Major Utility Company Makes Agreement for Space Based Solar Power

by Nancy Atkinson on April 15, 2009

Solar Collecting Satellite. Image courtesy of Mafic Studios.

Solar Collecting Satellite. Image courtesy of Mafic Studios.


One of the largest utility companies in the US has decided to look towards space to find more power. Pacific Gas and Electric (PG&E) in California announced a proposed agreement with startup company Solaren Corporation to provide 200 mega watts of space based solar power (SBSP) starting in 2016. PG&E is now seeking approval from California state regulators for permission to sign this agreement. While PG&E is not making any financial investment at this time, the announcement shows that SBSP is being taken seriously as a viable energy source. PG&E and the two other California utilities are required by the state to source 20 percent of their power from renewable sources by 2010 and 30 percent by 2017. None are producing the required amount so far.

Solaren Corporation is a small, 8-year-old company based in California whose executives have experience working for Boeing and Lockheed Martin. According to PG&E’s website, Solaren says it plans to generate the power using solar panels in earth orbit, then convert it to radio frequency energy for transmission to a receiving station in California. From there, the energy will be converted to electricity and fed into PG&E’s power grid

The proposed agreement is for the delivery of 200MW starting in 2016 for 15 years.

Earlier this year Universe Today interviewed Peter Sage from Space Energy, another SBSP company. Sage said in a statement released today that this announcement is a
“huge step forward for both Solaren and Space Energy as it highlights to the investment community that utility firms are willing to recognize Space-Based Solar Power as a credible and viable source of energy.” Sage added that while the 200 mega watts Solaren is planning to provide represents only 20% of the planned capacity of one of Space Energy’s satellites, it successfully validates the overall business case for SBSP within the larger energy industry.

The U.S. Department of Energy and NASA began seriously studying the concept of solar power satellites in the 1970s, again in the 1990′s and in 2007, a major study by the Defense Department’s National Security Space Office gave the concept another boost, concluding that “there is enormous potential for energy security, economic development, improved environmental stewardship … and overall national security for those nations who construct and possess a SBSP capability.”

It seems like a win-win situation for PG&E. They told their customers, “If Solaren succeeds, PG&E’s customers have a great opportunity to benefit from affordable clean energy. There is no risk to PG&E customers; PG&E has contracted only to pay for power that Solaren delivers.”

PG&E has 5.1 million electric customer accounts and 4.2 million natural-gas customer accounts in Northern and Central California.

Sources: Space Energy press release, PG&E website


  • pantzov

    by 2016?

    sorry, not a chance.

  • Vincent

    “WooWoo Adds on Universe Today”?

    Oh boy!

  • kanawa

    Dumb idea.
    Money would be better spent on nuclear and coal power plants.

  • Loki

    This is going to be very expensive. The cost of design/ development of the satellite, launching all that tonnage to orbit (others have already pointed out the huge area of solar panels needed; even if you do use mirrors to concentrate the sunlight on the panels as in the picture) and the O&M costs of operating the satellite as well as ground infrastructure for 15 years will go into the price of every kW-hr of power. Let’s take a quick stab at the math:

    200MW = 200000kW
    200000kW*15yrs*365days/yr*24hrs/day = ~28 Billion kW-hrs over the life of the satellite

    Assuming the total cost of everything I listed above is only $20 Billion (probably a low ball estimate I just pulled out of thin air)

    $20 Billion/28 Billion kW-hrs = ~$0.71/kW-hr.

    I don’t know what the current rate is in CA, but it’s probably a heck of a lot less than that. And like I said the $20 Billion is just a very rough guess and I probably low balled it by quite a bit.

  • http://caspianit.co.uk Sci-Fi Si

    It’s true, it would have to be massive to supply a substantial percent of a power station.

    It also could be dangerous if it missed it’s target receiver on Earth (think death ray)

    However if it were to aim its focus to a position above Earth… say the top of a carbon nanotube space elivator… humm it could even power the space elivator

    The sci-fi possibilities :)
    lol

  • http://caspianit.co.uk Sci-Fi Si

    p.s
    The energy it supplied to the space elivator would then become the cost of what it takes to get into space…

  • http://caspianit.co.uk Sci-Fi Si

    We need to try and make ‘space’ a viable business. Yes we could do it cheaper here on Earth, but that’s not the point. The point is – can we make it viable?

    Our future is to expand into space and stop abusing the resources of Earth (the only planet we know of in the Universe that actually has life – The ultimate expression of creation. We are the highest form of creation that we know of. The universe is able to know of itself through us. We need to take this life and without fear (read ‘boldly go’), spread into the unknown so that the universe might know more of itself. We are part of it and it is a part of us, expressed in what we call ‘life’.

    I think it is our responsibility, cleverly and sustainably, to make the most of the resources we have at hand so we can bring life to where there is none.

    Considering we are ‘space enthusiasts’ as well as scientists with common sense. I feel it is our duty to support endeavours such as this, as long as they are potentially realistic achievements and have even moderate financial viability. (I’m sure the Egyptians didn’t think ‘sod it, lets just build a few bungalows…) The resources on Earth are finite. The resources available to us out in space – if only we could get there – are unlimited, vast beyond our imagination. The day we stop trying to reach for the stars, is the day we lose a part of ourselves.

  • http://solreka.com SolReka | solar power

    Finally, we are starting to see solar power being used in a constructive way.

    Solar farms and heliostats out in space are a great idea, it may be a worthwhile exercise to roll out such technologies en masse at ground level first.

    The only worthy heliostat farm worthy of mentioning is the Solucar Solar plant in Seville, Spain.

    There really isn’t any need for the utility company, PG&E to invest their billions in space technologies, when they can just as easily implement the same technologies in any equatorial ‘sunny’ location.

  • dbdncr

    Inverse Square Law

    physical quantity or strength is inversely proportional to the square of the distance from the source of that physical quantity.

    and somehow, someone thinks that converting dc via solar, to RF via some really stupidly large transmitter, to a receiving station on earth through the atmosphere, converting RF back to DC, subsequently converting that DC into a usable form of AC for our electrical grid… Is somehow efficient and will power california…

    besides the fact that we’re adding energy to our atmosphere that would have not under normal circumstances arrived at earth… I really want someone to show me the tech specs of a 200 megawatt RF transmitter

    take a 150kw radar transmitter and paint a target from 25k feet that’s effectively fifty miles away and you’ll recieve a signal back in the milliwatt range.

    this seems like a really stupid idea….

  • Winston

    Dumbest idea I have ever heard of. Why doesn’t the enterprise just beam down energy. Has everyone now lost their mind?

  • Tutweiler

    Spock has told me the idea is feasible and he and Al Gore are figuring out the details since they are the biggest minds in the universe.
    When a company such as PG&E takes this seriously it must be the end of days.

Previous post:

Next post: