After the Storm: Measuring the Structure and Temperature of a Quiescent Neutron Star

by Ian O'Neill on January 10, 2009

Accretion can cause neutron stars to flare violently

Accretion can cause neutron stars to flare violently

So how do you take the temperature of one of the most exotic objects in the Universe? A neutron star (~1.35 to 2.1 solar masses, measuring only 24 km across) is the remnant of a supernova after a large star has died. Although they are not massive enough become a black hole, neutron stars still accrete matter, pulling gas from a binary partner, often undergoing prolonged periods of flaring.

Fortunately, we can observe X-ray flares (using instrumentation such as Chandra), but it isn’t the flare itself that can reveal the temperature or structure of a neutron star.

At the AAS conference last week, details about the results from an X-ray observing campaign of MXB 1659-29, a quasi-persistent X-ray transient source (i.e. a neutron star that flares for long periods), revealed some fascinating insights to the physics of neutron stars, showing that as the crust of a neutron star cools, the crustal composition is revealed and the temperature of these exotic supernova remnants can be measured…

During a flare outburst, neutron stars generate X-rays. These X-ray sources can be measured and their evolution tracked. In the case of MXB 1659-29, Ed Cackett (Univ. of Michigan) used data from NASA’s Rossi X-ray Timing Explorer (RXTE) to monitor the cooling of the neutron star crust after an extended period of X-ray flaring. MXB 1659-29 flared for 2.5 years until it “turned off” in September 2001. Since then, the source was periodically observed to measure the exponential decrease in X-ray emissions.

So why is this important? After a long period of X-ray flaring, the crust of a neutron star will heat up. However, it is thought that the core of the neutron star will remain comparatively cool. When the neutron star stops flaring (as the accretion of gas, feeding the flare, shuts off), the heating source for the crust is lost. During this period of “quiescence” (no flaring), the diminishing X-ray flux from the cooling neutron star crust reveals a huge wealth of information about the characteristics of the neutron star.

The cross section of a neutron star

The cross section of a neutron star

During quiescence, astronomers will observe X-rays emitted from the surface of the neutron star (as opposed to the flares), so direct measurements can be made of the neutron star. In his presentation, Cackett examined how the X-ray flux from MXB 1659-29 reduced exponentially and then levelled off at a constant flux. This means the crust cooled rapidly after the flaring, eventually reaching thermal equilibrium with the neutron star core. Therefore, by using this method, the neutron star core temperature can be inferred.

Including the data from another neutron star X-ray transient KS 1731-260, the cooling rates observed during the onset of quiescence suggests these objects have well-ordered crustal lattices with very few impurities. The rapid temperature decrease (from flare to quiescence) took approximately 1.5 years to reach thermal equilibrium with the neutron star core. Further work will now be carried out using Chandra data so more information about these rapidly spinning exotic objects can be uncovered.

Suddenly, neutron stars became a little less mysterious to me in the 10 minute talk last Tuesday, I love conferences

Related publications:

  • Astrofiend

    Hiker 9965 Says:
    January 12th, 2009 at 3:52 pm

    Oh God. Not another one. Why don’t you all go and start an ‘Electric Universe Today’ website so that everyone can safely not give a sh!t about it and you guys can wax lyrical about how oppressed by the mainstream you always are. I know there wouldn’t be any actual research or results to publish, but that shouldn’t get in the way of a good half-baked theory!

  • Manu

    Since there’s no answer about the temperature, and I’m curious too, I made a little search and calculation.

    X-rays wavelengths range between 10 E-11 and 10 E-8 m:
    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:EM_spectrum.svg

    Thermal radiation wavelength and temperature of emitting body are linked through ‘Wien’s displacement law’:
    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wien's_Law

    This would give a very rough estimate somewhere between 100,000 and 100,000,000 K – that is, if I understand what I read correctly! ;-)

    Not exactly ‘cool’!

  • bellinda birdleg

    Ian I love you.

    you have been a bit out of the business.
    But these scary things like Neutrons and gravitons and X-rays mae me shiver ….again.

    Oooohh do it again.
    dont listen to those scientists, you are my hero.
    So cool and so scary.

    And yes better a good storyteller than a dry scientist.

    Keep up those speculations and sensations.

    boooooomm Baaaang

Previous post:

Next post: