NASA Funds the Development of a Nuclear Reactor on the Moon That Would Last for 10 Years

If NASA’s Artemis project to return to the Moon permanently is going to succeed, it will need a lot of power. Shipping traditional fossil fuels up there is impractical, and surface solar cells won’t work for the two weeks that a given side of the Moon is shadowed. So the best option may be to set up a nuclear power station. NASA solicited some ideas along those lines with a preliminary design request for proposal – and they recently announced that three groups would each receive $5 million to develop preliminary designs for surface-based lunar fission reactors.

The names of the companies that received the funding probably won’t surprise anyone closely tied to the nuclear industry. They include:

  • Lockheed Martin, partnering with BWXT and Creare
  • Westinghouse, partnering with Aerojet Rocketdyne
  • IX (a joint venture of Intuitive Machines and X-Energy), partnering with Maxar Technologies and Boeing.

The cross-disciplinary nature of the project requires companies that are nuclear specialists (such as Westinghouse) to coordinate with rocketry specialists (such as Aerojet). The project is run by a combination of NASA and Department of Energy labs, with the DoE’s Idaho National Laboratory taking the lead on the project. At the same time, NASA contributes expertise from their fission surface power project at Glenn, and the funding comes from the Space Technology Mission Directorate, based at Marshall.

UT video describing KRUSTY, the predecessor experiment to the current development effort.

The RFP was initially released in November, with proposals due in March. Now the awardees, each of whom will have $5 million to work with, will have 12 months to work on their initial design concepts for a 40 kW fission reactor that can operate on the lunar surface for at least ten years.

The companies don’t have to start from scratch, though – they can leverage a former NASA project that ended in 2018 that aimed to create a reactor that could survive on the Moon. Known as the Kilopower Reactor Using Stirling Technology, it was mantled with the humorous nickname of KRUSTY.  

KRUSTY, which operated in collaboration with the National Nuclear Safety Administration, used a Stirling engine rather than the typical water-based heat engine most nuclear power plants are designed around. Using a Sterling engine, which relies on gas rather than heavier liquid, is one way to save weight and solve some energy problems that would plague liquid-based heat engines.

Workers install the vacuum chamber around the KRUSTY experiment.
Credit – NNSA

There’s still a long way to go before any fission reaction takes place on the Moon, though. At the earliest, a test reactor might be ready in the early 2030s. But most exploration experts agree that nuclear’s consistent, reliable power will be absolutely critical to humanity’s efforts for a sustained presence in the solar system. With the output of these projects in hand in a year, NASA will be one step close to realizing that critical goal.

Learn More:
NASA – NASA Announces Artemis Concept Awards for Nuclear Power on Moon
NASA – Kilopower
UT – NASA is Building a Nuclear Reactor to Power Lunar and Martian Exploration!
UT – NASA is Upping the Power on its Lunar Wattage Challenge!

Lead Image:
Concept art of a fission reactor on the surface of the moon.
Credit – NASA

Andy Tomaswick

Recent Posts

Hot Stars Blast Away at gas Giants Until Only Their Rocky Cores Remain

We don't see many Neptune-sized worlds closely orbiting their star. That may be because the…

22 hours ago

JWST’s Science, Surgeon Robot for ISS, Booster 7 Test Fire

James Webb delivers scientific results, SLS and Starship go closer to their maiden flights, remote…

1 day ago

MIT Researchers Propose Space Bubbles to Stop Climate Change

Climate change is a real problem. Human caused outputs of greenhouse gases like carbon dioxide…

1 day ago

In Wildly Different Environments, Stars End Up Roughly the Same

When you look at a region of the sky where stars are born, you see…

2 days ago

Primordial Black Holes Could Have Triggered the Formation of Supermassive Black Holes

Computer simulations show the role primordial black holes may have played in the early universe,…

2 days ago

Why Betelgeuse Dimmed

Using data from Hubble and other observatories, a team of scientists have determine the cause…

3 days ago