The Case of the Missing Sunspots: Solved?

by Anne Minard on June 17, 2009

Want to stay on top of all the space news? Follow @universetoday on Twitter

NASA image of a sunspot up close. Solar physicists are working to understand why the Sun has seen so few in the past year.

NASA image of a sunspot up close. Solar physicists are working to understand why the Sun has seen so few in the past year.

The Sun has seen precious few sunspots (as shown in this NASA closeup) in the past year, and solar physicists have been working to understand why. Now, some think they have an answer.

According to work being presented this week at the meeting of the Solar Physics Division of the American Astronomical Society, a solar jet stream deep inside the Sun is migrating slower than usual through the star’s interior and it’s at least associated with — if not causing — the current lull in sunspots and solar activity.

The Sun normally undergoes an eleven-year cycle of magnetic activity related to sunspots, solar flares, and the interplanetary storms called “CMEs.” The current “solar minimum” quiet period has been unusually long and deep, confounding scientists who hope to understand the origins of space weather and the Sun’s magnetic field.

Rachel Howe and Frank Hill, both scientists with the National Solar Observatory (NSO) in Tucson, Arizona, used long-term observations from the NSO’s Global Oscillation Network Group facility to detect and track an east-to-west jet stream, known as the “torsional oscillation,” at depths of ~1,000 to 7,000 km (about 600 to 4,000 miles) below the surface of the Sun. The Sun generates new jet streams near its poles every 11 years; the streams migrate slowly, over a period of 17 years, to the equator and are associated with the production of sunspots once they reach a critical latitude of 22 degrees.

Howe and Hill found that the stream associated with the new solar cycle has moved sluggishly, taking three years to cover a 10-degree range in latitude compared to two years for the last solar cycle, but has now reached the critical latitude. The current solar minimum has become so long and deep, some scientists have speculated the Sun might enter a long period with no sunspot activity at all. The new result both shows that the Sun’s internal magnetic dynamo continues to operate, and heralds the beginning of a new cycle of solar activity.

“It is exciting to see,” said Hill, “that just as this sluggish stream reaches the usual active latitude of 22 degrees, a year late, we finally begin to see new groups of sunspots emerging at the new active latitude.” Since the current minimum is now one year longer than usual, Howe and Hill conclude that the extended solar minimum phase may have resulted from the slower migration of the flow.

GONG and its sister instrument SOHO/MDI measure sound waves on the surface of the Sun. Scientists can then use the sound waves to probe structures deep in the interior of the star, in a process analogous to a sonogram in a medical office.

“Using the global sound wave inversions, we have been able to reveal the intimate connection between subtle changes in the Sun’s interior and the sunspot cycle on its surface,” said Hill.

“This is an important piece of the solar activity puzzle,” added Dean Pesnell, of NASA’s Goddard Space Flight Center. “It shows how flows inside the Sun are related to the creation of solar activity and how the timing of the solar cycle might be produced. None of the forecasting research groups predicted the current long extended delay in the new cycle. There is a lot more to learn in order to understand how the Sun creates magnetic fields.”

The new science of helioseismology, enabled by instruments such as the ground-based GONG, the Michelson Doppler Imager aboard the SOHO spacecraft, and NASA’s planned Solar Dynamics Observatory, has revolutionized understanding of the solar interior. “While the surface effects of the Sun’s torsional oscillations have been observed for some time, understanding of the dynamo and the origin of sunspots depend on measurements of the solar interior that are only possible
with helioseismic techniques,” said Hill.

Source: AAS Solar Physics Division Meeting (press release). Anne Minard is attending the meeting, and will report additional details from the teleconference on her blog at anneminard.com. Check back there after 2 p.m. Mountain. Also: check out this great movie!

IVAN3MAN June 22, 2009 at 9:16 PM

Anaconda:

Did you even bother reading the link I provided that explained the electric current in the Sun’s flux tubes. Apparently not.

Yeah, I read it, but what the bloody hell has that got to do with an ‘electric powered’ Sun? I have electric currents flowing through the ring-mains of my house, but it does NOT flow on its own accord; it requires a power supply, so what the bloody hell is the alleged power source for the ‘electric’ Sun?

Furthermore, is the link to that half-assed schematic of the ‘electric’ Sun supposed to impress me? ROFLMAO! :lol:

So, Anaconda, how is it that the polar orbiting Ulysses spacecraft did not detect any inflowing electric current into the Sun’s polar regions as allegedly portrayed in that schematic, then? :P

Also, you’re a bloody hypocrite to complain when someone else doesn’t read your links, and yet you don’t bother to read the links that my associates and I provide for you. It is YOU who should go back to class!

IVAN3MAN June 22, 2009 at 9:58 PM

@ Anaconda,

RE: Your ‘schematic’ of the Sun link…

To paraphrase Crocodile Dundee: That’s no Sun schematic; THIS is a Sun schematic! (Click on the image to embiggen!)
:cool:

Nereid2 June 23, 2009 at 2:35 AM

Anaconda, you have shown – repeatedly – that you do not understand (classical) electromagnetism.

When you use the term ‘electromagnetism’, you do so in a highly idiosyncratic way.

No surprise, then, to learn that what you understand when you read words like ‘electrical’ and ‘magnetic’ is likely to differ, possibly radically so, from what the authors who wrote those words intended, and what most readers understand when they read them.

Not even Nereid disputes the Sun’s electrical nature.

If you think that the link contains a representation that I would, or might, agree with, well, you think wrong.

I do not know what that diagram has to so with the Sun, and have no idea where the person(s) who created it got the idea that the Sun is part of a giant electrical circuit from, but I do think it’s fair to say that such a concept is inconsistent with huge numbers of very good observations*

The solar wind (diffuse electric current) accelerates, so likely a constant force is being applied to it.

You’re in that alternate universe again Anaconda; this sentence is unintelligible …

The solar wind is NOT a “diffuse electric current“, and it does NOT “accelerate” (at least, not in the manner you seem to imply).

Why do you seem to positively wallow in your ignorance?

*caveat: the diagram has no scale, nor are any items in it quantified … so, strictly speaking, as a stand-alone diagram it is scientifically meaningless (like the infamous ‘Electric Comet’).

IVAN3MAN June 23, 2009 at 3:23 AM

@ Nereid,

Anaconda could not tell an electric current from a blackcurrant!

ND June 23, 2009 at 7:14 AM

Anaconda,

When you say the solar wind accelerates, I’m guessing you mean as it travels through the solar system. If so, is there evidence for this?

IVAN3MAN June 24, 2009 at 4:31 AM

Anaconda: **CRICKETS**

Comments on this entry are closed.

Previous post:

Next post: