Breaking the Speed of Light

by Jason Major on September 22, 2011

The Large Hadron Collider at CERN (CERN/LHC/GridPP)

It’s been a tenet of the standard model of physics for over a century. The speed of light is a unwavering and unbreakable barrier, at least by any form of matter and energy we know of. Nothing in our Universe can travel faster than 299,792 km/s (186,282 miles per second), not even – as the term implies – light itself. It’s the universal constant, the “c” in Einstein’s E = mc2, a cosmic speed limit that can’t be broken.

That is, until now.

An international team of scientists at the Gran Sasso research facility outside of Rome announced today that they have clocked neutrinos traveling faster than the speed of light. The neutrinos, subatomic particles with very little mass, were contained within beams emitted from CERN 730 km (500 miles) away in Switzerland. Over a period of three years, 15,000 neutrino beams were fired from CERN at special detectors located deep underground at Gran Sasso. Where light would have made the trip in 2.4 thousandths of a second, the neutrinos made it there 60 nanoseconds faster – that’s 60 billionths of a second – a tiny difference to us but a huge difference to particle physicists!

The implications of such a discovery are staggering, as it would effectively undermine Einstein’s theory of relativity and force a rewrite of the Standard Model of physics.

The OPERA Neutrino Detector. Credit: LGNS.

“We are shocked,” said project spokesman and University of Bern physicist Antonio Ereditato.

“We have high confidence in our results. We have checked and rechecked for anything that could have distorted our measurements but we found nothing. We now want colleagues to check them independently.”

Neutrinos are created naturally from the decay of radioactive materials and from reactions that occur inside stars. Neutrinos are constantly zipping through space and can pass through solid material easily with little discernible effect… as you’ve been reading this billions of neutrinos have already passed through you!

The experiment, called OPERA (Oscillation Project with Emulsion-tRacking Apparatus) is located in Italy’s Gran Sasso facility 1,400 meters (4,593 feet) underground and uses a complex array of electronics and photographic plates to detect the particle beams. Its subterranean location helps prevent experiment contamination from other sources of radiation, such as cosmic rays. Over 750 scientists from 22 countries around the world work there.

Ereditato is confident in the results as they have been consistently measured in over 16,000 events over the past two years. Still, other experiments are being planned elsewhere in an attempt to confirm these remarkable findings. If they are confirmed, we may be looking at a literal breakdown of the modern rules of physics as we know them!

“We have high confidence in our results,” said Ereditato. “We have checked and rechecked for anything that could have distorted our measurements but we found nothing. We now want colleagues to check them independently.”

A preprint of the OPERA results will be posted on the physics website ArXiv.org.

Read more on the Nature article here and on Reuters.com.

UPDATE: The OPERA team paper can be found here.

 

 

  • Nicholas

    Einstein’s theories of relativity do NOT say that nothing can travel faster than the speed of light. They say that nothing with non-zero rest mass can ever cross that barrier; although, zero rest-mass particles can do so. The real problem here is the relation between local and non-local events, e.g.: the dynamics of universal structure. Experimental tests of Bell’s inequality have shown that microscopic causality must be violated; i.e.: there must be faster-than-light travel. In any physical theory, we must assume that there is some kind of non-local structure – and this non-local structure itself violates causality – i.e.: it must assume faster-than-light connections exist in order for it to exist and to validate any physical laws.

    • Torbjörn Larsson

      Einstein’s theories of relativity do NOT say that nothing can travel faster than the speed of light.

      Yes, it does. Particles “on shell” get “off shell” by acquiring imaginary energy. These entities are computational devices of field theory, not real particles.

      Experimental tests of Bell’s inequality have shown that microscopic causality must be violated;

      Excuse me? The very idea behind the inequality and its test is that relativity is taken to be preserved. So causality is preserved too, naturally. All physical observations and theories to date are causal. To suggest otherwise is to not have done due diligence.

      The outcome of the tests is consistent with the prediction, and shows that there are no hidden variables. Hence relativity and quantum mechanics are compatible, and especially quantum systems shows entanglement.

  • Anonymous

    So, the most advanced particle physics lab in the world has got it wrong? And wasted two years worth of work and 16,000 “events” at who knows what cost, just to be told by every par-time wikiscientist (refrence the hacks on most sites these days, no disrespect to the real guys who kindly explain the hard stuff for me) with a computer and more supposed knowledge than The big E himself that its all wrong? Hmmmm…..still, science via press release has about as much weight as one of these ftl particles.

    • Torbjörn Larsson

      No, no, we are just goofing off.

      But then maybe they were. As you say, it wasn’t exactly a cautious release of extraordinary support for an extraordinary claim.

  • Anonymous

    Atoms were also once thought to be indivisible.

    • http://www.facebook.com/people/Brian-Smith/547806188 Brian Smith

      Yeah, but back then we were wrong. This time we’re not.

