Project Lucifer. Could the plutonium fuel onboard the Cassini mission cause a nuclear chain reaction on Saturn? Credit: NASA
Project Lucifer. Could the plutonium fuel onboard the Cassini mission cause a nuclear chain reaction on Saturn? Credit: NASA

Missions, Saturn

Project Lucifer: Will Cassini Turn Saturn into a Second Sun? (Part 2)

31 Jul , 2008 by

[/caption]
The story: The Lucifer Project is allegedly the biggest conspiracy theory NASA could possibly be involved in. First, back in 2003, the space agency (in co-operation with secret and powerful organizations) dropped the Galileo probe deep into Jupiter’s atmosphere. On board, was a significant quantity of plutonium. As the probe fell though the atmosphere, NASA hoped atmospheric pressures would create an implosion, generating a nuclear explosion thereby kick-starting a chain reaction, turning the gas giant into a second Sun. They failed. So, in a second attempt, they will drop the Cassini probe (again, laden with plutonium) deep into Saturn’s atmosphere in two years time, so this smaller gas giant can succeed where Jupiter failed…

The reality: As investigated briefly in Project Lucifer: Will Cassini Turn Saturn into a Second Sun? (Part 1), we looked at some of the technical problems behind Galileo and Cassini being used as makeshift nuclear weapons. They cannot generate an explosion for many reasons, but the main points are: 1) Tiny pellets of plutonium used to heat and power the probes are in separate, damage-proof cylinders. 2) The plutonium is not weapon grade, meaning the 238Pu makes a very inefficient fissionable fuel. 3) The probes will burn up and break apart, therefore disallowing any chance of lumps of plutonium forming “critical mass” (besides, there is no chance the plutonium could possibly form a configuration to create an implosion-triggered device).

OK, so Galileo and Cassini cannot be used as crude nuclear weapons. But say if there was a nuclear explosion inside Saturn? Could it cause a chain reaction in the core, creating a second Sun?


Thermonuclear bombs

The Soviet 50-megaton Tsar Bomba, the largest weapon ever detonated (1961)

The Soviet 50-megaton Tsar Bomba, the largest weapon ever detonated (1961)


Unless nuclear fusion can be maintained within a stellar body, the reaction will very quickly fizz out. So the Lucifer Project proposes Cassini will plunge many hundreds of miles into the atmosphere of Saturn and explode as a crude plutonium-fuelled fission explosion. This explosion will cause a chain reaction, creating enough energy to trigger nuclear fusion inside the gas giant.

I can see where this idea has come from, even though it is inaccurate. The fusion bomb (or “thermonuclear weapon”) uses a fission trigger to kick-start an uncontrolled fusion reaction. The fission trigger is constructed to explode like a normal fission bomb much like the implosion device described in Part 1 of this series. When detonated, huge quantities of energetic X-rays are produced, heating the material surrounding the fusion fuel (such as lithium deuteride), causing the phase transition to a plasma. As very hot plasma is surrounding the lithium deuteride (in a very confined and pressured environment) the fuel will produce tritium, a heavy hydrogen isotope. Tritium then undergoes nuclear fusion, liberating huge quantities of energy as the tritium nuclei are forced together, overcoming the electrostatic forces between nuclei and fusing. Fusion releases large quantities of binding energy, more-so than fission.

How does a star work?

A comparison of the size of Jupiter, a brown dwarf, a small star and the Sun (Gemini Observatory/Artwork by Jon Lomberg)

A comparison of the size of Jupiter, a brown dwarf, a small star and the Sun (Gemini Observatory/Artwork by Jon Lomberg)


The point that needs to be emphasised here is that in a thermonuclear device, fusion can only be attained when immense temperatures are reached within a very confined and pressurized environment. What’s more, in the case of a fusion bomb, this reaction is uncontrolled.

So, how are nuclear fusion reactions sustained in a star (like our Sun)? In the thermonuclear bomb example above, tritium fusion is achieved through inertial confinement (i.e. rapid, hot and energetic pressure on the fuel to cause fusion), but in the case of a star, a sustained mode of confinement is required. Gravitational confinement is needed for nuclear fusion reactions to occur in the core. For significant gravitational confinement, the star requires a minimum mass.

In the core of our Sun (and most other stars smaller than our Sun), nuclear fusion is achieved through the proton-proton chain (pictured below). This is a hydrogen burning mechanism where helium is generated. Two protons (hydrogen nuclei) combine after overcoming the highly repulsive electrostatic force. This can only be achieved if the stellar body has a large enough mass, increasing gravitational containment in the core. Once the protons combine, they form deuterium (2D), producing a positron (quickly annihilating with an electron) and a neutrino. The deuterium nucleus can then combine with another proton, thus creating a light helium isotope (3He). The outcome of this reaction generates gamma-rays that maintain the stability and high temperature of the star’s core (in the case of the Sun, the core reaches a temperature of 15 million Kelvin).

Ian O'Neill

The proton-proton chain that fuels nuclear fusion inside the core of our Sun. Credit: Ian O'Neill

As discussed in a previous Universe Today article, there are a range of planetary bodies below the threshold of becoming a “star” (and not able to sustain proton-proton fusion). The bridge between the largest planets (i.e. gas giants, like Jupiter and Saturn) and the smallest stars are known as brown dwarfs. Brown dwarfs are less than 0.08 solar masses and nuclear fusion reactions have never taken hold (although larger brown dwarfs may have had a short period of hydrogen fusion in their cores). Their cores have a pressure of 105 million atmospheres with temperatures below 3 million Kelvin. Keep in mind, even the smallest brown dwarfs are approximately 10 times more massive than Jupiter (the largest brown dwarfs are around 80 times the mass of Jupiter). So, for even a small chance of the proton-proton chain occurring, we’d need a large brown dwarf, at least 80 times bigger than Jupiter (over 240 Saturn masses) to even stand the hope of sustaining gravitational confinement.

There’s no chance Saturn could sustain nuclear fusion?

NASA/JPL/SSI

Saturn, seen by Cassini. Image credit: NASA/JPL/SSI

Sorry, no. Saturn is simply too small.

Implying that a nuclear (fission) bomb detonating inside Saturn could create the conditions for a nuclear fusion chain reaction (like the proton-proton chain) is, again, in the realms of science fiction. Even the larger gas giant Jupiter is far too puny to sustain fusion.

I have also seen arguments claiming that Saturn consists of the same gases as our Sun (i.e. hydrogen and helium), so a runaway chain reaction is possible, all that is needed is a rapid injection of energy. However, the hydrogen that can be found in Saturn’s atmosphere is diatomic molecular hydrogen (H2), not the free hydrogen nuclei (high energy protons) as found in the Sun’s core. And yes, H2 is highly flammable (after all it was responsible for the infamous Hindenburg airship disaster in 1937), but only when mixed with a large quantity of oxygen, chlorine or fluorine. Alas Saturn does not contain significant quantities of any of those gases.

Conclusion
Although fun, “The Lucifer Project” is the product of someone’s lively imagination. Part 1 of “Project Lucifer: Will Cassini Turn Saturn into a Second Sun?” introduced the conspiracy and focused on some of the general aspects why the Galileo probe in 2003 simply burned up in Jupiter’s atmosphere, scattering the small pellets of plutonium-238 as it did so. The “black spot” as discovered the next month was simply one of the many dynamic and short-lived storms often seen to develop on the planet.

This article has gone one step further and ignored the fact that it was impossible for Cassini to become an interplanetary atomic weapon. What if there was a nuclear explosion inside Saturn’s atmosphere? Well, it looks like it would be a pretty boring affair. I dare say a few lively electrical storms might be generated, but we wouldn’t see much from Earth. As for anything more sinister happening, it is highly unlikely there would be any lasting damage to the planet. There would certainly be no fusion reaction as Saturn is too small and it contains all the wrong gases.

Oh well, Saturn will just have to stay the way it is, rings and all. When Cassini completes its mission in two years time, we can look forward to the science we will accumulate from such an incredible and historic endeavour rather than fearing the impossible…

Update (Aug. 7th): As pointed out by some readers below, molecular hydrogen wasn’t really the cause of the Hindenburg airship disaster, it was the aluminium-based paint that may have sparked the explosion, hydrogen and oxygen fuelled the fire.

By  
[Follow me on Twitter (@astroengine)] [Check out my space blog: Astroengine.com] [Check out my radio show: Astroengine Live!] Hello! My name is Ian O'Neill and I've been writing for the Universe Today since December 2007. I am a solar physics doctor, but my space interests are wide-ranging. Since becoming a science writer I have been drawn to the more extreme astrophysics concepts (like black hole dynamics), high energy physics (getting excited about the LHC!) and general space colonization efforts. I am also heavily involved with the Mars Homestead project (run by the Mars Foundation), an international organization to advance our settlement concepts on Mars. I also run my own space physics blog: Astroengine.com, be sure to check it out!


Sort by:   newest | oldest | most voted
LLDIAZ
Guest
LLDIAZ
July 31, 2008 6:16 AM

I bet if it were to happen the gravitational effect’s on our solar sysytem would be devastating

Sean Ellis
Guest
July 31, 2008 3:07 AM

I know I’m arguing against the illogical, here, but – Comet Shoemaker-Levy 9, anyone? If the power of a billion hydrogen bombs did nothing lasting to Jupiter, why would a few kilos of non-fissile plutonium?

leafguy
Member
July 31, 2008 3:31 AM

So how do the conspiracy theorists get past the fact that Saturn contains an extreme lack of flammable materials needed to ignite the fusion process as mentioned in the previous article…perhaps another conspiracy theory that Saturn is indeed a star and NASA has simply edited the photos to appear as a planet smile

Kevin F.
Member
July 31, 2008 4:30 AM

Although fun, “The Lucifer Project” is the product of someone’s lively imagination.

Or they just ate too much pizza and then fell asleep reading Arthur C. Clarke. grin

Chuck R.
Guest
Chuck R.
July 31, 2008 6:44 AM

@Steve: “So how do the conspiracy theorists get past the fact that Saturn contains an extreme lack of flammable materials needed to ignite the fusion process as mentioned in the previous article…”

Simple, they ignore the finer facts as always. ^_^

Fenring
Guest
Fenring
July 31, 2008 8:49 AM

Is Plutonium-238 even fisible? It’s highly alpha radioactive which makes it a good heat source, but I seriously doubt it would split as easily as Pu-239 or U-235.

Dan
Guest
Dan
July 31, 2008 9:01 AM

>However, the hydrogen that can be found in Saturn’s atmosphere is diatomic molecular hydrogen (H2), not the free hydrogen nuclei (high energy protons) as found in the Sun’s core.

Er… hm… don’t you think that heat from niclear explosion _could_ turn molecular hydrogen into plasma? (Yes, I know you won’t get self-sustaining reaction that way. But oversimplification looks strange).

Dark Gnat
Member
Dark Gnat
July 31, 2008 9:23 AM

This is one of the dumbest conspiracy theories ever.

These idiot “theorists” just don’t understand basic science, and are simply trying to get some internet fame.

willphoenix1
Guest
willphoenix1
July 31, 2008 10:32 AM

II’ve got two questions.

First let me say that the facts are interesting, though the light show would have been cool.

Anyhow, my first question is, as I read this article it seemed to me that Galileo in 2003 actually did have plutonium in it. Is that true? If so, why would that be the case? Why are scientists actually sending a probe to saturn with plutonium in it. What is the science in that?

Just a thought. If someone could get back to me with the answers to that I would apreciate it. Much Peace!

Will

Adam R
Guest
Adam R
July 31, 2008 10:47 AM

Think about it folks. HAARPs is a High Frequency system that could change weather patterns on planets.

NASA is probably trying to launch this soon to a distant world to try to test what would happen.

HAARPs is much more interesting.

Silver Thread
Member
Silver Thread
July 31, 2008 11:01 AM

I really think they should be called Conspiracy Hypotheses. Calling them Theory lends far too much credit. Of course, they could also accurately be called inane speculation and fear mongering for the mindless.

RL
Member
RL
July 31, 2008 11:01 AM

This is slightly off tangent but springs to mind. I like to think free association is a gift!

In the movie 2010: A space oddessy, Jupiter is turned into a star. It seemed as if the monoliths were reproducing to create mass and start the fusion inside the planet to make it into a star.

Now, I know this is just a movie, but is it anywhere near remotely plausible, that NASA could turn Jupiter into a star if it could do a similar thing to dramatically increase Jupiters mass to give it sufficient gravity to become a stable star?

Just wondering…

RL
Member
RL
July 31, 2008 11:04 AM

I Mean remotely plausible in the vein that IF NASA could create monoliths from nothing in sufficient quantities, blah, blah, blah…not trying to start a new conspiracy theory…but if it takes off please call it RL’s Theory. Thanks.

YOGIH
Guest
YOGIH
July 31, 2008 12:01 PM

hi there everyone,
very interesting comments. I wonder, why no one is mentioning the presence of huge gravitation for a sun-like reaction to kick. So for this reaction to start we need a huge gas planet, something of above the mass of a brown dwarf (100-170 Jupiter mass?) and then the reaction will kick itself under the gravitation compression isn’t it? So why everyone’s talking about the gases and types of hydrogen and misses the real point? I might be wrong, please comment.

YOGIH
Guest
YOGIH
July 31, 2008 12:43 PM

Sorry, it’s me again. I got another one: Why would they try to recreate the fusion here on Earth on the billions costing labs -Tokamaks- if the gravitation force is the only one responsible for maintaining the fusion reaction?

wpDiscuz