them so finely.

Since neither of these explanations are sufficient, the team proposes that there are two planets that shepherd the ring: One interior and one exterior to it. Within our own solar system, we see similar effects in Uranus’ ε ring which is constrained by the moons Cordelia and Ophelia. Similarly, Saturn’s F ring is shepherded by Prometheus and Pandora. By varying the mass of hypothetical planets in the models, the authors could create a ring similar to that seen around Fomalhaut. However, the best fit was created by a pair of planets that were less than three times the mass of the Earth which would mean that the proposed mass for Fomalhaut b was significantly too high, further casting doubt on its existence. Additionally, the proposed orbit of Fomalhaut bwas 10 AU off from the orbit of the hypothetical interior shepherd planet.

Ultimately, these two planets are only hypothetical. Detecting them in a more direct fashion will prove challenging. The fact that their orbits wouldn’t be very close to line of sight as well as their distance from the star would make radial velocity detection impossible. Given the low proposed mass and the distance, they would reflect too little light to be able to be directly observed with current telescopes.

About 

Jon is a science educator currently living in Missouri. He is a high school teacher and does outreach with the St. Louis Astronomical society as well as presenting talks on science and related topics at regional conventions. He graduated from the University of Kansas with his BS in Astronomy in 2008 and has maintained the Angry Astronomer blog since 2006.
For more of his work, you can find his website here.

Comments on this entry are closed.

  • IVAN3MAN_AT_LARGE April 15, 2012, 9:55 PM
  • ???? ????????? April 16, 2012, 8:37 AM
  • Prism2Spectrum April 16, 2012, 12:07 PM

    A sharp-edged disk of fine dust, cause still undetectable? Bordering shepherding planets only hypothetical?

    “Curiouser and curiouser.” – Carl Sagan(?)

    From wide scans to narrow bans, static noise of the past, tracing crisper lines through the present, while fuzzy images stored in old archives, transform into today’s cleaner pictures of Observatories high. And as the data streams become rushing rivers, “Curiouser and curiouser”, may become a refrain oft repeated.

    • StockportJambo April 16, 2012, 1:40 PM

      “Curiouser and curiouser” was Alice, from Alice in Wonderland by Lewis Carroll.

      Sagan might have repeated it, but he was quoting Carroll if he did.

      • Prism2Spectrum April 16, 2012, 3:38 PM

        Thanks for illuminating the source.

        In that light, I recalled, and could almost hear him distinctively saying it in his riveting “Cosmos” series.

        Science is like Alice entering a “Wonderland”, if only as seen through various and sundry “looking glass”.

      • Prism2Spectrum April 16, 2012, 3:38 PM

        Thanks for illuminating the source.

        In that light, I recalled, and could almost hear him distinctively saying it in his riveting “Cosmos” series.

        Science is like Alice entering a “Wonderland”, if only as seen through various and sundry “looking glass”.

hide