      • Anonymous

        Until next time

        • Anonymous

          And then, until next time

  • http://www.facebook.com/brucecollie Bruce Collie

    Probably just another software bug at CERN.
    They just fixed over 10000 of them in the shared ROOT toolkit
    See http://www.theregister.co.uk/2011/09/22/cern_coverity/

  • http://www.facebook.com/people/Andrzej-Roszkowski/100000979823279 Andrzej Roszkowski

    What about Einsten-Rosen tunnel ?? what if neutrino made part of its way thru such tunnel ?? All should be in consistency with other laws …

  • http://www.facebook.com/anunay.prasad Anunay Prasad

    So time to coin new term, For sound barrier it is called Sonic Boom, so I would name it blaze boom :-)

    • Anonymous

      Sorry, Cherenkov already gave his name to it

  • http://www.facebook.com/anunay.prasad Anunay Prasad

    So time to coin new term, For sound barrier it is called Sonic Boom, so I would name it blaze boom :-)

  • Gavino Bazzoni

    Should consider plate tectonics and continental drift that could influence the experiment. Experiment to be confirmed by other laboratories of physics

  • Marcel -

    http://indico.cern.ch/conferenceDisplay.py?confId=155620

    Here you can watch how they officially present their results at 4PM CEST (UTC+2)

  • http://www.facebook.com/tiago.nevesnet Tiago Neves

    I would think that perhaps these things are traveling at the correct limit and light is being slowed by gravity and interactions with other particles… my 2 cents.

    • rob hardenberg

      the niwe findings are faster then light in vacuum…

  • Anonymous

    A paper discussing the discovery is posted on arxiv: http://static.arxiv.org/pdf/1109.4897.pdf

  • Anonymous

    If this turns out to be confirmed, then it would be the most remarkable discovery since Einstein’s theory itself.

    However, I’m thinking that something mundane was missed, which caused an error. I kinda hope it is true, because I want a warp drive! ;)

  • Anonymous

    I’m not a scientist, so I have to ask – how do they know its not some random neutrinos from elsewhere they are detecting?

    • Torbjörn Larsson

      They produce neutrinos in bunches, and can recognize the accelerator beam packet periodicity, rough travel time, and over all particle bunch spread by comparing to a local detector.

  • Anonymous

    Neutrinos faster than light – maybe they had the same trainer as Usain Bolt.

  • http://twitter.com/error303 jough donakowski
    • Torbjörn Larsson

      But they didn’t claim that they had nailed it, they lacked enough resolution.

  • Kristjan Backman

    This looks more like a head start then a difference in speed.

  • Torbjörn Larsson

    Nice, what an interest in mere physics!

    So … has everybody caught where they goofed yet?*

    It is an easy one. According to the paper the distance measurement procedure is documented here, and they use the geodetic distance in the ETRF2000 (ITRF2000) system as given by some standard routine. The european GPS ITRF2000 system is used for geodesy, navigation, et cetera and is conveniently based on the geode.

    I get the difference between measuring distance along an Earth radius perfect sphere (roughly the geode) and measuring the distance of travel, for neutrinos the chord through the Earth, as 22 m over 730 km. A near light speed beam would appear to arrive ~ 60 ns early, give or take.

    Of course, they have had a whole team on this for 2 years, so it is unlikely they goofed. But it is at least possible.

    [Note added after publication: I reread the paper, and I don't see the explicit conversion between the geodesic distance and the travel distance anywhere. Maybe they *did* goof.]

    Unfortunately the technical details of the system and the routine used to give distance from position is too much to check this quickly. But the difference is a curious coincidence with the discrepancy against well established relativity.

    ——————–
    * Extraordinary claims need extraordinary evidence. Other outstanding concerns are:

    1. This needs to be repeated.

    2. It is not a clear photon vs neutrino race. Physicist Ellis and others here noted that the time differential for the supernova SN 1987A was a few hours, but at the distance of ~ 200 000 ly it should have been years if the suggested hypothesis would be correct.

    3. Analogous to the experiments where light waves seemingly travels faster than photon speed in vacuum, they don’t measure travel times of individual neutrinos but averages over a signal envelope. That must be carefully measured to establish that particles (or information, for that matter) travels faster than relativity allows.

    Especially since the neutrino beam oscillates between different kinds of particles!

  • Keith Butler

    OOPZZZ! …Nothing in our Universe can travel faster than 299,792 km/s (186,282 mph), not even…

  • Anonymous

    If nothing else, this story has created a regular ‘firestorm’ of controversy and a re-examination of accepted theory. That in itself makes this news release valuable, even if or when it is proven wrong!

  • http://www.facebook.com/people/Thomas-Houck/1202581481 Thomas Houck

    If neutrinos are traveling faster than the speed of light there’s a time dilation effect to consider. Therefore the ones you think passed through my body didn’t because I wasn’t there at the same time they were.

Previous post:

Next post: