Shield Volcanoes

Color mosaic of Mars' greatest mountain, Olympus Mons, viewed from orbit. Credit NASA/JPL

[/caption]
Shield volcanoes are large volcanoes with gently sloping sides. In fact, the largest volcanoes on Earth (and even the Solar System) are shield volcanoes. They form when lava flows of low viscosity build up over long periods of time, creating volcanoes with huge internal volume. The best known shield volcanoes are ones that make up the Big Island of Hawaii: Mauna Loa and Mauna Kea.

The common feature with shield volcanoes is that they’re built up slowly over time from a very stable central summit vent. Flow after flow pours out of the vent, slides down the slopes of the volcano, and builds up the size. The largest volcanoes, like Mauna Loa and Mauna Kea would have been created from thousands of these flows.

Shield volcanoes can be found around the world. In northern California and Oregon, they can be 5-10 km across and about 500 meters high. But in the Hawaiian Islands, the volcanoes were atop very active vents for millions of years. Mauna Loa projects 4,168 meters above sea level, but if you measure it from the base of the ocean to its top, it measures 8,534 meters. (Mount Everest is 8,848 meters tall).

Volcanic activity is linked to plate tectonics, and the most of the world’s volcanoes are located near plate boundaries where subduction is happening. This is where one plate is passing under another plate, sinking into the Earth’s mantle.

The largest shield volcano in the Solar System is Olympus Mons on Mars. This monster measures 27 km above the surface of Mars, and is 550 km in width. It’s believed that Olympus Mons got so big because Mars lacks plate tectonics. A single volcanic hotspot was able to channel lava for billions of years, building up the volcano to such a great size.

We have written many articles about the Earth for Universe Today. Here’s an article about Olympus Mons, and here’s an article about Mauna Kea and Mauna Loa.

Want more resources on the Earth? Here’s a link to NASA’s Human Spaceflight page, and here’s NASA’s Visible Earth.

We have also recorded an episode of Astronomy Cast about Earth, as part of our tour through the Solar System – Episode 51: Earth.

Weekend SkyWatcher’s Forecast – March 13-15, 2009

Greetings, fellow SkyWatchers! With the Moon gone from the early evening skies, it’s time for a little sky dancing this weekend. Are you ready for a little old stepping out and a little new? Then waltz this way as we check out some very new star clusters and interesting asterisms! Grab your binoculars and telescopes and I’ll meet you in the back yard….

lowellFriday, March 13, 2009 – Today note the 1886 birth of Albert William Stevens, a daring balloonist who took the Explorer II to an altitude of 72,395 feet. He took the first photo showing Earth’s curvature and the first solar eclipse photo of the Moon’s shadow on Earth. Also, salute the 1855 birth on this date of Percival Lowell, who predicted the existence of Pluto (but Clyde Tombaugh was the one who actually discovered it, on Lowell’s 75th birthday!). Sir Percival was a determined soul who spent his life trying to find proof of life on Mars. He founded Lowell Observatory in 1894, where he studied Mars intensively, drawing the Red Planet covered with canals and oases. As Lowell once said: ‘‘Imagination is as vital to any advance in science as learning and precision are essential for starting points.’’

co106

Tonight we’ll look at a bright collection of stars located less than a handspan west of Procyon. Its name is Collinder 106 (RA 06 37 19 Dec -05 57 55). At a combined magnitude of 4.5, this expansive open cluster can be spotted as a hazy patch with the unaided eye and comes to full resolution with binoculars. It contains only around 14 members, but this widely scattered galactic collection has helped scientists determine size scales and dispersion among groups of its type. Viewed telescopically at low power, the observer will find it rich in background stars and a true delight in a low power, wide field eyepiece. If you’d like a challenge, hop a half degree to the northeast to spot Collinder 111 (RA 06 38 42 Dec -06 54 00). While visually only about one-tenth the apparent size of its larger southwestern neighbor, spare little Collinder 111 also belongs to the same class of open clusters. Who knows what may lurk around these understudied clusters?

Saturday, March 14, 2009 – Before dawn, look for the close appearance of Spica and the Moon to celebrate today’s famous astro births, starting with astronaut Frank Borman (b. 1928), a crew member of Apollo 8, the first manned flight around the Moon. Next, astronaut Eugene Cernan (b. 1934), who floated in space for more than 2 hours during the Gemini 9 mission and piloted Apollo 10. How about Giovanni Schiaparelli (1835), the Italian astronomer who described Mars’s ‘‘canali’’ and named its ‘‘seas’’ and ‘‘continents.’’ Schiaparelli’s comet studies demonstrated that meteoroid swarms existed in the path of cometary orbits, and thus predicted annual meteor showers. He was first to suggest that Mercury and Venus rotate and discovered the asteroid Hesperia. Still not enough? Then wish a happy birthday to Albert Einstein (b.1879), the German–American physicist considered the most brilliant intellect in human history!

ecrossFor a moment let’s reflect on Einstein’s Cross, proof of his genius. We can’t observe this Pegasus-based gravitational lens right now, but we can try to understand Einstein’s theory of gravity as an effect of the curvature in space–time. For example, if you draw a line around the center of a ball, the line would be straight, eventually coming back to its point of origin. We don’t see the point until we reach it, but we know it’s there. Einstein knew this dimension existed and predicted any object with mass will bend space and time around it, just like our line around the ball. He predicted light would also follow a curved path around an object… such as a distant quasar located behind a closer galaxy!

easterismTonight’s object is a ‘‘cross’’ astersim of stars. Begin at Procyon and shift about 10 degrees southwest (or 2 degrees south of 18 Monocerotis) to locate this pretty grouping of stars. Yes it’s true. It’s just an unknown, undocumented, and unnamed asterism, but how fitting to honor all these famous astro figures and a brilliant man who once said: ‘‘The fairest thing in life we can experience is the mysterious. It… stands at the cradle of true art and true science.’’

bo2

Now let’s go for a a challenging study. Larger telescopes should look for diminutive Bochum 2 less than half a degree northeast of ‘‘Einstein’s Asterism’’ (RA 06 48 50 Dec 00 22 35). At low power, it’s just a tight configuration of stars, but test the limit your telescope and increase magnification. This young open cluster has been studied for internal kinematics, spectroscopic binaries, and its motion in the galaxy, but its most interesting feature is a trapezium system at its heart. After a 4-year study, two of the members were documented as close binary stars with highly eccentric orbits, and one of the members is leaving as a runaway!

ngc2301For smaller optics, continue another half degree east for NGC 2301 (RA 06 51 48 Dec -00 28 00). Even telescopes as small as Lacaille’s can see this bright, 2,500 light-year-distant open cluster. Studied for its variable stars, NGC 2301 is also on many binocular deep-sky observing lists!

Sunday, March 15, 2009 – Today marks the 1713 birth of Abbe Nicolas Louis de Lacaille, the French astronomer who named 15 of the 88 constellations. Using only a half-inch refractor, Lacaille made 26 new discoveries and charted 9,776 stars, creating the first southern star catalog. Sharing the date is William Rutter Dawes (b. 1799). ‘‘Eagle-eyed’’ Dawes made exhaustive measurements of binary stars, discovered Saturn’s inner Crepe Ring, and accurately mapped Mars. Dawes also devised the elegantly simple formula (Dawe’s Limit) of dividing the number 11 by the aperture in centimeters to give the arcseconds of resolution required to split a binary star.

Thankfully, somebody was watching the sky at 5:30 p.m. on this date in 1806, because the observed fall of a pristine 6-kilogram chondrite meteor made an indisputable case that chondrites carried carbon-based organic chemicals. Perhaps it was from one of the Corona Australid meteors whose shower peak is tonight after midnight? The fall rate is about 5–7 per hour, and best for our friends in the southern hemisphere!

ngc2360Tonight let’s return to the Einstein’s Asterism and drop 15 degrees due southeast to study open cluster NGC 2360 (RA 07 17 42 Dec -15 38 00). At a distance of 4,600 light-years, magnificent NGC 2360 contains around 40 members, 7 of which are red giants. You have Caroline Herschel to thank for this lovely cluster… and her birthday is tomorrow!

do25

Now, return to our Einstein’s Asterism and head slightly more than half a degree west to study scattered open cluster Dolidze 25 (RA 06 45 06 Dec -00 18 00). This low power, telescopic only, galactic cluster is a worthy study for those who seek the unusual. Located at the outer edges of our own galaxy, Dolidze 25 may very well be the product of the merger of the Milky Way and the Canis Major Dwarf galaxy. Extremely rich in oxygen and significantly deficient in metals, this huge starforming region contains young stars, pre-main sequence stars, and Delta Scuti types. With its thin veil of nebula, Do25 should prove to be challenging and quite to your liking! Hop another half degree west, and then slightly south for Dolidze 23 (RA 06 43 12 Dec -00 00 00). This telescope-only cluster reveals around a dozen easily resolvable stars at low power. Dolidze 23’s two brighter members are finderscope visible. Locate the cluster at low power, and place it at the south edge of the field of view. Turn off your drive units and allow the field to cruise by naturally as you observe. This allows Dolidze 25 to drift across your line of sight, a technique that often improves your ability to spot fine detail in fainter objects.

Celestial scenery alert on Tuesday, March 17! A few hours before dawn, the Moon and mighty Antares will be nearly touching, separated by only a fraction (0.2) of a degree. For some, this could be a wonderful occultation event, so be sure to check maps and resources! Although the occultation path is limited, even more so is the graze path, just a few kilometers wide. For these lucky viewers, brilliant red Antares may flash in and out of view several times as it moves slowly along behind the lunar mountains.

Until next week, dreams really do come true when you keep on reaching for the stars!

This week’s awesome photos are: Sir Percival Lowell (historical image), Collinder 106 (credit – Palomar Observatory, courtesy of Caltech), Einstein’s Cross (credit – HST/NASA), “Einstein’s Asterism’’ (Credit – Palomar Observatory, courtesy of Caltech), Bochum 2, NGC 2301, Dolidize 25 and NGC 2360 (credit – Palomar Observatory, courtesy of Caltech). Thank you so much!

Herschel and Planck Launch Delayed

Guyana Space Center Credits: ESA - S. Corvaja

[/caption]
The launch of the Herschel and Planck spacecraft has been delayed from the original launch date of April 16. Right now, officials from the European Space Agency and Arianspace say the liftoff date will be delayed by a few weeks in order to carry out additional checks on the ground segment of the Herschel and Planck programs. Recent software updates for spacecraft operation procedures need to be validated. A new launch date will be announced at the end of March, but officials are hoping for time frame around April 29.

Launch configuration for the Herschel and Planck spacecraft. Credit: ESA
Launch configuration for the Herschel and Planck spacecraft. Credit: ESA
Planck, ESA’s microwave observatory that will study the relic radiation of the Big Bang, while the Herschel missions will study the formation of stars and galaxies. The two will be launched together on an Arian 5 rocket.

Planck is designed to image the anisotropies of the Cosmic Background Radiation Field over the whole sky, with unprecedented sensitivity and angular resolution. It will provide a major source of information relevant to several cosmological and astrophysical issues, such as testing theories of the early universe and the origin of cosmic structure.

The Herschel Space Observatory (formerly called Far Infrared and Sub-millimetre Telescope or FIRST) has the largest single mirror ever built for a space telescope. At 3.5-meters in diameter the mirror will collect long-wavelength radiation from some of the coldest and most distant objects in the Universe. In addition, Herschel will be the only space observatory to cover a spectral range from the far infrared to sub-millimeter.
During the delay, preparation of the two spacecraft for launch continues as planned at Europe’s Spaceport in Kourou, French Guiana.

Source: ESA

Looking For Extraterrestrials Looking At Us

If there are habitable planets out there, where do we look?

[/caption]The cosmos is a very big place, how do you begin the search for exoplanets orbiting other stars? Astronomers have a few tricks up their sleeves to work out how to spot these tiny specks of distant alien worlds. Astronomers can look for the gravitational “wobble” of a star as a massive exoplanet tugs on its parent star during orbit, or more commonly, they look for the slight dimming of star light as the exoplanet passes in front of the star. In fact, the Kepler space telescope is going to peer into space, surveying 100,000 stars to do just this; not looking for large gas giants, but detecting rocky bodies that resemble large Earths with the unparalleled precision.

OK, so we have a means of finding these habitable worlds, how can we use this information to widen our search for extraterrestrial intelligence? Researchers in Israel have asked that same question, and arrived at a very logical answer. If we are to communicate with these advanced beings, perhaps we should make sure they can see us first…

The concept is simple enough. Find a star with an Earth-like transiting exoplanet (we will hopefully have a few super-Earth targets over the next three years with Kepler), aim a radio transmitter at the star and send a “Hello world!” message to the possible alien civilization living on the exoplanet. All going well (or not, depending on whether these extraterrestrials are actually friendly), we’ll get a reply from said star system in a few decades with a message saying something like “Hello world to you too!”. It would be a momentous day for interstellar communications and it would answer the one question that bugs astronomers everywhere: Are we alone in the cosmos?

So far so good, until interstellar travel becomes a reality, mankind and our new chatty alien neighbours can play a very long game of radio tag, learning more about each other as the years/decades/centuries go on (depending on how distant the extraterrestrial civilization is in the first place). But there’s a problem with this plan. What if our ET neighbours aren’t looking in our direction? What if the Sun looks like ‘just another’ star amongst the other 1010 Sun-like stars hanging out in the Milky Way? We can transmit to our hearts content, but they may never see us.

Shmuel Nussinov at Tel Aviv University in Israel asked these same questions and actually makes the search for extraterrestrial intelligence a little bit easier. With the assumption that a sufficiently advanced alien race is surveying the skies, also looking out for exoplanets orbiting other stars, they may be using the same transit method that we use to detect exoplanets. Therefore, it only seems reasonable that ET will only be able to detect Earth if we pass in front of the Sun, thus dimming it slightly for our alien neighbours to see us. If this is the case, it seems highly unlikely that any alien race will detect our existence unless they are located along a narrow angle along the ecliptic plane of our Solar System. So, if we want to open up some alien banter, we should perhaps send signals to Earth-like exoplanets spotted along the ecliptic.

Although the Earth only passes across the solar disk for 13 hours every year (as viewed by a distant observer), our star will appear to dim slightly, allowing ET to see us. Factor in the various transits of the inner Solar System planets, and our observers will see there are a few possibly habitable rocky “exoplanets” for them to transmit to. If we are already transmitting, communications can be exchanged.

What a good idea

Source: arXiv blog

New Horizons Spots Neptune’s Moon Triton

[/caption]

New Horizons got a great shot of Neptune’s moon Triton last fall, as it was trucking toward Pluto and the Kuiper Belt. 

The mission was 2.33 billion miles (3.75 billion kilometers) from Neptune on Oct. 16, when its Long Range Reconnaissance Imager (LORRI) locked onto the planet and snapped away. The craft was following a programmed sequence of commands as part of its annual checkout. NASA released the image Thursday afternoon.

Mission scientists say the shot was good practice for imaging Pluto, which New Horizons will do in 2015. Neptune’s moon Triton and Pluto — the former planet retitled in 2006 as the ambassador to the Kuiper Belt — have much in common.

“Among the objects visited by spacecraft so far, Triton is by far the best analog of Pluto,” said New Horizons Principal Investigator Alan Stern. 

Triton is only slightly larger than Pluto, boasting a 1,700-mile (2,700-kilometers) diameter compared to Pluto’s 1,500-mile (2,400-kilometer) girth. Both objects have atmospheres primarily composed of nitrogen gas with a surface pressure only 1/70,000th of Earth’s, and comparably cold surface temperatures. Temperatures average -390 degrees F (-199 degrees C) on Triton and -370 degrees F (-188 degrees C) on Pluto. 

Triton is widely believed to have once been a member of the Kuiper Belt that was captured into orbit around Neptune, probably during a collision early in the solar system’s history. Pluto was the first Kuiper Belt object to be discovered.

Furthermore, “We wanted to test LORRI’s ability to measure a faint object near a much brighter one using a special tracking mode,” said New Horizons Project Scientist Hal Weaver, of Johns Hopkins University, “and the Neptune-Triton pair perfectly fit the bill.”

LORRI was operated in 4-by-4 format (the original pixels are binned in groups of 16), and the spacecraft was put into a special tracking mode to allow for longer exposure times to maximize its sensitivity.

Mission scientists also wanted to measure Triton itself, to follow up on observations made by the Voyager 2 spacecraft during its flyby of Neptune in 1989. Those images revealed evidence of cryovolcanic activity and cantaloupe-like terrain. New Horizons can observe Neptune and Triton at solar phase angles (the Sun-object-spacecraft angle) that are not possible to achieve from Earth-based facilities, yielding new insight into the properties of Titan’s surface and Neptune’s atmosphere.

New Horizons is currently in electronic hibernation, 1.2 billion miles (1.93 billion kilometers) from home, speeding away from the Sun at 38,520 miles (61,991 kilometers) per hour. LORRI will continue to observe the Neptune-Triton pair during annual checkouts until the Pluto encounter in 2015. 

LEAD IMAGE CAPTION: The top frame is a composite, full-frame (0.29° by  0.29°) LORRI image of Neptune taken Oct. 16, 2008, using an exposure time of 10 seconds and 4-by-4 pixel re-binning to achieve its highest possible sensitivity. The bottom frame is a twice-magnified view that more clearly shows the detection of Triton, Neptune’s largest moon. Neptune is the brightest object in the field and is saturated (on purpose) in this long exposure. Triton, which is about 16 arcsec east (celestial north is up, east is to the left) of Neptune, is approximately 180 times fainter.  All the other objects in the image are background field stars. The dark “tails” on the brightest objects are artifacts of the LORRI charge-coupled device (CCD); the effect is small but easily seen in this logarithmic intensity stretch. (Credit: NASA/Johns Hopkins University Applied Physics Laboratory/Southwest Research Institute)

Source: NASA

Dawn Spacecraft on Target for Vesta Following Gravity Assist

This image was taken near the point of closest approach to Mars on Feb. 17, 2009, during Dawn's gravity assist flyby. Image credit: NASA/JPL/MPS/DLR/IDA, and the Dawn Flight Team

[/caption]

Recently, the Dawn spacecraft – on its circuitous route to the asteroid belt — used the gravity of Mars to provide a little ‘kick’ to the spacecraft’s velocity. Universe Today finally had the chance to catch up with the team from the Dawn mission following this maneuver to find out how things went, and how the spacecraft is doing following the gravity assist operations. “The gravity assist accomplished exactly what we needed to get on course for Vesta,” Dawn Chief Engineer Marc Rayman told UT. “In addition to the gravity assist, we decided to undertake some bonus instrument calibrations, taking advantage of flying by such a well-studied planet. In doing so, we obtained some performance data on some of our instruments.” The image seen here of Mars’ surface is one of the results of those calibrations.

Dawn will be visiting two different asteroids, Vesta and Ceres. Because of its distinctive ion engine, the spacecraft will be able to enter orbit around Vesta in August of 2011, remain there until May of 2012, then leave orbit and head to Ceres, arriving in February of 2015.

The thrusters work by using an electrical charge to accelerate ions from xenon fuel to a speed 10 times that of chemical engines. But what does this mean for a gravity assist – is there any difference between an ion engine versus and a chemical thruster in a gravity assist?

“In most ways, there is no difference,” said Rayman. “We used the ion thruster to get on course for the gravity assist, but the spacecraft coasted for most of the 4.5 months before it reached Mars. When we had to refine the trajectory, we used the ion thruster because it is so much more efficient than conventional propulsion. Moreover, because the ion propulsion affords so much flexibility in the mission, we did not have to hit as small a ‘window’ at Mars.”

Dawn's trajectory.  Credit: JPL
Dawn's trajectory. Credit: JPL

Generally, a gravity assist is used to increase a spacecraft’s velocity and propel it outward in the solar system, much farther away from the Sun than its launch vehicle would have been capable of doing.

Dawn got as close as 549 kilometers (341 miles) to the Red Planet during the Tuesday, Feb. 17, flyby. JPL said that if Dawn had to perform these orbital adjustments on its own, with no Mars gravitational deflection, the spacecraft would have had to fire up its engines and change velocity by more than 9,330 kilometers per hour (5,800 miles per hour).

At maximum thrust, each engine produces a total of 91 millinewtons — about the amount of force involved in holding a single piece of notebook paper in your hand. You would not want to use ion propulsion to get on a freeway: At maximum throttle, it would take Dawn’s system four days to accelerate from 0 to 60 miles per hour.

Using the gravity of Mars was an important part of the Dawn mission that makes going to the asteroid belt possible.

Sources: JPL, email exchange with Marc Rayman

What is Earth’s Magnetic Field?

You can’t see it, but there’s an invisible force field around the Earth. Okay, not a force field, exactly, but a gigantic magnetic field surrounding the Earth, and it acts like a force field, protecting the planet – and all the life – from space radiation. Let’s take a look at the Earth’s magnetic field.

The Earth is like a great big magnet. The north pole of the magnet is near the top of the planet, near the geographic north pole, and the south pole is near the geographic south pole. Magnetic field lines extend from these poles for tens of thousands of kilometers into space; this is the Earth’s magneto sphere.

The geographic poles and the magnetic poles are far enough apart that scientists distinguish them differently. If you could draw a line between the magnetic north and south poles, you would get a magnetic axis that’s tilted 11.3 degrees away from the Earth’s axis of rotation. And these magnetic poles are known to move around the surface, wandering as much as 15 km every year.

Scientists think that the Earth’s magnetic field is generated by electrical currents flowing in the liquid outer core deep inside the Earth. Although it’s liquid metal, it moves around through a process called convection. And the movements of metal in the core sets up the currents and magnetic field.

As I mentioned at the top of this article, the magnetic field of the Earth protects the planet from space radiation. The biggest culprit is the Sun’s solar wind. These are highly charged particles blasted out from the Sun like a steady wind. The Earth’s magnetosphere channels the solar wind around the planet, so that it doesn’t impact us. Without the magnetic field, the solar wind would strip away our atmosphere – this is what probably happened to Mars. The Sun also releases enormous amounts of energy and material in coronal mass ejections. These CMEs send a hail of radioactive particles into space. Once again, the Earth’s magnetic field protects us, channeling the particles away from the planet, and sparing us from getting irradiated.

The Earth’s magnetic field reverses itself every 250,000 years or so. The north magnetic pole becomes the south pole, and vice versa. Scientists have no clear theory about why the reversals happen. One interesting note is that we’re long overdue for a reversal. The last one happened about 780,000 years ago.

We have written many articles about Earth for Universe Today. Here’s an article about how the geomagnetic reversal doesn’t mean doomsday in 2012, and here’s an article about how a solar storm compressed the Earth’s atmosphere.

Want more resources on the Earth? Here’s a link to NASA’s Human Spaceflight page, and here’s NASA’s Visible Earth.

We have also recorded an episode of Astronomy Cast about Earth, as part of our tour through the Solar System – Episode 51: Earth.

Reference:
NASA: Is the Earth’s magnetic field changing?

Stars at Milky Way Core ‘Exhale’ Carbon, Oxygen

Carbon exists only in a fine-tuned universe( 'Cat's Eye' Planetary Nebula)
Cat's Eye Nebula. Researchers have found carbon and oxygen in dusty planetary nebulae surrounding stars at the center of the Milky Way. Credit: NASA/JPL-Caltech/J. Hora (Harvard-Smithsonian CfA

[/caption]

Carbon and oxygen have been spotted in the dust around stars in the center of the Milky Way galaxy, suggesting that the stars have undergone recent disruptions of some kind — and hinting how stars can send heavy elements — like oxygen, carbon, and iron — out across the universe, paving the way for life.

Scientists have long expected to find carbon-rich stars in our galaxy because we know that significant quantities of carbon must be created in many such stars. But carbon had not previously shown up in the clouds of gas around these stars, said Matthew Bobrowsky, an astrophysicist at the University of Maryland and a co-author of a new study reporting the discovery.

“Based on our findings, this is because medium-sized stars rich in carbon sometimes keep that carbon hidden until very near the end of their stellar lives, releasing it only with their final ‘exhalations’,” explained Bobrowsky.

The new results appear in the February issue of the journal Astronomy and Astrophysics.

Bobrowsky and his team, led by J. V. Perea-Calderón at the European Space Astronomy Centre in Madrid, Spain, used the Spitzer Space Telescope to view each star and its surrounding clouds of dust and particles, called a planetary nebulae. The researchers measured the light emitted by the stars and the surrounding dust and were able to identify carbon compounds based on the wavelengths of light emitted by the stars. Looking in an area at the center of the Milky Way called the “Galactic Bulge,” the team observed 26 stars and their planetary nebulae and found 21 with carbon “signatures.”

But the scientists did not just find carbon around these stars; they also found oxygen in these 21 dust clouds, revealing a surprising mixture of ingredients for space dust. They report in their paper that this is likely due to a thermal pulse where a wave of high-pressure gas mixes layers of elements like carbon and oxygen and spews them out into the surrounding cloud.

The finding of carbon and oxygen in the dust clouds surrounding stars suggests a recent change of chemistry in this population of stars, according to the authors.

“Stars in the center of the Milky Way are old and ‘metal-rich’ with a high abundance of heavy elements,” Bobrowsky said. “They are different in chemical composition than those found in the disc, farther out from the center.”

Studying the chemistry of the stars helps scientists learn how the matter that makes up our earth and other planets in our galaxy left its stellar birthplaces long ago. 

As a star burns hotter and hotter, the hydrogen gas that originally made up almost all of its mass is converted, through nuclear fusion, first to helium, and then to progressively heavier elements. The hottest region in the core fuses together the heaviest elements. And these can reach the surface of the star only when its life is almost over.

“The Big Bang produced only hydrogen and helium,” Bobrowsky said. “Heavier elements like carbon and oxygen only come from getting ‘cooked up’ in stars. Nuclear reactions in stars created the heavier elements found in ‘life as we know it’.”

In the last 50,000 years of their 10 billion-year lives, sun-sized stars expel carbon atoms along with hydrogen and helium to form a surrounding cloud of gas that soon disperses into space, perhaps to eventually become the stuff of new stars, solar systems, or perhaps even life on some earth-like planet. Much larger stars expel their heavier matter in massive explosions called supernovae.

“All the heavy elements [which astronomers call ‘metals,’ and include all elements heavier than hydrogen and helium] on Earth were created by nuclear fusion reactions in previous generations of stars,” said Bobrowsky. “Those earlier stars expelled those elements into space and then our solar system formed out of that gas containing all the heavy elements that we now find in Earth and in life on Earth.”

LEAD IMAGE CAPTION: Cat’s Eye Nebula. Researchers have found carbon and oxygen in dusty planetary nebulae surrounding stars at the center of the Milky Way. Credit: NASA/JPL-Caltech/J. Hora (Harvard-Smithsonian CfA)

Source: Astronomy & Astrophysics and Spitzer, via AAS

Earth, Sun and Moon

From our perspective, the three objects that have the greatest impact on our lives are the Earth, Sun, and Moon. The Earth, of course, is the planet beneath our feet. Without it, well, we wouldn’t have anything at all. The Sun warms our planet, and with the Moon, creates the tides.

The Moon orbits the Earth and in turn, the Earth orbits the Sun. We see the Universe from a platform that is both rotating on its axis, and traveling in an elliptical orbit around the Sun. The Earth’s rotation on its axis makes the Sun rise in the east and set in the west, and is a big part of why the Moon rises and sets too; although the Moon takes 29 days to complete an orbit around the Earth as well.

The average distance from the Earth to the Moon is 384,403 km. And the average distance from the Earth to the Sun is 149,597,887 km. If you divide these two numbers, you get approximately 389. Now, if you divide the diameter of the Sun (1.4 million km) by the diameter of the Moon (3,474 km), you get 403. Those two numbers are pretty close. This is why the Moon and the Sun appear to be the same size in the sky; it’s a total coincidence.

Because they appear to be the same size in the sky, the Sun, Earth and Moon work together to create eclipses. When the Moon is directly in between the Earth and Sun, we see a solar eclipse. The Moon appears to pass in front of the Sun and darken it completely. And in the opposite situation, when the Earth is in between the Sun and the Moon, the Earth’s shadow darkens the Moon. This is a lunar eclipse. We don’t see eclipses every month because the Moon’s orbit it tilted slightly away from the Earth’s orbit around the Sun. Sometimes the Moon is above this orbit and sometimes it’s below, so it doesn’t block the light from the Sun, or get caught in the Earth’s shadow.

The Sun and the Moon work together to create the tides we experience here on Earth. Most of the rise of the tides comes from the gravitational pull of the Moon, but a small amount comes from the Sun. When the two objects are on the same side of the Earth, we get the highest and lowest tides, and when they’re on opposite sides of the Earth, the tides are less extreme.

The brightest object in the Sky is the Sun. Astronomers measure its apparent magnitude as -26.73. This makes it 449,000 times brighter than the full Moon. The brightness of the Moon is only -12.6. Of course all of the Moon’s brightness is just reflected light from the Sun.

We have written many articles about the Earth for Universe Today. Here’s a more detailed article about the Sun and the Moon.

Want more resources on the Earth? Here’s a link to NASA’s Human Spaceflight page, and here’s NASA’s Visible Earth.

We have also recorded an episode of Astronomy Cast about Earth, as part of our tour through the Solar System – Episode 51: Earth.

Reference:
NASA Earth Observatory

Hubble Finds Evidence of Dark Matter Around Small Galaxies

Perseus Cluster. Credit: NASA, ESA, and Z. Levay (STScI)

[/caption]
The Hubble Space Telescope has uncovered a strong new line of evidence that galaxies are embedded in halos of dark matter. By looking at the Perseus galaxy cluster, Hubble discovered a large number of small galaxies that have remained intact while larger galaxies around them are being ripped apart by the gravitational tug of other galaxies. “We were surprised to find so many dwarf galaxies in the core of this cluster that were so smooth and round and had no evidence at all of any kind of disturbance,” said astronomer Christopher Conselice of the University of Nottingham, UK, and leader of the team that made the Hubble observations. “These dwarfs are very old galaxies that have been in the cluster for a long time. So if something was going to disrupt them, it would have happened by now. They must be very, very dark-matter-dominated galaxies.”

Observations by Hubble’s Advanced Camera for Surveys spotted 29 dwarf elliptical galaxies in the Perseus Cluster, located 250 million light-years away and one of the closest galaxy clusters to Earth. Of these galaxies, 17 are new discoveries.

Cosmologists estimate that dark matter comprises 23 percent of all energy in the cosmos. An equally mysterious “dark energy,” which drives galaxies apart, is thought to take up another 73 percent or so. The ordinary matter that we can see is believed to represent only four percent of the total mass of the Universe.

Because dark matter cannot be seen, astronomers detected its presence through indirect evidence. The most common method is by measuring the velocities of individual stars or groups of stars as they move randomly in the galaxy or as they rotate around the galaxy. The Perseus Cluster is too far away for telescopes to resolve individual stars and measure their motions. So Conselice and his team derived a new technique for uncovering dark matter in these dwarf galaxies by determining the minimum additional mass contribution from dark matter that the dwarfs must have to protect them from being disrupted by the strong, tidal pull of gravity from larger galaxies.

Galaxies in the Perseus Cluster. Credit: NASA, ESA, and Z. Levay (STScI)
Galaxies in the Perseus Cluster. Credit: NASA, ESA, and Z. Levay (STScI)


The dwarf galaxies may have an even higher amount of dark matter than spiral galaxies. “With these results, we cannot say whether the dark matter content of the dwarfs is higher than in the Milky Way Galaxy,” Conselice said. “Although, the fact that spiral galaxies are destroyed in clusters, while the dwarfs are not, suggests that this is indeed the case.”

But these new images provide evidence that the undisturbed galaxies are enshrouded by a “cushion” of dark matter that protects them from being torn apart.

Source: HubbleSite