Herschel and Planck Launch Succesfully

Ariane V launch. Credit: Arianespace tv

[/caption]

The Herschel and Planck spacecraft successfully launched together Thursday from Europe’s Spaceport in Kourou, French Guiana. The Ariane V rocket performed flawlessly, with the rocket’s trajectory matching exactly the predicted flight path. The two spacecraft separated individually and in different directions from the launch vehicle, about four minutes apart, after spinning to orient themselves correctly for their high elliptical orbits. Just 40 minutes after lift-off, Herschel and Planck sent their first radio signals to Earth, confirming that they both are operating in good shape. In a few months, they will arrive at the L-2 (Lagrange) point in space, 1.5 million kilometers (930,000 miles) from Earth, beyond the Moon’s orbit. By early next year, they’ll begin operations to open new windows on the Universe. Herschel will be studying star formation while Planck will be looking back at the Big Bang.

Herschel will be looking at specific points in space while Planck will look at the whole sky.

Herschel in 3-D. Credit:  Nathanial Burton-Bradford.
Herschel in 3-D. Credit: Nathanial Burton-Bradford.


This 3-D image of Herschel was created by Nathanial Burton-Bradford. Check out other images at his Flickr page.

Named after the 18th century astronomer who discovered infrared light, the Herschel spacecraft is 7 meters in length and 4 meters wide. The telescope mirror is 3.5 meters wide, 4 times bigger than previous space telescope, and will collect long-wavelength radiation from some of the coldest and most distant objects in the Universe. The mirror is also a technological wonder: it uses 12 silicon carbide petals fused together into a single piece. Herschel will be the only space observatory to cover a spectral range from the far infrared to sub-millimeter.

To detect cold, dark objects, Herschel has to be even colder. 2,400 liters of liquid helium cools the spacecraft to -273 Celsius. Like a thermal camera can see a person’s body heat, Herschel will look beyond dust and gas to see inside star forming regions, study comets and look into the distant universe where galaxies collide and give birth to stars. Scientists are planning for at least three years of operation from Herschel.

Planck.  Credit: ESA
Planck. Credit: ESA

Planck will be sweeping the whole sky continuously to map out a picture of the Universe as it was 13.7 billion years ago. The spacecraft is four by four meters, with a 1.5 meter primary mirror that is surrounded with a baffle to limit any stray light from nearby objects, the Sun, Earth and Moon. Planck’s detectors have to be cold as well, and will be chilled to between 273 C to just 1/10th of degree above Absolute Zero.
Routine observations with Planck are expected to last for at least 15 months. The mission could be extended depending on the status of helium 3 isotope that is being used to chill the spacecraft.
Planck will test key questions in cosmology, investigating the cosmic microwave background, to ascertain the primordial constituents of the universe, and look for existence of gravitational waves. Planck will journey back in time, while giving us a better understanding of the future.

Watch Herschel/Planck Launch Live

Ariane V with the Herschel and Planck spacecraft ready to launch. Credit: ESA-CNES-Arianespace / Optique Vidéo du CSG

[/caption]

The launch of the Herschel and Planck spacecraft is scheduled for 13:12 GMT (9:12 EDT) this morning (Thursday). You can watch it live, starting at 12:40 GMT (8:40 EDT) at this link.

The two spacecraft are launching together in what was originally a cost saving move, but the complexity of preparing two spacecraft at once has caused frequent delays and cost overruns. However, now that launch day is here, hopefully the cutting-edge technologies included in both spacecraft will soon pay off in new discoveries astronomy and cosmology. Read more about the two spacecraft here.

Also, Robert Simpson at Orbiting Frog has some interactive features that show the altitude, velocity and acceleration of the Ariane rocket as it progress through the air into space. You can even click and drag to zoom in on a section of these charts, and move your mouse around inside them to get more information.

And the first of five spacewalks for the Hubble Space Telescope servicing mission starts at around 9:00 am EDT, and will be pretty much an all-day event. Watch live on NASA TV.

Debris Whizzes By Hubble, Shuttle; What Are We Going to do About Space Junk?

