Astronomy Without A Telescope – Black Hole Evolution

by Steve Nerlich on November 27, 2010

Want to stay on top of all the space news? Follow @universetoday on Twitter

The idea that every galaxy of significant size has a supermassive black hole at its centre keeps gaining momentum. So... coincidence? Or are these SMBHs somehow fundamental to the process of galaxy formation? Credit: NASA.

While only observable by inference, the existence of supermassive black holes (SMBHs) at the centre of most – if not all – galaxies remains a compelling theory supported by a range of indirect observational methods. Within these data sources, there exists a strong correlation between the mass of the galactic bulge of a galaxy and the mass of its central SMBH – meaning that smaller galaxies have smaller SMBHs and bigger galaxies have bigger SMBHs.

Linked to this finding is the notion that SMBHs may play an intrinsic role in galaxy formation and evolution – and might have even been the first step in the formation of the earliest galaxies in the universe, including the proto-Milky Way.

Now, there are a number of significant assumptions built into this line of thinking, since the mass of a galactic bulge is generally inferred from the velocity dispersion of its stars – while the presence of supermassive black holes in the centre of such bulges is inferred from the very fast radial motion of inner stars – at least in closer galaxies where we can observe individual stars.

For galaxies too far away to observe individual stars – the velocity dispersion and the presence of a central supermassive black hole are both inferred – drawing on the what we have learnt from closer galaxies, as well as from direct observations of broad emission lines – which are interpreted as the product of very rapid orbital movement of gas around an SMBH (where the ‘broadening’ of these lines is a result of the Doppler effect).

But despite the assumptions built on assumptions nature of this work, ongoing observations continue to support and hence strengthen the theoretical model. So, with all that said – it seems likely that, rather than depleting its galactic bulge to grow, both an SMBH and the galactic bulge of its host galaxy grow in tandem.

It is speculated that the earliest galaxies, which formed in a smaller, denser universe, may have started with the rapid aggregation of gas and dust, which evolved into massive stars, which evolved into black holes – which then continued to grow rapidly in size due to the amount of surrounding gas and dust they were able to accrete.

Distant quasars may be examples of such objects which have grown to a galactic scale. However, this growth becomes self-limiting as radiation pressure from an SMBH’s accretion disk and its polar jets becomes intense enough to push large amounts of gas and dust out beyond the growing SMBH’s sphere of influence. That dispersed material contains vestiges of angular momentum to keep it in an orbiting halo around the SMBH and it is in these outer regions that star formation is able to take place. Thus a dynamic balance is reached where the more material an SMBH eats, the more excess material it blows out – contributing to the growth of the galaxy that is forming around it.

The almost linear correlation between the SMBH mass (M) and velocity dispersion (sigma) of the galactic bulge (the 'M-sigma relation') suggests that there is some kind of co-evolution going on between an SMBH and its host galaxy. The only way an SMBH can get bigger is if its host galaxy gets bigger - and vice versa. The left chart shows data points derived from different objects in a galaxy - the right chart shows data points derived from different types of galaxies. Credit: Tremaine et al. (2002).

To further investigate the evolution of the relationship between SMBHs and their host galaxies – Nesvadba et al looked at a collection of very red-shifted (and hence very distant) radio galaxies (or HzRGs). They speculate that their selected group of galaxies have reached a critical point – where the feeding frenzy of the SMBH is blowing out about as much material as it is taking in – a point which probably represents the limit of the active growth of the SMBH and its host galaxy.

From that point, such galaxies might grow further by cannibalistic merging – but again this may lead to a co-evolution of the galaxy and the SMBH – as much of the contents of the galaxy being eaten gets used up in star formation within the feasting galaxy’s disk and bulge, before whatever is left gets through to feed the central SMBH.

Other authors (e.g. Schulze and Gebhardt), while not disputing the general concept, suggest that all the measurements are a bit out as a result of not incorporating dark matter into the theoretical model. But, that is another story…

Further reading: Nesvadba et al. The black holes of radio galaxies during the “Quasar Era”: Masses, accretion rates, and evolutionary stage.

  • http://www.cheapastro.com Steve Nerlich

    @ TL OM

    “Yes, but it seems to affect star production (when it is there), doesn’t it?”

    Well, its radiation prevents star production locally – but pushes/concentrates dust out to a certain region where star formation does take place, albeit at a distance well beyond the SMBH’s sphere of influence (at least that’s my understanding of the model).

    In a nutshell, the SMBH is the seed from which a huge galaxy grows – though more through these feedback processes than by virtue of its direct gravitational influence.

  • SteveZodiac

    @TL OM
    I harken to the idea that galaxy formation and SMBH formation is somehow connected, even though it seems fast.

    LC reckons 5e^8 years post radiation period, not very long. It would be enough to form very large Pop III stars which all explode into BHs, but is it enough to form SMBHs and galaxies as well?

  • Lawrence B. Crowell

    TL OM, The anti de Sitter spacetime can hold a black hole both classically and quantum mechanically, Gauss’ law tells us that a spherical shell around a central gravity field can’t hold it. The Poisson equation nabla^2U = 4pi G rho gives a nonzero and variable gravity potential U when the surface of integration encloses a mass, and U = const when the surface encloses vacuum. In the case of a spherical shell a Gaussian surface encloses nothing, hence the potential inside is zero or constant. Dyson spheres and the like (ring worlds and other sci-fi fantasies) are not able to really trap the star inside them. By the same token there is no box which can contain a black hole. This means we can’t trap a black hole and set up an equilibrium situation where particles that enter it and quantum tunnel out of it are in equilibrium or ideally “controlled.” However, a theoretical box does exist and it is the anti de Sitter spacetime (AdS). A two dimensional version of the AdS_2 are the circle limit drawings Escher worked. This spacetime has a negative curvature, so it repels anything from the boundary, and the arcs which leave the boundary and re-enter it are geodesics which leave at v near the speed of light and return as v – -> 0. The mathematics for the two dimensional case is the Poincare disk. The 2 space plus 1 time version AdS_3 is interesting for one can place a black hole at the center of this spacetime and the black hole can’t escape. Further, any particle which quantum tunnels out of the black hole is matched by one which leaves the boundary of the AdS and enters the black hole. This is the BTZ black hole and it has some interesting features. One can further work the 3 Q-bit quantum information theory of the black hole, where categories of entanglements (bipartite entangled states, W-states, GHZ states etc) correspond to the configuration (extremal, BPS etc) of the black hole. This can be carried to higher dimensions as well, but that gets into deep work. This also leads to the AdS/CFT hypothesis, where the boundary of the AdS is dual to a quantum field theory on the conformal spacetime on the boundary.

    What I wrote above pertains mostly to quantum black holes, where black holes of astrophysical dimensions are fairly standard classical black holes. One might think according to the large N = # quantum states limit with how quantum mechanics transitions into classical mechanics. The astrophysical black hole is a standard classical physical configuration of general relativity. It is also worth pointing out that even with super massive BHs that beyond 100 or 1000 times the Schwarzschild horizon radius R = 2GM/c^2 the gravitation is not significantly different from Newtonian physics. The motions of stars observed at the center of the Milky Way galaxy is largely Newtonian. It will require extraordinary resolution to image the physics of the accretion disk close to the SMBH.

    LC

  • Aqua

    Over at ‘Brand X’ I found the following:
    http://www.astronomynow.com/news/n1011/26jet/

  • Aqua

    Oops.. dang.. wrong link. My duh.. The title image made me jump w/o looking. http://www.universetoday.com/79898/j-e-t-s-jets-jets-jets/#more-79898

Previous post:

Next post: