Neutrinos Have Been Detected With Such High Energy That The Standard Model Can’t Explain Them | Universe Today
Categories: Physics

Neutrinos Have Been Detected With Such High Energy That The Standard Model Can’t Explain Them

Although neutrinos are mysterious particles, they are remarkably common. Billions of neutrinos pass through your body every second. But neutrinos rarely interact with regular matter, so detecting them is a big engineering challenge. Even when we do detect them, the results don’t always make sense. For example, we’ve recently detected neutrinos that have so much energy we have no idea how they are created.

A neutrino detector is typically a large chamber filled with pure water or ice. Within this chamber are very sensitive detectors. Neutrinos aren’t observed directly. Instead, a neutrino detector waits for a neutrino to smack into an atom. When it does, it can create charged leptons, such as an electron, muon or tauon. These charged particles can also produce light. So by detecting the light or leptons, we know that a neutrino has interacted with the detector.

Most of the neutrinos we detect are solar neutrinos, produced by nuclear fusion in the Sun’s core. But things such as supernovae and gamma-ray bursts also produce neutrinos. A great deal of effort has been focused on detecting these extra-solar neutrinos.

Diagram of the IceCube Neutrino Observatory. Credit: IceCube Science Team – Francis Halzen

One of the best neutrino detectors is the IceCube Neutrino Observatory in Antarctica. Antarctica is a great place for a neutrino observatory because its thick layer of ice is great at absorbing all sorts of stray particles such as cosmic rays and gamma rays that can mess with your sensitive detectors. By burying the observatory in the ice we can be assured that the events we detect are from neutrinos. The IceCube observatory has detected extra-solar neutrinos several times.

How ANITA detects neutrinos. Credit: Cosmin Deaconu

But there is another neutrino observatory in Antarctica, and it detects neutrinos in a very different way. Known as the ANtarctic Impulsive Transient Antenna, or ANITA, it is a sensitive radio detector that is mounted on a balloon. ANITA is a radio detector because when high energy neutrinos collide with Antarctic ice they can create radio light. These neutrinos are hundreds of times more powerful than those detected by IceCube.

When ANITA detected these high-energy neutrinos, it caused a bit of a stir because they seemed to be coming from neutrinos passing through the Earth before striking Antarctic ice. This is what you’d expect if some powerful astrophysical event created a stream of neutrinos in Earth’s direction. But if that’s the case these neutrinos would also trigger events that could be detected by IceCube.

So the IceCube Collaboration looked for detection events that occurred at the same time as the ANITA detections. They found no evidence for correlated events, which means it isn’t due to some powerful neutrino event light-years away. This is strange because that leaves two possibilities: either the ANITA gave false positives due to some flaw in the design, or these neutrino events are caused by a process that lies outside the standard model. Within the standard model of particle physics, there is no way to produce neutrinos with such high energy.

This is only a small set of events, so there is reason to be cautious about the results. However this latest work could hint at a new realm of physics we don’t yet understand.

Reference: Aartsen, M. G., et al. “A search for IceCube events in the direction of ANITA neutrino candidates.”

Brian Koberlein

Brian Koberlein is an astrophysicist and science writer with the National Radio Astronomy Observatory. He writes about astronomy and astrophysics on his blog. You can follow him on YouTube, and on Twitter @BrianKoberlein.

View Comments

  • So it's just two [2!] events, and when IceCube doesn't see them it constrains their likelihood distribution in energy range. And it is a radio detector, while Earth is radio noisy. (For instance of generic radio noise, Antarctica is a popular tourist ship locale in its summers - maps show tens of ships between South America and Antarctica simultaneously - and that is when the balloon was used according to the paper Table 1.)

    Simplest explanation seems to be spurious signals!?

Recent Posts

A New Telescope is Ready to Start Searching for Answers to Explain Dark Energy

Back in 2015, construction began on a new telescope called the Dark Energy Spectroscopic Instrument…

8 hours ago

China will begin constructing its space station in 2021

The Chinese space agency is building a brand new space station, and they're going about…

13 hours ago

Supermassive Black Holes Grew by Consuming Gas and Entire Stars

Where do they come from, those beguiling singularities that flummox astrophysicists—and the rest of us.…

1 day ago

Interstellar Oumuamua Was a Dark Hydrogen Iceberg

When Canadian astronomer Robert Weryk discovered `Oumuamua passing through our Solar System with the Pan-STARRS…

1 day ago

Finally! Mars InSight’s Mole is Now Underground

It looks like the InSight Lander's Mole instrument is making some progress. After months of…

1 day ago

Hubble Looked as Far Back in Time as it Could, and Still Couldn’t See the First Generation of Stars in the Universe

Astronomers don’t know exactly when the first stars formed in the Universe because they haven’t…

2 days ago