'); }
Artist's interpretation depicting the new view of the heliosphere. The heliosheath is filled with “magnetic bubbles” (shown in the red pattern) that fill out the region ahead of the heliopause. In this new view, the heliopause is not a continuous shield that separates the solar domain from the interstellar medium, but a porous membrane with fingers and indentations. Credit: NASA/Goddard Space Flight Center/CI Lab

Voyagers Find Giant Jacuzzi-like Bubbles at Edge of Solar System

10 Jun , 2011

by

[/caption]

The barrier at the edge of our Solar System may not be the smooth shield that scientists once thought. The venerable Voyager spacecraft have detected a huge, turbulent sea of magnetic bubbles in the heliosheath — the interface between the heliosphere and interstellar space — similar to an actively bubbling Jacuzzi tub. At a briefing today, scientists said the finding is significant as “we now will have to change our view of how the Sun interacts with the Solar System,” said Arik Posner, Voyager program scientist at NASA Headquarters. But it also means that the “force field” that surrounds the entire Solar System may be letting in more harmful cosmic rays and energetic particles than previously thought.

Over 30 years into their mission, the Voyagers are still monitoring their environment and sending back data. In 2007, scientists noticed that Voyager 1 recorded dramatic dips and rises in the amount of electrons it encountered as it traveled through the heliosphere, the barrier that surrounds the entire Solar System and is created by the Sun’s magnetic field. Voyager 2 made similar observations of these charged particles in 2008.

Computer simulation of the magnetic reconnection in the heliosheath, which look like bubbles, or sausages. Credit: NASA/J.F. Drake, M. Swisdak, M. Opher

Using a new computer model to analyze the data, scientists found the Sun’s distant magnetic field is likely made up of bubbles approximately 100 million miles (160 million kilometers) wide — “like long sausages,” said Merav Opher at the briefing, an astronomer at Boston University who is the lead author of a paper published in the Astrophysical Journal.

And the bubbles are moving around, with oscillations of plus or minus 10 to 20 km. “It is very bubbly as far as we can tell,” Jim Drake from the University of Maryland said at the press conference. “The entire thing is bubbly, like where the jets come out from a Jacuzzi.”

Opher said the bubbles, while not visible from Earth, cover a large portion of the sky at about 38 degrees latitude and as the solar winds “bumps” up against the heliopause, the bubbles fill up the entire region next to the heliopause.

Like Earth, our Sun has a magnetic field with a north pole and a south pole. The field lines are stretched outward, and as the sun rotates, the solar wind twists them into a spiral as they are carried outward.
The bubbles are created when magnetic field lines reorganize. The new model suggests the field lines are broken up into self-contained structures disconnected from the solar magnetic field.

These magnetic bubbles should act as electron traps, so the spacecraft would experience higher than normal electron bombardment as they traveled through the bubbles.

But the implications of this new finding, said Opher, is also that the heliosheath is very different from what scientists expected. She prefaced by saying that any earlier ideas about the region was only conjecture since no spacecraft has been there before. “We thought heliopause would be a smooth surface and shield us from intergalactic cosmic rays,” she said. “It is not a shield but more like a membrane that is a sea of bubbles.”

One argument would say the bubbles would seem to be a very porous shield, allowing lots of cosmic rays through the gaps. But another view would be that cosmic rays could get trapped inside the bubbles, making the bubbling froth a very good shield indeed.

However, the scientists are still working on figuring out exactly what these bubbles are. The Voyagers’ instruments, while still working fine, are being tested in this new region of space. “The magnetic instruments on Voyager were designed to measure magnetic fields, but they are right at very edge of what the instruments are capable of sensing,” said Drake. “The magnetic field is very weak. While trying to find out what these magnetic bubbles are, we haven’t reached that moment where we say, ‘yes, that is it.’ We’d like to be able to pin it down much better.”

This video from NASA’s Goddard Spaceflight Center helps to visually explain the new findings:

Sources: NASA press conference, NASA’s Sun/Earth briefing materials, press release, more videos and visuals can be found at this Goddard webpage

You can follow Universe Today senior editor Nancy Atkinson on Twitter: @Nancy_A. Follow Universe Today for the latest space and astronomy news on Twitter @universetoday and on Facebook.

, ,



Sort by:   newest | oldest | most voted
Anonymous
Guest
Anonymous
June 10, 2011 3:34 AM

Wow. What is this ribbon mentioned in the video?

I hope the Voyagers manage to keep functioning past the Bow Shock. I would love to see some instruments put to work in interstellar space!

Mogotor
Member
Mogotor
June 10, 2011 8:10 AM

As I understand it, one of the Voyager’s is already dead, and the other one just passed this tenuous limit . I may be mistaken in this, ? Comment?

Anonymous
Guest
Anonymous
June 10, 2011 9:59 AM

Both Voyagers are still working. It’s estimated that their Plutonium cores will continue putting out energy till around 2020. Hopefully this will allow them to reach interstellar space while in operation. No one really knows for sure exactly when these probes will traverse the Bow Shock.

Mogotor
Member
Mogotor
June 10, 2011 3:30 PM

You are right Fred, but I was under the impression that we lost contact with Voyager ll several years ago, but were still receiving data from Vl ?
I admit I am not current on this.

Lord Haw-Haw.
Guest
Lord Haw-Haw.
June 10, 2011 7:44 PM

Voyager II still relays limited data currently on the Heliosheath.

http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2011/04/110428200820.htm

Technical data on distance, trajectory, etc. is available here:

http://voyager.jpl.nasa.gov/mission/weekly-reports

Mogotor
Member
Mogotor
June 11, 2011 12:02 AM

Thank You for the link your Lordship HeHe! sorry, I could not resist! lol

Lawrence B. Crowell
Member
Lawrence B. Crowell
June 11, 2011 3:40 AM

You might be thinking of the Spirit rover on Mars. It failed to revive after the Martian winter and received a JPL death certificate a couple of weeks ago. Mars has dirt, grit and stuff to wear out machines. V-1 and V-2 are out in the deep cold, and in some ways cold is good — or better than heat.

LC

Mogotor
Member
Mogotor
June 11, 2011 6:26 PM

Yes . that was what I was thinking about! Thanks for clearing that up.

Mogotor
Member
Mogotor
June 11, 2011 6:26 PM

Yes . that was what I was thinking about! Thanks for clearing that up.

Raimo Kangasniemi
Guest
June 10, 2011 5:00 AM

Possibly a giant reflection, it was found by NASA’s IBEX satellite few years ago:

http://science.nasa.gov/science-news/science-at-nasa/2010/15jan_ibex2/

Ivan3man_At_Large
Member
Ivan3man_At_Large
June 10, 2011 6:30 AM

Yo Tammy, and other authors on UT, please note that according to the I.A.U. Style Manual:

The IAU formally recommends that the initial letters of the names of individual astronomical objects should be printed as capitals; e.g., Earth, Sun, Moon, etc. “The Earth’s equator” and “Earth is a planet in the Solar System” are examples of correct spelling according to these rules.

Mogotor
Member
Mogotor
June 10, 2011 8:05 AM

And the salutation “Yo” is appropriate when calling one to task for incorrect nomenclature?

squidgeny
Guest
squidgeny
June 10, 2011 1:14 PM

Also, “capitalized with an initial upper case letter”?

As opposed to capitalized with a terminal lower case letter?

Seems the pedant could do well to avoid such redundancies.

WaxyMary
Member
WaxyMary
June 10, 2011 2:23 PM

LOL @squidgeny

Initial caps, title caps, sentence case capping (even ballcapping), what ever one says about them, caps are cool and useful. Pedants just are, of course, the coolest of folks, they can’t be bested.

I hope to be a pedant when I grow up…

Mary

Mogotor
Member
Mogotor
June 10, 2011 3:19 PM

Oh No! Mary, please do not grow up! Expand outwards at an increasing rate! And to Hell with the “Red-Shift” !

Ivan3man_At_Large
Member
Ivan3man_At_Large
June 10, 2011 9:04 PM

I was just being specific!

Torbjorn Larsson OM
Member
Torbjorn Larsson OM
June 12, 2011 2:09 AM

Dood!

Ivan3man_At_Large
Member
Ivan3man_At_Large
June 10, 2011 8:43 PM

Well, next time I’ll say “Heus! Nancy!”

Mogotor
Member
Mogotor
June 10, 2011 8:02 AM

here is a thought: The “shield” and or bow wave of our solar system probably is affected by: myriad gravitational forces from all sides,dimensions, Eh and times.That this is not a uniform structure is not surprising Actually, if it were not would be amazing!.

Lawrence B. Crowell
Member
Lawrence B. Crowell
June 10, 2011 11:36 AM
There are a couple of points which have to be made. If you were riding on Voyager I you would see nothing. There would be nothing more than blackness, stars and the sun would appear to be just an unusually bright star. It would be cold — really cold, about 20K. All of those pictures of ribbon sheaths and the bubbles are just visual ways of illustrating a model. This gets to the next point. This is a model based upon the cosmic ray flux differences between the two Voyagers. The diffuse plasma is compressed as it reaches the interstellar region and magnetic flux increases. A charged cosmic ray is subjected to a force F = evxB, for… Read more »
Anonymous
Guest
Anonymous
June 10, 2011 3:44 PM

The article of the moment seems to be the Comet Elenin one. It’s attracting the doomsday crowd like nats to a heat lap.

Hopefully, I’m starting to figure out which articles to dedicate attention too.

PS: I corrected a comment I made on Voyager 2 below. Just to be sure, Voyager 1 “is” on course to pass through the Bow Shock, correct?

Lawrence B. Crowell
Member
Lawrence B. Crowell
June 10, 2011 4:47 PM
It is my understanding that V-I is passing through this region. It is too bad there is not another craft entering the leeward side of this. It does seem odd that there is such a doomsday crowd with respect to comets and the like. It seems we have not gotten over our medieval worries. If people want to go looking for doom, all they have to do is look in the bathroom mirror — there is the problem and it is us. Thomas Friedman has written a book “Earth if Full,” which I have not read yet, but have read some reviews. It is interesting that a NY Times neo-con panegyric of the last decade would be fiddling… Read more »
Olaf
Member
Olaf
June 10, 2011 9:46 PM

These Domesday crowd are desperate on anything else that get discovered because their big prediction seems to fail big time. Planets refuse to pop up from behind the sun, solar flares that come at the wrong timing and do nothing, black holes that refuse to blow up or something,…

They actually latch onto anything, comet, tiny asteroids, the big ribbon, the discovery of the 2 lack holes, Tyche, and probably this news here too as some kind if sign that the Mayans all knew about EU.

These people are really hurting young children as young as 9 and young moms.

Lawrence B. Crowell
Member
Lawrence B. Crowell
June 10, 2011 10:35 PM

The doomsterism of our age does have an element of reality to it. Since July 16, 1945 we have indeed had the machinery capable of ending our tenure here. This has been compounded by other looming problems, such as climate change. However, this gets wound up with other things, including religious ideas about the end of the world. We also have a lot of uncertainty right now. The economy is on shaky ground, we have had a major nuclear meltdown in Japan, and things in general look pretty dodgy right now. Transferring these fears to something celestial gives one a sense of resigning any responsibility for the problems of the day.

LC

Torbjorn Larsson OM
Member
Torbjorn Larsson OM
June 12, 2011 2:07 AM

Actually what does in most species (and societies) is change of environment.

H. sapiens is a very versatile generalist so I have high hopes for the species. It will most likely rapidly evolve into something different as most hominids have managed.

As for societies, the current one seems the most robust ever. We have weathered dry spells, plagues, famines and so on on a scale that no other society before us.

WaxyMary
Member
WaxyMary
June 10, 2011 5:04 PM
Thanks for your efforts Uncle Fred, that’s a lot of post operation to go through though for us readers, carry on. Is the flag account being forwarded to you as it was hoped and is that working well. As far as I know, you are correct with your current direction and vehicle. Only time will tell us what the ISM will do to the electronics on board but we can hope for some science to come after that event occurs, only if we chase after and inspect the craft ourselves. The bow shock is thought to be rather thick at the point of entry by V1. According to Robert Nemiroff and Jerry Bonnell of NASA, the solar bow… Read more »
Mogotor
Member
Mogotor
June 11, 2011 6:20 PM

While I agree that we should remain on topic and not for instance talk about grandma’s dirty socks. My question to you is: Who nominated you to moderate this discussion?

damian
Member
June 10, 2011 12:18 PM
So this new data suggest some kind of energetic connection with cosmic particles and our sun. That is probably one of the most fascinating aspects should it turn out to be verified. Hope for more accurate data now lies with Nasa’s ‘Vision Mission’ to the heliosphere.The Voyager spacecraft have demonstrated that theory based on indirect observation is no substitute for direct exploration, however their instruments lack precision. This new spacecraft is ‘proposed’ to be powered by some kind of nuclear electric propulsion Best launch date is 2014 and its a 25 year (best option) transit to the heliosphere. I would love to see a LISA concept spacecraft combined with this one. Lasers designed to measure theoretical gravitational waves… Read more »
WaxyMary
Member
WaxyMary
June 10, 2011 1:42 PM
@Damian You say: So this new data suggest some kind of energetic connection with cosmic particles and our sun. That is probably one of the most fascinating aspects should it turn out to be verified. My reply: refer to http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cosmic_ray for more about this. The re-connection of the solar magnetic field (the froth as it were) causes the path taken by charged particles (such as cosmic rays) to ‘not be straight lines’. The cosmic rays which originate from that particular quadrant are much the same as cosmic rays from any other quad. All are subatomic particles traveling at relativistic speeds having high (10^20 eV) energy levels, much higher than we can achieve via our efforts with particle accelerators… Read more »
damian
Member
June 11, 2011 3:14 AM
@ Mary Thanks for your eloquent response regarding cosmic particles. From the article presented here it is suggested that; ‘The Bubbles act as electron traps for energetic cosmic particles until they find smooth magnetic field lines and follow them back to our sun”. I would be most interested in knowing how much energy our sun receives from this dynamic system and in a broader sense what implications this might have for star formation. (if any). Speculatively its interesting that the sun is not a ‘closed’ system, even if the energy levels are weak, the fact that information transfers occur poses questions towards its function. Re LISA and Laser Interferometry. LISA may not be designed to measure magnetic fields,… Read more »
Torbjorn Larsson OM
Member
Torbjorn Larsson OM
June 12, 2011 1:59 AM
This new spacecraft is ‘proposed’ to be powered by some kind of nuclear electric propulsion From your own references: no, of course not. Considering the mission time it must use well know, reliable technology: a nuclear source for electric and thermal energy (an RTG, as usual), and an ion thruster (now well tested). I would be most interested in knowing how much energy our sun receives from this dynamic system That would be the cosmic rays, and they are already known. The EM part doesn’t couple back to the sun. the fact that information transfers occur Well, of course! _All forms of complete randomness maximizes information_ in a channel, so all these mechanisms (cosmic rays, field reconnection) creates… Read more »
damian
Member
June 12, 2011 2:20 AM
@ Torbjörn Larsson [rant] Why is it that people get started on information woo? Isn’t quantum woo and EM (“EU”) woo enough any longer? Is it so hard to look up what “information” actually means? [/rant] Sorry to infringe on your well defined understanding of everything, must be gratifying to be so knowledgeable. I just wish you would desist on placing my comments in a ‘crackpot’ context. Not everyone has such a ‘solid’ understanding on ‘everything’ as you. I will go further and say that no ‘crackpot’ theory’s were presented in this thread, however collectively how many mentions of EU (whatever that is) have been used in the comments? This is a blanket marketing of their cause by… Read more »
Ivan3man_At_Large
Member
Ivan3man_At_Large
June 12, 2011 3:03 AM

Please forgive our Torbjörn, he’s a bit trigger-happy, sometimes, due to previous bad experiences with the “Electric Universe” brigade that used to plague the comments section on Universe Today.

