Astronomy Without A Telescope – SETI 2.0

by Steve Nerlich on June 19, 2010

Credit: SETI Institute

Fifty years of eerie silence in the search for extra-terrestrial intelligence has prompted some rethinking about what we should be looking for.

After all, it’s unlikely that many civilizations would invest a lot of time and resources into broadcasting a Yoo-hoo, over here signal, so maybe we have to look for incidental signs of alien activity – anything from atmospheric pollution on an exoplanet to signs of stellar engineering undertaken by an alien civilization working to keep their aging star from turning into a red giant.

We know a spectroscopic analysis of Earth’s atmosphere will indicate free molecular oxygen – a tell tale sign of life. The presence of chlorofluorocarbons would also be highly suggestive of advanced industrial activity. We also know that atomic bomb tests in the fifties produced perturbations to the Van Allen belts that probably persisted for weeks after each blast.

These are planet level signs of a civilization still below the level of a Kardashev Type 1 civilization. We are at level 0.73 apparently. A civilization that has reached the Type 1 level is capable of harnessing all the power available upon a single planet – and might be one that inadvertently signals its presence after thoughtfully disposing of large quantities of nuclear waste in its star. To find them, we should be scanning A and F type stars for spectral signatures of technetium – or perhaps an overabundance of praseodymium and neodymium.

We might also look for signs of stellar engineering indicative of a civilization approaching the Kardashev Type 2 level, which is a civilization able to harness all the power of a star. Here, we might find an alien civilization in the process of star lifting, where an artificial equatorial ring of electric current creates a magnetic field sufficient to both increase and deflect all the star’s stellar wind into two narrow polar jets.

Left image - A proposed model for 'star lifting'. An artificial equatorial ring of electric current (RC) produces a magnetic field which enhances and directs the star's stellar wind though magnetic nozzles (MN) to produce two polar jets (J). Right image (Credit: SETI institute) - Artists impression of the completed Allen Telescope Array for future SETI observations. The lead image for this article is part of the current Allen Array prototype, comprising 42 of the proposed 350 dishes.

These jets could be used for power generation, but might also represent a way to prolong the life of an aging star. Indeed, this may become a vital strategy for us to prolong the solar system’s habitable zone at Earth’s orbit. In less than a billion years, Earth’s oceans are expected to evaporate due to the Sun’s steadily increasing luminosity, but some carefully managed star lifting to modify the Sun’s mass could extend this time limit significantly.

It’s also likely that Type 2 civilizations will play with Hertzsprung–Russell (H-R) parameters to keep their Sun from evolving onto the red giant branch of the H-R diagram – or otherwise from going supernova. Some well placed and appropriately shielded nuclear bombs might be sufficient to stir up stellar material that would delay a star’s shift to core helium fusion – or otherwise to core collapse.

It’s been hypothesized that mysterious giant blue straggler stars, which have not gone supernova like most stars of their type would, may have been tinkered with in this manner (some stress on the word hypothesized there).

As for detecting Type 3 civilizations… tricky. It’s speculated that they might build Dyson nets around supermassive black holes to harvest energy at a galactic level. But indications are that they then just use all that energy to go around annoying the starship captains of Type I civilizations. So, maybe we need to draw a line about who exactly we want to find out there.

Further reading:

Starry Messages: Searching for Signatures of Interstellar Archaeology http://arxiv.org/abs/1001.5455

Detectability of Extraterrestrial Technological Activities http://www.coseti.org/lemarch1.htm

  • AndyInv

    @ IVAN3MAN_AT_LARGE

    You can hold the door open for me….

  • http://www.cheapastro.com Steve Nerlich

    @AndyInv and IVAN3MAN_AT_LARGE

    Thanks – appreciate the gently delivered tips.

    I started with chlorofluorocarbons and rising CO2 (as suggested from the article) – but pulled it after considering that the CO2 could just be interpreted as volcanic. Forgot the ‘and’ – doh.

    I struggled with the second one – ‘large quantities’ is a qualification and the needed ‘of’ comes next:
    ‘after thoughtfully disposing large quantities of…

    It looks clunky, so probably not great writing in that respect alone – but two ‘of’s didn’t look right either.

    Please… don’t mention the soccer.

  • AndyInv

    @ Steve Nerlich

    :) Keep up the good work and thought provoking articles. Don’t worry about the other thing – I’m a Scot. Looks like our neighbours are trying (and succeeding) to play as badly as us.

  • IVAN3MAN_AT_LARGE

    Steve Nerlich:

    It looks clunky, so probably not great writing in that respect alone – but two ‘of’s didn’t look right either.

    In that case, may I suggest substituting the phrase “disposing of” with one of these alternative terms: dumping, discharging, or (since it would be a starship ‘garbage truck’ doing the dirty business) jettisoning…?

    @AndyInv,

    England are probably still ‘acclimatizing’ to the high altitude. ;-)

  • Uncle Fred

    Great article Steve.

    All the religious mumbojumbo and supersized/supermicro life stuff is all well and good, but how does this help us search for extra-terrestrial civilizations?

    What I don’t see is much of a willngness to consider what is likely the fastest and easiest way we will likely find a civilization – you know the kind we can actually relate to – type 0.x or 1.0 or Sagan’s equivalent.

    Here’s my thoughts:

    The Seti search is largely a waste of time. LC and others on here have explained that it is unlikely that readable transmissions will reach us. It may be possible with a overly large transmitter aimed at Earth but this means THEY are seeking us out. This is like wanting a pizza and deciding to wait at the front door, hoping for one to show up – It just won’t happen. Seti should thank everyone for their time and money, and quietly close up shop. The time/resources/personnel could be put into more productive projects.

    Again, some have proposed waiting around for bursts of laser light. However, I would rather be proactive in the search, rather than waiting around for someone to call us up.

    We need to really work on finding other terrestrial planets in goldilock’s orbits.

    These seem like the best candidates for life similar to our own. Lets get more technology and teams online to find these planets. Once we fond them we can check for unusual atmosphere elements indicative of a civilization.

    Once we are reasonably sure someone is home we can attempt to make that long distance call. Perhaps we can fire out a 2001 Space Odyssey-like information time capsule.

    What other options do we realistically have for this search in the near-term? Sure looking for signs of super-engineering is good.. but do we have the capability of detecting this any time soon? At best, we may be only able to detect oddities in the star’s behavior.. how do we rule out some natural process as yet undiscovered?

    Just my thoughts, let me know what you guys think.

    Why don’t we start by

  • Paul Eaton-Jones

    “Some well placed and appropriately shielded nuclear bombs might….”. Good grief. If they’re that advanced [type 2 civilisation] they will be as far ahead of nuclear bombs as nuclear bombs are ahead of ants squirting formic acid.
    I’m a s.f. fan but some of these ideas are not really ‘roadable’ in mainstream s.f. [Ian M. Banks excepted I suppose].

  • damian

    @ Olaf

    [IF an intelligence created this universe it would actually not be aware that we humans exists..]

    I want to clarify, I’m not advocating a higher (godly) intelligence created the universe. Indeed quite the opposite. I think any conjecture on (an Alien) intelligence is polluted by human social context.

    Searching for planets in Goldilocks Earth like orbits around other stars, or applying Human technological thought constructs about possible alien sentience is a flawed methodology.

    Perhaps in terms of exo-solar planet haunting we should be considering the (complexity) of any particular solar system.

    Simply put, the more complex and dynamic the system the more likely that sentience can arise there.

    The rationale for my thinking is entirely subjective, however is you can assume the basic tennet that sentience is Information, a kind of higher order complexity that arises on the building blocks of its surroundings then the search parameters need to be re-evaluated.

    Just for fun, another hypothetical, Take the three types of star we have observed and classified. Only G-Type (or Population 1) stars like our sun produce the kind of complex matter that can create biology. So its fair game that we should look at similar stars for possible signs of life like ours. However Type 2 and Type 1 (the earliest kind of stars) might also have spawned intelligence.

    This kind of intelligence is on a totally different level to us, but perhaps not as complex. The early universe was a simple place. An analogy I might make is with Biological evolution on Earth. Early life had simple goals, Make oxygen, procreate, survive, evolve.

    So a Type 3 star (early) intelligence is quite possibly a very simple one, but unfathomably large and incomprehensible to us. Just as oxygen breathing life evolved on earth as a second generation biology to organisms that started consuming CO2, so stellar evolution spawns ever more complex systems.

    In my original post I suggested that its possible that Sentience (on the Order that we consider ourselves sentient) has only just become possible in the universe. (at roughly the same time).

    If that is the case, then there are no advanced civilizations for us to find yet. We are all becoming more complex at the same time.

    As for the Earlier sentience that might have existed or still exists, they might forever be incomprehensible to 3rd generation life.

    However, one might argue that First and Second generation Intelligence created Galaxies, and thats an order of magnitude that goes into the God basket.

    I might argue that we have grown to understand how oxygen came to be on our planet, and have decided that its not an act of god.

    Did early pre-biotic life on earth have sentience. or self awareness. ?? How can we tell? Perhaps all life is sentient. Its all about context and purpose.

    As always the nail biting clincher to this whole subject is the proverbial: Why are we here. ?

    But thats another discussion.

    Damian

  • Aodhhan

    IMHO the Kardashev scale is nothing but science fiction jibble-jabble. Just the fact of harnessing ALL the power of a star is rediculous. Not to mention the fact it would likely bankrupt a planet–even with advanced technology. To anyone who can understand just how large the Sun is, and how much energy is expends every minute… the idea of using “well placed nuclear bombs” to extend a stars life doesn’t pass the giggle test.

    You wouldn’t be prolonging a stars life, you would only be prolonging its death. Eventually you would have to go… hopefully you didn’t waste away resources in the attempt to keep the star going a bit longer.

    As for type 3… just getting to a SMBH would likely take quite a few lifetimes, unless you have the technology to jump through space-time, or just happen to have one near by (which is highly unlikely for most systems).

    Not to mention a civilization would have to decide to do either; just because Kardashev decides to do this, doesn’t mean everyone will.

    damian…
    I’m in-line with your thinking. Although, I believe it is possible a civilization could have attained our technology up to 2 to 3 billion years before our existence; when the Universe was 9-10 billion years old.
    I think the problem is, once a civilization reaches the capability to build nuclear weapons, it will have a real problem maintaining the capability without blowing themselves back to the iron age and near extinction.

    Olaf…
    I can’t even understand half of what you are saying. However I will offer this piece of evidence in line with your thinking: “IFa caterpillar had a machine gun, a bird wouldn’t try to eat it”. I can stick “IF” in front of anything and make it work.

    Astrofiend…
    once again agree with you. I beileve if we are going to set up some sort of scale, it needs to be a lot more reasonable, have more levels, as well as more than one way to get there. Carl Sagan’s scale would be a good place to start.

    As for SETI…
    I don’t see any harm with keeping this going. I would like to see it become a bit more active. Right now I believe it is just a bit too passive.
    As in, use new technology to enhance its capability to ACTIVELY LOOK for different signals of the spectrum. Really check out systems where we have found planets near the “Goldielocks zone”.
    Kepler is finding planets faster than anyone imagined…so use it!

Previous post:

Next post: