Astronomers Define the “Really Habitable Zone”. Planets Capable of Producing Gin and Tonic | Universe Today

Astronomers Define the “Really Habitable Zone”. Planets Capable of Producing Gin and Tonic

A hospitable star that doesn’t kill you with deadly flares. A rocky planet with liquid water and an agreeable climate. Absence of apocalyptic asteroid storms. No pantheon of angry, vengeful, and capricious gods. These are the things that define a habitable planet.

Now some scientists are adding one more criterion to the list: gin and tonic.

Exoplanets are a hot topic in space science right now. We know of about 4,000 confirmed exoplanets, with many more on the way. We’ve come a long way from a few decades ago, when as far as we knew, our Solar System was the only one with a habitable world. What else were we supposed to think?

The Kepler mission changed all that. Our knowledge of exoplanets grew in leaps and bounds, and along with the discovery of all those distant planets, we began to refine our criteria for what a habitable world might look like.

Water, safety from stellar radiation, and an agreeable climate were just the beginning. It’s time to refine our understanding of habitable, and to start to add some other essentials with the list. According to one team of researchers, it’s time to introduce the concept of the Really Habitable Zone (RHZ.)

“In common with much of the work in the field, we rely throughout on assumptions which are difficult if not impossible to test and present some plots which astronomers can use in their own talks, stripped of all caveats.”

From “Defining the Really Habitable Zone.”

For these authors, an exoplanet is only in the RHZ if it can provide gin and tonic. Once a planet can provide that, it moves from Habitable to Really Habitable. Maybe a planet without gin and tonic isn’t really habitable at all; maybe it’s more of place where we’d like to send people we don’t like.

The new paper is titled “Defining the Really Habitable Zone.” The lead author of the paper is Marven F Pedbost.

So far, the science of the RHZ is unproven. But that’s not deterring these intrepid researchers. As they say in the introduction: “In common with much of the work in the <exoplanet> field, we rely throughout on assumptions which are difficult if not impossible to test and present some plots which astronomers can use in their own talks, stripped of all caveats.”

There’s some background to the idea of the RHZ. “The inquiry into the existence of life, however, is an extremely complex topic involving numerous convoluted considerations, making it an ideal theme for telescope and grant funding applications, but a less practical question to answer. Instead, the community has formed a hand-shake agreement to instead investigate the more loosely defined question of habitable zones.”

We’ve all seen this. It’s an artist’s illustration of the habitable zone around different types of stars. Is it time to update it with the Really Habitable Zone? Credit: NASA

Universe Today readers are familiar with the idea of a habitable zone. It basically means liquid water. All other considerations aside, we know that all life on Earth needs liquid water, so we search for other worlds that have it. If a planet, or a moon, has liquid water, we say it’s in the habitable zone, or, more cautiously, the potentially habitable zone.

A whole bunch of other conditions have to be met before life can exist. But like the authors say, it’s very convoluted. So why not just ignore it and jump ahead to the Really Habitable Zone, where abundant gin and tonics are waiting for us to arrive and drink them?

Gin and tonic. Image Credit: By NotFromUtrecht – Own work, CC BY-SA 3.0, https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?curid=8529628

What do you need to make a gin and tonic? According to the authors of the paper, we need several things.

“To proceed, we define the Minimum Acceptable Gin and tonIC, or MAGIC (Cook 2019) 3. A MAGIC must contain: gin, tonic, ice and some sort of citrus.”

Gin aficionados know that it’s flavoured with ‘botanicals’ which is nowhere defined clearly.

“Everything is a metal, apart from Hydrogen and Helium, and everything is a botanical apart from water and alcohol.”

from “Defining the Really Habitable Zone.”

“Gin, in essence, is alcohol which has been flavoured with a wide variety of ‘botanical’ species,” write the authors. “A precise definition of ‘botanical’ is lacking, so we assume it is the equivalent of a astronomer’s use of ‘metal’ – including almost everything in the Universe apart from a few common ingredients. Everything is a metal, apart from Hydrogen and Helium, and everything is a botanical apart from water and alcohol.”

Now we’re getting somewhere.

Spectroscopic analysis shows that gin contains juniper as a primary botanical. Juniper grows in a variety of conditions on Earth. But how hardy and widespread is exo-juniper? According to the authors, “… we should expect exo-juniper to exist on a wide range of planets.” Sounds good!

There are many types of juniper on Earth. This is Juniperus osteosperma. Image Credit: By Fcb981 – Own work, CC BY-SA 3.0, https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?curid=3667364

What about citrus?

Citrus isn’t quite as hardy as juniper, so exo-citrus worlds may be rarer than exo-juniper worlds. From the paper: “In contrast to juniper-related considerations, the region around a star where the conditions are adequate for the growing of lemons or limes, fundamental ingredients required for the gin and tonic drink, is sensitive to a number of factors. These necessary citrus fruits thrive in temperatures ranging from 21 to 38? C (botanist, priv. comm.) and require a steady supply of H2O, hereafter water.”

From the paper. The BHZ is the Boring Habitable Zone, where there’s likely water but no gin and tonics. The Blue region is the Really Habitable Zone, where exo-gin, exo-citrus, and exo-juniper are likely abundant. Image Credit: Pedbost et al, 2020.

The paper contains much more detail of course, so we encourage interested readers to read it closely. We also encourage readers to read the team’s other important paper, “Galaxy Zoo: an unusual new class of galaxy cluster.” That paper contains the same level of scientific rigor and ground-breaking analysis.

Juniper berries are used to flavor gin. Exo-juniper is used to flavor exo-gin. Image Credit: By MPF – Own work, CC BY 2.5, https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?curid=1023226

This is just the beginning of the scientific reckoning with the RHZ. Other papers are bound to follow.

For now, the last word belongs to the authors: “We suggest that efforts should be directed in the near future towards investigating only those planets whose orbits lie within the RHZ, and made unverified claims about the possibility of detecting relevant features. We’re off for a drink.”

More:

Evan Gough

View Comments

  • It is a curious fact, and one to which no one knows quite how much importance to attach, that something like 85% of all known worlds in the Galaxy, be they primitive or highly advanced, have invented a drink called jynnan tonnyx, or gee-N’N-T’N-ix, or jinond-o-nicks, or any one of a thousand or more variations on the same phonetic theme. The drinks themselves are not the same, and vary between the Sivolvian “chinanto/mnigs” which is ordinary water server at slightly above room temperature, and the Gagrakackan “tzjin-anthony-ks" which kills cows at a hundred paces; and in fact the one common factor between all of them, beyond the fact that the names sound the same, is that they were all invented and named before the worlds concerned made contact with any other worlds.

    • No doubt explained, not by evolution but by disregarding it, in Star Trek lore.

      Oh well, at least it isn't the Marvel Universe mistaking individual development for population evolution. Because if it can't be endlessly used to confuse facts, what would you need fiction for!?

      [Yeah, I know. But April Fool's were yesterday. Today is COVID-19 grumpy months again. ;-)]

  • Thanks! Paper carefully released on April 1st.

    I would be happy if astrobiologists started to qualify the common surface habitable zone versus the rest (such as crust or ice moon habitability). We can take it from there, as the observations of atmospheric disequilibrium starts to come in - is it enough to see O2 and CH4 simultaneously? Or do we need to see the pop fizz too?

Recent Posts

About 3.5 Million Years Ago, a Stream of Gas Outside the Milky Way Would Have Lit Up the Night Sky

It's a truism to point out that modern humans have only been around for the…

58 mins ago

What are the Odds of Life Emerging on Another Planet?

A new study by Prof. Kipping of Columbia University indicates that extraterrestrial life should be…

3 hours ago

Study of 200,000 Galaxies Reveals the Entire Universe Might Have Been Spinning in One Direction Early On

A new study finds evidence that the universe as a whole is rotating, and that…

5 hours ago

Barred Spiral NGC 3895 Captured by Hubble

NGC 3895 is a barred spiral galaxy in the Ursa Major constellation. It's about 145…

5 hours ago

New Simulations Show How Black Holes Grow, Through Mergers and Accretion

One of the most pressing questions in astronomy concerns black holes. We know that massive…

22 hours ago

Want to Mine Ice on the Moon? Scientists Create a Map for Where to Start

The first lunar maps consisted of simply the best images of the Moon from Earth-based…

23 hours ago