Scientist Explains the Weird Shiny Thing on Mars

by Nancy Atkinson on February 12, 2013

Want to stay on top of all the space news? Follow @universetoday on Twitter

A zoomed-in view of the shiny protuberance. Credit: NASA/JPL-Caltech/Malin Space Science Systems. Image via 2di7 & titanio44 on Flickr.

A zoomed-in view of the shiny protuberance. Credit: NASA/JPL-Caltech/Malin Space Science Systems.

As we reported last week, images from the Curiosity rover showed what looked like a piece of shiny metal sticking out from a rock. Some of our readers suggested that it might be a handle or knob of some kind. It’s a knob, yes, says Ronald Sletten from the Mars Science Laboratory team, but a completely natural formation. Sletten, from the University of Washington, explained that, not surprisingly, it is actually a part of the rock that is different — harder and more resistant to erosion — than the rest of the rock it’s embedded in.

On Earth, as on Mars, “often you can see knobs or projections on surfaces eroded by the wind, particularly when a harder, less erodible rock is on top,” Sletten said, via an email to Universe Today from the Jet Propulsion Laboratory media relations office. “The rock on top of the projection is likely more resistant to wind erosion and protects the underlying rock from being eroded.”

As far as why it appears shiny, Sletten said, “The shiny surface suggests that this rock has a fine grain and is relatively hard. Hard, fine grained rocks can be polished by the wind to form very smooth surfaces.”

It also may be shiny because it is wind-blasted and therefore dust-free, Sletten said, “while the surfaces not directly being eroded by wind may have a fine layer of reddish dust or rock-weathering rind. The sandblasted surfaces may reveal the inherent rock color and texture.”

He added that the object is an interesting study in how wind and the natural elements cause erosion and other effects on various types of rocks.

A closeup of the shiny protuberance. Credit: NASA/JPL/Malin Space Science Systems.

A closeup of the shiny protuberance. Credit: NASA/JPL/Malin Space Science Systems.

In looking at a zoomed-in close-up of the “knob” or protuberance from the rock, Sletten said, “This knob has a different type of rock on the end of the projection. This rock may vary in composition or the rock grain size may be smaller.”

A shiny-looking Martian rock is visible in this image taken by NASA's Mars rover Curiosity's Mast Camera (Mastcam) during the mission's 173rd Martian day, or sol (Jan. 30, 2013). Image Credit: NASA/JPL-Caltech/Malin Space Science Systems.

A shiny-looking Martian rock is visible in this image taken by NASA’s Mars rover Curiosity’s Mast Camera (Mastcam) during the mission’s 173rd Martian day, or sol (Jan. 30, 2013). Image Credit: NASA/JPL-Caltech/Malin Space Science Systems.

Because of the winds on Mars, there is quite a bit of erosion of rock, visible in the image above, as well as in many images from all the Mars rovers and landers. These type of surfaces are called “ventifacted” — wind-eroded surfaces caused by many fine particles of dust or sand impacting the surface over time. Areas of rocks may appear sculpted, as softer parts erode more easily or they may reflect small scale wind patterns, Sletten said.

In some ways, he added, it’s a lot like what happens to rocks in Antarctica. See the annotated images he provided below:

Annotated image supplied by Ronald Sletten, MSL science team.

Annotated image supplied by Ronald Sletten, MSL science team.

Annotated image supplied by Ronald Sletten, MSL science team.

Annotated image supplied by Ronald Sletten, MSL science team.

So, this weird shiny thing on Mars is nothing too out of the ordinary — not a door handle, hood ornament or not even Richard Hoagland’s bicycle, as was suggested by readers on our previous article.

But for one more look, here’s the 3-D version(make sure you use the red-green 3-D glasses):

3-D anaglyph from the right and left Mastcam from Curiosity showing the metal-looking protuberance. Credit: NASA/JPL/Caltech/Malin Space Science Systems. Anaglyph by by 2di7 & titanio44 on Flickr.

3-D anaglyph from the right and left Mastcam from Curiosity showing the metal-looking protuberance. Credit: NASA/JPL/Caltech/Malin Space Science Systems. Anaglyph by by 2di7 & titanio44 on Flickr.

The original raw image from the Curiosity rover can be seen here, and our thanks to Elisabetta Bonora, an image editing enthusiast from Italy, who originally pointed this image out to us.

About

Nancy Atkinson is Universe Today's Senior Editor. She also is the host of the NASA Lunar Science Institute podcast and works with the Astronomy Cast and 365 Days of Astronomy podcasts. Nancy is also a NASA/JPL Solar System Ambassador.

  • Kevin T

    ..and I thought it was a particle of pre animate matter caught in the matrix…haha

  • http://twitter.com/billy_mavreas billy_mavreas

    nice typo on the hoogland.

  • http://twitter.com/billy_mavreas billy_mavreas

    so we’ll be seeing more of these shiney things i take it, them being natural and all
    stating the obv

    • ren00r

      and if not, what is the explanation that there is just one

  • http://twitter.com/gracedon1 Donald Grace

    If there is one ,why not two or more close by ?

    • http://www.facebook.com/stas.novikov.16 Stas Novikov

      Actually, there is one more very close by ! Look at the biggest chunk of rock on the left with the 45 deg slope – one of its ridges has a similar shiny protrusion ! I pointed it out in a comment to the 1st article – nobody seemed to notice.

      As I mentioned in my 1st comment, it looks like there are veins of harder mineral permeating these rocks that take quite a shine to the wind polish.

      • http://www.facebook.com/misja.vanlaatum Misja van Laatum

        Must be me, but I’m really not seeing it…

      • http://twitter.com/eclipticart Thü

        Me too, I can not see such other thing.

  • Hans Peter Uhrig

    Well why do they send a multi billion dollar mobile laboratory to Mars if they can identify even the most curious things by low-medium quality jpg’s (remember the stream bed too)? Not even bothered to aim the ChemCam at that object just to be sure the visual identification as of “it looks like…” is valid eh? I would wish for a little bit more curiosity in the cause of this mission and not rely too much on visual identification only – albeit the imagery of MSL is very good compared to previous missions.

    Regarding wind polishing (in a near vacuum atmosphere that is) vs. dust settling all around in the CURRENT environment: whats the difference on this object?

    a little off-topic but significant here a statement from the Russian privateer who discovered a potentially dangerous asteroid recently:”In Mr Oreshko’s opinion, this once again proves that while technology plays a significant role in space exploration, attention to detail and open-mindedness are, in the end, what count the most.”

    • http://www.facebook.com/misja.vanlaatum Misja van Laatum

      Yes, I was wondering the same: why, if the wind polishes protruding rocks, ridges and edges, is only this tiny protuberance so shiny? All the surrounding rocks are covered in dust.
      Also, I think the Antarctic ventifacts analogy falls a little short as there is no dust (to speak of) there…

      • stemloop

        ? There is dust in Antarctic dry valleys. It’s just a cold desert.

        • http://www.facebook.com/misja.vanlaatum Misja van Laatum

          Of course there is … but there’s hardly any to be seen in the pictures provided. And I do think Mars is significantly dustier…

    • stemloop

      Investigating curious results of known processes isn’t why the NASA rover is on Mars.

      • Hans Peter Uhrig

        Hence its name curiosity? Seriously the “result of a known process” is nothing more or less than an educated or maybe a bit over-educated guess of busy mission scientists. MSL is or should not be an university seminar but pure exploration with a science background. Explorers would not take anything for granted and would love to investigate “curious results of known processes”. Who can say for sure that everything is what people/scientists think it is on an alien world.

    • http://www.facebook.com/stan.burfield Stan Burfield

      For one thing, I don’t think it would be easy for the rover to turn around and go back and find something, especially something quite small, that we earthlings saw in a photo quite a while after the rover had left it behind.

  • Dampe

    Knobs on Mars? What a load of bollocks!

  • http://www.facebook.com/sathyag413 Sathya Rajan

    That’s too perfect to be naturally formed. I think NASA have purposefully hidden high res images.

    • Mike Petersen

      And another conspiracy theorist. Sheesh.

    • Shootist

      Wolkenkuckucksheim

    • Olaf2

      Dumbass comment.

  • http://twitter.com/unklar Mark Dunk

    Looks like a Jaguar hood ornament to me . . .

