Astronomy Without A Telescope – Stellar Archaeology

by Steve Nerlich on June 26, 2010

Artist's impression of Population III stars born over 13 billion years ago - the earliest, oldest and presumably now long extinct star types. Credit: NASA.

Although, as we look further and deeper into the sky, we are always looking into the past – there are other ways of gaining information about the universe’s ancient history. Low mass, low metal stars may be remnants of the early universe and carry valuable information about the environment of that early universe.

The logic of stellar archaeology involves tracking generations of stars back to the very first stars seen in our universe. Stars born in recent eras, say within the last five or six billion years, we call Population I stars – which includes our Sun. These stars were born from an interstellar medium (i.e. gas clouds etc) that had been seeded by the death throes of a previous generation of stars we call Population II stars.

Population II stars were born from an interstellar medium that existed maybe 12 or 13 billion years ago – and which had been seeded by the death throes of Population III stars, the first stars ever seen in our universe.

And when I say death throes seeding the interstellar medium this includes average sized stars blowing off a planetary nebula at the end of their red giant phase – or bigger stars exploding as supernovae.

So for example, the low metal spectral signature of HE 0107-5240 matches that predicted for a very early low mass Population II star built from the end-products of a Population III supernova.

This is about as close as we can get gathering any information about Population III stars. Telescopes that can look deeper into space (and hence look further back in time) may eventually spot one – but it’s unlikely that any still exist. Theory has it that Population III stars formed from a homogenous interstellar medium of hydrogen and helium. The homogeneity of this medium meant that any stars that formed were all massive – in the order of hundreds of solar masses.

Stars of this scale, not only have short life spans but explode with such a force that the star literally blows itself to bits as a ‘pair-instability’ supernova – leaving no remnant neutron star or black hole behind. Supernova SN2006gy was probably a pair-instability supernova – mimicking the last gasps of Population III stars that lived more than 13 billion years ago.

Recipe for a pair instability supernova. In very massive stars, gamma rays radiating from the core become so energetic that they can undergo pair production after interaction with a nucleus. Essentially, the gamma ray creates a paired particle and antiparticle (commonly an electron and a positron). The loss of radiation pressure as gamma rays convert to particles results in gravitational collapse of the star's core - and kaboom! Credit: chandra.harvard.edu

It was only after Population III stars had seeded the interstellar medium with heavier elements that fine structure cooling resulted in disruption of thermal equilibrium and fragmentation of gas clouds – enabling smaller, and hence longer lived, Population II stars to be born.

Around the Milky Way, we can find very old Population II stars in orbiting dwarf galaxies. These stars are also common in the galactic halo and in globular clusters. However, in ‘the guts’ of the galaxy we find lots of young Population I stars.

This all leads to the view that the Milky Way is a gravitational hub nearly as old as the universe itself – which has been steadily growing in size and keeping itself looking young by maintaining a steady diet of ancient dwarf galaxies – which, deprived of such a diet, have remained largely unchanged since their formation in the early universe.

Further reading:

A. Frebel. Stellar Archaeology – Exploring the Universe with Metal-Poor Stars http://arxiv4.library.cornell.edu/abs/1006.2419

  • Excalibur

    After reading the papers i find that http://articles.adsabs.harvard.edu/cgi-bin/nph-iarticle_query?1983A%26A…119…54E&data_type=PDF_HIGH&whole_paper=YES&type=PRINTER&filetype=.pdf hints that pop-III stars below about 60Msun probably do not form at all in the inital stage due to lack of cooling (metals). The upper limit from the papers seems uncertain, somewhere around 500-810Msun.

    Stars between 100-300Msun are expected to explode as pair-instability supernovae, stars below about 100Msun are expected to pulsate during the crucial moments and eject matter but survive for the time being and eventually collapse at a later stage, and stars above 300Msun are expected to collapse to black holes without a supernova ejecta.

    Since several generations of pop-III stars are expected before the first pop-II stars form, i suspect in a later stage there might be a pop-IIIa kind of lower mass star, but thats me speculating. Those would be mostly undetectable anyway at this time.

    This makes me believe that the 300+Msun pop-III stars would become excellent galactic seeds for SMBH, whereas the 100-300Msun pop-III stars would be the ones mostly enriching the environment with metals. The <100Msun stars would also enrich the environment, but with more carbon/oxygen and less heavier metals, end less total contribution (unless they are a much more common population)

Previous post:

Next post: