Deep Impact Begins Searching for Extrasolar Planets

71482main_flyby_w_impactor-516-399.thumbnail.jpg

NASA’s Deep Impact completed its main mission. Back in July 2005, the spacecraft’s impactor carved a hole great big hole out of Comet Tempel 1, helping scientists study what lies beneath its surface. But now its time for the spacecraft to re-enter the space workforce and help discover alien worlds.

NASA recently announced that they had extended Deep Impact’s mission to fly past another comet. This time it’ll be Comet Hartley 2 on October 11, 2010. Just like the previous mission, Deep Impact – now renamed EPOXI – will be studying the surface of the comet with its suite of scientific instruments.

But between now and then, the spacecraft has some time to kill. So astronomers searching for extrasolar planets are calling it into service.

The spacecraft will be focusing its largest telescope at five stars, hoping to catch a glimpse of a planetary transit. This is where a planet dims the light from its parent star as it passes in front.

EPOXI Deputy Principal Investigator Dr. Drake Deming of NASA’s Goddard Space Flight Center in Greenbelt, Md explains the technique:

“When the planet appears next to its star, your telescope captures their combined light. When the planet passes behind its star, your telescope only sees light from the star. By subtracting light from just the star from the combined light, you are left with light from the planet,” said Deming, who is leading the search for exosolar worlds with Deep Impact. “We can analyze this light to discover what the atmospheres of these planets are like.”

This search for extrasolar planets has already begun. Deming and his team directed EPOXI to begin making observations on January 22, 2008. It’s looking at stars which are already known to have transiting planets. The hope is that these stars actually contain multiple planets. Since planets seem to orbit on the same plane, if one passes in front of the star, the rest should too. Even if the planets don’t pass perfectly in front of the star, the spacecraft might be able to detect them from the gravitational influence they have on light coming from the star.

EPOXI will be looking for transiting planets down to the size of Earth, orbiting some of our closest neighboring stars.

Original Source: NASA News Release

Astronomers Could Detect Oceans on Extrasolar Planets

Imagine if astronomers could tell the difference between Earth-like extrasolar planets just by seeing the reflected light from their oceans? That sounds like science fiction, but a team of researchers have proposed that it’s really possible to detect the shape of the light curve glinting off an extrasolar planet and know if it has oceans.

This ground-breaking (water splashing?) idea was written in a recent journal article by D.M. Williams and E. Gaidos, entitled Detecting the Glint of Starlight on the Oceans of Distant Planets published January, 2008 in the Arxiv prepress e-Print archive.

The article describes the methods astronomers could use to detect the glint, or water reflection, from the “disk-averaged signal of an Earth-like planet in crescent phase.” They used the Earth as an example, and generated a series of light curves for a planet with our orientation and axial tilt.

They calculated that planets partially covered by water should appear much brighter when they’re near the crescent phase because light from the parent star reflects off the oceans very efficiently at just the right angles. By watching an extrasolar planet move through its orbit, its light curve should give off the telltale signature that there are oceans present.

According to their calculations, this method should work for about 50% of the visible planets. Furthermore, it should be possible to measure the ratio of land to water, and even get a sense of continents.

In order to test their theories, they’re planning to use remote observations of Earth, using interplanetary spacecraft. This will demonstrate if Earth can be observed at extreme phase angles—orbiting spacecraft around or on route to Mars.

And then the upcoming planet hunting missions, such as Darwin and the Terrestrial Planet Finder (if it ever gets completed) should be able to make the direct analysis of Earth-sized worlds orbiting other stars. Just by measuring the brightness, they should know if there are oceans, boosting the prospects for life.

Original Source: Arxiv

Using Gravity to Find Planets in the Habitable Zone

microlens.thumbnail.jpg

Astronomers have several techniques to discover planets. But one of the least used so far, gravitational microlensing, might be just the right technique to find planets in the habitable zone of nearby dwarf stars.

The first way astronomers find planets is with the radial velocity technique. This is where the gravity of a heavy planet yanks its parent star around so that the wobbling motion too and fro can be measured.

The second technique is through transits. This is where a planet dims the light coming from its parent star as it passes in front. By subtracting the light from when the planet isn’t in front of the star, astronomers can even measure its atmosphere.

The third way is through gravitational microlensing. When two stars are perfectly lined up, the closer star acts as a natural lens, brightening the light from the more distant star. Here on Earth, we see a star brighten in a very characteristic way, and then dim down again. A blip in the change of brightness can be attributed to a planet.

Geometry of a lensing event.
Unlike the other two methods, microlensing allows you to reach out and see planets at tremendous distances – even clear across the galaxy. The problem with microlensing is that it’s a one-time opportunity. You’re never going to see those stars line up in just the same way again.

But Rosanne Di Stefano and Christopher Night from the Harvard-Smithsonian Center for Astrophysics in Cambridge, MA think there’s another way microlensing could be used. In their research paper entitled, Discovery and Study ofNearby Habitable Planets with Mesolensing, the researchers propose that many stars have a high probability of becoming a lens.

Instead of watching the sky, hoping to see a lensing event, you watch specific stars and wait for them to pass in front of a more distant star.

These high-probablility lenses are known as mesolenses. By studying a large number of dwarf stars, they expect that many of them should pass in front of a more distant star as often as once a year. And if pick your targets carefully, like dwarf stars moving in front of the Magellanic Clouds, you might get even more opportunities.

Unlike other methods of planet detection, gravitational lensing relies on light from a more distant star. It is therefore important to ask what fraction of nearby dwarfs will pass in front of bright sources and so can be studied with lensing. Within 50 pc, there are approximately 2 dwarf stars, primarily M dwarfs, per square degree.

For less massive red dwarf stars, you should be able to see them at a distance of 30 light years, and for Sun-mass stars out to a distance of 3,000 light years. These stars are close enough that if a planet is detected in the habitable zone, followup techniques should be possible to confirm the discovery.

They calculated that there are approximately 200 dwarf stars passing in front of the Magellanic Clouds right now. And many of these will have lensing events with the stars in the dwarf galaxies.

Large Magellanic Cloud. Image credit: NASA
Instead of monitoring specific stars, previous surveys have just watched tens of millions of stars per night – hoping for any kind of lensing event. Even though 3,500 microlensing candidates have been discovered so far, they tend to be with stars at extreme ranges. Even if there were planets there, they wouldn’t show up in the observations.

But if you pick your stars carefully, and then watch them for lensing events, the researchers believe you should see that brightening on a regular basis. You could even see the same star brighten several times, and make follow-up observations on its planets.

And there’s another advantage. Both the radial velocity and transit methods rely on the planet and star being perfectly lined up from our vantage point. But a microlensing event still works, even if the planetary system is seen face on.

By using this technique, the researchers think that astronomers should turn up lensing events on a regular basis. Some of these stars will have planets, and some of these planets will be in their star’s habitable zone.

Original Source: Arxiv

Red Dwarfs Have Teeny Tiny Habitable Zones

dn9704-1_450.thumbnail.jpg

As space telescopes get larger and more sensitive, the search for Earth-sized worlds surrounding other stars is about to get rolling. But astronomers are going to need to know where to look. A team of researchers are working on a survey of nearby stars, calculating the habitable zones around them. When the search begins, astronomers are going to want to study these regions.

The Research Consortium on Nearby Stars (RECONS) is a survey using relatively small telescopes to study the habitable zones in the nearby stars. The team uses measurements of various stars brightnesses at optical and infrared wavelengths matched with their distances to get a sense of the stars’ habitability.

After gathering together a big list of potential candidate stars, the researchers can then categorize stars by size and temperature to find ones that might harbour life.

“Once we have good values for the temperatures and sizes of the nearby stars, we can estimate how hot planets will be at different distances from the stars,” explains Justin Cantrell, a Doctoral Candidate in Astronomy at Georgia State University. “We consider those stars that would have surface temperatures suitable for liquid water to be in the traditional habitable zone.”

The researchers were looking for habitable zones around red dwarf stars, which can be 50-90% smaller than the Sun and much cooler. The comprise 70% of the stars in the Milky Way, but they’re harder to spot because they put out less light.

They were surprised to learn that these red dwarf stars have tiny habitable zones. When they added up the habitable zones of 44 red dwarf stars nearby the Sun, they found they didn’t add up to equal the habitable zone of a single Sun like star.

So even though these red dwarfs are common, they’re not great candidates for life. Earth-type stars would need to be perfectly positioned in their tiny habitable zones to be good candidates for life.

Original Source: Georgia State University News Release

Researchers Find a Planet, Right Where They Expected

tinybrowndwarfsystem_r008.thumbnail.jpg

Before Neptune was discovered in the 1840s, astronomers predicted its location based on how it was interacting with Uranus. Once again, this technique was used to find a planet, but this time orbiting a star 200 light-years away. It turns out planets like to be packed together in star systems. Find a gap, and you might have discovered a planet.

Astronomers from the University of Arizona in Tucson announced their findings today at the meeting of the American Astronomical Society in Austin.

Rory Barnes, a post-doctoral associate at UA’s Lunar and Planetary Laboratory, and a team of colleagues studied the orbits of several planetary systems. They found that the planets are generally packed as close together as possible without actually gravitational disrupting each other – if you get them any closer, planets will be kicked inward or outward from the system. This is called the Packed Planetary Systems hypothesis.

“The Packed Planetary Systems hypothesis reveals something fundamental about the formation of planets,” Barnes said. “The process by which planets grow from clouds of dust and gas around young stars must be very efficient. Wherever there is room for a planet to form, it does.”

The researchers studied the orbits of several planetary systems and noticed that there was a big gap between two planets orbiting the star HD 74156. So if their hypothesis was correct, there should be a planet orbiting in between the gap.

“When I realized that six out of seven multi-planet systems appeared packed,” Barnes said, “I naturally expected that there must be another planet in the HD 74156 system so that it, too, would be packed.”

With this prediction in hand, a team of astronomers from the University of Texas made careful observations of the HD 74156 system, looking for the theorized planet.

And guess what… they found it!

With this prediction confirmed, Barnes and his colleagues also predicted that there should be another planet orbiting around 55 Cancri. This was found by a different team of astronomers.

The researchers have predicted a specific planet orbiting a third star, but so far they haven’t found it.

But as more planetary systems are discovered, the Packed Planetary Systems hypothesis will fill in the holes. Astronomers will know where to look for more planets.

Original Source: University of Arizona News Release

Some Stars Can Go through a Second Stage of Planet Formation

star_bp_piscium-prv.thumbnail.jpg

Newly forming planetary systems follow a routine. They collapse down from a cloud of gas and dust to form a central star and orbiting planets. But astronomers have found two unusual stars that went through a second phase of planetary formation, hundreds of millions or even billions of years after the first.

The announcement was made by Carl Melis, an astronomy graduate student at UCLA, at the 211th meeting of the American Astronomical Society held in Austin, Texas.

“This is a new class of stars, ones that display conditions now ripe for formation of a second generation of planets, long long after the stars themselves formed,” Melis said.

The two bizarre stars are known as BP Piscium, in the constellation Pisces, and TYCHO 4144 329 2, in the constellation Ursa Major. They have characteristics similar to young stars, such as the rapid accretion of gas, extended disks of material, infrared emissions of radiation, and even jets.

They may act young, but these stars are very old. The astronomers measured the quantities of lithium in the stars; an element which is consumed when stars get older. If they were young, they would still have their reserves of lithium, but they have very little of it left.

So you have older stars behaving like young stars; what happened?

The researchers think that these stars were once part of a binary system where a solar-mass star was matched with a much less massive star. The more massive star ran out of fuel first and ballooned up as a red giant, engulfing the smaller star. At this point, the smaller star would actually be orbiting inside the envelope of the red giant, forcing material out into space, while slowly spiraling inward to meet its destruction.

This ejected material would actually contain the building blocks of terrestrial planets, and so, the planetary formation process would get going all over again. The size of the new planets that could form would depend on how much material was ejected during this red giant phase.

Original Source: UCLA News Release

If You Crashed Neptune and Jupiter Together…

collision.thumbnail.jpg

Our early Solar System was a violent place. For hundreds of millions of years, large planetoids smashed together, forming larger and larger planets. This same process is happening in other star systems right now. In fact, astronomers have discovered a system where a Neptune-sized object and a Jupiter-sized object might have just smashed together. Ouch.

This newly discovered planet orbits a 25-Jupiter-mass brown dwarf located about 170 light-years away. Computer models show that the brown dwarf is very young, probably only 8 million years old. This means that its planetary companion should be the same age.

And here’s why they think it’s the result of a massive collision. At its current age, the planet should have cooled down to a temperature of about 1000 Kelvin. But recent observations show that it’s actually around 1600 Kelvin. So something heated it up.

That something might have been a planetary collision.

“Most, if not all, planets in our solar system were hit early in their history. A collision created Earth’s moon and knocked Uranus on its side,” explained Eric Mamajek, of the Harvard-Smithsonian Center for Astrophysics. “It’s quite likely that major collisions happen in other young planetary systems.”

An object this size should radiate its heat away over the course of 100,000 years, so this collision must have happened relatively recently.

That’s a pretty exciting possibility, but there are some more conservative possibilities as well. Other astronomers have proposed that the planetary companion is actually much smaller, only the size of Saturn. So it would have a smaller surface area radiating all the detected energy.

If this technique works out, astronomers could just take the temperature of planets in young star systems, and calculate just how long it’s been since they were impacted. “Hot, post-collision planets might be a whole new class of objects we will see with the Giant Magellan Telescope.”

Original Source: CfA News Release

Earth, Barely Habitable?

lores.thumbnail.jpg

Our home planet has been often described in glowing, nurturing terms. A cradle for life, right in the goldilocks zone. But our planet is actually right on the edge of habitability. If it were any smaller, and a little less massive, plate tectonics might never have gotten started. It turns out, life needs plate tectonics.

Astronomers at the Harvard-Smithsonian Center for Astrophysics announced their research today at the Winter meeting of the American Astronomical Society. According to the team, plate tectonics only really get going when a planet gathers enough mass. And the Earth has just barely enough mass to enjoy plate tectonics.

“Plate tectonics are essential to life as we know it,” said Diana Valencia of Harvard University. “Our calculations show that bigger is better when it comes to the habitability of rocky planets.”

When a planet reaches a large enough size, huge chunks of the planet’s surface can float atop an ocean of boiling magma. These plates spread apart and crash into one another, lifting up gigantic mountain ranges like the Himalayas.

And without plate tectonics, we wouldn’t be here. The process enables complex chemistry and recycles carbon dioxide, which acts like a blanket to keep the Earth warm and hospitable for life. Carbon dioxide is locked into rocks, and then returned to the atmosphere when the rocks melt. Without this cycle, carbon dioxide would get locked away in rocks forever.

The researchers examined what would happen on different rocky planets. They looked at a range of planets, smaller than our planet, up to the so-called “super-Earths” – planets twice our size with 10 times the mass. Any bigger than that, and you start to get a gas planet.

According to their calculations, the Earth is barely habitable. If you get a planet with more mass, the plate tectonics really get rolling, and the carbon cycle becomes really active. A super-Earth could have globe-spanning rings of fire, bursting with hot springs and geysers. Life would have every opportunity to get started.

Of course, if we tried to visit a super-Earth, we’d find the gravity uncomfortable. We’d experience 3 times the gravity trying to walk around on the surface of the planet. Oh, my back.

But for native life forms, it would be paradise.

Original Source: CfA News Release

Studying Planets With Sunglasses

hd189733b_drawing.thumbnail.jpg

While finding a planet orbiting another star is incredibly exciting, it’s almost becoming commonplace. The current exoplanet count is up to 270. So now that astronomers know where these exoplanets are located, they are currently devising new techniques in order to study the planets in detail. Using a new method similar to how polarized sunglasses filter away reflected sunlight to reduce glare, an international team of scientists were able to infer the size of an exoplanet’s atmosphere, plus directly trace the planet’s orbit.

Orbiting a dwarf star in the constellation Vulpecula and lying approximately 63 light years from earth, this exoplanet was discovered two years ago. Using this new polarization technique, the astronomers were able to see details about the planet called HD189733b that aren’t possible to observe using other indirect methods. The scientists extracted polarized light to enhance the faint reflected starlight “glare” from the planet, and for the first time, were able to detect the orientation of the planet’s orbit and trace its motion in the sky.

This new technique also indicates that the atmosphere of the planet is quite large, about 30% larger than the opaque body of the planet seen during transits, and probably consists of small particles, perhaps even tiny dust grains or water vapor.

Earlier studies of HD189733b using the Hubble Space Telescope indicated that this world doesn’t have any Earth-sized moons or a discernible ring system. Also, the temperature of its atmosphere is a blazing seven hundred degrees Celsius.

The planet is so close to its parent star that its atmosphere expands from the heat. Until now, astronomers have never seen light reflected from an exoplanet, although they have deduced from other observations that HD189733b probably resembles a “hot Jupiter,” a planet orbiting extremely closely to its parent star. Unlike Jupiter, however, HD189733b orbits its star in a couple of days rather than the 12 years it takes Jupiter to make one orbit of the sun.

“The polarimetric detection of the reflected light from exoplanets opens new and vast opportunities for exploring physical conditions in their atmospheres,” said Professor Svetlana Berdyugina, leader of the group from Zurich’s Institute of Astronomy and Finland’s Tuorla Observatory. “In addition, more can be learned about radii and true masses, and thus the densities of non-transiting planets.”

They discovered that polarization peaks near the moments when half of the planet is illuminated by the star as seen from the earth. Such events occur twice during the orbit, similar to half-moon phases.

Original News Source: Swiss Federal Institute of Technology Press Release

ET Would Know There’s Life on Earth

2007-1220earth.thumbnail.jpg

It seems impossible to believe, but astronomers are now making plans to reach for the brass ring of planet hunting: to find Earth-sized worlds orbiting other stars, and then to analyze them to see if there’s life. But you’ve got to know what you’re looking for. That’s why astronomers are considering what the Earth might look like from afar. What clues would our planet give to distant astronomers that there’s life here?

The number of discovered planets is up to 240 now and growing. In fact, the planetary discoveries are coming so fast and furious that many universities don’t even bother releasing press releases any more.

But these are all hostile worlds; larger than our own gas giants, and many orbit tightly to their parent star. We’re not going to find life on these “hot jupiters”. No, it’s going to be the Earth-sized planets, orbiting within the habitable zone of their star, where water can still be a liquid on the surface of the planet. These planets are going to have active weather systems, oceans and land masses.

Even with a telescope with many times the power of the Hubble Space Telescope, an Earth-sized world would appear as a single pixel in a vast empty space. You wouldn’t get any kind of detailed resolution.

Can a single pixel tell you anything about that world? Researchers say, “yes”. In a new paper published in the online edition of the Astrophysical Journal, they say that observers looking at the Earth from afar would be able to judge our rotation rate, the probability of oceans, weather, and even if the planet has life.

If distant astronomers were watching Earth, they’d see the brightness change over time as clouds rotated in and out of view. If they could also measure its rotation period, they’d know whether a certain part of the planet was in view, and start to deduce if there are oceans or land masses pointed towards them.

The researchers have created a computer model for the brightness of Earth over time, showing that the global cloud cover is surprisingly constant. There are usually clouds over the rain forests, and arid regions are clear.

Astronomers watching Earth would start to recognize the patterns, and be able to deduce an active weather system here. Compare this to the other planets in the Solar System:

“Venus is always covered in clouds. The brightness never changes,” said Eric Ford, a UF assistant professor of astronomy, and one of 5 authors on the paper. “Mars has virtually no clouds. Earth, on the other hand, has a lot of variation.”

To recognize these kinds of characteristics on another world will require a telescope with roughly twice the size of Hubble. And observatories like this are in the works.

Original Source: University of Florida News Release