  • http://www.facebook.com/jimmy.mathieu2 Jimmy Mathieu

    Ancient metallic meteorite fragment trapped in sedementary rocks then eroded after eons.

  • Aqua4U

    Are we to assume mission managers have opted to not investigate further? Not that this object is critical to mission success, but still this interesting erosion artifact might prove beneficial to future martian construction efforts, composition dependent? What if it were proven to be made out of ‘unobtainium’?

  • http://www.desertsouthwest.org Gary W.

    nah…its the knuckle bone of a fossilized metallic Martian. That’s the story and I am sticking too it.

  • softeky

    The object in question is obviously the main water shutoff valve for Mars. Once it is turned back on, the sprinklers will resume operation and terraforming may begin. The previous occupants turned the water off before they went on extended vacation.

    • http://www.facebook.com/stan.burfield Stan Burfield

      Good one!!

  • http://www.facebook.com/Jamey520 Jamey Khamjani

    ARE YOU F’N KIDDING ME??? Seriously… I mean do any of those pictures look remotely the same, and a smooth looking rock and something that looks like metal are two totally different things IMO. Like Hans said earlier. WHY on earth do the send this freaking rover to mars when they can’t make a pit stop at something that actually does look seriously interesting?? They could of used the chem cam on it and POW! We know exactly what it is….. I know you guys are on a schedule and all, but you have like 10 years to get where your going. JEEZ NASA, at least use our multibillion dollar TAXPAYER machine to analyze something that a good portion of the public finds strange! Stop looking for traces of water, when we all know that it was there in abundance and do something useful with that LIFE SIZE remote control car!!!!

    • http://www.facebook.com/stan.burfield Stan Burfield

      Because the rover is long gone when we got a lot of these pictures.

      • Lorin Ionita

        As far as I remember, the image came in before they started drilling.

  • Pojsp

    Did anyone notice the ‘tracks’ on either side of the object? It looks like the rover’s tracks, and if so, maybe that object is a piece of the rover that fell off? It seems that almost anything is a better explanation than those of the experts….

    • http://www.facebook.com/misja.vanlaatum Misja van Laatum

      Nah, this object is only about 5 mm in size (so tiny, really). If the depressions left and right of it were rover tracks (I don’t think they are) the object would be much, much bigger.

    • Aqua4U

      Nope… If you go to the MRL raw images page (http://mars.jpl.nasa.gov/msl/multimedia/raw/) and take a look at image Mastcam: Left 2013-01-30 23:39:17 UTC on day 173… you will see that the rover did not go any closer. The images on either side of this particular image are part of a panorama scan and can be ‘pieced’ together…. There are no tracks there. Perhaps you are seeing ‘tracks’ where actually there are dust/sand filled in gaps between the rocks?

  • http://twitter.com/rdbrewer4 rdbrewer

    I’m telling ya, it’s a hoodoo. A little one.

  • http://twitter.com/rgray222 Richard

    My problem with this story is that just like the crazies ready to label this a “alien object” science is ready to call this a piece of the rock that erodes slower than the rest of the mass. The truth is, unless you are there to actually examine it, test its compounds and physical make up then your really only guessing. Science is suppose to be based on fact and they should give their thoughts but exit with the parting comment that is is “only our best guess”.

  • Lorin Ionita

    How did you get from shiny to organic? And at most you could say it looks like a hammer. But head and legs?

  • http://twitter.com/eclipticart Thü

    I find this inacceptable. We send Curiosity to Mars and when it finds something conspicuous, instead of sending it there to investigate, we get far fetched partial guesses as explanation, even only based on low res images from the object. Of course it is a harder part more resistant to erosion, thats why it sticks out. Does not explain what that harder part is, or why or how it got embedded into the surrounding stone in the first place. So I have to say to NASA: “is this how you normally work, just hunches and guesses and stuff?”

  • space_sailor

    Good point – I don`t understand why NASA prefere to say ““The shiny surface suggests that this rock has a fine grain and is
    relatively hard. Hard, fine grained rocks can be polished by the wind to
    form very smooth surfaces.” instead of making reaserch. It is not scientific approach.

  • Thü Mulder

Previous post:

Next post: