Early Black Holes Are Starving, Not Feasting

by Anne Minard on August 10, 2009

Credit: KIPAC/SLAC/M. Alvarez, T. Abel and J. Wise

Credit: KIPAC/SLAC/M. Alvarez, T. Abel and J. Wise

A new black hole may not voraciously devour nearby gas — because it may kick out most of the gas in its neighborhood, a new study shows.

Marcelo Alvarez, of Stanford University, and his colleagues performed a new supercomputer simulation designed to track the fate of the universe’s first black holes. They found that, counter to expectations, young black holes couldn’t efficiently gorge themselves on nearby gas.

“The first stars were much more massive than most stars we see today, upwards of 100 times the mass of our sun,” said John Wise, a post-doctoral fellow at NASA’s Goddard Space Flight Center in Greenbelt, Maryland, and one of the study’s authors. “For the first time, we were able to simulate in detail what happens to the gas around those stars before and after they form black holes.”

The intense radiation and strong outflows from these massive stars caused nearby gas to dissipate. “These stars essentially cleared out most of the gas in their vicinity,” Wise said. A fraction of these first stars didn’t end their lives in grand supernovae explosions. Instead, they collapsed directly into black holes.

But the black holes were born into a gas-depleted cavity and, with little gas to feed on, they grew very slowly. “During the 200 million years of our simulation, a 100 solar-mass black hole grew by less than one percent of its mass,” Alvarez said.

Movie, credit KIPAC/SLAC/M. Alvarez, T. Abel and J. Wise

Movie, credit KIPAC/SLAC/M. Alvarez, T. Abel and J. Wise

Starting with data taken from observations of the cosmic background radiation — a flash of light that occurred 380,000 years after the big bang that presents the earliest view of cosmic structure — the researchers applied the basic laws that govern the interaction of matter and allowed their model of the early universe to evolve. The complex simulation included hydrodynamics, chemical reactions, the absorption and emission of radiation, and star formation.

In the simulation, cosmic gas slowly coalesced under the force of gravity and eventually formed the first stars. These massive, hot stars burned bright for a short time, emitting so much energy in the form of starlight that they pushed away nearby gas clouds.

These stars could not sustain such a fiery existence for long, and they soon exhausted their internal fuel. One of the stars in the simulation collapsed under its own weight to form a black hole. With only wisps of gas nearby, the black hole was essentially “starved” of matter on which to grow.

Yet, despite its strict diet, the black hole had a dramatic effect on its surroundings. This was revealed through a key aspect of the simulation called radiative feedback, which accounted for the way X-rays emitted by the black hole affected distant gas.

Even on a diet, a black hole produces copious X-rays. This radiation not only kept nearby gas from falling in, but it heated gas a hundred light-years away to several thousand degrees. Hot gas cannot come together to form new stars. “Even though the black holes aren’t growing significantly, their radiation is intense enough to shut off star formation nearby for tens and maybe even hundreds of millions of years,” said Alvarez.

Source: NASA. The study appears in The Astrophysical Journal Letters.

  • Hannes

    ehhh, and with my spelling above

    loose and not to lose is the question :-)

  • Hannes

    The textbook continuous btw.

    There is also an explanation for the accelerated expansion of the universe and for dark matter and dark energy involved.

    ..When the decaying neutronium core of the the first EBS fell apart, it produced a stream of extremely heated and accelerated electrons.
    The baryonic protons on the other hand were not as efficient in energy transfer causing differences in chaotic behaviour. And the sum of a group of electrons carrying energy, called plasma, is greater than the parts.
    More than half of the Poynting flux of these electrons have been converted into kinetic energy flux, and the terminal Lorentz factor approached the maximum possible value (?? ? ?).
    Early studies concerning the efficiency of electrons accreting gave a too low value concerning power-efficiency rating of electrons like in this early study: http://aps.arxiv.org/abs/astro-ph/0409421

    There were more electrons moving in different vectors than protons, most which went straight to the event horizon.
    The accretion rate of electrons was therefore higher than expected, causing a discrepancy in electrical charge on the outside of the primordial black hole.
    The BH got a positive charge (which doesn’t matter actually), where the jets did accrete a surplus of super-accelerated electrons.
    These accreting electrons with a restmass of more than 207 times greater than the electron (105.6 MeV) are still showing up in our earth’s atmosphere today. They are called muons (and tau) leptons. Although decaying very rapidly in our atmosphere they have quite a lonely travel history.
    As even the anti-matter EBS’ produced mainly electrons, the BH’s produced jets which cancelled out early anti-matter baryons. This did not have an great effect on the universe as a whole, but after some 5 billion years there was no anti-matter left.

    After that moment the universe expanded exponentially.
    The negative charge of the leptons caused an accellerated expansion.

  • Hannes

    Where is Don Alexander?

    Don Alexander Says:
    October 24th, 2008 at 10:54 am
    @Hannes: Do you have the first idea how GRBs are even produced?

  • Hannes

    For Don Alexander,
    who would probably ask how it’s possible the electrons from the second layer came through the third layer (lead) of the EBS, :-)

    The textbook says about that:

    When bombarded with electrons from the second layer of lead plasma, the third layer expanded.

    Lead as an element has some very peculiar properties. The radiative loss in lead is exponentially growing with the energy-loss of the electrons involved.

    The electrons coming from the second layer in the EBS carried energies in the TeV range, releasing enormous amounts of energy. Part of this energy went back to the second layer, powering the endothermic reactions needed for the r-processes (which need high entropy). The rest of the remaining energy heated up the lead enough to make it behave like a plasma, fighting the pressure from gravity to slowly expand to a relatively thick (but not too dense) layer. It made it easier for the remaining electrons to pass.
    When hitting the layer above, mainly consisting of iron, it created a magnetic field while travelling further to the surface. The TeV electrons where in the maintime reduced to the MeV range, but easily went past the remaining layers. They now landed in a tremendously powerfull magnetic field.
    The synchroton radiation came into birth when the electrons followed the field-lines around the EBS, coiling around them.

    Sadly the EBS did not have a long lifespan, as it will be consumed by it’s ever hungry neighbour.

    But some were lucky, being not a part of a binary system. They made it, passing higher elements to future stars.

  • Hannes

    Sorry, misread.

    “Lead as an element has some very peculiar properties. The radiative loss in lead is exponentially growing with the energy-loss of the electrons involved.”

    Should be:

    “Lead as an element has some very peculiar properties. The radiative loss in lead is exponentially growing with the energy-increase of the electrons involved.”

    Pff, beer is really bad while reading and writing at the same time.

  • Hannes

    Another glass of beer revealed:

    “When bombarded with electrons from the second layer , the third layer of lead plasma expanded.”

    Is anyone reading this book also?
    Nice, I feel lonely. Do not understand a word of it, you know.

Previous post:

Next post: