Categories: Dark Matter

Astronomy Jargon 101: Dark Matter

In this series we are exploring the weird and wonderful world of astronomy jargon! You’ll feel mysterious about today’s topic: dark matter!

Something funny is going on in the universe. Way back in the 1930’s astronomer Fritz Zwicky was studying the motions of galaxies inside the Coma galaxy cluster. He found that those galaxies were moving around way too quickly. Once he added up all their mutual gravitational attraction, their incredible speeds should have ripped apart the Coma cluster ages ago. But there the cluster was, sitting there. He figured that there must be some sort of matter hidden from his observations, providing enough gravitational pull to keep the cluster together.

He named the stuff “dark matter” and moved on to other subjects. The topic was largely ignored by the astronomical community.

In the 1970’s astronomer Vera Rubin was examining the motions of stars within the Andromeda galaxy. She found that the stars were whipping around in their orbits way too quickly. That galaxy, and the dozens of others that she studied, should have torn itself apart, unless there was some hidden kind of matter to hold everything together.

Dark matter came back.

Since then, more evidence has mounted. The mass in galaxy clusters can bend the path of light from background objects, and astronomers can use the amount of bending to calculate the mass of the clusters. Those calculations reveal that the true mass of the clusters is at least 5 times that of what we can see.

Cosmologists studying the early universe can map the cosmic microwave background, the leftover light pattern from when the cosmos was only 380,000 years old. Those observations tell us that there was a form of dark matter knocking around back then.

Calculations of the formation of elements in the very early universe successfully predict the abundances of hydrogen and helium…and tell us that the amount of normal matter isn’t very much.

Everywhere we look, we see signs for dark matter. No other theory can account for the wide variety of observations that point to its existence. As best we can tell, it’s some new kind of particle, previously unknown to the standard model of particle physics, that simply doesn’t interact with light. Light passes through it – it doesn’t reflect, refract, glow, or absorb. A better name would be “invisible matter” but I guess that doesn’t sound as cool.

The hunt is on to find direct evidence for dark matter. So far, those searches have turned up empty. But I suppose if it were easier to see dark matter, it wouldn’t be very dark after all.

Paul M. Sutter

Astrophysicist, Author, Host | pmsutter.com

Recent Posts

One Star Flies Past the Milky Way’s Black Hole at 3% the Speed of Light

There's a population of stars in the heart of our galaxy whipping around Sagittarius A*…

8 hours ago

It Would Take About 100 Billion Years for Another Star to Pass Close Enough to Make the Solar System Unstable

A new study by a team of Canadian researchers shows that our Solar System will…

14 hours ago

Mars Rovers Will Need to Dig Deeper If They Want to Find Evidence of Life

The search for life—even ancient life—on Mars is trickier than we thought. In a recent…

1 day ago

LHC Scientists Find Three Exotic Particles — and Start Hunting for More

Physicists say they've found evidence in data from Europe's Large Hadron Collider for three never-before-seen…

2 days ago

SpaceX Shares an Image of the Super Heavy Booster Bristling With 33 Newly Installed Raptor Engines

SpaceX has released new images that show the Starship and Superheavy prototypes with all their…

2 days ago

We've Seen a Helicopter on Mars. Next, Sailplanes?

The success of the Mars Ingenuity helicopter has encouraged engineers to consider and reconsider all…

2 days ago