Ihsan Yorulmaz
Guest
Ihsan Yorulmaz
June 10, 2011 3:21 PM

very interesting…must think about the fusion or proton-proton reaction,where electrons and positrons dissolve each other to energy.

Torbjorn Larsson OM
Member
Torbjorn Larsson OM
June 12, 2011 1:40 AM

First, nothing here speaks of fusion.

Second, protons are made up of quarks (and gluons).

In an atom you would have a possibility of electrons visiting the nucleus (but where would the positron come from?), but mostly when nuclei fuse they are already fully ionized. The electron density of stars are thus smeared out, and I don’t think it is important in fusion.

Torbjorn Larsson OM
Member
Torbjorn Larsson OM
June 12, 2011 1:40 AM

First, nothing here speaks of fusion.

Second, protons are made up of quarks (and gluons).

In an atom you would have a possibility of electrons visiting the nucleus (but where would the positron come from?), but mostly when nuclei fuse they are already fully ionized. The electron density of stars are thus smeared out, and I don’t think it is important in fusion.

Adrian Morgan
Guest
June 11, 2011 3:32 AM

An interesting article. Also, you made me look up ‘jacuzzi’.

Mogotor
Member
Mogotor
June 11, 2011 6:30 PM

You need to get out more Adrian! smile

Adrian Morgan
Guest
June 12, 2011 3:39 AM

So “get out” equals “visit America” now, does it? smile All I needed to know was that ‘jacuzzi’ is a company that makes spas. If the article had referred to spa-like bubbles, it would have been perfectly comprehensible to an international audience (including Australians like me).

Mogotor
Member
Mogotor
June 13, 2011 5:05 AM

actually! “Jacuzzi” Was the name of the man that developed that!
Buena Serra! Glug Glug!

Adrian Morgan
Guest
June 11, 2011 3:32 AM

An interesting article. Also, you made me look up ‘jacuzzi’.

Jesper
Member
Jesper
June 11, 2011 8:44 AM

Here is a nice video about this: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qq3U5o4Yblw
from the NASA Heliophysics and the Science Visualization Studio.

Jesper
Member
Jesper
June 11, 2011 8:44 AM

Here is a nice video about this: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qq3U5o4Yblw
from the NASA Heliophysics and the Science Visualization Studio.

Belinda
Guest
Belinda
June 11, 2011 1:18 PM

Solution: Gentle pulsating waves to break up the bubbles before they completely breech the
heliosphere.

Torbjorn Larsson OM
Member
Torbjorn Larsson OM
June 12, 2011 1:35 AM

Awesome! This promises to explain so much.

Alas, nitpicks:

#1

A beef with NASA: I note that the heliotail, that was rejected by IBEX, is still very much alive in the imagination of artists. (Even Wikipedia picked up on that in the illustrations here.)

#2:

“bubbles approximately 100 million miles (160 million kilometers) wide”.

Or, in layman’s terms, 1 AU. =D

Charles Mitchell
Guest
Charles Mitchell
June 12, 2011 3:13 PM

Note cosmic ray “hot spots” discovered by observatories at South Pole, New Mexico and Tibet. A relationship to the Voyager data may exist. Birkeland currents and a solar electric circuit seem increasingly reasonable to hypothesize.

DrFlimmer
Member
DrFlimmer
June 12, 2011 10:45 PM

Nope.

Ivan3man_At_Large
Member
Ivan3man_At_Large
June 12, 2011 11:21 PM

Feh!

ITSRUF
Guest
ITSRUF
June 13, 2011 1:26 AM

“Initial caps, title caps, sentence case capping (even ballcapping), what ever one says about them, caps are cool and useful.”

I vote for knee-capping…

wpDiscuz