SpaceX has gathered a long string of successes since its founding in 2002. Photo Credit: Alan Walters/awaltersphoto.com

SpaceX Looking to Launch Next Dragon Spacecraft – to the ISS

13 Dec , 2010 by

[/caption]

With the success of the first and second launches of the Falcon 9 rocket as well as the successful recovery of the Dragon spacecraft, Space Exploration Technologies (SpaceX) has stated its intent to accelerate the pace of the Commercial Orbital Transportation Services (COTS) program that the private space firm has with NASA. The company has been inspecting various elements of the Dragon spacecraft that launched to orbit on Dec. 8, to make potential changes to the next Dragon – in preparation for its flight.

The company became the first private organization in history to launch a vehicle into orbit and then have it successfully return safely to Earth. The company has, for some time, been working to step up the pace of the COTS program. Under this program the first three flights of the Dragon would be demonstration flights with the third, and final demonstration flight docking with the International Space Station (ISS).

SpaceX encountered delays in both of its Falcon 9 launches - but forged ahead in a manner reminiscent of the early days of manned space flight. Photo credit: Jason Rhian

SpaceX is, if anything, a young and restless company, a company on the move and as such they want to combine the mission requirements of the second and third flights – into one. In short, SpaceX is hoping to send their next Dragon – to the space station itself, cutting out one demonstration flight in the process. However, while officials at SpaceX and the company’s CEO and CTO Elon Musk are attempting to relive the golden age of manned spaceflight (this effort is somewhat similar to the accelerated launch of the Apollo 8 mission) – NASA appears uncertain about speeding up the process. NASA has stated that if all went well with the first flight of the Dragon that it would consider speeding up the program.

The next flight of the Dragon spacecraft could take place as soon as the middle of next year. According to Musk, there are few differences between the maneuvers that Dragon conducted on Orbit this past Wednesday – and those that would be required if the craft were to rendezvous with the ISS. For a mission to the orbiting outpost, the Dragon would need to be equipped with solar arrays and certain equipment on board the craft would need to be upgraded.

To date, NASA has only stated that it is assessing the possibility of accelerating the program and that it recognizes the successes that SpaceX has enjoyed. Those within the space community note that NASA has a risk-averse philosophy and that the agency will likely want to see the company complete the requirements of the initial contract and fully demonstrate the Dragon’s capabilities.

SpaceX launched the second of its Falcon 9 rockets from Cape Canaveral Air Force Station's launch complex 40 on December 8 at 10:43 p.m. EDT/15:43 UDT. Photo Credit: Alan Walters/awaltersphoto.com


Sort by:   newest | oldest | most voted
Astrofiend
Member
Astrofiend
December 13, 2010 8:23 PM
It would be great to be able to speed up the process, but to a certain extent I would understand any NASA reluctance and their risk-adverse position. They have learnt lessons from Challenger and Columbia, and these lessons were hard-won. Both inquiries found very serious shortcomings in NASA’s attitude to safety. SpaceX simply cannot afford to have any sort of launch failure if they are to provide a man-rated launch vehicle. I would think that they would want to have a good number of launches under their belt to truly test out their launch and reentry vehicles before sending up manned flights, because if they kill somebody, the entire COTS program will go down the gurgler, and it… Read more »
dphuntsman
Member
dphuntsman
December 14, 2010 5:04 PM
Astrofiend – “SpaceX simply cannot afford to have any sort of launch failure if they are to provide a man-rated launch vehicle. I would think that they would want to have a good number of launches under their belt to truly test out their launch and reentry vehicles before sending up manned flights, …..” You’re misunderstanding what’s being said. SpaceX wants to go to ISS UNMANNED sooner than the agreement with NASA, negotiated years ago before anything flew, would indicate. We’re not talking manned here in the next 12 months (or for the next few years), ok? Also, realize that almost all the commercial crew-related designs submitted by companies yesterday (again, none of them to fly for several… Read more »
Redbaron719
Member
Redbaron719
December 15, 2010 12:06 AM
That’s too juicy for someone totally outside of the space tech club not to bite right into with gusto. Completely devoid of any insider intel, it’s not all all obvious that the US Gov’t gave up and froze anything about space shuttle tech. From out here in the cheap seats events look consistent with: Money got tight as early as the Nixon years. Needs arose to be more secretive/classified than was easily done with NASA. So, DARPA, USAF etc. shifted R&D emphasis into a series of “X-vehicles” that looked like a spectacular series of pathetic dead end wastes of budget (except maybe for the X-15), until suddenly out pops the secretive mission of the X-37B and on its… Read more »
Torbjorn Larsson OM
Member
Torbjorn Larsson OM
December 13, 2010 10:54 PM

You could also claim that it is totally unfair, especially from a market POV: neither Soyuz, Shuttle, Progress, ATV or HTV had to make these “demonstrations” IIRC. (Granted, Progress was developed and tested on MIRs.)

I guess NASA pays a sum whether the demonstrations happens or not, so it is mainly SpaceX that has to gain. And this is why NASA is *not* on the move so much – they gladly pay to slow things down and get lower ROI.

Feh! Sad.

gopher65
Member
gopher65
December 14, 2010 6:09 AM
Well… I can see NASA’s point of view. If they speed up the program and the first Dragon that tries to dock bashes into the station and damages a port, they’re going to look like morons. If they let the program play out and the same event occurs, they can simply state that spaceflight is difficult, and setbacks are to be expected. So from NASA’s point of view they have a lot to lose by speeding up the program, and only a little bit to gain (deliveries would start a few months earlier). Article author: hyphens are not – something that you just – drop in the middle of a – sentence because you – think that they… Read more »
CrazyEddieBlogger
Member
December 14, 2010 6:38 AM

Well demo 2 says come to within 10 km and then back away.

If all goes well at 10 km, why not proceed with demo 3 (docking?)

This is not risk mitigation, this is being afraid of the boogyman, and some CYA.

wpDiscuz