As of November 2014, these are all of the planetary, lunar and small body surfaces where humanity has either lived, visited, or sent probes to. Composition by Mike Malaska, updated by Michiel Straathof. Image credits: Comet 67P/C-G [Rosetta/Philae]: ESA / Rosetta / Philae / CIVA / Michiel Straathof. Asteroid Itokawa [Hayabusa]: ISAS / JAXA / Gordan Ugarkovic. Moon [Apollo 17]: NASA. Venus [Venera 14]: IKI / Don Mitchell / Ted Stryk / Mike Malaska. Mars [Mars Exploration Rover Spirit]: NASA / JPL / Cornell / Mike Malaska. Titan [Cassini-Huygens]: ESA / NASA / JPL / University of Arizona. Earth: Mike Malaska

Comet Landing: Side-By-Side Pics Of Alien Surfaces Humanity Explored

14 Nov , 2014 by

Correction, 11:33 a.m. EST: The University of Central Florida’s Phil Metzger points out that the image composition leaves out Eros, which NEAR Shoemaker landed on in 2001. This article has been corrected to reflect that and to clarify that the surfaces pictured were from “soft” landings.

And now there are eight. With Philae’s incredible landing on a comet earlier this week, humans have now done soft landings on eight solar system bodies. And that’s just in the first 57 years of space exploration. How far do you think we’ll reach in the next six decades? Let us know in the comments … if you dare.

More seriously, this amazing composition comes courtesy of two people who generously compiled images from the following missions: Rosetta/Philae (European Space Agency), Hayabusa (Japan Aerospace Exploration Agency), Apollo 17 (NASA), Venera 14 (Soviet Union), the Spirit rover (NASA) and Cassini-Huygens (NASA/ESA). Omitted is NEAR Shoemaker, which landed on Eros in 2001.

Before Philae touched down on Comet 67P/Churyumov–Gerasimenko Wednesday, the NASA Jet Propulsion Laboratory’s Mike Malaska created a cool infographic of nearly every place we’ve lived or visited before then. This week, Michiel Straathof updated the infographic to include 67P (and generously gave us permission to use it.)

And remember that these are just the SURFACES of solar system bodies that we have visited. If you include all of the places that we have flown by or taken pictures from of a distance in space, the count numbers in the dozens — especially when considering prolific imagers such as Voyager 1 and Voyager 2, which flew by multiple planets and moons.

To check out a small sampling of pictures, visit this NASA website that shows some of the best shots we’ve taken in space.

, , , , , , ,



Sort by:   newest | oldest | most voted
Ignoramus
Member
Ignoramus
November 14, 2014 10:12 AM

None of these look like “ice” to me.

Astrostevo
Member
Astrostevo
November 15, 2014 4:54 AM

No because they mostly rock (Moon, Venus, Mars, Itokawa) with one water (Earth), one tholin covered ice (Titan) and another a rocky dirty ice mixture! (Comet Churyumov-Gerasimenko aka 67P) So?

pauloaguia
Member
pauloaguia
November 14, 2014 10:48 AM

Earth – 182x (?)
Moon – 1966
Mars – 1971
Venus – 1975
Titan – 2005
Itokawa – 2005
67P/C-G – 2014

I’m sure in 60 years from now they’ll be more than 14. The only problem is that they’re all very far away, unless we start colonies closer to those places or send several landers at once, the numbers will keep growing sowly…
Hopefully bythen there’ll be a similar panel with photos taken by people and not just by probes smile

DrPhiltill
Member
November 14, 2014 11:37 AM

We are actually up to 8 already. The NEAR Shoemaker spacecraft landed on asteroid 433 Eros smile

dr_km
Member
dr_km
November 14, 2014 11:51 AM

February 12, 2001
Landing of NEAR spacecraft on asteroid Eros
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/NEAR_Shoemaker

kkt
Member
kkt
November 14, 2014 2:10 PM

The thing is, we’ve landed on most of the easy ones already. Governments show little enthusiasm for funding projects that will take multiple decades to get any new results. I do expect landings on the major satellites of Jupiter and Saturn by then, probably another few asteroids and comets. Landings on Triton, a Kuiper belt object, or Mercury might happen but are long shots.

forj
Member
forj
November 14, 2014 3:29 PM

my understanding was that the Itokawa image was taken from above the surface ( several thousand meters ) and there arent images from after landing on it’s surface.. though it was a soft landing. the rest of the surfaces above we have imagery FROM the surface..

Astrostevo
Member
Astrostevo
November 15, 2014 5:02 AM

Mine too at first – except they did have a sample return capsule thingy that did collect a few particles by sort of bumping into briefly so maybe that counts!

Eros was landing for the NEAR-Shoemaker spacecraft so I think maybe they could have substituted that for Itokawa? However, yeah, it was a harder landing as noted. Also not sure it actually imaged from the surface itself just the moments leading up to it. (I could be wrong there -would have to check and so feel free to correct me on this.) Thus I can see the logic here. Sort of anyhow.

Pvt.Pantzov
Member
November 15, 2014 2:50 AM

venus is my fav. so… deadly.

Astrostevo
Member
Astrostevo
November 15, 2014 5:10 AM
“How far do you think we’ll reach in the next six decades?” Not sure but plenty of hopes! Six decades takes us out to 2075 which is quite a while! I’d expect Phobos & Deimos – the martian moonlets, maybe Mercury and a few other asteroids. Perhaps also Pluto, Triton, Europa, and some of the other Jovian and Saturnian, Ouranian* and Neptunean moons as well. Jupiter has radiation issues and Io has vulcanism as major obstacles but also fascinating large worlds. I’d love to see that and more! * As the only planet named for a greek God rather than its roman equivalent I prefer to use the accurate greek spelling of Ouranos for the “sideways planet” also… Read more »
wpDiscuz