Mission patch for STS-125 mission to the Hubble Space Telescope. Credit: NASA

[/caption]
NASA tracked a piece of orbital debris that came fairly close to space shuttle Atlantis and the Hubble Space Telescope Wednesday evening, but decided no evasive maneuver was required. A 4 inch (10 cm) chunk of a Chinese satellite that was destroyed in a 2007 anti-satellite test came within 1.7 miles (2.8 km) ahead and 150 meters below Atlantis at its closest approach. These potential orbital impacts seem to be occurring routinely for the ISS, and previous shuttle missions have been forced to maneuver out of the way to avoid collisions. The satellite collision in February destroyed a functional satellite, and seemingly, it will be only a matter of time until a serious impact could endanger human lives in orbit. Last week, experts gathered at the International Interdisciplinary Congress on Space Debris, at McGill University in Montreal, Canada and concluded that action must be taken now to reduce the threat to both human spaceflight and satellites from destructive space debris.

“Space debris is primarily a global issue. Global problems need globally solutions, which must be effectively implemented internationally as well as nationally,” said McGill University’s Ram Jakhu, Chair of the Congress.

Space debris in Low Earth orbit.  Credit:  ESA
Space debris in Low Earth orbit. Credit: ESA

Over the past decade and a half, the world’s major space agencies have been developing a set of orbital debris mitigation guidelines aimed at stemming the creation of new space debris and lessening the impact of existing debris on satellites and human spaceflight. Most agencies are in the process of implementing or have already implemented these voluntary measures which include on-board passive measures to eliminate latent sources of energy related to batteries, fuel tanks, propulsion systems and pyrotechnics.

But the growing number of developing countries that are launching using satellites, and they need to be encouraged to use these measures as well.

Last week’s Congress suggested that the mitigation guidelines should become mandatory instead of just voluntary, and another possibility mentioned was the establishment of an international regime for dealing with orbital debris similar to the Missile Technology Control Regime, or perhaps the Limited Test Ban Treaty of 1963. There are a variety of other means within international law as well, including codes, declarations and treaties.

Up until now, the debris mitigation process has been focused mainly on the technical aspects, with an enormous amount of research producing excellent recommendations, noted Brian Weeden, Technical Consultant for the Secure World Foundation.

“However, the community is now starting to focus on the legal aspect, which is critical for broadening and strengthening the adoption of debris mitigation guidelines and space safety in general,” Weeden said.

Weeden explained that the recent Congress explored lessons from terrestrial environmental pollution law as well as maritime law that could be applicable to outer space. Furthermore, international law isn’t necessarily the only method for implementing the guidelines. “We are also looking at a variety of other mechanisms, to include economics and industrial standards,” he said.

Additionally, researchers are moving towards the next phase of scientific study. “There is an emerging consensus among the technical community that simply preventing creation of new debris is not going to be enough,” Weeden emphasized.

“At some point we will need to actively remove debris from orbit. Fortunately, new studies are showing that removing as few as five or six objects per year could stabilize the debris population over the long term. The big question right now is which objects to remove first and what is the best method to do so.”

Some of the options for removing space debris include a “space broom” concept that NASA proposed in 1996 called Project Orion, frying space trash with ground-based lasers, an inflatable set of space tongs that could grab and tow objects, or a space vacuum similar to the Planet Eater, which devoured spaceships in an episode of “Star Trek.”

Any of these concepts would require substantial leaps in technology before they are feasible.

Sources: Secure World Foundation, Wall Street Journal

Where In The Universe #54



It’s Wednesday, so that means its time for another “Where In The Universe” challenge to test your visual knowledge of the cosmos. See if you can name where in the Universe this image is from, and give yourself extra points if you can name the spacecraft responsible for the image. Make your guess and post a comment, but please no links to the answer. Check back sometime on Thursday to find the answer and see how you did.

UPDATE: The answer has now been posted below.

I chose a Hubble image this week, in honor of the current Hubble Servicing Mission. This is, as many of you said, the Cartwheel Galaxy.

The Cartwheel is a ring galaxy, lying about 500 million light-years away in the constellation Sculptor. It has been tidally distorted by an encounter with another galaxy into a ring-and-hub structure.

The striking cartwheel appearance is the result of a smaller intruder galaxy having careened through the core of the larger system, which was probably once a normal spiral similar to the Milky Way. Like a pebble tossed in a lake, the collision sent a ripple of energy into space, plowing gas and dust in front of it.

Expanding at a rate of more than 300,000 km/h, this cosmic tsunami left a burst of new star creation in its wake. Images taken by the Hubble Space Telescope, including the one shown here, have resolved bright blue knots that are gigantic clusters of newborn stars and immense loops and bubbles blown into space by supernovae.

Sounds incredibly violent, but it sure makes a pretty picture!

Check back next week for another WITU challenge!

A New Drake Equation? Other Life Not Likely to be Intelligent

Radio Telescopes. Credit: University of Washington

Looking for signals from distant civilizations might be an effort in futility, according to scientists who met at Harvard University recently. The dominant view of astronomers at a symposium on the future of human life in the Universe seems to be that if other life is out there, it likely is dominated by microbes or other nonspeaking creatures.

Speakers reviewed how life on Earth arose and the many, sometimes improbable steps it took to create intelligence here. Radio astronomer Gerrit Verschuur said he believes that though there is very likely life out there — perhaps a lot of it — it is very unlikely to be both intelligent and able to communicate with us.

Verschuur presented his take on the Drake equation, formulated by astronomer Frank Drake in 1960, that provides a means for calculating the number of intelligent civilizations that it is possible for humans to make contact with.

The equation relates those chances to the rate of star and habitable planet formation. It includes the rate at which life arises on such planets and develops intelligence, technology, and interplanetary communication skills. Finally, it factors in the lifetime of such a civilization.

Using Drake’s equation, Verschuur calculated there may be just one other technological civilization capable of communicating with humans in the whole group of galaxies that include our Milky Way — a vanishingly small number that may explain why 30 years of scanning the skies for signs of intelligent life has come up empty.

“I’m not very optimistic,” Verschuur said.

Dimitar Sasselov, professor of astrophysics at Harvard and director of the Harvard Origins of Life Initiative, agreed with Verschuur that life is probably common in the universe. He said that he believes life is a natural “planetary phenomenon” that occurs easily on planets with the right conditions.

As for intelligent life, give it time, he said. Though it may be hard to think of it this way, at roughly 14 billion years old, the universe is quite young, he said. The heavy elements that make up planets like Earth were not available in the early universe; instead, they are formed by the stars. Enough of these materials were available to begin forming rocky planets like Earth just 7 billion or 8 billion years ago. When one considers that it took nearly 4 billion years for intelligent life to evolve on Earth, it would perhaps not be surprising if intelligence is still rare.

“It takes a long time to do this,” Sasselov said. “It may be that we are the first generation in this galaxy.”

Several speakers at the event hailed the March launch of NASA’s Kepler space telescope, which is dedicated to the search for Earth-like planets orbiting other stars. Several Harvard-Smithsonian Center for Astrophysics faculty members, including Sasselov, are investigators on the telescope mission.

Andrew Knoll describes the beginnings of life on Earth. Photograph by Stephanie Mitchell/Harvard News Office
Andrew Knoll describes the beginnings of life on Earth. Photograph by Stephanie Mitchell/Harvard News Office

Sasselov said he expects Kepler to quickly add to the 350 planets already found orbiting other stars. By the end of the summer, he said, it may have found more than a dozen “super Earths” or planets from Earth-size to just over twice Earth’s size that Sasselov expects would have the stability and conditions that would allow life to develop.

If life did develop elsewhere, Andrew Knoll, the Fisher Professor of Natural History, used the lessons of planet Earth to give an idea of what it might take to develop intelligence. Of the three major groupings of life: bacteria, archaea, and eukaryotes, only the eukaryotes developed complex life. And even among the myriad kinds of eukaryotes, complex life arose in just a few places: animals, plants, fungi, and red and brown algae. Knoll said he believes that the rise of mobility, oxygen levels, and predation, together with its need for sophisticated sensory systems, coordinated activity, and a brain, provided the first steps toward intelligence.

It has only been during the past century — a tiny fraction of Earth’s history — that humans have had the technological capacity to communicate off Earth, Knoll said. And, though Kepler may advance the search for Earth-like planets, it won’t tell us whether there’s life there, or whether there has been life there in the past.

Other speakers included J. Craig Venter, Freeman Dyson, Peter Ward, Andy Knoll, Maria Zuber, David Charbonneau, Juan Enriquez, and David Aguilar.

Source: PhysOrg

US Air Force to Test Scramjet Aircraft

Charlie Brink, manager of the Air Force's X-51 "Waverider" scramjet research project stands with a scale model of the hypersonic aircraft. Credit: Ty Greenlees Dayton Daily News

[/caption]
The US Air Force has been developing an aircraft that employs an air-breathing scramjet engine, and hopes to run test flights in the fall of 2009. Officials hope the X-51 “Waverider” aircraft will provide high speed aircraft for reconnaissance or strike missions, and eventually the engines will be used for rockets to deploy satellites in space.

“The long-range goal of this for the Air Force is access to space,” said Charlie Brink, an Air Force Research Laboratory propulsion directorate official who manages the X-51 program from Wright-Patterson Air Force Base.

The first test flight of the X-51 will be on Oct. 27, 2009, launched from a B-52 aircraft with a missile booster to at least Mach 4.5, the minimum speed at which the air-breathing scramjet engine operates, before the scramjet kicks in and accelerates the vehicle to at least Mach 6 — six times the speed of sound. The Air Force Research Laboratory expects that the aircraft will fly for about five minutes before crashing into the Pacific. The October flight — and three separate test flights planned in early 2010 — are designed to demonstrate the practicality of using the air-breathing scramjet engine to power and control an aircraft at hypersonic speeds (Mach 5 or greater). The $246.5 million development program has been under development since December 2003.

Scramjet is an acronym for Supersonic Combustion Ramjet. A ramjet has no moving parts and achieves compression of intake air by the forward speed of the vehicle. The scramjet differs from the ramjet in that combustion takes place at supersonic air velocities through the engine. It stays aloft, in part, with lift generated by the shock waves of its own flight. It is mechanically simple, but vastly more complex aerodynamically than a jet engine. Hydrogen is normally the fuel used.

In 2004, NASA conducted flight tests of a hydrogen-based scramjet engine which reached speeds of Mach 9.6, or nearly 7,000 mph, powering an aircraft known as the X-43. However, none of the vehicles survived a flight test.

Brink compares the work of developing the scramjet — to complement aircraft turbine engines and rockets — with aviation’s earlier transition from propellers to jet engines. Air Force leadership will decide the scramjet program’s next step, depending on how the project turns out, Brink said.

Lead Photo Caption: Charlie Brink, manager of the Air Force’s X-51 “Waverider” scramjet research project stands with a scale model of the hypersonic aircraft. Credit: Ty Greenlees Dayton Daily News

Source: Dayton (OH) Daily News

New Mechanism Explains Origins of Cometary Ingredients

A combination of radiation pressure from the star and the disk creates a net force that enables dust grains to surf along the disk surface from inner to outer regions of the disk. Credit: D. Vinkovic

Rocky planets like Earth are all believed to have begun as dust circling newly born stars, and clues about the origin of such dust comes to us in today’s meteorites and comets, as well as observations of circumstellar disks around young stars.

But mystery has shrouded the details of the evolution of dust and how it eventually comes to form larger objects. Now, two papers in the journal Nature are proposing a new mechanism to explain it.

The new mechanism hinges on heat-shocked crystalline dust grains, which somehow migrated from where they were created — presumably close to the Sun — to the outer Solar System.  By implication, the same process should occur around other young stars. 

A trio of past hypotheses had been proposed to explain the migration, but none of them quite fit. They included, according to physicist Dejan Vinkovic of the University of Split in Croatia, turbulent mixing, ballistic launching of particles in a dense wind created by interaction of the accretion disk with the young star’s magnetic field (called the X-wind model), and mixing mediated by transient spiral arms in marginally gravitationally unstable disks. Vinkovic is lead author on one of the Nature papers.

“The turbulent mixing requires a source of efficient turbulent viscosity and the magnetorotational instability is invoked as the most promising candidate, but large stretches of the disk are considered not sufficiently ionized to keep this instability active,” he wrote. “The X-wind model relies on the theoretical notion of magnetic field configurations in the immediate vicinity of pre-main-sequence stars and high hopes are put on future observations to resolve this predicament.”

And finally, “The spiral arms model is in the domain of discussions on whether the underlying numerics, physical approximations and assumptions about the initial conditions are realistic enough to make results plausible.”

In the other paper, Peter Abraham of the Hungarian Academy of Sciences and his colleagues find the signature of crystalline dust after a young star flared, whereas archival data showed no sign of it before the flare.

The Vinkovic paper investigates the mixing of large crystalline dust particles in the protoplanetary nebula around the young Sun.

The force produced by the light shining on an object is a well known phenomenon called radiation pressure. We do not feel it in daily lives because we are too massive for this effect to be noticeable. For very small particles, on the other hand, this force can be larger even than the gravity that keeps particles in the orbit around the star. Investigations have been focused so far only to the radiation pressure due to the starlight. The results showed that individual grains would not travel far and would be pushed deeper into the disk. 

Vinkovic reports that infrared radiation arising from the dusty disk can loft grains bigger than one micrometer out of the inner disk, where they are pushed outwards by stellar radiation pressure while gliding above the disk. Grains re-enter the disk at radii where it is too cold to produce sufficient infrared radiation pressure support for a given grain size and solid density.

However, Vinkovic points out that it is not only the star, but also the disk that shines. When studying effects on protoplanetary dust grains larger than one micrometer, which is comparable to the particle size of cigarette smoke, Vinkovic has discovered that the intense infrared light from the hottest regions of the protoplanetary disk is capable of pushing such dust out of the disk. Infrared radiation is what we can feel as “heat” on our skin. Combination of radiation pressure from the star and the disk creates a net force that enables dust grains to surf along the disk surface from inner to outer regions of the disk. 

The temperatures in this hot region reach around 1500 degrees Kelvin (2200 degrees Fahrenheit), enough to vaporize solid dust particles or to alter their physical and chemical structure. The mechanism that Vinkovic describes in his paper would transfer such altered dust particles to colder disk regions away from the star. This can explain why comets contain a puzzling combination of ices and particles altered at high temperatures. Astronomers have been perplexed by this mixture, since comets form in cold disk regions out of frozen substances like water, carbon dioxide or methane. Rocky dust particles that end up mixed with ices are therefore expected to never experience high temperatures.   

In an editorial accompanying the studies, University of Missouri astrophysicist Aigen Li wrote that the origin of crystalline silicates in comets “has been a matter of debate since their first detection 20 years ago.”

While Li touts promise in the new theory, “It would be interesting to see whether other mechanisms such as turbulent mixing and the ‘X-wind’ model would effectively carry submicrometre grains, which are efficient mid-IR emitters, outwards and incorporate them into comets,” he wrote. “It is also possible that some — but not all — crystalline silicates are made in situ in cometary comae.”

Source: Vinkovic’s press release. Watch a short animation showing how the newly proposed mechanism of dust movement works.

Hubble Captured by Space Shuttle Crew

Hubble grappled by Atlantis' RMS. Credit: NASA TV

[/caption]
The Hubble Space Telescope is now safely in the arms of space shuttle Atlantis. “Houston,” a jubilant shuttle commander Scott Altman called down, “Hubble has arrived on Atlantis!” “Everybody is very excited up here, I can tell you,” said Hubble fixit man John Grunsfeld. “We’re looking at an amazing sight right now. Hubble as an old man of 19 years still looks in fantastic shape.” However, there were a few tense moments as additional commands were required to get Hubble back in communication with the ground. Communication was re-established shortly before the shuttle was to begin a special maneuver to re-align the telescope’s antenna, much to the relief of everyone on the ground and in space.

UPDATE 2:15 EDT: Hubble is now securely attached to the servicing platform in Atlantis’ payload bay.

The grapple of Hubble occurred at 1:14 EDT, 350 statute miles over western Australia as both spacecraft orbited in tandem at 5 miles per second. With Hubble’s mass of 11,000 kg.

Screenshot of first view of Hubble from Atlantis on NASA TV.
Screenshot of first view of Hubble from Atlantis on NASA TV.

Atlantis approached Hubble from below, and when the shuttle was 700 feet away, Altman took over manual control of the shuttle, with a 42 degree yaw maneuver to align the two spacecraft. Altman then guided the ship up to within 35 feet of the observatory. Megan McArthur, operating Atlantis’ 50-foot- Remote Manipulator System, or robot arm, grappled the telescope. McArthur will then move the arm to mount Hubble on a service platform in the shuttle’s cargo bay.
The view from the shuttle's RMS camera of the grapple fixture on Hubble. NASA TV.
The view from the shuttle's RMS camera of the grapple fixture on Hubble. NASA TV.

The actual repair work will begin tomorrow (May 14) when the STS-125 crew will conduct the first of five spacewalks.

Scratches visible on Atlantis, found during the inspection. Credit: NASA
Scratches visible on Atlantis, found during the inspection. Credit: NASA


Also, later on Wednesday, a final determination will be made on damage to the shuttle, seen in the picture above, Early assessment from engineers was that the damage is not a problem. But further examination of results from the thermal protection system inspection will be done to determine of the scratches or scrapes will need to be fixed on orbit before the shuttle returns home.

Additionally, for more info on the Hubble Telescope, check out Phil Plait’s new article, “Ten Things You Don’t Know About Hubble.”

Galaxy Core

NGC 4314. Image credit: Hubble

[/caption]
A typical spiral galaxy is shaped like a flat spinning disk – think of a record. It has a bulging galactic core surrounded by a flat rotating disk of stars. For example, our own Milky Way measures about 100,000 light-years across. Our Sun is thought to be about 25,000 light-years away from the galaxy core.

Studying the galaxy core is very difficult for astronomers. That’s because the regions surrounding the central core are shrouded in thick gas and dust that blocks visible light. In order to study the center of the galaxy, astronomers used to have to look at other galaxies that were similar in structure to the Milky Way. But in the last few decades, astronomers have been finally able to study the galaxy core in other wavelengths, like infrared and x-rays, which can pass through gas and dust.

And what they found surprised them.

Researchers discovered that the stars at the galactic core are orbiting an object with an enormous amount of mass. That object turned out to be a supermassive black hole, with 4.1 million times the mass of the Sun. Since that discovery, astronomers have located supermassive black holes in the galactic cores of many galaxies, and theorized that they’re in all galaxies.

Active galaxies, known as quasars (as well as other names), occur when the supermassive black hole is actively feeding on infalling material. This material heats up to millions of degrees and blazes with more radiation than all of the stars in the galaxy. And then when the supermassive black hole at the galaxy core runs out of fuel, it goes quiet again.

Within a parsec of the galactic core, there are thousands of stars. Most of these are old main sequence stars, there are many massive stars too. In fact, more than 100 of the brightest, hottest types of stars have been discovered around the galaxy core. Astronomers used to think that massive tidal forces from the supermassive black hole at the center of the galaxy would prevent their formation, but there they are.

We have written many articles about galaxies for Universe Today. Here’s an article about how a collision between galaxies creates a dark matter core.

If you’d like more info on galaxies, check out Hubblesite’s News Releases on Galaxies, and here’s NASA’s Science Page on Galaxies.

We have also recorded an episode of Astronomy Cast about galaxies – Episode 97: Galaxies.

Sources: SEDS, UCLA Galactic Center Group, NASA

How Do Galaxies Get Named?

Traveling to distant locations, like Andromeda, could have interesting consequences. Credit: NASA

[/caption]
Andromeda, M31, Triangulum, NGC 2403 the Whirlpool… have you ever wondered how galaxies get their names?

Galaxies usually have several names. That’s because there are several catalogs that maintain the names. For example, there’s the Messier catalog of objects. This was a list of 110 fuzzy objects that Charles Messier maintained that could be confused with comets.

There’s another list that starts with NGC. For example, NGC 7331, a galaxy that has been called a twin of the Milky Way because of its similarity. The NGC catalog is short for New General Catalogue, and it’s a list of 7,840 interesting objects in the night sky.

So let’s take a look at an object like Andromeda. It’s named the Andromeda Galaxy because it’s located in the constellation of Andromeda. Many galaxies are named after the constellation they’re located in. Andromeda also has the designation M31, or Messier 31, since it’s the 31st object on Messier’s list of things that look like comets but aren’t comets. Andromeda is also designated as NGC 224 in the New General Catalogue.

There are also specialty catalogs that describe objects in other wavelengths, like x-ray and even gamma rays. And many galaxies will have “names” in those directories as well.

So a galaxy can have many names. It just depends on which name you want to use.

If you discover a galaxy, do you get to name it? Unfortunately, no. The official names for astronomical objects are maintained by the International Astronomical Union. Just how you can’t officially name a star after yourself, you can’t name a galaxy either.

We have written many articles about galaxies for Universe Today. Here’s a more information about naming a star.

If you’d like more info on galaxies, check out Hubblesite’s News Releases on Galaxies, and here’s NASA’s Science Page on Galaxies.

We have also recorded an episode of Astronomy Cast about galaxies – Episode 97: Galaxies.